Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Pi Cubed
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Visit Sexy Pattycake

1. Sexy Pattycake (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Marcus (0) 01-01-12  09:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-10-12  04:12am  (Update History)
Reason: Comprehensive rewrite as am a current member
Pros: - Good balance of photos and videos, all of which is downloadable
- Patty is a very pretty, young-looking blonde non-nude tease
- Gets very close to nude while leaving something to the imagination
- Website takes full advantage of her eternal youthful looks
- Features forum and blog, both of which are active
Cons: - Website seems stuck in the 90s in many respects
- Most videos are short and poor quality
- Photo galleries are tiny, normally with only 30-40 pictures
- Slow update schedule compared even to other sole tease sites
- Some content is 'limited time' so won't appear in archive
- Best content is saved for overly expensive downloadable ZIPs
Bottom Line: I must admit I have a soft-spot for Patty, but this a hugely disappointing website offering content that might have been acceptable 10 years ago, but is definitely a long way behind what I'd expect in 2012, even bearing in mind this is a solo website.

Membership costs $29 via CCBill. Do not get fooled by the offer of discounts for long-term members - you save only $2 for every six months you remain a member (maximum two discounts).

Frankly, the content and number of updates don't warrant a six-month membership, and if you do want to remain a member for several months, then you can save $22 by buying their 90-day membership.

Their preview area is probably a fairly accurate representation of their member's site. Once inside, you have options at the top for a blog, bio, photos, videos, webcam and forum.

The bio has full stats for Patty (height, weight, vital stats), favourite films etc, plus a short introduction. The blog is a relatively new addition to the site and is updated occasionally with thoughts from Patty and a few candid pictures.

There are around 200 galleries, but not a single gallery I viewed had over 50 photos. The photos themselves are only 1024px on their longest side, which is pretty low-fi nowadays, even on my little monitor. I can't think of any other website that consistently offers such low-res photos in such small galleries. The photo content is good, but you feel like you're only getting half of the story as there are so few photos.

Navigation-wise, galleries are arranged onto 13 pages with a thumbnail gallery of photos. You can save all pictures, but there are no downloadable ZIPs.

Content-wise Patty is a great tease. She must be in her late 20s now, but hasn't aged at all. Most galleries have her removing her underwear, there are handbras, implied nudity and often slips here-and-there. Sometimes she'll have a dildo or something, but from what I've seen there's no insertion.

They definitely take advantage of her youthful looks. Lots of candy colours, Patty wearing bunny ears, posing in front of cuddly toys, lots of Hello Kitty backgrounds etc.

Video-wise, there are around 250 videos, which - at best - are only OK quality-wise. The very best quality is 768px wide which, again, is very low quality for 2012. Most videos (and I mean around 200 of the 250 available) are 352px which, for videos released in 2010, is very bad (and I don't have particularly demanding standards, either).

Most of the videos are her stripping on a bed, playing in the shower or doing a strip tease to teeny bop music. She's pretty good, and there are nip slips scattered throughout the latter videos, but the quality is poor to the point there's little-or-no pay-off in that respect.

Most of the scenes are split into two-or-three parts. With other updates in between, along with a pretty pedestrian update schedule, it's likely to be several months until you manage to download the whole scene.

The videos are arrange chronologically, with a thumbnail preview and an option to stream a few of the newer ones. Only one format is downloadable (MP4 for newer videos, MPG for the majority), no indication of file size (although most are 50-200mb) or running time (most are 5min long), and no description other than the video title.

There is a section for webcams, which is an archive of screenshots from her webcams. Most of the webcams seem to just be the same as her videos or galleries, but there are hundreds and hundreds of small (600px wide), blury screenshots. No videos and no clue as to where her webcams are available or when the next show is.

The forum is active, and Patty clearly has passionate fans. No input from what I can see from Patty herself though, and although there's a 'Patty Tweets' thing on the membership homepage, I'm not sure if she's on Twitter or not as there's no link to it, so I think it's just a kinda member's only news feed. No sign of interaction here, either.

Unfortunately, the best content is saved for ZIPs which have to be bought on top of membership. There are discounts for members, but at $35, it's still hugely expensive and 'In Training', though hot, was hardly on another level to what's available on her site. Another cynical aspect by her webmasters is splitting member's videos into 3 parts, so with updates in between, you have to remain a member for months to get a whole scene.

To summarise, Patty is wonderful, but her website is hugely disappointing, particularly compared to other solo tease websites. A lot of the content is pretty samey, the update schedule of one update a week maximum is pretty disappointing, as is most of the content.

680x354 videos, 1024x680 pictures and 30 pictures per gallery might have been OK ten years ago, but definitely aren't in 2012.

Patty's site is a jack of all trades, master of none. The video content, pictures and interaction from Patty are all below average. Patty is great, but her website has hardly moved with the times.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sexy Pattycake

2. Sexy Pattycake (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
tboy (0) 09-15-11  08:05am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: +plenty of galleries
+plenty of vids
+new blog
+twitter feed (scraping the barrel as a pro)
+still alive and updated maybe once a week
Cons: -video quality is terrible (even newer vids)
-updates are too infrequent for sub cost
-blog is updated to infrequently
-forum is barely active
Bottom Line: this is a real struggle for me, i love patty, i love her vids and her pics. the teasing panty shots, the bum slapping, the dancing and the cheeky facial expressions.

creatively speaking i'd say the site and model are a gem.

but in 2011 they are producing horribly low quality videos (more recently vids are mp4 but still no better than wide 640x480).

the galleries have way too few pics, usually about 30 to 40, also generally no bigger than 1024x768.

no zips are provided and all pics are stored on seperate html pages so you'll need a plugin like DTA and some batch download jiggery-pokery to get all the images.

updates come in the form of gallery, video or webcam, the webcam update is just a series of very low res vidcaps which i still don't see the point in. just pissed me off that it was used an update slot. maybe i missed a selling point, does she do live webcam sessions?

i joined for 3 months and i was excited about updates as they were so few and far between, but i was consistently dissapointed to the degree that i had to cancel my sub.

i *wish* the site was better and i *wish* i could give it a better score, I genuinely hope she ups her game and i'll be back like a shot.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sexy Pattycake

3. Sexy Pattycake (0)

Pay
Newbie
81*
BostonPJR (Disabled) 07-25-08  07:09pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Patty is cute, petite, curvy in all the right places with that great naughty look in every shoot.
- Fabulous breasts. I have to say this.
- Shoots are creative; with varied outfits and themes. Especially appealing to those with a mild craving for sploshing content.
-And they are well shot. Smallish, but good framing, perfect poses. She looks like she's having fun.
- A large amount of content. Over 150 shoots and 100 or so videos.
Cons: - Problem is, I don't much care about photos these days, and the video content, while abundant, updates infequently and is pretty low quality. Years behind that of most sites.
- The site seems a bit behind in general, from video quality to photo size. I always worry when sites slow down this much.
- Videos that are more high def. must be paid for -- even by subscribers.
Bottom Line: Always one of my favorite tease girls. That's right folks, this is primarily a TEASE site. So no acting surprised. Breast shots with occasional peeks of nipples are easy to come by, as are flashes under the panties, but this model and her site are all about the tease. She does it well and keeps me coming back. She has a special appeal to minifetishes, and she has been a pioneer of her own brand of "messy" shoots: bright paint with blacklight being one of her early specialties.
But the overall delivery, unfortunately makes the website feel dated. I hate squinting to see her (fabulous) breasts.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-3 of 3  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.