Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Striptease - A Poorly Catered for Niche.
51-100 of 264 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

11-14-09  07:21am - 5479 days #53
SimonSubAms (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 24
Registered: Mar 02, '07
Location: UK
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:

Been wanting to check out SububanAmateurs for a long time and the new price cut may just force me to do that soon.


There's never been a better time Jeffrey :)

Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:

Someone needs to copy what OnlyTease does but make the site a full nude site.


Then I think you'll be pretty much satisfied with Suburban Amateurs. The dressed and part dressed girls, as well as the clothing, are a huge part of our photosets and videos....and not a fake boob on the site :) http://www.suburbanamateurs.com/freeview/

11-14-09  08:17am - 5479 days #54
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


I'd recommend checking out SimonScans. I think they do a decent job at the slow strip tease thing, picture wise that is.


Thanks for the tip Jeffrey, I will check them out ;0)

Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


Been wanting to check out SububanAmateurs for a long time and the new price cut may just force me to do that soon.


Definitely worth checking out. Some very nice models & photosets. My main gripe is that stockings & shoes are left on too often. IMO That misses out a particularly erotic part of the striptease.

Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


Someone needs to copy what OnlyTease does but make the site a full nude site. LOL


All praise to the folks that would do that!!!
I would probably be a member for life!!! LOL!
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


(BrookLeePlaymates) Preview suggests the site is extrememly heavy on the fake big boob jobs. Is that a fair assesment?


Yes I think so, but they may be in process of addressing that issue. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

11-14-09  08:19am - 5479 days #55
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
A very on topic site for this is KarupsPC.
I have known about it for years, but the price put me off trying it.
I am pleased I took the plunge though. ;0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

11-16-09  07:53am - 5477 days #56
topbucksGina (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 5
Registered: Jun 22, '07
Location: AZ/Tucson
We've got real boobs, as well as smaller boobs.
G ~

11-16-09  09:08am - 5477 days #57
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
True enough & it is a visually appealing site with tasteful softcore content.

It does not have full strip sequences though.

If you aiming for that niche it needs more focus.

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

11-16-09  11:05am - 5477 days #58
topbucksGina (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 5
Registered: Jun 22, '07
Location: AZ/Tucson
Thanks for your comments Cap'n, I'll pass them along to our creative department.
G~

11-16-09  03:48pm - 5477 days #59
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
If this is the niche you are gunning for I can offer more detail, to point you in the right direction? Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

12-10-09  09:54am - 5453 days #60
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I take it 'not' then. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

12-21-09  11:30am - 5442 days #61
Auxilia (0)
Suspended

Posts: 8
Registered: Dec 21, '09
Location: Cardiff, UK
Hi Cap'n - hi all

Cap'n - you know me from KIN/SGC so you'll know I'm kind of on the same page as you!

You might consider these guys:

britishtease.com

The site is static at the moment but they are relaunching early next year and are encouraging ideas as to what niche to fill - so, an opportunity there I think! Edited by Staff on Dec 21, 2009, 12:04pm (Khan: corrected URL format)

12-21-09  01:24pm - 5442 days #62
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
A pleasure to see you here, my friend.
Welcome.

Thanks for the background info.
Do you have an email I could reach them on, please?

Cap'n :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

12-27-09  11:03pm - 5435 days #63
samanthaf (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 5
Registered: Dec 27, '09
Location: USA
I like the virtua men ....mmmm lots of good looking men My Blog

01-29-10  09:56am - 5403 days #67
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Originally Posted by Jeffrey99:


I'd recommend checking out SimonScans. I think they do a decent job at the slow strip tease thing, picture wise that is.


It is not really covered in the tour.
Do sets often start fully clothed?

Cap'n. :0/ Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

01-29-10  02:52pm - 5403 days #68
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Capn:


It is not really covered in the tour.
Do sets often start fully clothed?

Cap'n. :0/


Yes they frequently do. They are not really a hardcore site, though there is still toys by the ton and lots of spreading and gaping if that's your thing. Most of the photo sets I have seen have started fully clothed, though the videos are more straightforward (but they are much more oriented towards photos than video). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

01-29-10  02:59pm - 5403 days #69
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Thanks for that extra info.

I may well give that a whirl.

I suppose I can take it that the models are mostly shaven?

Cap'n. :0/ Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

01-29-10  05:17pm - 5403 days #70
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
I would say the majority are shaven but there are quite a few that are not or simply do not have thorough scorched earth shave jobs. I can't believe I am saying this but there are in fact more than a few girls who either should have just trimmed or kept the razor for their thighs. What I mean is SS does not do much Photoshop work, if any at all, and the result is not always sexy and smooth closeups.

