|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Shooting Porn in Public |
| 1-16 of 16 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 12-17-08 01:46pm - 5849 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Shooting Porn in Public x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:17pm | |
|
||
| 12-17-08 02:35pm - 5849 days | #2 | |
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User  Posts: 106 Registered: Nov 04, '08 Location: Good Ole Midwest USA |
After taking a look at the site, not really sure I'm fond of hardcore in public places. But there are many US sites that have public flashing and/or girl/girl making out stuff. As for children in cars or people in cars driving buy, people don't pay attention to what the hell is going on on the road. Like they are really gonna pay that much attention to see some lady flashing or having sex on the side of the road? I think you could put a huge sign that reads Naked Lady with a arrow and most drivers would still miss it. Edited on Dec 18, 2008, 07:19am | |
|
||
| 12-17-08 03:07pm - 5849 days | #3 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
Generally I don't have any interest for porn in public - just not my kind of game. But I'm certainly interested in the common welfare of innocent bystanders and especilly children - and of course also the children anywhere in eastern Europe. I think it unacceptable to do any kind af porn-shooting where people may be exposed to it involuntarily...and if any risk children could be bystanders - it's just criminal! Porn is freedom, but it's also a personal thing... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Dec 17, 2008, 03:10pm | |
|
||
| 12-17-08 03:22pm - 5848 days | #4 | |
|
mbaya (0)
Suspended  Posts: 891 Registered: Jul 07, '08 Location: new jersey |
I don't mind at all that this has become a forum topic. One thing that I need to add is that on this particular site not only is there public sex, but it is BDSM. Flashing is one thing, but I can easily see someone getting arrested for this, even without the issue of children as possible witnesses. Would the public realize this was consensual? Edited on Dec 17, 2008, 03:31pm | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 02:16pm - 5848 days | #5 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I haven't posted in a while, but shooting in public is one of my pet peeves. I am not sure which irritates me more -- public nudity or public sex -- because I think they are both equally stupid and pointless, at least in terms of what makes for good porn. Public nudity is often advertised as "wild" or "crazy," but it is too boring and repetitive to be anywhere close to that. Wow, a model is getting naked in public, pretty crazy. What's worse is when a good site stoops to this level, and repeatedly. I am thinking of ALSScan, because as much as I love their work, they continually shoot and release this junk to members. In fact, their latest bonus was "Billy Raise - Nude in Public!" It is 400+ photos and 20min of her posing around strangers, plus the obligatory run in with the cops. Public sex is just as bad and comes across as the Jackass of porn; a bunch of douchebags with a camera, who don't seem to really care what they do, as long as it is on tape and in front of an unwilling, and often uninterested, public audience. I think if someone is really serious about making porn then they don't start with a public place in which to shoot it, especially if it is hardcore or BDSM. No, children should not be exposed to it, even public nudity, which is not very innocent if it is being shot for a porn site. I definitely agree with Wittyguy here; free expression is a great thing, but most of us probably have little patience for a porn crew guffawing and sneaking around in a local public area just to make a video. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 03:07pm - 5848 days | #6 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User  Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
Modesty used to be a luxury of the rich, and has become what people, especially Americans, believe to be the norm. The aristocratic classes developed modesty and many many other traditions to differentiate them from the commoners. Their homes were large enough to house dedicated bathing facilities and individual bedrooms. They changed clothing frequently, and did so in privacy. They shielded themselves from the sun and from dirt. As Monty Python pointed out: "How do you know he's the King?" "Well he's not all covered in shite is he?" The poorer the people, the more likely for them to be comfortable and surrounded by nudity. Tenement Housing often gave privacy by a sheet draped over a line - providing less coverage than a common cubicle. Bathrooms were shared - often are shared even today. So as the collective society has become wealthier, the lower classes tried to adopt as much of the traditions of the wealth as possible - including modesty. In modern America one is expected to shield their children from nudity, though this expectation is quite young. However, this expectation is also not universal. My brother used to date a girl who grew up in East Germany - and she was shocked that he'd never seen his mother naked. It was her firm belief that families should be comfortable seeing each other nude and her family frequented steam rooms together. All nude beaches are still very common in Eastern Europe and the old Soviet block. So while I understand that many of you may feel that children should be shielded from nudity, do understand that not every culture agrees with you, and most likely your great grandparents also wouldn't agree with you - unless you come from a very wealthy background. As for sex - farm children would certainly see and aid animals in performing that feat quite regularly; and most kids 125 years ago would have been farm children. While I doubt fellow humans were often flaunting it in public, my guess is it would be more used as fodder to gibe the performers rather than something that would upset the children or their parents. Still, children were shielded from performing sex by a simple method - they would stop calling them children once they were old enough to have sex. Modern diets are so high in protein and nutrients that children are maturing much earlier, starting puberty at 8 or 9 rather than 13 or 14. And 14, if you recall older stories like Romeo & Juliet, was a rather standard marrying age - and in some countries still is. Still, you should also note that most public nudity sites are more careful about where they perform actual sex rather than simple nudity. Sex itself tends to be a bit of a hot topic anywhere these days. As for my own opinion, I think children tend to be far too sheltered from everything except violence these days. Granted the olden-timey days especially didn't shelter kids from violence, but in our society where you don't need to go kill a pig or cow to eat, there isn't any need for children to witness the massive amounts of violence on television. However, children are growing up to hate their bodies for not looking like what is on the magazines and TVs and they spend all of their time indoors playing video games or watching TV - so their bodies are weak both in strength and in immunity to basic diseases found in good ol' dirt. A scraped knee at age three is better than a hospital stay when you are fort...ay. (My apologies for the Tom Lehrer method of finishing a rhyme.) If parents would turn off the TV and send kids out to play, maybe the kids would burn off some extra energy and fat and be a bit healthier. Also, if we didn't punish kids for nudity so heavily, maybe they'd be more comfortable with the body genetics gave them. The media will always present the prettiest people and cars and houses and everything, that doesn't mean people can't dream while being satisfied with what they've got. