Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site that started my interest in lesbian porn and it's still at the top of the lesbian site list
Quality is near unmatched, very crisp and clear video downloads and outstanding quality photosets to download.
The other quality is high too. That's the believability and quality of the action. If these women are not really into lesbian scenes, they are damn good actresses
What was the old tagline? Pretty girls doing it right? Sounds right to me and explains the majority of their content.
Lots of tags and good searching capabilities
One of the few sites that can win me over without much talking, the models' mouths are usually full of something or something else
Cons:
There is no story! That's usually a deathblow for me, a dealbreaker, but see above, pretty girls doing it right. That's all the story I need. May not be enough for you.
How about the dumbest con ever? The women are too attractive. You know half the people that watch the scenes say, "there's no way she's into women!" Which is what makes it great to me. I like fantasies.
Bottom Line:
You know a site is really strong when it comes with a network and the network doesn't even get mentioned in the pros. Sapphic Erotica is now part of the Sapphix network along with Fist Flush and Give Me Pink. Making it one of the best networks. Unlike most networks, Sapphix has Sapphic Erotica as the breadwinner and Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as support or bonus sites.
Sapphic Erotica has been around longer than I have been watching online porn and I'm not that young. And knowing this will make a few of the other Porn Users laugh, I thought Sapphic Erotica was too hardcore back when I first got into porn. That didn't last for very long. And I'm glad it didn't. Sapphic Erotica was one of the first sites that made me feel real sexual attraction to women, even though, I have never even tried sex with women.
The content ranges from deep, passionate kissing and grinding tribbing to strap ons and more hardcore acts. It works perfectly for fantasies since you know, in fantasies, sex is never boring or repetitive. Which is a major compliment to Sapphic Erotica. Even if the scenes are repetitive, it's a good repetitive and it's some of the highest quality, technical and in action, porn available.
I can compare the scenes to other top lesbian sites like Mommy's Girl on Adult Time, but I don't think those scenes are near as good as these scenes. Stories are a great part of porn when done right. I'm not for sure lesbian porn has a good plot or storyline available. Let it be two attractive women testing each other out that turns into a torrid romp of wild sex.
The best part of the tags is the inclusion of positions involved in each scene. If you like 69, there's a tag for it and for every other lesbian niche position you can think of.
The models are almost all European. When I first started joining porn sites, European porn was on top of the porn world and this site shows why. The models, many of them, are 9s or 10s.
I have seen individual lesbian scenes on other sites that were better. I have seen lesbian scenes that were more hardcore, but I don't know of a lesbian site with this much consistent quality, action and technical quality.
The network is just a bonus, I didn't want to use "cherry on top", as the sites Fist Flush and Give Me Pink are two of the better sites from their respective niches. Fist Flush is a site focused on young women fisting each other and it's relatively extreme compared to other fisting sites. Give Me Pink is a site that once was one of the top solo sites. Pretty women, doing extreme things to their body and high quality close up camerawork. If you get your eye too close, you might get pink ... eye, sorry, couldn't resist.
I just don't think you're going to find a site like Sapphic Erotica in 2024. It stands so far and above its competition.
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming.
Cons:
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface
Bottom Line:
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the greatest pornsites ever
- Over 2,000 scenes plus access to 2 other great sites.
- The prettiest "lesbian" site.
- Videos are available up to 4K download
- Photosets are downloadable
- Regular updates
- Includes access to Fist Flush and Give Me Pink
- Download speeds are great (90% my max)
Cons:
- Very little to complain about other than it's repetitive.
- Gets boring if you don't like looking at near perfect models naked and playing with each other.
Bottom Line:
There was a time when Sapphic Erotica was the top site across all genres. There also was a time that Give Me Pink was a top-level site. You get both of those now with one subscription. I do remember the days of paying $30 for each of those sites.
The videos are up to 4k downloads and there are over 2,000 scenes. Each scene includes a downloadable zip file of photos. The photos are not videocaps, they are legitimate studio quality photos.
Downloads are fast and easy. There are regular weekly updates along with the bonus access to Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
Give Me Pink is a solo site showing beautiful models using strange and even large objects to masturbate with. Fist Flush is a very good, albeit small, fisting site.
You do receive access to all 3 and it is unlimited access. CCBill is the billing agent so you should feel confident about giving them your credit card details.
Sapphic Erotica has one downside and I'm going to point it out based on my own discussions with lesbians. The women at Sapphic Erotica are more for the viewing pleasure of men than lesbians. That's not to say lesbians won't like it, but this lesbian content firmly lands in the oddity genre known as straight-lesbian. That just means it's aimed at straight men who want to see 2 or more naked young women rolling around and having sex.
The site's navigation is very good and there is an extensive tagging system. The tags are almost too extensive. You can filter by location, then color of hair and action. It's overwhelming even for me.
The bet part is the models. These are Europe's best models dating all the way back to 2004, which was part of the European porn boom of the mid-2000s. You will see models you've never heard of and legends like Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, even Club Sandy.
It's one of the best bargains when combined with Give Me Pink and highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen.
Cons:
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn.
Bottom Line:
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There’s nothing on this site except lesbian porn.
Pretty, mostly European models that I have seen on the 21st sites and even Nubiles.
Very high quality on the videos and pictures.
Updates on average twice per week. Sometimes they have as many updates as 4 per week. It’s not a consistent update schedule.
There are currently 1,817 videos and those are mostly long videos of 40+ minutes each.
Comes with two bonus sites: Give Me Pink (still updating) and Fist Flush (which has updated for the last two months)
Cons:
If you don’t like a lot of white backgrounds, the newer scenes are nearly all in a white living room. All the furniture is white. I’m not for sure what they’re going for with these white backgrounds.
In my different times as a member of this site, the quality of the sex has been hot/cold. I believe it’s because the nature of the niche is repetitive.
Bottom Line:
One thing I can’t complain about is how pretty the models are. I can complain that the models look a lot alike. When thy do get a darker complexion model she really stands out. Especially in the all-white living room. One of the better newer scenes has Alyssa Reece and Mia Split in it. Not only does Alyssa Reece have a darker complexion, the majority of the scenes captures the outdoor greenery and even some neutral colors like tan furniture. It makes a lot of difference! That scene is so much better than the other newer scenes, it makes me think that all-white background doesn’t work with pale models.
