Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-tons of videos. it looks to be 1 update per week. very few repeat models
-REAL amatuers, not tons of makeup or fake boobs. im guessing theyre college girls looking to make some money
-very entertaining videos
-trial gives full access
-great download speeds. ive been getting around 2mb/s and have gotten 50gb the past 2 days
-download managers supported (i use download them all for firefox)
-uses ccbill payments. never had a problem with them, very easy to cancel
-newest videos are 720p
-most videos are 20+ minutes
Cons:
-a lot of the photos are screen caps. however they are honest about it and label them such
-very confusing filenames. sometimes theres similar names like nsv-001 & nsv-01
-older videos quality drops. even the newest videos quality isnt very impressive for being 720p
Bottom Line:
basically hot russian teens doing stretches and jumping around having there boobs bounce. they range from uncomfortable, embarrassed, and having fun. a lot of the girls are normal looking, with a couple 10s. quality isnt the best and the music gets old fast (tho it is quite catchy), but its the best place to ogle real amateur teens working out
i love this series of websites. theres no others like them, they own this niche. the $10 3 day trials is a steal, its just too bad they dont have a $20 a month deal with tbp cause id def sign up for that instead
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ original concept
+++ very natural feeling
++ probably unscripted
++ mostly beautiful girls
+ HD video quality (1280x720)
Cons:
--- no translation, no subtitles
- collection is small
- price (29.95) is inadequate for such small collection
Bottom Line:
TotallyUndressed is a new site which has great potential which is unfortunately not realized because of one small but very important detail, if they fix it (and will produce regular updates) - for me it will become one of personal favorites.
The plot in every clip (about 20-25 minutes each) is very similar: there is a room where girls are coming to some kind of interview (maybe job interview), where they're asked some questions, then they are asked to remove shoes (to measure height, though I don't know it is related to interview), then - shirt and so on, and pretty soon they come to suck a dildo and get dildo-fucked. There is nothing unusual about this plot, but what makes it really special is how natural it feels. Girls do not look as models, they do not look as pros at all, they're shy (or playing being shy), and so on. The whole thing looks so natural that I just need to hope that it is not a REAL job interview where girls are tricked into doing this kind of things without knowing it will be all over the Internet.
Now to the bad part. As I've said, this thing looks and feels very natural, and there is a lot of conversation going on. The problem is that all this conversation goes in some language I cannot comprehend (probably Russian or something similar), and it spoils at least half of the fun.
GUYS, IF YOU ARE READING THIS - MAKE SOME EFFORT TO ADD SUBTITLES TO YOUR MOVIES (for example, the same way as FuckingGamble guys are doing it), IT WILL BECOME SO MUCH BETTER!
Technical details: video quality is nothing special but ok (1280x720 ~2Mbit/s), number of scenes is small (~15), which is IMHO ok for a new site, but price (29.95) is certainly way too steep for this amount of content.
Other details: there is NO B/G or G/G sex on TotallyUndressed, girls are just masturbating and playing with dildos. Girls are of "girl next door" type, but on more beautiful side. The plot is almost exactly the same every time, it is reaction of the girls which makes it worth looking.
Bottom line: it might be a VERY GOOD (I'd probably rate it in 90's range) if they just would add subtitles (or any other kind of translation). Unlike most adult sites, dialogs is a VERY important part of TotallyUndressed, and being kept in dark about what girls and interviewers have said, ruins most of the fun.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No regional billing even though it is through CCBill.
-Inexpensive three day full access trial. There is no need to spend more for a full month as you can get it all with a download manager. In my book this makes the site a bargain.
-Once a week updates in an archive of 241 videos, about a half hour each.
-Natural looking Russian amateurs. About as unglam as you can get. They are real, not overly made up plastic looking clones. However, the models are mostly very similar in body type and age and the content can get repetitive. Instead of porn star clones you get natural women who don't vary much either.
Cons:
-Video quality could be a lot better. The stats show 1280x720, 4000 kbps for the best videos, but I suspect these are redone lower quality shoots.
-As you may expect with amateurs, many are very ordinary in their attractiveness. Like many non porn star websites, you have to search for the knockouts. There are some videos here that I really love.
-Sometimes slow downloads.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-WMV is the only video option.
-No way to search. The videos are listed in date order. However, almost none of the models have more than one video.
-Turn the sound off as the background music is terrible.
Bottom Line:
When I was twelve, the 19 year old next door used to dance and exercise nude. Sometimes she drew the shades and sometimes she did not. I think she secretly got off on me watching her. That makes nude exercise enough for me to love this site, although it is hardly perfect.
One thing I appreciate is that the models seem real. These are amateurs acting like amateurs. Sometimes they play up to the camera, and sometimes they just go through the motions. If they are showing me their bodies in an explicit way, I truly don't care if they are enjoying themselves. If a model shows me her pussy spread eagled, do I care if she is having a good time? It is all the same to me if they are an exhibitionist or just doing it for a paycheck.
In most of porn, I get the feeling that a scene I am watching is of people who fit the ideal of what porn producers think we like. Further they usually pretend they are having a good time and most of the time that involves bad acting. That seems so fake and artificial to me. It is obvious that on most porn sites the models are doing it for just a paycheck, but on this site you don't get bad acting in an obvious attempt to pretend otherwise.
