|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » CUM SHOTS: what you like and hate |
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 02-11-09 05:50am - 5794 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended  Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
CUM SHOTS: what you like and hate The Cum shot is the point to which many porn scenes build towards. Standard etiquette seems to demand that the girl orgasms first, and then the guy cums (usually over her tits or in her mouth). This is counter to most real-life sex, where the guy almost invariably cums first. But that aside, what do you like and hate most in cum shots? My preferences are: holding steady (if the cock is waved around, you can't see the cum come out), lots of it, an active squirt, and the lady finishing the guy off (especially by mouth) My pet hates are: the guy pumping his own pud, weak payloads (eg a few drops of pathetic clear fluid - they should bring the dick back in 3 days and make him shoot it again), and worst of all, fake cum. What do others think? | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 06:08pm - 5793 days | #2 | |
|
jd1961 (0)
Active User  Posts: 296 Registered: Jun 07, '07 |
Don't care either way. When you get to my age, porn is less about bodily functions and more about eroticism. Unfortunately for me, most porn nowadays seems to be made with 15 year old boys in mind :( | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 07:06pm - 5793 days | #3 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I tend to lean toward jd1961 on this one. I grew up watching 70's porn where the cum shot was primarily used to prove that the sex was real and not fake. It was usually reserved to the body part nearest the exit of the penis ie: in doggy it was the buttocks or lower back. In missionary it was the pube(yes in those days they were still there) or lower stomach. From time to time you had a blowjob that resulted in cum in the mouth(rare) or face(also rare). The last one involved actresses with above average breast. These became the primary instrument for the masturbation and therefore the breats were the recipient of said cum shot. At some point the cum shot became a stand alone sex act. You have movies and websites dedicated to just that. I may be a little old fashion, but I find that most of todays cum shots are degrading to women. You don't feel that the women want it as much as the men want to give it to her and they will pick the most offensive place to deposit it. I rememeber a series of movies called red eye. The main thrust of these was to cum inside the eyeball of the performer. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 08:47pm - 5793 days | #4 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
I gotta go with pat362 and jd1961 and say that the cum shot is just a sign that the scene is over and that it's not really the main emphasis of the shoot unless it's something like a bukkake scene. This idea is highlighted today by all the fake cum shots producers put in and the intentional shot to the eye. Unless you're a freakin' horse there's no way your body could produce that much goo unless you had a testosterone, protein and sugar iv plugged into your gonads all day long. Some end shots can be interesting but it's definitely more the exception than the rule. Personally, I would have no problem if they left them out most of the time. | |
|
||
| 02-12-09 03:04am - 5793 days | #5 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I was going to ask Miss Manners about this, but yes, the "standard etiquette" (LOL) is girl "first," then the dude. Nice guys finish last. Thing is, women can cum again and again, if they're so inclined. Doing porn, though, I dunno. But my answer is, sorry to say, not a direct one to the question. Cum shots have become so cliche that I just don't give a hoot about them. They're about as interesting as the perfunctory pretexts for the sex scene (girl needs something repaired in the home, girl kept after school, whatever). I almost never watch them. I only watch hardcore if I'm into the girl. The guy can blow his store all over the voting district as far as I'm concerned. Don't care. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 02-12-09 05:12am - 5793 days | #6 | |
|
elonlybuster (0)
Active User Posts: 52 Registered: Aug 24, '08 Location: Georgia |
In my opinion I hate when the guy suddenly jumps up, puts his dick in the girls face and uncontrollably cums everywhere, it looks really amateurish and like the guy has no experience or self control. I personally like when the guy just decides he's ready to cum (not on the verge or seconds away) and lets the chick suck him off a little bit and she either takes his load directly into her mouth, or if she's not a fan of swallowing she just aims him down on her breasts. If she's talented it's pretty hot when she sucks him off with just her mouth (no hands) and takes his load, swallows it, then just kind of sucks him dry. you girls gotta remember to give it a few extra seconds of attention in the end ;) | |
|
||
| 02-12-09 04:26pm - 5792 days | #7 | |
|
DickH (0)
Suspended Posts: 2 Registered: Feb 01, '09 Location: UK |
Hmmm tricky, I must admit personally I am a fan of the Peter North "school of cum" so a lots of it facial is my preference. I would agree about fake cum being a real let down but then any part of a porn scene being faked would be a let down for me really. A cum shot that both ( all ? ) parties involved enjoy is the most erotic. If that's a huge facial then so be it, if the woman involved is clearly dreading it then that's not erotic. | |
|
||
| 02-12-09 07:53pm - 5792 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think the series was actually called "Pink Eye" but the premise was just as you described it: the girls' eyelids would be held open (usually by the guy about to fire off a round) and she would just have to take it... I cannot say I am a fan of that, or even most cumshots in general. They are too forced, either by the guy working himself at a blinding pace, or the girl target on the receiving end. I find it kind of disappointing, not to mention disrespectful, when the girl is squinting, or her eyes are just shut tight because she is not really into the theory that there is some sort of universal pleasure in having a guy's fluids all over her face. If, on the other hand, the girl is really into it, eyes and mouth wide open, smiling, impatiently horny, then it can be pretty good, and the mechanics and physics of the guy's shot don't really matter. I have seen quite a few "weak" loads where the girl was still really into it and it made for an entertaining scene. Then there are Peter North-like blasts that arc halfway across a set while the guy struggles to stand but the girl is anything but happy or lovin' it, and it can end up being a real downer. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-13-09 07:12pm - 5791 days | #9 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I do believe you are correct on that series name. Red Eye is a non-porn movie with Rachel Mcadams. They are all forced. No one believes that a guy fucking a girl will at the moment of climax stop, hold it in while she gets on her knees, looks up at him and then cum in her face. I think facials are one step lower than spitting in the face, and I dislike spitting. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