The quality is really high on this site and the network it belongs to – Sapphix. This network is focused on women. Give Me Pink is all women. Fist Flush is women fisting women. If you’re tired of seeing hairy asses and balls this is a really good network for you. The quality on the videos includes downloads up to 4K and those have been 4K since December 2015. They also give you the options of 1080p, 720p, 540p and mobile. You won’t see many of their videos with lower than 720p. Some of their 2005 videos have 720p and 1080p. They have been doing high quality for a very long time. That is a good part. The older scenes are easily better. If you like tribbing there’s a lot of it on this site. The quality of the older videos is important not just because those are better. There are more of them. From looking at the updates, it looks like, at one time 2005-2008, they were releasing a new scene every 2-3 days. I also believe the models in the older scenes were some of the top models in the world. It seems like the older scenes were more hardcore if that’s possible. There are a lot of 3 female scenes, some of those are 3 females masturbating furiously together. I don’t see that much in newer lesbian scenes. The videos are not only downloadable, but from what I see there is no limit. The pictures are very good quality and downloadable. Those are photo sets that have file sizes reminiscent of videos, over 500 MB each.
The only complaint I really have is about the newer scenes. That white background, the models not as much into it. When I look at the models in the older scenes, I’m not surprised the models aren’t as into the scenes. Some of those old scenes have three women that are legitimate 10s. You’ll have some color-shock if you watch the older scenes. They had blue chairs and hippy looking sheets, brightly colored beach towels.
The site is very big with nearly 2,000 scenes. A lot of the prettier, sexier models in the older days of the site have over 10 scenes each. It surprised me when this site become a part of the Sapphix network. I never had any problems joining this site and being satisfied with just it. It’s almost too big by itself for a one month membership.
This is very believable, to me, lesbian porn. These women look like they are loving it (especially older scenes) and they’re really pretty to look at. I just come away with the feeling that the production changed sometime over the last 5 years, and someone took it in the wrong direction. The newer scenes try to be more softcore, but the sex is not. The models are still doing 69s and rimming even on the white furniture. I would like to see the site go back to its older style which reminded me of the old Vivid DVDs. It was pretty women doing dirty things. Maybe the all-white background has made me view those scenes as more innocent. It’s not the models are just not as into it? It’s still an easy site to recommend for those that like to see pretty women naked and doing sexual things.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
For people that love lesbian and solo scenes, this can be an interesting network. It has a lot to offer in terms of body type and ethnicity. For the most part, models are good and they know how to move in front of a camera.
There is a lot of choice in terms of content. Do you prefer soft and sweet girl\girl actions? Then Sapphic Erotica got you covered. Are you a fan of fisting? Fist Flush has some very good videos. Do you like to watch girls masturbating? Give Me Pink offers a good catalogue. There are even interviews with girls that shot for Sapphix, if you want to have more details. For every video there is also an attached photo gallery
You can download films on your device with no extra cost, which is not at all granted, as a lot of websites make you pay extra for this feature.
There are also some live shows with chat. Personally it is not my cup of tea, however it is a nice addition to the package.
Cons:
The website has a quite outdated design. It looks and feels like one of those free tubes. It is not a premium experience to me. If you usually watch porn on your mobile devices, avoid this network at all costs: it works very well on computers, but on my android phone and tablet it is slow, the player is clunky and lacks options, plus the buffering is eternal. Considering that people tend to navigate on the Internet with smartphones, I would say that this is not a wise strategy.
Bottom Line:
Sapphix Network is a quite decent package if you are really into lesbian porn. They are on the market for a lot of years, therefore I do not understand why they don't offer a better user experience, redesigning the layout a little and optimizing the content.
Videos are in Full HD, which is fine, but more and more premium porn networks are offering 4K definition for the same amount of money. It is granted at this point. They really should step up their game.
I personally think that this can be a good purchase, if the subscription would be around 15 dollars per month. Paying 30 bucks for this, is definitely too expensive, considering that there are better alternatives on the market.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Women seeing how far they can stick their fist up inside themselves, sometimes with help from others.
Small but very good collection of 78 videos. They have updated as recently as August 2020.
Easy to use site with excellent video quality.
These scenes seem to take on more of a realistic feel to them. Maybe it's just me thinking a woman wouldn't be into this unless she was really into the scene?
I have only been a member of one other fisting site and have to say these models are much prettier than the other fisting site I tried.
Epoch is the payment processor.
Every scene has at least 1080p and 720p videos. Some of the newer ones have 4K.
Cons:
The scene count could be higher, but this niche is poorly represented. Supply and demand thinking?
These scenes would be some of my favorites if the models talked much or explained what is going through their minds when somehow shoving their fist up their pussy and their other fist up their ass.
Bottom Line:
This site was a pleasant surprise for me. As someone that works (sometimes) in sexual therapy, I can understand the need and use of extreme masturbation. Some of the content here goes into extremes I haven't seen one woman do to herself like the scenes with a woman fisting her pussy with one hand and ass with the other. Besides being extreme stretching in a relative area, it takes a lot of flexibility to pull that off.
I would like to see more of the solo scenes in this niche. There are less than 10 of the 78 videos here with a solo model. I can see the attraction, possibly the "heat of the moment" to be fisted when with another person, but the solo ones are as graphic and explicit as any porn. These scenes add draw even more interest with the pretty models. I am not saying this to be offensive, but I thought this was a niche more for the average or below looking models. I do not believe the low video count is a problem. That is combined with how pretty the models are. You just aren't going to find a lot of videos of very pretty models fisting themselves and each other. I talked about being a member on another site featuring fisting. I did not download any videos from it as I thought the models were unattractive. I will download at least half of the videos from this site.
The video quality couldn't be much better. Their oldest scenes all have 1080p, 720p and a few other smaller options including mobile, while the newer scenes offer 4K too.
This is a niche that I don't believe can be faked. There is a lot of realism in these scenes, very clear orgasms with some squirting too. While I do prefer the solo ones for the pure kinkiness of it, some of the scenes with two models also reach that high level of kinkiness. There are scenes where one model is fisting the other and starts giving her oral too while fingering her ass. I am thinking, "What more could she even do to her?" There are even cute moments when one model has a hard orgasm and you can see her laugh or smile like it embarrassed her. This was an overlooked site for me. It hits a happy medium between too kinky and not kinky enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen.