A criticism I have of most softcore nude sites, think MetArt for example, is that the models are not erotic and just don't give that something extra that would work for me. Too much art, not enough erotic.With this site, you have movement that often teases in that you seldom know when you are going to get that great angle or that explicit shot. The teasing may not be intentional or played up, but you get it just the same. If you want to see a twenty year old on her back,opening and closing her legs, this is what you get. How about arching her back and pushing her pussy towards the camera after laying on the floor doing scissor kicks with her legs? Works for me.
If they only had better video quality I would give the site a higher score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-720p videos
-long videos
-fast downloads, i get 1.2 mb/s
-images arnt video grabs
-some girls dont seem too pleased to be there
-no music!
Cons:
-limited content (still a new site)
-images cant be zipped
-images appear soft
-videos can be a bit over exposed
-only 720p videos, huge file sizes
-some girls dont seem too pleased to be there
Bottom Line:
the videos start off with the trainer and the girl/s running to a spot on the beach. the subject then strips and does running in place, running through tire traps, crawling under ropes, digging holes (bunkers) in the sand. just about everything youd expect at a training camp porn set. then usually takes a strapon for some generic lesbo action, nothing special really. then sometimes, which i think is odd but original and great, the girl goes back to training just after being fucked! then she re-cloths and leaves. also note that these girls do sweat, and the sand sticks to their body when they roll in the sand!
if you join the 1 month or more option, you also get full access to specialexercies.com which is a site i love
updates seem to be 1 video and image set a week. for a smaller site such as this i dont think its bad, especialy considering is a niche site.
the videos are about 25 minutes each, and around the 400mb mark. the images around around 8mp.
the videos seem to over expose the skin sometimes, i think its because the dark green forest is directly behind them. the images seem like the shutter speed was too slow, it didnt capture the movement the best. however i dont care about photos so this didnt affect my score
most of the models are gorgeous imho. mostly petites but a few with floppy boobs (fun to watch them run in place!). they dont seem to enjoy the workout, if that bothers you at all. i think it makes to videos better since this is kinda softcore lesdom
join this site if you want to see nude teen workouts with a female trainer giving orders (in russian im guessing) and dont care about the lesbian or picture part of the site
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-Inexpensive full access trial option of 3 days at $9.95.
-Excellent video quality at 1280x720, 2500 kbps. 29 videos about 20 to 30 minutes.
-Excellent quality screenshots at 2136x3216. One set for each video. Not zipdownloadable.
-Attractive Russian models. Not one was not worth watching. Look to be in their early twenties.
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Can use download managers.
Cons:
-Not enough variety in the scenarios. Every one is exactly the same. Girl strips, has her temperature taken anally, does some calisthenics, probed by doctor manually, check out pussy with speculum then she gets dressed and leaves.
-No sexual interaction with the doctor. Some doctors are male, some female.
-Not part of any network, no bonus material.
Bottom Line:
This site is from the same people as nudesportvideos.com and has a lot in common with it. The girls are mostly thin and mostly very close in age, which looks to be in their early twenties. Unlike nudesportvideos, there are a few girls with nice curvy bodies and tits that have some size. Mostly the girls look really good, kind of like the girl next door real amateurs, but Russian style. No fake boobs, tattoos or even bleached blond hair. I would not have complained if they had some makeup used tastefully though.
Nudesportvideos has a primary focus on the girls moving in various ways to show off their bodies. This, in contrast, is basically a medical fetish site. The girls do some calisthenics for the doctor, but don't really put effort into showing off their bodies a lot. The scenario starts with the girl entering the room and then stripping. The balance of the video is completely nude.
The doctors do some ordinary tests such as eye exams or taking blood pressure. There is also some manual vaginal probing, but not any anal. The only anal activity is that each girl takes a thermometer rectally.
There is nothing very sexy about the doctor/patient interaction, but there is quite a bit of pussy on display. Totally softcore, but nonetheless explicit posing.
There are both male and female doctors, but it doesn't really matter. In only one video the female doctor changed her clothes before putting on a lab coat. More of that kind of thing would be a distinct improvement. Some great looking female doctors are wasted here.
A bit more variety in the scenes would also be a plus. Pretty much every scene is the same. The tiny amount of dialog is in Russian, so it is not clear why the girl is there. A suggestion for other scenarios could be having a group of girls being examined at the same time, perhaps taking off uniforms.
Some variety in age would also help.
This site can definitely be improved, but it is true to its niche and it does deliver softcore interesting nudes. I would also think being part of a network would make it a better value for the money. As a trial, it is an ok price, but not at the full price of $29.95 without a lot more content.
The site offers nice video and photo quality and the girls are attractive. The poses can be quite explcit. Overall I can recommend the site, despite its few weaknesses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ arround 250 videos
+ next door russians
+ newer videos have better quality
+ one extra site
+ nice idea of posing
Cons:
-inconsistent download speed
-slow download speed 27-2100 kbit/s
-medium video quality
- music in videos (a no go!)