I generally like the models but I would say that the majority are amateur (at least to me) and so there is a decent variety of body shapes and sizes--not all skinny girls, but no really fat girls either. A lot of in between girls who would not make the cut at say ALSScan or InTheCrack but are barely in the BBW category.

I'll try and write a review this weekend and sum it up a little better "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

01-30-10  11:55am - 5402 days #71
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
OK, I'll look out for that.

Thanks.

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

01-30-10  01:52pm - 5402 days #72
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Yes they frequently do. They are not really a hardcore site, though there is still toys by the ton and lots of spreading and gaping if that's your thing. Most of the photo sets I have seen have started fully clothed, though the videos are more straightforward (but they are much more oriented towards photos than video).


Thanks for the info, turboshaft. I wish I had read your post here first because I just made a comment (enquiry) about models starting fully clothed at the site. :-)

02-06-10  03:25pm - 5395 days #73
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
WeAreHairy has made quite a promising start.
Hopefully they are picking up on this niche?

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

02-06-10  03:44pm - 5395 days #74
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


WeAreHairy has made quite a promising start.
Hopefully they are picking up on this niche?

Cap'n. :0)


I hope so, too, Cap'n! Our webmaster has me scared by promising more American Models, this usually means pretty unimaginative photography. I realize I am generalizing but just look at Toby's (an American) work in WeAreHairy and compare it to what comes out of the Czech Republic or Russia or the Ukraine etc. and you will see what I mean. I guess for American photographers a model going "commando" seems like a hot idea but I miss those panties and bras and stockings etc. BTW, thanks for leading me, unknowingly, in the direction of custom made zips. I downloaded a couple of sets today that I would not normally have downloaded because they contained too many pictures that looked the same. Doing a bit of on-line editing is not a bad way to spend ones time. :-)

02-06-10  03:53pm - 5395 days #75
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I am not a fan of Toby's work either. What I dislike is the excessive use of the tight-in portrait format, especially before the model starts to strip. I wish he would zoom out landscape for a few full body shots before she starts to strip.

In contrast I like Vlads work.

I'm pleased you like the custom zip idea. I find it very pleasant & useful.

I do hope you are going to register & post on the forum there. It definely needs more member input. I am doing my best to drum up discussion there but there aren't many folk there yet :0(

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

02-06-10  04:35pm - 5395 days #76
Basil (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 11
Registered: Jan 11, '10
Location: Raleigh
Originally Posted by messmer:


I hope so, too, Cap'n! Our webmaster has me scared by promising more American Models, this usually means pretty unimaginative photography.


EU and US photographers have got different styles and I can't disagree with that but at the same time I don't have any prejudices against certain country.
It's very hard to please everyone cause at the same time we receive numerous requests from other members about adding more US girls. You are right at some point about "more American Models, this usually means pretty unimaginative photography" but as I said it has to do with particular models and/or photographers. We're against boring and unprofessional shoots and do our best to handpick the best updates on the site and I think good content is always a good content, no matter in what country it was shot.

Basil

02-06-10  06:09pm - 5395 days #77
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I am not a fan of Toby's work either. What I dislike is the excessive use of the tight-in portrait format, especially before the model starts to strip. I wish he would zoom out landscape for a few full body shots before she starts to strip.

In contrast I like Vlads work.

I'm pleased you like the custom zip idea. I find it very pleasant & useful.

I do hope you are going to register & post on the forum there. It definely needs more member input. I am doing my best to drum up discussion there but there aren't many folk there yet :0(

Cap'n. :0)


When it comes to "landscape" format we are once again on the same track, Cap'n. I wish more photographers would use less Portrait and more Landscape. I've been saying that so often that I finally promised some time ago to stop hounding webmasters about the subject. My ideal photographer would shoot everything in landscape. :-)

02-06-10  06:36pm - 5395 days #78
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Basileus:


EU and US photographers have got different styles and I can't disagree with that but at the same time I don't have any prejudices against certain country.
It's very hard to please everyone cause at the same time we receive numerous requests from other members about adding more US girls. You are right at some point about "more American Models, this usually means pretty unimaginative photography" but as I said it has to do with particular models and/or photographers. We're against boring and unprofessional shoots and do our best to handpick the best updates on the site and I think good content is always a good content, no matter in what country it was shot.