Cons:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Overwhelmingly large lesbian site that has content from as far back as 2003.
Over 1,000 models.
1,816 scenes with new updates being posted every 3 days.
Each scene includes downloadable photos and videos.
Advanced search allows the user to filter multiple tags.
Very attractive models, could possibly be a con.
Good price for all the content you get access to.
Cons:
There is a professional feel to everything. The models are nearly all Europeans and the porn feels that way.
The advanced search will likely confuse just as many people as help them.
Consistency is not always a good trait.
Bottom Line:
This is my first time joining this site. While I am open to lesbian content, it is not my favorite and I have to be in the mood for it. This site is a good example of that. I won't deny the quality of the content or the beauty of the models, but some of the content feels forced, scripted and the newer scenes do not offer much variety. The professional feeling is a con to me. Everything looks like a porn set. This automatically loses me a little bit. You can even use the advanced search to see the actions used in each scene go in phases. It's like they pick up on what's popular and use it in every scene until it's no longer popular then they find something new to add.
That is more my subjective opinion. I have been using lesbian sites like Girls Out West which is on the other end of the spectrum. Some of the scenes here are outstanding. It does seem to matter who the models are. Which offers some inconsistency, but the production is highly consistent. I would like to see more action letting the women work within the scene without so much direction.
From an objective view there isn't much wrong. They list 1,000 models, but it looks like more than that to me as one page says, "Our latest 1,000 models". They have a little of everything too. See a short list of what all different actions they have in their scenes.
374 scenes with 69.
298 scenes with at least 3 girls.
57 scenes with fisting.
95 scenes with tribbing (I don't agree with their number on that one, it seems much higher)
74 scenes with strap-on dildos.
The video quality is very good, they have 1080p downloads available on some scenes from 2004 and 2005. Starting in 2006-07, all videos have 1080p and for the last year or two they added 4K. Many attractive models, high quality video downloads, photos for the photo lovers and still updating during the Covid-19 pandemic. I think the only real faults with it are if you're into amateur action, scenes that make you believe the actresses are into it the lesbian sex, or if you want any kind of story or setup, you may be a little disappointed. The site does do an excellent job of capturing the action on camera (professional) and showcases the models' bodies.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Includes 3 female-centric sites, Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush. A total of 2,400 scenes. These include a video and high-quality photo set. You may download all.
They have 1,150 of the prettiest women I have ever laid my eyes on.
Billing company changes, I sometimes get Rocketgate, sometimes Epoch, both are easy to use and cancel.
Fist Flush has not been updated since 2018 and only has 77 scenes on it, the content they have is good, but if you're only joining for it know ahead of time it's not being updated.
There's some serious gay for pay going on, some of the scenes feel like neither woman wants to be there.
Bottom Line:
When Sapphix was created it was one of the greatest days in female-centric porn. You get the archive site Fist Flush for those into the rougher fisting (only girls, no guys), you get Sapphic Erotica, one of the greatest lesbian sites ever created and you get Give Me Pink, a solo, but hardcore solo site.
The video quality and options are as good as any site I have seen.
Sapphic Erotica has been offering 4K downloads on every scene since October 2015. If you don't want 4K they also offer 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They have been offering 1080p since 2007!
Give Me Pink has been offering 4K downloads since November 2015 and those also come with 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They too have been offering 1080p since 2007.
Fist Flush's few newer updates offer 4K and all of their past scenes have 1080p, 720p and 540p.
Each scene includes a photo set that is up to 3000 resolution. These can be downloaded as zip files.
Gay for pay does hamper some of the scenes, but I would estimate it at less than 15% of the scenes. Most of the scenes on Sapphic Erotica are believable enough to make a girl wonder about the talk of bi-curious.
Give Me Pink could be a little much for some as there are extreme insertions, but I have noticed those are in the older scenes. The newer scenes are more standard "hard masturbation".
Fist Flush is a site about fisting. I'm not really into this scenes myself -- they even have anal fisting.
It does offer a varied selection from scene to scene, the kissable, lovable, innocent tribbing of the cute, pretty and even beautiful lesbians on Sapphic Erotica, the harder masturbation of the Give Me Pink girls and the whole fist of Fist Flush.
The tagging system here is really incredible. As many as you want can be used at one time.
It starts with Categories - here you have anal, kissing, 69 and 26 other choices.
Now you get Locations - They have living room, outdoors, pool and 9 other locations.
Next is Face Type - baby face, slutty, butch and 6 more types of faces
Bringing Ethnicity in now - Exotic, Hispanic, Caucasian and Black
How about Hair Color - redhead, brunette, blonde and 3 more
Need more for hair fetishes, Hair Style - short, long-curly, long-straight and 4 more
Can't forget those sexy Eyes - blue, grey, brown and green
What about the body art - tattoos, piercings, branding and glasses
Like some Pubic Hair - shaved, trimmed, hairy
Can't forget the pussy/labia type - small, medium, meat curtains (really?), big clit
Ethnicity wasn't enough, Skin Tone - light, medium, dark, tan-lines
Thought they forgot the Breasts - natural, flat, floppy, fake, perky, large, teardrop, medium
But don't forget the Butt - thick, bubble butt, apple, average and flat
What good are those without Body Type - athletic, curvy, MILF, petite, tall, barely legal and more
Who needs Clothes - costume, bikini, jeans, hot pants, dress, heels, sneakers, fully naked(invisible clothes?), leggings, hose, stockings, pajamas and more.
Last is the site - Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink, Fist Flush
You can go through all those options and mark everyone you want to see and it will filter down to the scenes with everything you marked. I think it's why I like the site so much. There is no guessing. You can literally select what you want to see and it will be there.
Sapphic Erotica has 1,798 scenes, Give Me Pink has 391 scenes, Fist Flush has 77 scenes and they do have interviews, but there are only 59 of those.
In my opinion, they have the best all-around experience in porn -- the quality, the quantity, the excellent tagging system and the quality of models.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the largest and in my opinion, best, lesbian sites.
