Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
My favorite solo model – and she’s still active!
Red hair, cute smile, great body and maybe the prettiest big boobs my eyes have seen
While it is updating – it’s not the fastest uploading site, two videos, two to three photosets a month
The site currently has over 350 videos of Tessa and over 350 photosets
One of those models you almost want to stay softcore and innocent
Can go from looking 18-24 to looking 30-40
Cons:
There is a good chance Tessa is a little too softcore for most fans
Trying to decide what to focus on besides her hair, eyes or boobs
Bottom Line:
I found Tessa Fowler while exploring my 60 year love of redheads. I saw her eyes first, then the hair came into focus and the boobs knocked everything else out of focus! What a beautiful woman. I don’t want to know her age, but I can tell you it’s between 18 and 40. It also wouldn’t matter to me if she was 18 or 40. We don’t see a lot of solo models these days that can command the attention of an audience by herself. Tessa can and she does.
I could compare her to Veronica Zemanova or Emily Addison, but I believe, in my opinion only, Tessa tops both of them. She’s a very natural model. Not only is she natural physically, but her posing seems genuine and authentic. You will catch peeks of a smile or grin when she moves around.
You not only get over 350 videos, but also over 350 photosets. There is a download limit of 3GB per 12 hours, but I have never hit it. The videos download in 720p, 1080p and some of the newer videos have 4K.
All this talking and I’m still thinking about her boobs. I don’t know if I have ever seen boobs as big as hers, unless augmented. Those massive boobs are also pretty all the way around. Tessa’s complexion stays even on her boobs and it makes them look perfect.
There is a downside I didn’t list in the cons. There is nothing extra included with the site. The videos are not very long and the content is almost exclusively softcore. There is even annoying softcore music in some of the videos, but when you lay your eyes on Tessa, you might be like me and forget all these negatives. She’s captivating and is probably the first woman I would ever use an adverb and adjective to describe.
I do believe that’s what makes a solo site great. A model that can make 300+ videos and still have fans coming back for more. I don’t know if I even want her to go further. It’s like the feeling of if it’s not broken, don’t fix it. On the othe hand, if she does more than softcore, I have to think she would gain a whole new fanbase and that would likely mean much more content of Tessa.
It’s been very rare for me to fall this hard for a softcore model, but I fall again, each time I join the site. I won’t score the site perfect, but I do believe she’s as close to perfect as a woman can be for my tastes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good selection of zaftig* ladies, mostly Caucasian. Most are naturally big boobed but some have had some surgical assistance. The vast majority of the models are gorgeous.
A few fatties but the vast majority are proportional.
Good assortment of photos with occasionally functioning zip downloads (see Cons). My estimate is 850 videos on the entire site with an average of 1 to 2 updates per week.
Reasonably simplistic, but accurate, navigation.
There are several models that appear on other sites (such as DDF) so the site seems to be willing to pay for better talent for short cameo type appearances.
*Webster's definition of zaftig - "of a woman: having a full rounded figure : pleasingly plump"
Cons:
Most (close to all) videos and photos are only focused on mammaries. So far I haven't found any examples of pussy shots of any kind let alone any B/G material. I'll acknowledge I haven't browsed through the entire site but if you want a site like Score with pussy tease and some heterosexual action, you'll be disappointed.
Cross selling on signup.
Some ads. Not overwhelming but still annoying.
Peddling separate sites of models that appear on the main site which really irritates me. If you have a model on your site, don't tease into buying a separate site to see more. Score does that too as do other sites, but it seems like Pin-Up files could be a preview site for its many solo model sites in it's inventory.
Most videos have music soundtracks. There isn't any significant action in any of the scenes so there wouldn't be much point in recording natural sounds. (How much oohing and ahhing is involved in taking off tops and occasionally squeezing a pair of big tits?)
Bottom Line:
Bottom line, I have been receiving a bunch of promotional emails peddling the site. I finally decided to bite and signed up to see if the promotional stuff was accurately representative of the actual content.
I didn't spend much so I don't feel shortchanged but I don't plan on renewing when my first month runs out.
The one positive benefit of the site is that it helped me enhance my listing of well built big titted models with good photos.
If you are a fan of well shaped and natural boobies, the site is worth a single month signup. But if you are like me where you enjoy nice floppers bouncing away in reverse cowgirl scenes while a stunt cock is rocking her socks, you will be disappointed.
My score is 74 because the promotional material did not "overpromise" but there's only so much one can enjoy girls pulling off t-shirts while wearing securely tight shorts (or slacks) that seem to be firmly fixed to their waists.
The 74 score meets TBP's guideline for 70-79, "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend."
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has the most beautiful girls I have ever seen on a porn site. They have pretty faces, hot bodies, and simply fabulously big, beautiful tits. And at least 90% of the models have 100% natural tits.
Cons:
First of all, content is added way too infrequently. Maybe 1 photo set per week and only 2 short videos per week.
Secondly, they started out as a photo only site and are still not very good at taking videos. The older videos were simply videos of photo shoots where the models are standing still getting their pictures taken. More recently, they are starting to make videos where the model actually plays up to the video camera. But even in these shoots, the lens of the still camera often pops up into the field of vies.