Basil


Sorry, Basil, you are right. I should not attack a particular country because there are indeed good and bad photographers to be found anywhere. So, my apologies!

I am not sure if it would be kosher to mention other sites I belong to at the moment. I wish I could because then you would understand my disenchantment and moaning about the subject.

I resubscribed to these sites because both made me an offer I thought I couldn't refuse and in over a week I have not downloaded a single one of their daily updates because they are so incredibly monotonous. These are all sets shot by American photographers.

On the mature site, women wear the usual dark suit jackets and skirts with nothing underneath (except for the occasional thong), of course there are scenarios other than office but the same is true for all of them: a minimal amount of clothing!

On the younger site, you get the ultra short Jean skirts or cut-offs with a cropped top, again nothing underneath but a thong .. so, when it comes to a set of pictures in either site you get the first page all with suit / jean skirt / cut-offs while the remaining four pages of the set feature all nude.

Therefore you can imagine my delight when I found something different on your site, something that put the excitement back into browsing .. EXCEPT .. for the one American photographer I came across who pretty well did what all the others seem to do.

What makes it worse with most of those other sites is that most of the genital and buttock shots are shown as truncated pieces of meat rather than as parts of a whole person. One or two shots like that would be acceptable but a never ending series of identical looking buttocks and vaginas? It's driving me over the edge, I tell you, and that's why I was so happy to find your site and so scared it might turn into something else with more American models. No offense was intended.

02-06-10  07:22pm - 5395 days #79
Basil (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 11
Registered: Jan 11, '10
Location: Raleigh
No worries!
I've already told our content editor to leave more of the "clothed" part of the shoot when editing pictures. Usually a "proper" site supposed to do content selection and editing, as a typical photographer sends a set of 200-250 pics so most of the times it's up to a content editors to decide what part to delete and what to put online, some guys put all pics which is not good, some put only naked and so on. I'd say this striptease issue depends on editors much more than on the actual photographers

02-07-10  03:25am - 5394 days #80
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
While we're on the subject of photographers (and still striptease, too), I've got a few things to say about the ones at the ATK sites such as ATK Galleria, Premium, and Petites.

First is BMB/Wanton Photography. They do too many pics at too great a distance from the model, though they'll also do some closeups (ass, face, etc.) In this way, they remind me of the photographer at InTheCrack, who seems to do that, too. It's either right up in your face or, "Can you hear me now?"

Second is Alicia S. Sorry, but the work is BORING!! I'm also not into the "peachy" tones and textures; they don't look real.

It's gotten to the point where I almost always know that stuff from these two outfits will not wind up on my hard drive. Just seeing their names with the models makes my blood curdle a bit. Yet some of the models are great! What a waste!

Marco P, on the other hand, seems to know how to deliver in terms of composition (and ass)! At ATK Petites, he's done Jayme Langford, Lexi, and Tessa, to name a few. PKM, who did Stephanie Crane, is also in the good books.

Anymore, I can look at a gallery at one of those sites and usually guess who the photographer is! Even a single preview thumb will do sometimes.

I miss Russ T, who did some great stuff of several European models at ATK Galleria about two years ago, like Suzie Black, 77babes4. That was the shit!

That site has never been as good as it was then, at least for photos. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 07, 2010, 11:14am

02-07-10  10:17am - 5394 days #81
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I subscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy on an on and off basis for years since it was the only quality site to offer "hair" but ended up so disillusioned with the quality of their later material that I haven't been back in ages. They were and are one of my main reasons for constantly complaining about the monotony of most photo sets, yet (as you write) their early stuff was very, very good.

When it comes to photographers I had a hate-love-hate relationship with SeanR. His earliest sets had the models with way too much make-up on, making them look like painted dolls, then he had a good period where the models looked more natural and wore some exciting stuff and last time I looked they were dressed very drably in sports gear etc. and I hated his work again. :-)

The one I disliked the most was one of their most prolific photographers, Toby, Most of his sets had a pinkish tinge to them and they were never crisp enough for my taste, he shot his models in way too modest a fashion as well and his sets were repetitious.

Too bad because Toby had some gorgeous women for models, but I hate artsy tricks, sets of pictures that look like screen caps (except in better quality) with only a tiny difference from one picture to the other and like my pictures flesh-colored, natural and crisp, not photo-shopped.