- Massive catalog of content, earliest content dates back to 2003.
- Is now part of a network (Sapphix) which includes Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
- Carries a tagline that fits ... "Pretty girls doing it right". See cons.
- Very high technical quality on videos and photos.
- Good DL speeds (80-85% of max)
- Billing, canceling, is easy though I'm not familiar with the biller (AXSCharge), original billing was handled by Rocketpay but canceling went through AXSCharge, maybe it's the same company?
- Carries a level of eroticism that only Viv Thomas matched.
- Many A-list Euro models.
- More tribbing than any site that I know of.
- Very clean website design, no ads in the members area, comes off as professional.
- Falls into either the top 10 or top 5 all-time in all genres.
- Very fast "fixes" to site problems, will explain in BL.
Cons:
- The biggest complaint that I will call legitimate but won't say I care about it, is a real lesbian will say these models aren't lesbians.
- Updates have slowed on Sapphic Erotica to one every 4 days. Maybe not a con in the truest sense but I'm nitpicking.
- The mainstream era (2011-2014) content just doesn't do much for me.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is one of the most difficult genres for me to review. My closest co-worker for the last 5 years, is 100%, way out of the closet, lesbian. She doesn't "look" like a lesbian. The first time we worked together, she introduced herself and her sexual preference to me by saying, "You better not start flirting with my girlfriend." But I did! Part of this review is based on her opinion that she has shared with me. Her biggest problem with lesbian porn is she says it's just not realistic. Then she laughs and says, "Or we're just not very good at it". She crushed my every lesbian fantasy by saying she's never tribbed and neither has any of her lesbian friends. So, I'll stop with that part and get to my view of lesbian porn since who needs reality when there's 2-4 very pretty women kissing and naked?
Sapphic Erotica's tagline for as long as I can remember has been, "pretty girls doing it right". In all my years on PU, I've made it pretty clear that I like natural women BUT I don't hold tattoos against the models and sometimes I even like the tattoos (see Dragon Lily, Satine Phoenix and Regan Reese). I also like natural boobs but (not a big but) I can look over implants. I've told about one of the models Sapphic Erotica has a lot of content of named Zafira. One of the prettiest mid-2000s Euro models. She realized one of her boobs was bigger than the other so she had implants (nearly same size as natural) to even them out. She falls into that category of "more people would say those are natural than implants". That's the type of implants I have no problems with.
Which to me is what Sapphic Erotica goes for with the "pretty girls doing it right" tagline. You would be hard-pressed to find another site with more feminine, natural, no tattoos, no implants, models, than Sapphic Erotica.
So, if you're into 18-24 year old, mostly slender, some average/sporty builds with hardly no tattoos, no implants, Sapphic Erotica, a lesbian site, is a site you would probably love. Some liked to call this style of models and porn, "Glam" but this isn't glam. It's "normal", sorry dating is horrible in 2018, trying to find a "normal" woman who doesn't kill spiders with her hand, drinks a 12 pack of beer and goes hunting on the weekend is becoming increasingly hard. These are what people call, "girly-girls". They know they're pretty and they want you to know it too.
Sapphic Erotica is right up there with Viv Thomas when it comes to creating passionate sex films. Sex Art tries it but I don't think it works as good with a man and woman as it does with 2 or 4 women. Most of the scenes start off with the models fully-clothed (skimpy). And usually ends with one pretty girl's butthole pressed down on the other pretty girl's tongue. In-between, there's deep kissing, heavy touching, nipple-squeezing, fingering (toys aren't too common), dry-humping that turns into tribbing and of course, lots of 69s.
That's real to me! I very easily can imagine two college girls being bored, admiring how pretty the other is then suddenly getting lost in 30 minutes of lesbian sex.
Here's the numbers:
1,747 scenes (videos and downloadable pictures) They have been offering 4K on all videos since late 2015 and 1080p on all videos since late 2006!
The models number is a bit harder to find since the model list covers Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphic Erotica and it's over 1,000.
In my review of their network, I noted that I scored Give Me Pink higher than the full network. The reason was a glitch in the navigation of the network that made it very hard to separate the sites. Well, they fixed it. So, I would change their tagline to, "Webmasters doing it right". The navigation on Sapphix (network hub) lets you click the drop down box and pick which site you want to see content from, in this example, Sapphic Erotica. Where the glitch was happening was when I clicked on any page except page 1, it wouldn't load. That's fixed and you can now search from within each site with the "tags" that are very useful and accurate.
The part I call the "mainstream era" is an era of Sapphic Erotica where the content became very formulaic. The good part is, pretty girls, have been part of their formula the whole time. I don't know what the not-to-distant future of porn is but I do believe Sapphic Erotica and this Sapphix network has established itself as the top lesbian/all girl network. My scoring changed on Sapphix once they got the navigation problem fixed so it's a 95 and Sapphic Erotica to me, is also a 95. I mainly scored them this way because I don't think you even need an interest in Give Me Pink or Fist Flush to get your money's worth with a subscription. Those two sites are like icing on the cake or gravy on your mashed potatoes or two wet clits sticking together.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that made me think I had found heaven but am thinking this might be hell.
- Two of the greatest "girl" sites, Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink come with this network. It also has Fist Flush too but the content is very limited, I found some way back in 2008-2009.
- Navigation is okay, seems better than it is at first, gets worse, but then improves, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are excellent (85% of max).
- Sapphic Erotica is arguably the greatest lesbian site in internet porn history.
- Very high quality, dating back to the 2007 content, they have 1080p option on the videos and have 4K option dating back to September 2015.
- Updates roughly 10 times per month.
- If your porn interest is in just women, solo and lesbian scenes, this is the network for you, there are 0 scenes with men.
- The archives include some of the most explicit masturbation (Give Me Pink) of the Euro top models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Two problems in one con. On the model list, they are still using Sapphic Erotica's aliases for the Sapphic Erotica scenes. If you weren't around when Euro porn was the top porn, you might not be familiar with this and the countless debates we used to go through with webmasters over the confusion of aliases. And they use one name for multiple models, even when you use the "search" but the search goes around the aliases! Meaning if you search for Eve Angel, her scenes listed as Daphne (Sapphic Erotica) also show up.
