Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models.
Current Halloween promo for $14.99
Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty.
I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star.
Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400.
Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content.
Cons:
Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019.
Not near as much nudity as I expected.
Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background.
40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it.
Bottom Line:
I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that.
We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?"
It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site.
I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn.
I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan...
Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris.
All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range.
The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless.
I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it.
The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes.
A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around.
I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p.
I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me.
It also hasn't updated in 7 months.
There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
There's a variety of video content, especially inter-racial. The boys are cute, the sex is well photographed.
Cons:
Uploads are limited and often take a long time and sometimes don't work at all. Navigation isn't easy. The photo gallery is limited to screen captures from the videos. Some videos can be found at other sites, especially the older ones.
Bottom Line:
Site membership is inexpensive, but in this case you get what you pay for.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I by and large concur with Maggie on this site. The models are young and range from twinks to muscle studs. There are some good episodes featuring a white daddy and young muscle stud. And as noted, you get access to three bonus sites
Cons:
Updates are not as frequent as claimed. The site is poorly organized and a little diffcult to navigate because of that.
Bottom Line:
I think a limited membership is worth the money. There's plenty of variety but video quality is also variable.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