02-13-10  04:58am - 5388 days #82
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I have to agree in my frustration with Toby.
Far too much zoomed in portrait format & not enough relaxed landscape full body shots.
The only time he goes to landscape is after she starts to strip.
Even a few full body, fully clothed shots in landscape format at the start would improve his work substantially for me.
It is a shame.
He gets really nice models but I don't feel he does them justice.

BMB/Wanton.
Very frustrating again. They usually start off OK, but there is very little in the way of nudity in their sets.

A pulled up skirt & top showing the bits is not nude!

Cap'n. :0/ Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!
Edited on Feb 13, 2010, 05:03am

02-13-10  09:43am - 5388 days #83
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I have to agree in my frustration with Toby.
Far too much zoomed in portrait format & not enough relaxed landscape full body shots.
The only time he goes to landscape is after she starts to strip.
Even a few full body, fully clothed shots in landscape format at the start would improve his work substantially for me.
It is a shame.
He gets really nice models but I don't feel he does them justice.

BMB/Wanton.
Very frustrating again. They usually start off OK, but there is very little in the way of nudity in their sets.

A pulled up skirt & top showing the bits is not nude!

Cap'n. :0/


What gets me about landscape shots (a format both of us love) in general is that most photographers only use them to take pictures of a torso, or the pubic area rather than show the whole person. :-(

02-13-10  10:04am - 5388 days #84
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Yes, that happens frustratingly often.

There is nothing wrong with showing a little more of the set in order to do that.
It tends to give the impression the viewer is in the room with the model.
Also if discarded clothing is left in shot it adds colour & reinforces the striptease element of the photo.

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

02-17-10  09:58pm - 5383 days #85
FuckingGambler (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 15
Registered: Jan 28, '10
Location: Hungary
I am sorry if my reply is not quite helpful, but I hope it will be at least worth the time spent reading it.

Our site FuckingGamble.com is not entirely about striptease, but it has some elements of it, so it might be worth a look for those interested. The idea of the site is that we take several models and let them play a strip-and-sex game (which can be anything from blackjack to go-karts) according to their own sexual preferences. Players normally start dressed, and as the game goes ahead, they need to undress and then perform various dares of increasingly sexual nature.

To avoid being too obtrusive, I will keep this message short, though if anybody has any questions, I will be happy to elaborate.

02-19-10  09:25am - 5382 days #86
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I took a look & posted a comment to which you gave an encouraging reply.

I shall take a closer look at your work! ;0)

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

02-19-10  09:53am - 5382 days #87
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
A gratuitous post: I just noticed that I had posted 666 times in this forum which is not considered to be a good number so I am hastily promoting myself to 667. I thank you in advance for your tolerance re. really getting off the subject!

02-20-10  02:27am - 5381 days #88
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
No problem.

These things have to be done. ;0)

Whilst I am here though, some additional on topic info.
For striptease fans I have some good news, especially if you also like the natural look below decks.
There should be regular on topic material appearing on WeAreHairy fairly shortly.
Give them a few weeks to get the new material through, then take a look. ;0)

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

02-20-10  09:43am - 5381 days #89
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
All right!!! Looking forward to that. Good show, Cap'n.

03-08-10  10:38am - 5365 days #90
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
I actually have a collection of her including this one of Nicole. Nice Since 2007

03-10-10  08:37am - 5363 days #91
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Originally Posted by Capn:


I agree with you on the masturbation thing. I don't think it has a place in what is otherwise a softcore item.

What I find really frustrating is there is so often no nudity either coy or more explicit prior to the dildos coming out. :0(

Far too much of that sort of thing creeps into softcore sites. It makes the whole softcore area harder to sell as it becomes much less distinct from the hardcore sites out there. I've been trying to market sites for years now which are too explicit for mainstream but not explicit enough for full on porn. When I originally started the softcore market was barely acknowledged at all, at least now people mostly know what it means (although masturbation isn't it as far as I'm concerned), but I feel there is still a long way to go.

I look forward to the day when "adult" doesn't automatically mean "porn". Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-11-10  11:58am - 5362 days #92
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I think Pat's coining of the term midcore is excellent.
It covers the middle ground between softcore & hardcore.

For me softcore goes up to explicit full nudity without insertions.
Hardcore starts with sexual intercourse.
Everything in between falls into midcore.

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

03-11-10  02:03pm - 5362 days #93
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I think Pat's coining of the term midcore is excellent.
It covers the middle ground between softcore & hardcore.

For me softcore goes up to explicit full nudity without insertions.
Hardcore starts with sexual intercourse.
Everything in between falls into midcore.