- Fist Flush has very little content on here. It's not a site I'm familiar with so I don't know how much there should be.
- One of the advertising "index" pages I was on said you get 7 sites with Sapphic Erotica but you don't, you get 2 with Sapphic Erotica.
Bottom Line:
I'll start with why I took 10 points off the score. When I was checking out Sapphix, it said 7 sites are included with a membership to Sapphic Erotica and one of those sites was In Focus Girls, a site Sapphic Erotica owned. Once I signed up, there's really only two sites on Sapphix. It also only officially lists 3 but one is Fist Flush, I've only found a handful of scenes from it (really didn't intend that one). This is combined with the network Perfect Gonzo, that was supposed to have Give Me Pink on it. When I joined Perfect Gonzo, they told me it was originally supposed to be on Perfect Gonzo but was now on Sapphix. This is all too typical of mid to late 2000s Euro porn.
But the Sapphix site redeems itself. It does "only" include Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink but those are two of the top 10 sites of the 2005-2010 era (Euro boom) AND they're updating. I probably should review those sites separately since they are very large sites with big followings and might in the future but for now, I'm sticking to the network.
I had to dig deep into the archive of my reviews to find how I scored these sites in the past. I gave Sapphic Erotica a 94 in 2007 and Give Me Pink an 88 in 2008.
Sapphic Erotica was and still is the premier lesbian site, TBP's current score on it is 95. And they've been around since 2003. They were the first lesbian site that I know of that had "tribbing" or scissoring. They had deep kissing between the models, models getting so turned on even with their panties on that you could see a wet spot forming on their panties. But they did go mainstream at some point (2010, maybe?) and started focusing on quantity over quality. The newer content (2014-15 and forward is more like the older content).
Give Me Pink was at one time part of a group of sites (not a network) owned by one company that focused on extremely high quality, for the time (1080p in 2007) and they had every known, great, top-tier Euro model on their site with a catch. It was as close to "hardcore" masturbation as you could get. Close-ups throughout the masturbation. Old friend and PU member Denner once asked, "Is it a porn site or a site about gynecology?" It wasn't for everyone but it was for me. I had watched these models tease and "gently" masturbate for years. I wanted to see more and Give Me Pink did that. Then, it and its sister sites, stopped updating. Sister sites included All Internal and Ass Traffic. Those like me then found In the Crack and I've even wondered in, In the Crack reviews, if the Give Me Pink producers were the producers at ITC. That's a compliment.
What you get here is Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink, including their entire archives. You also get 10 new scenes a month and the quality shows with 1080p videos dating back to 2007, 4K dating back to 2015.
It's really impressive but there's that alias problem which really isn't a problem unless you want to use the model list and not the search box.
If you're into the more extreme insertions, Give Me Pink was one of the first sites I knew of that did it. Including some models using a smaller than average baseball bat. They also include photo sets in downloadable zips.
There's a chance that my excitement over this combination won't be as exciting to others. That 2005-2010 era of porn was my favorite and while they have new content, I'm mostly focused on that era.
Their overall content includes 2237 movies. The Sapphic scenes average 30-40 minutes, the Give Me Pink scenes average 30-50 minutes. They do some "strange" things in the classic Give Me Pink scenes including but not limited to, squirting milk out of their butthole. The newer Give Me Pink scenes aren't near as long (10-30 minutes).
I would say anyone who is into the kinkier masturbation would like Give Me Pink, especially if you were into any of the Euro models from the time period I mentioned. Anyone who likes lesbian porn should love Sapphic Erotica. They at least have returned to their more classic style of shooting. I watched a scene earlier between two women I'm not familiar with, Talia Mint (sounds familiar to me) and Vanna Bardot, full scene of fully dressed to kissing, undressing each other, lots of touching that gets rougher and where these scenes stand out just like they did in their heyday, after both orgasm, they're still laying there together, naked, kissing and lightly touching each other. There's a high level of eroticism in these scenes. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone who likes In the Crack and anyone who likes lesbian porn that doesn't come off as too scripted. Would also recommend it to any women who are wondering if they're bi-curious, pretty sure the tagline to women viewers on Sapphic's scenes was, "If you weren't bi-curious, you will be soon." Meaning it's also female-friendly porn. I'm just learning about the genre so bare with me. Very good price from TBP/PU too. I used to pay $29.95 for each of these sites.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Membership here includes free access to the solo model site Hanna's Honeypot.
Although the PU listing states a price of $29.95 if you follow the link here you get offered the same discounted price of 19.95 USD/EUROS that is available at Rabbits.
Option to join via Paypal through Epoch
Some exclusive content (not 100%)
Lots of well known Euro models have sets/videos here.
Nice quality photos sized at 1333 x 2000 with zip downloads.
Choice of 4 download and streaming options for the videos with the highest resolution being 1280 x 720 @ 4000k.
A fair sized archive with over 320 models and more than 1300 each of picture sets and videos.
Cons:
Primary credit card biller is Rocket Pay with Euro based regional pricing and pre-checked cross sales.
Lousy tour, clicking on almost anything takes you straight to the sign up page.
Annoying website, slow loading pages, thumbnails don't always display, constant 404 errors, downloads that don't start, downloads that don't finish.
I'd estimate at least 30% of the content appears to be non exclusive licensed content.
Too much emphasis on toy use in the solo sets.
Normally I'd list daily updates as a pro but it appears to just be 10 year old content being recycled as new updates.
Bottom Line:
Only Cuties is a fairly generic teen site offering a mix of exclusive and non exclusive licensed content. The majority of the content is solo girl which I would estimate accounts for around 70% of the content overall with the rest a mixture of girl/girl and boy/girl. The content is split fairly evenly between photo sets and videos, in fact a lot of the videos match the photo sets (ie same location and outfit) but appear to be shot separately. You will find a lot of the well known Euro models from years gone by with content here such as Caprice, Aneta Keys, Eve Angel, Suzie Carina, Nella and Ariel to name a few although invariably they are listed under different names here.
