|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Network sites |
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 01-03-09 10:01am - 5832 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Network sites I saw an admin comment (in my profile) on one of my comments, asking me not to cut-n-paste comments on multiple sites in the future. The intent was not to bolster my stats or whatever, the purpose was so people could realize that the sites (where I posted the duped comment) was part of a network of sites which use the same password as the site I posted a review on. If thats hard to understand: I posted a review on JaysPOV, but instead of copying and pasting the review on the other 5 network sites (e.g. CockHungryMoms, RectalDestroyer, etc.) I posted a comment saying that these five sites were part of a network of sites which included JaysPOV and therefore shared the same review as JaysPOV. And the reason I did this was because I saw someone left a comment on one of the network sites review page (TeensHoney) asking if anyone had info on the site when all the info that was needed could be found in the review of JaysPOV. And that brings me to the issue at hand. There are too many sites listed on PornUsers which are part of a network of sites, which share the same password, share the same kind of content, same layout, etc. 1) It is a waste of time to have to write separate reviews for these network sites when the review will be the exact same (since everything about the next site is the same as the previous) and apply to all sites 2) It looks like spam if you copy-n-paste your review to this list of sites. For the sake of users who are looking to invest in new sites, there should be a system which links reviews from network sites as to apply to the network as a whole. For example, when you buy access to "Teens Like It Big" you are actually buying access to the Brazzers network, and thus the reviews of Brazzers applies. If you buy access to CumFiesta you are actually buying access to the Reality Kings network. (In my case) If you buy access to JaysPOV you get access to five other sites that are exactly the same as that site. However on PornUsers there are separate review pages for CumFiesta and Reality Kings, there are separate pages for Teens Like it Big and Brazzers, there are separate pages for JaysPOV and its network of sites, etc. It would be nice if, besides merging the network pages into one page, that if you searched for a networked site you would get the main network page result. E.g. if you searched for "Teens Like It Big" or "Real Wife Stories" you would get back "Brazzers" with a note that the site searched is part of the Brazzers network. I've been to places like that (not for porn, mind you) and it is a pleasure. Obviously MOFOS.com is also a Brazzers owned site, but in this case it would deserve its own page because you dont get that site included with Brazzers. Similarly, while 1By-Day, and DDFCup, and Sweet-Models, etc. are all DDF-owned sites you don't get all those sites with 1 membership; they all require separate accounts. I hope what I said was clear. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 10:15am - 5832 days | #2 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I agree with what you are saying here, and it's something I have thought about since I joined the site. It's the reason I didn't do a ton of reviews of every site in the Pink Visual Network, just to get points. The reviews would contain about 80 per cent duplicate material. The only thing different would be the niche aspects. I really couldn't be arsed to do the same reviews just for points anyway. I do agree with the points you make. Most of the sites in a network have very much the same look and technical aspects. Maybe the reviews in these instances should be cut and pasted along with the individual aspects of the niches, which could be talked about as an addition. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 10:50am - 5832 days | #3 | |
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User  Posts: 106 Registered: Nov 04, '08 Location: Good Ole Midwest USA |
I agree, I've had the same problem with the Playboy Girls of sites. PU has them all listed seperate but they are actually all 1 subscription. It'd be nice if there was someway on the main page to know that a membership to this site also includes these other sites. I realize they have company sites at the very bottom but not always are all of those included in that one membership. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 11:02am - 5832 days | #4 | |
|
atrapat (0)
Active User  Posts: 182 Registered: Apr 19, '08 Location: Non-USA |
When I reviewed the Porn Pros Network sites I wrote the bare facts in the Porn Pros Network page (resolutions, site navigation, etc) and discussed the niche only (facts aside) in each subsite (Deep Throat Love, Flexible Positions or Sleep Creep). Of course, to do this, the network has to have a main site where you can input all this information (this is usually the case and, if not, admins will sure add it if asked) and the niche sites have to be substantially different (as was the case). On the other hand, I suppose everyone is aware that when you go to the TBP site facts you get information on every site your membership gives access to. In my experience, that information is usually very accurate. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 12:43pm - 5832 days | #5 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Here's the thing, though - while most networks make this easy, some - 21st Sextury - make it more difficult by varying access depending on the "Join" site. With that network of sites, it would be more cumbersome to do what you suggest than it would with most. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 02:56pm - 5832 days | #6 | |