Cap'n. :0)


Yep, that's how I would be categorizing Porn as well. Thank you, Pat. Midcore is an excellent term. Patent it quickly, just in case the industry catches on. This way you can ask them for royalties every time they use the term. :-)

03-11-10  03:25pm - 5362 days #94
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Originally Posted by messmer:


Yep, that's how I would be categorizing Porn as well. Thank you, Pat. Midcore is an excellent term. Patent it quickly, just in case the industry catches on. This way you can ask them for royalties every time they use the term. :-)

Shame you can't patent words (but you can trade mark them).

I think we should start a campaign to give softcore/midcore/hardcore some sort of formal recognition. I'll write an article about it on my blog for starters.

I agree with Capn's definition. Sounds spot on to me. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-11-10  03:26pm - 5362 days #95
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Why are my avatar and footer still not working? They did for a couple of posts but now they've vanished again! Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-11-10  03:35pm - 5362 days #96
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Check details in 'Edit Profile' at the top of the page. ;0)

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

03-11-10  03:54pm - 5362 days #97
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Oops, of course one can't patent words! Trade Mark or Copy Right was what I meant and even then I am not quite sure if you could. :-)

03-11-10  07:46pm - 5362 days #98
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Why are my avatar and footer still not working? They did for a couple of posts but now they've vanished again!


You avatar was approved (twice now) but is still not showing. I've asked our tech guy to look into it.

I'm not seeing a SIG associated with your account. You can try creating it again or else email it to me and I'll see if I can get it working. Just use the "Contact Us" link. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

03-12-10  08:46am - 5361 days #99
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Originally Posted by Capn:


Check details in 'Edit Profile' at the top of the page. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

Checked and rechecked. Everything is there. They appear in support messages but not forum posts. Weird. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-12-10  08:48am - 5361 days #100
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Originally Posted by Khan:


You avatar was approved (twice now) but is still not showing. I've asked our tech guy to look into it.

I'm not seeing a SIG associated with your account. You can try creating it again or else email it to me and I'll see if I can get it working. Just use the "Contact Us" link.

Thanks Khan. I'll create it again. The weird thing is everything works fine in the support threads (discussing a review with one of the review staff), and for a while it worked fine here too. I'll e-mail it to you shortly. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-12-10  12:46pm - 5361 days #101
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Thanks Khan. I'll create it again. The weird thing is everything works fine in the support threads (discussing a review with one of the review staff), and for a while it worked fine here too. I'll e-mail it to you shortly.


Ok, think we tracked down the problem.

Seems you created two accounts.

Ed2008 - which has the SIG and avatar
Ed2009 - no SIG or Avatar ... and the one you're posting with here.

You should either add the SIG and avatar to the account you're posting with or else post with the account that already has those associated with it. Either way, it'd be best if you just use one account.

Let us know if we can help further. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

03-12-10  01:08pm - 5361 days #102
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Thanks Khan. I think I've got it sorted now. That's weird the way I was logged into BOTH accounts at the same time!

Basically when I clicked on the "Edit Profile" button it was taking me to the edit page for the other account. Then when I returned to the forum it was going back to using the first account. So totally seemless I didn't notice it was dealing with two accounts.

I've logged out of Ed2008 and I think I've set up Ed2009. (Hopefully the account I'm posting for now). Is it safe to delete Ed2008? Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

03-13-10  09:27am - 5360 days #103
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Is it safe to delete Ed2008?


As it looks like you're still using that account in communications with the TBP Editors, it's best I don't delete it just yet. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

03-18-10  12:57pm - 5355 days #104
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Another thing I have seen recently on occasion, which I think is quite a nice variation, are shots of the model handing the clothing to the photographer ( / viewer ;0) )

Cap'n. :0) Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

03-18-10  04:03pm - 5355 days #105
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


That is a very nice thought. I like something very similar. I can not resist women drying off after showering. It is such a tease to me, and if they wear a robe after it makes it even better.


You know, after all of the talk about school uniforms and nurse uniforms, etc., one type of stripping that you don't see much of is girls stripping out of bathrobes! And I don't mean necessarily in the bathroom, either. There's a new set of Izabella today at MetArt, and she just looks great in this white bathrobe, which she fully removes in due course.

So you webmasters out there, how's about a bathrobe stripping and nudity site?

Or if it HAS to be hardcore, well, fine, a bathrobe pileup and double-penetration hardcore site! (Just kidding.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

51-100 of 264 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.