When I first signed up I was under the false illusion that the site was still updating with new content but about a week into my membership one of the updates was a photo set of a youngish looking Zafira which got me thinking no way is this new content so I did a bit of digging and discovered on Zafira's page at indexxx.com that this particular set was in fact listed as having been added to the site originally in March 2008. The same thing applied to the next Photo update of Jeny a couple of days later, also originally posted in March 2008. In the last week of my membership I also noticed a couple of the video updates had a maximum resolution of 640 x 480 @ 1500k in the old 4:3 format and when played displayed a copyright date of 2006. Just for the record they are adding an update daily alternating between a photo set one day and a video the next but at this point I think it's highly unlikely that you are going to get any actual new material which I guess is the reason for the lack of transparency in the site tour.
A lot of the non exclusive photo sets here look like the old Fred sets that used to show up at sites like ATK, Teendreams and Babelicious. The Caprice and Kari (Kari Sweets) sets here I already had in my Babelicious folder, the Eve Angel sets I already had in my Teendreams folder and so on. At least they do tag the sets as licensed under the categories listing they give with each set so you can easily avoid the non exclusive stuff if you want to. Despite the recycling of old content and the non exclusive stuff if you have never had a membership here before as was the case for me then you will find some nice exclusive content of some very cute models particularly if you are a collector of solo model content as I am. If you've had a membership here before I would say save your money as it's highly unlikely you will find anything new. In my opinion TBP score of 86 is way too high for a site that contains 10 year old recycled and leased content. The best thing about this site for me was getting the Hanna's Honeypot site as a free bonus site, a girl who I absolutely adore.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Membership here includes free access to Only Cuties and vice versa.
Option to join using Paypal through Epoch.
Nice quality photos sized at 1333 x 2000 px
Zip downloads.
All videos available in 720p HD
Decent file naming includes the name of the set/video.
Cons:
Primary credit card biller is Rocket Pay with Euro based regional pricing and pre-checked cross sales.
The website can be slow loading, thumbnails don't always display and constant 404 errors.
Only solo and lesbian content (maybe a con for some).
Too much emphasis on toy use in solo sets.
No model interaction or any of the extras you might expect in a solo model site, just a collection of photos and videos.
Bottom Line:
This is a solo model site featuring Hanna (a.k.a. Faith, Evelyn), a petite, slim, small breasted blond in a mix of solo and girl/girl photo sets and videos. I got free access here after buying a membership at Only Cuties, in fact having access to this site was probably a selling point for me as she has been one of my favourite models for many years. The photos and videos show posting dates from July 2015 up until a few days ago but I suspect in reality most of the content here is at least 10 years old. Current content count is 146 photo sets and 165 videos which is only a couple difference from the site stats at TBP last updated in 2014 so I suspect they are simply rotating the content or the dates.
Around two thirds of the content features Hanna on her own in solo sets starting out dressed and teasing in a cute outfit before stripping and usually progressing to masturbation and toy play. The outfits are young teen themed, lots of short jean skirts, shorts, socks and cotton panties, don't expect to see any glamour wear or stockings and high heels. It's all very similar and can become a bit repetitive.
The videos are downloadable in 4 different resolutions, 1280x720 @ 4000k, 854x480 @ 2000k, 640x320 @ 968k and 480x260 @ 664k, all size options are MP4 files. You also have the same 4 options available to stream online. The file sizes and run times are shown for each video and they also give you a brief written description and a gallery of around 25 screen caps previewing the action. The solo videos run from about 7 to 15 minutes and the lesbian scenes tend to be a bit longer at around 15 to 25 minutes. None of the videos I've watched so far have had any background music.
The site was easy to navigate, you have separate categories for photo sets and videos and also a model index showing a listing of all the models who appear with Hanna in the girl/girl sets, there's 40 models listed on the site including Hanna.There's also a search engine but I wasn't convinced that it works that well, it's hardly needed on a small site like this though.
I found it cheaper to sign up through Only Cuties. Although TBP/PU list the price there as $29.95 by following the link from the PU listing of Only Cuties I was offered a discounted price of 19.95 USD/Euros. Oddly when attempting to pay by credit card they wanted to charge me 19.95 Euros but when I switched the payment method to Paypal I was charged the dollar price.
As with any solo model site whether it's worth a recommendation is all down to whether you like the model or not. I'm a fan of Hanna and all the content here was good quality so for me it was worth the money but it only took a day to download everything I wanted so I won't be sticking around.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of, if not the, top lesbian sites on the internet.
- Over 750 models, 1,558 videos, every video has accompanying photo set/screencaps that are downloadable.
- Roughly 3 updates a week.
- Older content has tons of scenes of the top-tier Euro models from the 2005-08 time period. Great for collectors of those models.
- Was the first site I saw with "tribbing" and there's quite a bit of it, it's one of my favorite parts of the lesbian porn. Also lots of kissing.
- A little confusion on how long they've had 1080p, it looks like they've started remastering the older videos, randomly, so there's some 1080p, then a newer one won't be 1080p, but it looks like they are all 1080p starting in 2006. Will go into that in BL.
- Good download speeds and navigation but will also go into navigation problem that might not be a problem for some.
- TBP/PU price is very good.
- Photo quality is good, but not great.
- A rare one these days, no ads in the member area!
Cons:
- There was several of these sites that were using the same "naming" system for Euro models and Sapphic Erotica still uses it. What this means is if you knew a model by a certain name there's a chance she won't be named the same here. The most obvious one for me that shows how confusing it can be is Eve Angel. I would think she's one of the best known Euro models. Her name on here is ... Daphne. I've seen her name as Eve, Eva, Evie, but Daphne is only used on this site and a few others also managed by the company who manages Sapphic Erotica.
- Like any porn that focuses on one genre, it can become boring.
- Some of the old videos that say they are HD 1080p, look like someone has taken an old video and upscaled it improperly as they're not as clear as the newer 1080p videos. Also had several videos to "fail" during download.
Bottom Line:
A bit of a mixed bag. I really do believe Sapphic does lesbian porn as good as anyone. At least for me and I'm of course, a male, who knows very little about real lesbian sex. So, lets put it this way, they do lesbian porn in a way that is directed at men. Not to say women and lesbians won't like it, but it's very similar to Viv Thomas' way of shooting lesbian porn. There's lots of kissing, focusing on the womens bodies, the action including tribbing is very good. I have a friend who is a lesbian that tells me tribbing is nothing more than the creation of a dirty man's fantasy and I tell her that's fine. It works.