-sometimes unmotivated exercises from the girls
- body shape is to similar
-expansive trial price 8,95
-Expansive regular price 29,95
Bottom Line:
I am not that in voyeur sites, but seeing a 90 in the purating i had to check it out.
I can`t really say that i am disappointed, but all in all the site is only an average site form e.
You got plenty videos of every kind of duration. The videos content is, as the sitename says so sportive. that`s for itself, a good idea. you got all kind of exercises. The quality of the videos is all in all medium, something what in theses times isn`t better then standard. The newer ones have better quality, but there are to less videos i that quality.
As an extra you get the site Voyeur Realm which is like that site, only from the voyeuristic point of view.
The cons are in my opinion massive.
The downloadspeed was totally inconsitent. While downloading a single file the speed varies from 27-2100 kbit/s which takes a small video clip a long download time. If you use a downloadmanager the total speed increases, so you can download simultaniously e.g. 5-6 videos. All in all the downloadtime stays even very long.
The girls do there exercises rather very unmotivated and getting the lousy backkground music also, some of the videos aren`t worth to download them. The girls also look rather the same. Body slim, tits none, pubic hair shaved…that bores even if they stretch every part of the body.
Last but not least, the price is in regular and as a trial much to expansive for what you get. A price arround 10€ would be fitting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Inexpensive three day full access trial that includes full access to voyeurrealm.com.
-Archive of 160 videos going back almost three years. They are about a half hour long, some are over an hour.
-Newest videos are 720x576, 2515 kbps. Most of the site is only a little less quality.
-Russian girls, basically the girl next door type. Little or no makeup.
-Some variety of body types and ages. However, mostly 20 to 25 and very thin.
Cons:
-Some girls are so skinny that you can clearly see their ribcages. Not my taste.
-Support for Download Manager Plus, but not Flashget or Free Download Accelerator.
-No model index or way of searching for models.
-Lousy, really bad background music. Turn the sound off.
-No interviews or any model information of any kind.
Bottom Line:
This site has yoga, stretching, dancing both ballet moves and other dancing, gymnastics, fitness workouts, etc. Almost every video starts out clothed and includes full nudity about halfway through. There is a nice mix of full body interesting shots with very explicit ass and full spread eagle pussy shots. Most importantly, they are not stingy with the erotic shots, which will keep your interest. My only real complaint is that many of the girls are too skinny for my taste. Even those videos can be well done and work for me. The girls are mostly quite flexible, limber and even athletic. Interesting to watch, but at a half hour for each video, you may want to fast forward a bit.
I like nudity, but this is better than the ordinary simple posing on many sites because of the interesting variety that comes from the athletic movements of the girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Full access trial that also includes full access to nudesportvideo.com
-Weekly updates, over 300 short videos.
-Russian girls that look like amateur, girl next door types. Little or no makeup.
-No dialog, no interviews, nothing spoken.
Cons:
-Too many very skinny girls. I don't want to see ribcages.
-Need more variety of body types and ages.
-Not really voyeur. Obviously staged. This can be a plus-see below.
-Many videos poorly photographed. This is common for this genre, but it is not erotic.
-Often have cheesy background music.
Bottom Line:
It is transparent that these are not genuine voyeur videos. This is a minus if you care about truth in advertising, but to me this is a plus. I prefer that a girl's privacy was not invaded. More importantly, the girls here play up to the camera. There is a lot of explicit nudity and an attempt at teasing. There are also clips of upskirt, panty teasing, stripping, under table, etc. Unfortunately too many videos are just weak and basically don't work. Like so much in porn, a good concept, but the execution just isn't that good. I kept only 6 videos of the more than 300.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
All originial content
Some nice (if rather skinny) eurogirls
Unique idea
At this time the site seems to update rather regularily (once in a week)
OK video quality
Cons:
Boring scenes
No "real" bondage
Softcore (almost no sex)
Nudity does not focus on erotic views
Low production value (bad lighting, bad camera-angels)
Poor site design (no browsing)
Bottom Line:
I'd say: great idea - lousy realization...
The site contains around 45 scenes (with photos of about 25 of the older ones in the preview area) of "forced" - nude - exercises.
The scenes are very softcore and the force or bondage level is very low as is the exercise/stress level (where is the sweat, girls?).
Some of the girls are hot (many are average) but you won't see much... the level of nudity is low and open legs are an exception...
In addition the camerawork is lacking skill and focus: you could at least try to put the girls in focus and try to catch a glimpse of their sexuality (so that at least the voyeuristic part of the viewer is satisfied).
The bottom line:
There is much work to do before this site gets interesting for the crowd! At this time it seems to be more an experiment with a special fetish than a sexy site.
At least there are regular updates - and the producers are honest and let you comment on any photo/videoshoot (boring is a word you'll often read there).
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-mostly very high quality bitrate (video quality)
-fast download speeds
-pictures are decsent size, not screen caps
-access to another site nudevoyuer.com
Cons:
-needs more content
-pictures could be bigger
-some videos dont match the high quality of the others
Bottom Line:
i got the trial membership and was very impressed with how this site started. if you like watching beautiful teens workout, stretch, dance, then this site if for you, and pretty much no one else.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
