Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Very large and comprehensive photo section dating back over 100 years.
• Includes probably some of the oldest photos and smut videos available, though it’s unlikely that they are exclusive.
• No pre-checked cross-sell.
• CCBill and Epoch are two of the processors, though I had issues with CCBill. See comments.
• Streaming for most videos is available plus unlimited downloads.
• Meaningful file names for most videos which includes year of release in the name most of the time.
• For its time, good video and photo quality. Videos remastered in digital avi or mp4 format, though only 1 DL option. The old stuff was undoubtedly shot mostly in 8mm or16mm. Photos show little wear and tear, i.e., scratches.
• Daily updates.
• Free 1-day trial with full access – however, see comments.
• Each video lists the stats, i.e., year, format, size, duration, resolution and date added.
• HTTPS.
Cons:
• A huge drawback: photo content only available as individual downloads.
• Viewing option for photos is laborious and antiquated.
• Not really a con because It’s unavoidable but I’ll mention it so that there aren’t any unrealistic expectations – although digitized, the videos are low quality as are the older photos.
• No search tools.
• Poor navigation.
• Signing up was fraught with problems, see comments. However, I did get a discounted price of $15.95 recurring at $15.95 – regular price is $29.95 recurring at $29.95.
Bottom Line:
Pornography has a long and rich history. One of the earliest pieces of evidence dates back 25,000 years! A 4” statue of Venus of Willendorf dating back to that period was discovered in Austria. There is further evidence of statues and explicit images throughout ancient times. A major game changer was the invention in 1440 of the Gutenberg Press. As a result, the first book of erotic engravings was published in 1524. Then came the invention of photography in 1839 which basically ushered pornography into today’s modern era. That is roughly where Vintage Cuties begins its foray into porn, a.k.a., smut, dirt, erotica, filth.
Vintage Cuties may be the only site you’ll ever need for a titillating reference of what I’ll loosely refer to as modern porn, the era following the invention of photography. The site includes a vast photo collection as well as an abundance of videos from 1850 to the 1990s. At least some of the content is member submitted. While the quality of the photos and videos reflects the standards of the time, the content on VC seems mostly free of excessive wear and tear, i.e., scratches. Of course, the quality of the content from 30+ years ago seems primitive by today’s HD standards. But alas, that is part of the charm.
There are several other sites included with membership but they warrant no attention. They are unrelated to vintage porn. While the content is mostly current (within 10 years), quality and content lack any redeeming values. For example, there’s a site “Home Made Junk,” an apt title, and consists of poor quality photos and short poor quality videos. These sites detract from the main site and I recommend not spending more than a few minutes, if that much, checking them out.
The site is painful to navigate. Hitting the back button doesn’t always take you to the last page viewed. It sometimes took 4 or so clicks to get back to the menu. This is frustrating. On a similar note and another major drawback is the lack of any search feature. However, there is an extensive menu.
The photos are the real draw, at least for me. This is an enormous section consisting of 200,000 photos (as per the site) and one which you can spend days going through. However, it is unforgivable that the files are not zipped and you cannot download the sets, only individual photos.
The oldest photos date back to 1850 and were shot using t process known as daguerreotype, a photograph taken by the earliest photographic process introduced in 1839 employing an iodine-sensitized silvered plate and mercury vapor.
As mentioned, the menu is extensive and logical. The photo section includes many subsets. They’re separated by date range (1850 - 1920, 1920 - 1940, 1940 – 1950, 1950 – 1970, 1970 – 1980 and 1980 – 1990). There are different subsets under each period. For example, under 1850 – 1920, subsets include daguerreotypes, erotica, fetish, filthy, risqué cards and world people. In case you’re wondering, the “filthy” stuff is the hardcore smut, “erotica” consists simply of nudes, “fetish” is mostly spanking and bondage, “world people” consists generally of Africans and “risqué cards” which are simply nude photos. Each period has different subsets.
Also listed in the photos section after the options for date ranges are further options, some which only serve to confuse, others which are lots of fun. The options following the date range options are:
• Amateurs –1,000 photos from circa 1980s.
• Burlesque – 1,400 photos - the title says it all, undated but I’ll guess 1960s – 1980s
• Covers & Posters – 2,000 images of what seems to be entirely magazine covers apparrently from the 1950s – 1980s
• Exotic Art – 2,000 images of erotica drawings – again, undated but seemingly spans the early 20th century thru more modern times
• Magazines – 1,350 sets (~30,000 photos) with subsections by time period from 1880 to 1990. Some sets include only photos from the magazines and others seem to include the entire magazine. Very comprehensive and fun.
• Playing Cards – 360 images of, guess what? -)
• Retro Ads – over 100 sets (~5,000 images) of ads seemingly most from the 1950s, mostly nostalgic but not erotic. Remember Schlitz beer? Beech-nut gum?
• Retro Stars – 100s of mostly pinup models which tally several thousand photos - subsections by time period from the 1920s to 1980s. Retro stars include the likes of Josephine Baker (the oldest one and from 1920), Jean Harlow, Barbara Eden (clothed), Rita Moreno (clothed), Betty Blue, Anita Ekberg, Babette Bardot, Annie Sprinkle, etc. A fun section.