I didn't score Sapphic as high as I thought I would. I've had numerous errors in downloads of older videos. I used to join this site 3-4 times a year and have a large back collection of thier content. When I saw the older videos showing up as HD, I downloaded them since I already have them, but mine are lower quality. As I said in cons, I am only assuming they've done some kind of upscaling to those source videos and it shows. While the videos are 1080p, they look stretched and blurry. Those are also the ones I'm getting the most errors on when downloading.
With that complaint out of the way, the newer content is still very good, the videos, dating back to 2007 or so are crystal clear 1080p. Anything before then is hit or miss.
I don't know if they've changed the way they do pictures, but a lot of the pictures are just screencaps from the videos. I know some of their old sets came with a video/photo set that wasn't spot-on identical.
The alias problem has always been a big problem for me since I am/was a collector of Euro models. Some of the models don't have aliases like Peaches, but most of the other well-known ones do. I've had long discussions/arguments with webmasters about this for over 10 years. They tell me they use the name the model on her release paper. Other people with knowledge of the behind the scenes work in porn have chimed in and said that's not true. That the sites originally did it to make a model "seem exclusive" to their site or to claim some kind of exclusivity to the model being on their site.
Sounds like a lot wrong with the site, but really it's not. The site works well, downloading is easy, clean interface and the action really is probably as close as we're going to get to real lesbian sex. It's very passionate, very believable and on top of that, nearly every model is very pretty/attractive.
I would recommend it for anyone into lesbian porn, at least as a one-time join, just to get the older videos which were some of the best porn I've ever seen.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Large library of content, going back over a decade.
+ Video library has 720p HD video back to 2005. Most video good to great quality.
+ Great price at $19.99 (w/ TBP discount)for the large library of video and photo content.
+ Web site has good navigation features. Content can be sorted by release date or rating, there is a model index and a search box for key word searches.
+ Ability to create a favorites list.
Cons:
- Only started offering Full HD videos in September of 2015. (i.e. 1080p)
- Paging tool can only be navigated with provided buttons. The URL shortcut of changing the page # in the URL doesn't work. Bookmarks also don't work. Can be annoying if you want to return to the page at a later time.
Bottom Line:
This is probably the first porn site I started visiting regularly. I remember watching video clips from this site that I downloaded from a peer downloading site back in 2003. Sapphic Erotica has been the model of a good porn site for me from the start. (And for many others, I'm sure.) They have always delivered well produced, high quality, video and photos -- usually a step ahead of competing porn sites.
It's been a few years since I've been a member. On my most recent visit The quality still holds though the competition has caught up or surpassed them on at least a few fronts. Sapphic Erotica has only started offering 1080p full HD videos in September of 2015. There are other sites that have been offering full HD for years now. This is more subjective, but the formula used to shoot the videos hasn't changed at all over the years. if anything, the more recent videos are a bit less passionate or fun.
Sapphic Erotica has a high standard for their models. They are all beautiful, mostly European girls. In my opinion the best batch of girls was in the 2005 - 2008 period. There was another good period around 2011-12.
In recent years I've been drawn more to male/female hardcore porn, hence the three year hiatus from SE. On visiting a lesbian site for the first time in a while, the first thing I noticed was how SE highlights the features of these beautiful women. It helps you appreciate them even more!
All around great site. If you enjoy lesbian porn and haven't been a member of Sapphic Erotica, what are you waiting for!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice balance between video quality and file size. A 4MBit 1280x720 video 24 minutes long is around 722MB. This is ok for me but I'm sure some will complain about the quality.
-Acceptable download speeds. Average around 2.5 MB/sec on my 40 MB/sec network.
- Easy signup and cancellation
- Easy navigation
- Had lots of scenes with some of my favorite stars
Cons:
- All scenes look the same. Remarkably so. Some favorite models can have 30 or 40 scenes on this site and they all look the same. Often the models will have multiple scenes with the same partner dated around the same time. You can tell they shot multiple scenes on the same day. The action definitely shows. It appears that a single individual is shooting these scenes. There is no variety whatsoever.
Bottom Line:
I won't renew when my subscription when it runs out. I can't really recommend it. The formulaic approach to shooting these scenes wastes some real talented stars.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High-quality photography.
Not too many duplicate or badly shot photos included (to inflate pix count).
Mostly very good video quality, production value.
Fast, reliable downloads, site rarely down.
Mostly beautiful, sexy models.
Occasional spectacular peeing scenes.
Reasonable price.
Cons:
Too little model variety: very few Asian or black, almost no pussy hair.
Too little scene variety: nearly every scene is Solo, B/G hardcore, or fake lesbian, and each genre follows exactly the same script every time.
Too much frantic masturbation action; slow languid spreading far too rare.
Pussies hidden behind hands and toys.
No info about models.
Not all exclusive content.
Some old content recycled as "new."
No feedback/comment feature beyond 1-dimensional 10-star scale for each scene/set.
Bottom Line:
Worth a membership now and then - you're sure to find some pix and video worth a good wanking. Color, focus, general quality are toward the high end of the scale in porn, and many of the models are gorgeous.
However, the site suffers from too little variety and imagination. The result feels like assembly-line porn, with little sense that these might be real individual women with personalities.
I don't share their tastes, but I get that some viewers get off on clothing, backs of frantically thrashing hands, and big dildoes. But I can see all those things in reality anytime, and I get tired of seeing them in front of the lovely lady parts that I don't get to see otherwise.
Please, pornmasters, depart from the canned script once in a while, and give us more slow, sensual, truly sexy shots of exposed pussies. Enough of fingering, toying, moaning, and fake orgasms!
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-huge amount of lesbian scenes
-fantastic girls (mainly Czech and Hungarian)
-no attempts for silly porn storylines, usually very easy setup
-the make up of the girls is decent and the dresses are usually nice
-indoor and outdoor scenes
-during 2003-2006 there were some remarkable lesbian scenes done
-some girls worked exclusively only for them
-there were usually no useless huge toys
-no extreme, violent, degrading scenes
Cons:
-sometimes the setting is very stereotypical (sofa, leather seats, etc.)
