Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » CLOSE-UP: SOME ANNOYING TRENDS
1-4 of 4 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

02-06-09  04:28am - 5798 days Original Post - #1
ramscrota (0)
Suspended



Posts: 54
Registered: Jul 04, '07
Location: Geelong Vic Australia
CLOSE-UP: SOME ANNOYING TRENDS

I'm curious to get the thoughts of others on this. My gripe has to do with how, in porn scenes, they 'manufacture' angles so you (the viewer) can see the various bits. Eg, in a BG scene, how the guy sets himself at an angle to the girl (not front on) so you can see his cock making entry.
Two obvious results from this:
1. The guy's cock usually only enters halfway. Any further in, and his torso would ne too close, and would block the view.
2. It looks phoney, laboured, and lacking in erotic appeal.
The most common positions for this seem to be doggie and missionary.

In those positions I much prefer the guy to lean forward, and envelope the girl in his arms - play with her boobs (doggie) or tongue kiss her (missionary). In these positions, you know his member has made full entry, a far bigger turn-on than the staged look I refered to above.

I think that close-ups are best done in certain positions (such as girl on top - camera from behind, reverse cowgirl or spooner), and I wish the vid people would stop trying to 'manufacture' views which look false and phoney

Have close ups by all means; in fact, the close-ups are the icing on the cake. But surely it's best to do the close-ups using poitions which are best suited for them.

What do others think?

02-06-09  11:32am - 5798 days #2
picdude (0)
Active User

Posts: 107
Registered: Dec 26, '08
Location: Italy
Yep, I prefer the 'far shots' I like to see the girl, her face especially. It's nice to see a close up here and there but spending more than a minute is far to long.

As is mentioned above close-ups are like the icing...too much and you get sick of it.

02-06-09  01:25pm - 5798 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Sometimes these closeups get a little awkward because they have to fit the camera and a burning hot light between the guy's legs, then when he changes positions sometimes he'll just throw it into reverse and bump into the camera. I always laugh at these moments because I can't understand why they don't choose to edit these out.

Another camera-bumping culprit is these stupid platform high heels that every girl seems to be required to wear at some time or another, and usually through the whole damn scene! They look uncomfortable to the girl, and potentially eye-gouging or testicle-smacking to the guy, never mind how often they swing into the side of the camera equipment.

These weird closeup angles never look very comfortable for the guy. The girl will be on the edge of a bed or couch and the guy leans in from one side or the other, one hand on the couch or bed and the other at his waist like he's stretching his back. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-06-09  01:43pm - 5798 days #4
ramscrota (0)
Suspended



Posts: 54
Registered: Jul 04, '07
Location: Geelong Vic Australia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



Another camera-bumping culprit is these stupid platform high heels that every girl seems to be required to wear at some time or another, and usually through the whole damn scene! They look uncomfortable to the girl, and potentially eye-gouging or testicle-smacking to the guy, never mind how often they swing into the side of the camera equipment.



Hi turboshaft - you raised some really good points! Re the high heels: they are one of my pet hates! They bugger up a girl's posture, deportment, and make movement awkward. To me, the sexiness of a girl depends upon good posture, figure presentation and ease of movement. The ONLY type of scene I can accept HHs in is a secreetary type scene, and even then they should get rid of them early in the scene.

Re your other points: you mention the fact that often things look uncomfortable for the couple. I agree, and I think for the sex to be convincing, they need to be comfortable.

1-4 of 4 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.