Unfortunately, viewing the photos is a tedious task. There is sort of a slide show feature but it’s not automatic and it’s time consuming. In addition, navigating to and from sets often requires several mouse clicks. I’m confused why they would have such a fantastic and enormous photo section with very limited viewing and download options.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of pictures
Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
Cons:
I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the "network" and decided never to go back.
Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than "Grannies."
Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites "Hairy Pussy Cuties,"Vintage Cuties," "Home Made Junk" were horribly outdated. In Hairy Pussy Cuties, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! Vintage Cuties is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
Bottom Line:
All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.
Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.
Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!
Minor addition:
One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A week is free with a monthly membership. You get 37 days for the one month price.
-Frequent updates. Photo sets are one every 2 days, videos one a week.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Good size photo archives. 829 photo sets. The number of photos is not listed, but almost all sets are between 100 and 200. The photos are mostly of professional models and the rest are homemade and user submitted.
-Some variety of races, ages and body types. Most are Eastern Europeans.
-Mostly fresh faces. Only a few I recognized as older pornstars.
-Comes with three bonus sites-hairypussycuties.com, homemadejunk.com, and vintagecuties.com.
-Nearly all have hairy bushes. The models are very unglam and appear to be natural without boob jobs or tattoos. Many have noticeable imperfections. For me this is a plus.
Cons:
-Advertises itself as featuring models at least 40. I don't think that some are that old. Most of the better looking models appear to be younger.
-The videos are not of very good quality. Most are masturbation or b/g, with a few a few lesbian scenes. I considered the videos to be a total waste and deleted them all. Definitely not a site to join for the videos.
Bottom Line:
This is billed as a niche site and comes with others that also focus on models with hairy bush. This one focuses on older models within that niche.
The models are mostly in their 40s, with a few that seem a few years younger. The older models are almost all unattractive and overweight. Not much to be found here that promotes sexiness. More to my taste is that the younger models are much better looking. I suspect this is not due to the aging process, but to a much smaller pool of women willing to pose. Most of the older models would not have been hot in their twenties either.
Some of the photosets are very hot, but not enough of them are due to the fact that unfortunately the site seems to focus more on frequent updates than on quality. Many of the photosets feature the same models over and over. Since these are usually the most attractive models, I see this as a plus. In contrast, the photos of the models that are used as previews generally makes you pass by most of the sets. I found at best one in four sets worth checking out. One thing I do appreciate is that the style of the photography is professional, very explict and gets to the point.
Overall worth considering if you find older bush interesting. However, a lot of the content just isn't worth bothering with.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch. CCBill is also an option but the price is higher, $33.74 as compared to $29.95 for Epoch.
-A week is free with a monthly membership. You get 37 days for the one month price.
-Frequent updates. Photo sets are one every 3 days, videos one a week.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Good size photo archives. 275 sets with 5479 photos are homemade, user submitted and another 552 sets with 50,115 photos use professional models.
-Nice variety of races, ages and body types. Many are Eastern Europeans.
-Comes with three bonus sites-amazinggrannies.com, homemadejunk.com, and vintagecuties.com.
-Hairy bush.
Cons:
-Videos are old as well as dull. Most are MPEG2 or even older. Some videos look like they were made in the 80's. I saw only b/g.
-The most recent photo set is 768x1152. Ok, but many if not most photo sites do better.
Bottom Line:
This is primarily a photo site, even though they do have videos. The videos here are uniformly of low quality and are not at all worth joining for.
The focus is on hairy bush and I must say they do deliver. The photo archive is rather large and worth the price of admission. Nearly all are neatly trimmed and the photos focus on showcasing them.
The models vary quite a bit in attractiveness, age, race, ethnicity and is what you can expect in a site that encourages user submissions. Most of the professional models are very attractive, but only a few are truly outstanding. This isn't penthouse.com. They advertise all exclusive content. While, that may be true, the models are certainly not all exclusive. I recognized quite a few faces that I have seen on other sites. Some I know from porn movies as well. However, most of the faces appear to be exclusive to the site.
Like other sites with photos, most of them are not explicit. However, enough of them are to get my vote. The style is one of straightforward, nonglamour type photography. No overdone makeup, no artsy type nonerotic shots. There is a decent mix of portrait and landscape. Sets average 67 photos.
Overall I would recommend the site if you like photos of hairy bush. The models are mostly very natural and the photography is a serious attempt at the erotic. If only the photos were of better quality than about 800x1200, I could rate the site higher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There aren't many here other than the site complies with the premise of being hairy.
-There are some nice models.
Cons:
-The photo sizes are odrinary as is the quality. Any self-respecting site these days need to offer 1000X 1500 pix. Anything less is not worth the trouble of looking at. This site offers small, outdated pix.
Bottom Line:
This is such an ordinary site. it's not funny. There's nothing to gain by joiing this site. If you want hairy, go to atk, you 'll be loads happier.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