-predictable flow of the positions
-girls faking orgasms
-the quality of the scenes was deteriorating last few years due to change of the girls
Bottom Line:
very special lesbian site with lots of fantastic scenes with the most incredible Hungarian and Czech girls, if you are really into lesbian lovemaking, you won t regret joining
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice new clean look.
MP4 HDV UP To - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit (MP4)
Unique Material to this site.
Streaming Material is fast smooth
Many Vids have matching Photosets.
Navigation is good.
Very professional looking site.
Cons:
Older Movies SDV - 640 x 480 @ 964Kbit (MP4)
Photos not accessed on video page.
Search engine did not accurately search.
Downloads on my 50MB connection was average not impressed.
Sameness in shoots.
Bottom Line:
Toads over view:
The site has improved greatly since my last review in 2008. I did notice PU icon is not accurate to the new site format makes one think the site has not updated the look.
I found joining was easy and accessed with no problem. Girls are stunning and very nice bodies.
I was disappointed that most all the girls appeared under 24 and looked award when dressed in clothes for a person in their 30's. But were good non-the less.
Conerns I had:
I disliked the older material, some as old as 2005 and did not look or feel fresh. The newer
material was great and very high quality.
I was troubled by the poor results from a well designed search engine. The look of the search engine looked intuitive and clean but gave bad results. A search for blonds would bring up black hair and blond. Other niches did the same.
I ran a check on my PC and connection several times and took longer per movie then it should on this site.
Toads take:
This is one of the best overall sites out there, the search engine and old material are bothersome but the site over all is clean fresh and feel right. Those issues are the only reasons that kept me in the mid 90's score wise. If the search worked well I would have bumped my score up to 96.
The girls are amazing with many niches this is a girl only site there is some hardcore solo activity and some Lesbian shoots by over all is mostly solo. Allot more outside shoots then I would like, and would not make not of it but the search engine did not omit these well and added to the confusing finding the idea user material.
If you join any solo site make sure you do not miss this one. The unique material alone makes this a high mark site and quality is great except on older material which in my opinion should be archived and not included as total videos the site offers. I was also impressed that each video had picture sets. However in the video section there was " UNCLICKABLE" photos icon and access to the photo was done by a almost missed link. The link is fine but pictures should be clickble to the set. Just some small annoyances but the the site is great and worth the join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download except update browsing
+ Nice price except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most far most of the girls/models have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy especially when browsing models the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here 1700-2000 Kb/sec sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics but you get three seizes and of course zip best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here and joined and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful, clean women as convincing lesbians.
- Great speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL)
- Allows full use of download managers. Downthemall in my case, and the site didn't restrict me from setting up videos to download overnight. Well done, sapphicerotica.com.
- No gonzo mascara-running, gagging, put-a-foot-on-her-head-while-penetrating-her nonsense.
- Very few fake breasts. Two thumbs up. The women are young, slim, and (mostly) natural.
- Did I mention beautiful women smooching on other beautiful women?
Cons:
- Some scenes are a bit too "charged" to be convincing. Being so immediately orgasmic is likely a medical condition.
- Some scenes are a bit silly. Not typical American XXX silly, but a bit much. I enjoy looking at four gorgeous women in tennis outfits coming in after a vigorous match and stripping/licking, but it's a bit unbelievable.
Bottom Line:
- A great site. Seriously. Especially the older stuff, and especially for the price. I think it's one of the few sites that everyone who enjoys XXX and finds women attractive should join at one time.
- Flashiness and web design are personal style preferences, but I really like the simplicity of the site.
- A pretty good model index.
- "Clean" was used above, but I can't stress enough how nice it is to see attractive models who look like they've used shampoo within the last eight hours on a site.
- The approach that some of the older, wonderful oral scenes used is being a bit neglected. Now there seems to be lots more fingers and toys and anal-licking. That's fine, but when you join and see the older vids and the girls sucking their lover's entire labial folds into their mouth and really dwelling on them... well, you'll see. The older videos have something the new ones lack.
- Most women are fairly unknown, so it's a bit odd to see big stars in a few scenes. Kathia Nobili (although in my top 5 favorites) and Nessa Devil seem very out of place.
- Probably 90% of the women are completely shaved in their pubic area. A personal preference thing, but I'd like for more of the women to have hair down there. Nothing unusual or fetishistic, but just natural and trimmed adult women.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Large high-quality photo-sets and videos
- Compared to my first review in 2009 they have increased their "hardcore-level" (intense pussy & ass fisting for example)
- Clear, focused & consistent style: Young, sexy girls with small or medium sized tits "teeny"-style.
- regular (dated) updates, which allows the user to find out how often the site is updated.
- these two pros also have their DRAWBACKS as described below!
Cons:
The cons consist, in my opinion of two different apects: (1) the sites style and (2) the transparency of the updates:
- the clear style, which I also mentioned as a pro can become a little boring, if you subscribe to the site on a regular basis or for a long amount of time. You get the sapphic-erotica-style. No less, but also no more!
- There seems to be hardly any "evolution" or (positive) "sursprise" concerning the kind of models featured and the porns style:
You will find sweet, nice, "teeny"-style girls, very clean & enjoyable but sometimes a little too "innocent". Some of them seem to appear on a regular basis.
- The site feautures, say, 80%-hardcore as it has been for the last year or so --
while some other sites also keep their style but adapt to the overall development in the industry (some new exciting "porn stories" for instance or a different kind of girl here and there...). But it seems that their customers like it that way.
Bottom Line:
The cons consist, in my opinion of two different apects: (1) the sites style and (2) the (missing) "transparency" of the updates:
- the clear style, which I also mentioned as a pro can become a little boring, if you subscribe to the site on a regular basis or for a longer amount of time. You get the sapphic-erotica-style. No less, but also no more!
There seems to be hardly any "evolution" or (positive) "sursprise" concerning the kind of models featured and the porns style.
It stays, say, 80%-hardcore as it has been for the last year, while some other sites also keep their style but adapt to the overall development in the industry (some new exciting "porn stories" for instance or a different kind of girl here and there...). But it seems that their customers like it that way. So maybe they wont change a working system... :-)
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