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 04:45pm - 5847 days | #7 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:17pm | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 05:52pm - 5847 days | #8 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
With regards to how a bit of extra nudity might help people with their own body issues: I think the problem is that people aren't reminded that most everybody have various imperfections, be it wrinkles, stretch marks, some extra fat, a birth mark, whatever. The problem is that the only time they see unclothed or mostly unclothed humans are the perfect beings that get hired by the media. Yes the Greeks and Romans had their statues and paintings, every culture has those - but until recently, no culture has had the ability to so thoroughly clothe its people as our culture has. I think that cultures that are more open about what people really look like, tend to generate a populace that is less stressed about their bodies. (Though this could be a bit of a Chicken or the Egg situation.) I think the American body obsession has had some pluses - for example, our dental care. Most Americans have healthy, clean and straight choppers and that early dental work will keep those choppers healthy and pain-free for a lifetime. On the other hand, how many fat male kids have you seen in the swimming pool wearing a shirt? Everybody knows they are fat, nobody cares - they should just take off the damn shirt and be comfy. Granted everybody running around butt naked the whole damn might be overkill, but some extra nudity at the beach might work. People should be relaxed about their body, and if they want to improve it, they should work out - but they shouldn't stress about it. There are enough stresses in today's society, one's body shouldn't be an added one. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 08:59pm - 5847 days | #9 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:18pm | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:05pm - 5847 days | #10 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
The nude beaches and nude colonies are all responses to the modern society's universal use clothing and modesty. Yes, warm climate cultures are the only cultures that used constant nudity, but my previous point was that until recently occasional nudity was unavoidable for all but the richest of people. You mentioned Eskimos, the women would wash their hair in urine as a cleaning ritual - I imagine others would see something while the women were adding the urine to that bowl. So older societies didn't need nudist colonies because the rich were segregating themselves from the commoners with their modesty and the commoners had plenty of nudism in their daily life (again due to general close quarters and lack of secluded bathing facilities). "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:18pm - 5847 days | #11 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:18pm | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:28pm - 5847 days | #12 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
Haha, true, a few more naked bits won't solve the world's problems - but it might help :-D Ah, why aren't we one nation under porn? "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:53pm - 5847 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe I should have clarified myself a lot more: I don't really have any problem with public nudity, but I think public nudity as porn is just dumb. I don't think witnessing nudity, or even sex, whether or not it is public, is going to hurt children. But porn -- not sex -- is a different story, and explaining it to a young child would not be very pleasant (actually, the prospect of ever being a parent would be scary enough for me). Our society has definitely got its head screwed on backwards as far as nudity and sex goes though. I am sure everyone remembers the Janet Jackson bare breast thing a few years back ("The horror! The horror!), and I think some TV networks even got fined as a result. Why, I don't know, but if instead they show something as violent as someone getting disemboweled, or decapitated, or shot to death -- as long as there is no nudity! -- no one bats an eye. I think if our biggest problem was only kids getting into sex, instead of, say, picking up firearms and killing their peers, we would be pretty well off... Nah, better keep locking up pornographers, censoring all nudity, and stop wasting time with things like gun laws and violent crime instead. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 11:45pm - 5847 days | #14 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
I like the ALS Scan public nudity stuff. It's a little adventure and the girls seem to have fun and the crew has a good time doing it and the people around the action have their reactions. It's fun. It's not like they build their entire site around it - They do public nudity bonuses about once a year - either painted or not. Billy Raise is a gorgeous girl and the last woman they did it with was a delectably painted Susanna Spears doing one of the lightest shoots of her career and looking just awesome. I wouldn't join a site that was all about public nudity, but I do like seeing girls doing outrageous shit in public - I like it in my personal life as well and have some friends that are flat out crazy and will do hilariously kooky things in public and look hot doing so. | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 12:58pm - 5847 days | #15 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
Two Notes : #1. Witty Guy Please refrain from "tossing out" or "off" when asking us to respond. hehehe. #2 Hmmmm public nudity I have no problem with and I like the scenes they look risky reminds me of my younger days at construction sites etc. Umm anyways my point was if you can be 100% sure those seeing it are not affended then thats cool . Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 02:01pm - 5847 days | #16 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:18pm | |
|
||
| 1-16 of 16 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