|
atrapat (0)
Active User Posts: 182 Registered: Apr 19, '08 Location: Non-USA |
You're right, PinkPanther. Some networks don't have a particular site that serves as an entry point so a PU page cannot be created for them. There's also those networks that give you additional sites every month as a loyalty bonus. Still, in these cases, to avoid entering the tech info everywhere, one can always input all the details in the first review and refer people to it in all the others. Just an idea. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 09:09pm - 5832 days | #7 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
I realize this. JaysPOV has no landing site. You just login to one of the 6 network sites and in the left column you have links to the other 5 network sites' login page. In that event, when you search for one of the network sites, instead of getting back JUST the site itself there should be a message like: "The site you searched for, XXXXXXX.com, is part of a network of sites which are included with membership to this site. Therefore these sites have been included as results as reviews for those sites may apply to the site you are searching for." And then return all of the sites. So searching for JaysPOV would return JaysPOV, RectalDestroyer, etc. etc. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 11:43pm - 5832 days | #8 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User  Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Here is something you can try, post one comment on the networks's main site and list the sites that you receive with it. This way you won't have to post a comment or review for each one and each person that comes to that network's main site review will see the comment and what they get with it. I don't think all networks are or should be graded as a whole though, unless the content is that similar from site to site. The best example that I can think of is the Tasty Pass network. I really didn't like more than 2 of the sites in it, but I really liked one of those a lot and thought members who liked the models those sites featured would like a review just of that site, not the network. It causes too much confusion in the grading scale for me. The site that I personally liked was Tasty Tara, she is more commonly known as Zuzanna or Susane and her solo site on the network, for me, topped the rest of the network. By posting a separate review I could make that clear. I have every video and picture set from the solo site of Tara and no content from the other sites in the network. So, if someone doesn't really like Tara/Zuzanna they know not to join the network. You also have to take into consideration that the level of quality/resolution can vary from site to site in networks and also, one I've ran into, some sites on networks have zip files for pictures, while others don't. Now, if we could get networks to make every site on their network have the same quality, then we wouldn't need separate reviews for each site on the network. I think...ha ha My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 11:59pm - 5831 days | #9 | ||
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
A good idea in essence, but that still doesn't work. Example (following your suggestion): I post a comment on Reality Kings' page saying that "by purchasing membership to Reality Kings you are in fact getting access to CumFiesta, MILF Hunter, Captain Stabbin, 8th Street Latinas, etc. etc. all in one big page blah blah blah" A person then visits Reality Kings' page and sees that comment and says "OK cool, then I don't have to worry about the fact CumFiesta has no ratings because the Reality Kings' review applies here". OK fine. But now look at it in the reverse. What if that same person (who we shall assume is unaware of the affiliation between CumFiesta and Reality Kings) instead visits CumFiesta's page first? They will see no reviews and no comments because the posts were made on the Reality Kings page and there is no information to otherwise indicate to the user that they should be reading the Reality Kings page for this information. And this is where the problem occurs (for both users and reviewers). Users are not clued into the fact that CumFiesta is just website where Reality Kings parks. Reviewers, feeling an obligation to help users, will be inclined to double post and post a review on Reality Kings and CumFiesta. Yes, I see that you can click the RK Netmedia link to get a list of sites, but that still does not tell users "hey, all of these sites are linked into one big site called Reality Kings". Reality Kings is LISTED as a site, but shows nothing to indicate it encompasses all the sites listed below it.
Can you give me another example? I've never joined that network. Edited on Jan 04, 2009, 12:03am | ||
|
|||
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