Bottom Line:
The bottom line is it is not worth it to have an ongoing subscription to this site, simply because it is not updated often enough and a lot of the updates are repetitive. The typical video will come in three parts. Part 1 is just a video of the photo shoot. In Parts 2 and 3, the model will usually acknowledge the video camera but you will still see the still cameramen and their lenses popping up in the video. I recommend doing what I do. I will sign up for one month about every two years and within a week you can download everything that was put up there since your last subscription.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great looking models.
-Download speed is ok: i got 350kps and the best that i've ever gotten from my connection with a website is 650kps.
-You can download multiple files at a time.
-There seems to be no DL limit. No DRM.
-One of their last videos uploaded: stunning Jordan Carver (who is waiting to take the step of showing her boobies) with a red bra; it lasts 6 mins and 9 secs, weighs 175mbs, the bitrate is 3977 and it displays as 960x540.
-A recently added set of pictures of Erica Campbell: i clicked on properties and it reads 557kbs and 2144x3152 pixels, i completely ignore if that's a pro or a con because i don't care much for pictures. You can download zipfiles.
-You can add models to a favourites folder.
-The total number of videos is 298 and the total number of photosets is 482.
-No regional pricing, i'll write it again: no regional pricing, that must constitute a pro in this poor reviwer's book.
Cons:
-You need to login numerous times throughout an evening.
-their last set of Miss. Campbell's pics adds up to 33 images -althoughy i counted only 30- ; if i were a picture lover i'd rather have more pics per set.
-If you go back in time the quality of the videos drops too fast. September 29, 2008
Jana Defi video ("Red fishnet") lasts 5 mins and 58 secs weighs 66,7mbs, its bitrate is of 1551 kps and it displays as 320x240. The picture quality seems to diminish pretty fast to: Jana Defi pic from January 26, 2007 356x537 pixels
and weighs 302 kbs.
-terribly annoying music for the most part.
-Not very many models, although it has to be said that the ones they feature or stunning.
Bottom Line:
I'd recommend the site to any big boobs lover, without a doubt, even if you're not a pin-up fan, the looks of their models are fantastic, but... beware! the music in their videos is so off-putting that perhaps you'll end up watching the videos muted, which is a shame, because i'd enthusiatically listen to whatever Miss Campbell or Miss Defi have to say and i'd also love to hear Miss Merylin Sekova speaking in a slavic language regardless of if she talks about shoes, politics, or marital questions. Nevertheless, i guess the music is required in order to mantain the pin-up glam fantasy. However, IMHO, it would be much more arousing to listen to Miss Campbell's contempt towards male filthy instincts.
And, last but not least, they don't resort to nasty geo-targeting pricing practises and that speaks volumes of their sense of decorum.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The quality. great HD great photography and if you like big boobs it doesnt get any better
Cons:
navigation
number of women
Bottom Line:
I docked a point because there are only about 2 dozen models. This site is more like a mega network sologirl network for girls with big tits all natural mostly. Some of the biggest boobs I have ever seen. Well one of the girls Rachel was awarded the biggest boobs by Guinness book or world records and shes not fat.
The navigation is a little clunky but I have yet to see a site with good navigation or one that didnt try to make the site feel like there was more content then there actually is.
For $20 its on the cheap end of paysite price points. I'm gonna try to download as much video as I can but some how I think I'll need 2 months to get everything. And they update frequently maybe I'll stay we'll see. I like pinup stuff better than porn. And this is my favorite site so far so thats why I was compelled to write the review. The other score at 65 is just unfair.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Features a number of glamour shots of stunning and gorgeous busty models: Denise Milani, Lorna Morgan, Taylor Kennedy, Erica Campbell, Anya/Busty Merilyn, Maria Swan/Jana, Monica Mendez, Bianca Beauchamp, Maggie Green, Amber Campisi..
Pretty extensive photo collection of Retro busty models from the 40's to the 70's.
Pretty good production values on video.
Professional website design
Cons:
Aside from the retro material, everything on PinupFiles is scraps and leftovers from its (superior) sister site, Pinupglam. The tour makes you think that Files is the equal of Pinupglam, but it's not!
Updates only about once a week, and contemporary models' material is even more infrequent.
Video quality is low to moderate; most scenes are video taking during photo shoots; some scenes are too brightly lit or washed out by the sun.
Far too expensive at $25 per month ($20 recurring)
Bottom Line:
Pinup Files and Pinup Glam have to be considered as a single enterprise. Glam is the superior site (unless you are interested in the Retro photo collection on Files); it has 90+ videos, avg. 5 min. long, covering all their top models, and a large collection of nice 'pinup' photoshoots. And as I mentioned in the Pros, they have some of the most beautiful busty models out there, all glamorous enough to be in Playboy, all with beautiful curves.
But there are 3 big frustrating things about these sites. First, they will do a model shoot with pictures and videos. Then they will divide the pictures up into 3 sets and edit the video into 3 different shorts. And then they will dribble out the sets and the video shorts, publishing them over a long period of time - in some cases, as much as a year-and-a-half!
The second annoying thing is that Files is just a repository of scraps not available on Glam, designed to tempt the completist into spending another $25. It only has about 25 movies, which cycle through, so that they are not even all available at the same time.
Finally, they don't update very frequently, and thin everything out with their retro material.
Bottom line: if you like the models they have, and want some sexy softcore videos of them posing and stripping, a 1-month subscription to Glam wouldn't be a bad deal.
The only thing Files will really give you is a lesson in how to water down excellent material and mislead your customers!
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
