Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Best video quality
1-18 of 18 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

07-01-12  08:34am - 4557 days Original Post - #1
pornpundit (0)
Active User

Posts: 104
Registered: Mar 10, '07
Location: brooklyn ct.
Best video quality

I'm wondering what you think are the highest quality videos on the net. I'm nominating all Bang Brothers HD at this point however it's a close race. Also in the running is Score HD, Mommy Blows Best to name just two. Whatis your opinion? Pornpundit

07-01-12  09:25am - 4557 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
When you say video quality. Are you talking content or the resolution of the video? Long live the Brown Coats.

07-01-12  09:33am - 4557 days #3
pornpundit (0)
Active User

Posts: 104
Registered: Mar 10, '07
Location: brooklyn ct.
Resolution, clarity, I have found that there is a big difference between the highest resolution and ultimate quality Pornpundit

07-07-12  08:19am - 4551 days #5
bibo (0)
Suspended

Posts: 179
Registered: Sep 16, '10
Location: GER
Brazzers and Realitykings are offering the best quality vids in my opinion. Realitykings is even a little better that ZZ.

07-31-12  05:54am - 4527 days #6
marcdc1 (0)
Active User



Posts: 139
Registered: Jan 10, '07
Location: New York
I think kink.com may have the best quality vides. Although obviously the content is not for everyone.

07-31-12  06:47am - 4527 days #7
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
StripGameCentral has FullHD videos at 1920x1080. Most members seem to go for the 1280x720 HD option instead. I'm not sure if that's because they don't have screens with a high enough resolution to display 1920x1080 or they prefer smaller video files either because of download time or storage considerations. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

07-31-12  09:34pm - 4526 days #8
RagingBuddhist (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 893
Registered: Jan 23, '07
I think InTheCrack has the best quality. Their 1920x1080 wmvs, at almost 8000 kbps, are as clear as anything I've downloaded - with the exception of some insane copy of Avatar I managed to find, at 20 some gigs of file size. Sarcasm is a body's natural defense against stupidity.

08-01-12  12:38pm - 4526 days #9
Micha (0)
Active User

Posts: 321
Registered: Jul 04, '10
Location: san jose ca
Ed2009 wrote: ..... Most members seem to go for the 1280x720 HD option instead. I'm not sure if that's because they don't have screens with a high enough resolution to display 1920x1080 or they prefer smaller video files either because of download time or storage considerations.

It had not occurred to me that there might be a higher resolution available.
I thought the consumer level screens were much the same.

On my 27 inch screen there is not enough difference between the visual quality of 1080p and 720p to justify the huge difference in storage space and download speed.

The highest definition can't help a video made by a director or camera man who lack skills.

Reality Kings have some good stuff but only in 1080p. For me, that combined with their absurd 10G daily limit, removes them from consideration. I have no interest in a membership that allows only two or three downloads a day.

There is so much out there. unless life also gives you water and sugar, your lemonade is gonna suck.

08-01-12  01:32pm - 4526 days #10
Claypaws (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 144
Registered: May 16, '12
Location: UK
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


StripGameCentral has FullHD videos at 1920x1080. Most members seem to go for the 1280x720 HD option instead. I'm not sure if that's because they don't have screens with a high enough resolution to display 1920x1080 or they prefer smaller video files either because of download time or storage considerations.


My PC cannot play 1920x1080 video at all. There will be lots of people with old PCs for whom 1920x1080 is useless.

08-02-12  08:23am - 4525 days #11
noche (0)
Active User

Posts: 1
Registered: Apr 08, '11
I think scorehd has awful video quality. As people have noted, these sites have great HD video quality:

Top tier

Reality kings
Brazzers
In the crack
Penthouse
21 sextury
FTV girls
ALS
Met-Art
Facial Abuse - if you can take the content
Sunrise Kings - not updating

Second tier

Bangbros
Nubiles
Video Box (HD)
XArt - bitrates are not good and uses soft filter
Teen Mega or other eastern euro
Devil's film
Porn.com
ATK

Sites with marginal to awful video quality. These sites are usually using low bitrates:

naughty america - ok quality
ztod - ok
Scorehd - one of the worst
hustler - awful
porn pros - marginal
mofos - bitrates as good as brazzers, but camera/lighting is awful

08-02-12  11:51am - 4525 days #12
RagingBuddhist (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 893
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Originally Posted by noche:

I think scorehd has awful video quality.

The last of Score's wmv files that I have are 1280x720 at 2+mbps. I wouldn't call that awful - just average. The damned, ridiculously HUGE watermark they plaster on every video is another story... Sarcasm is a body's natural defense against stupidity.

08-03-12  01:06am - 4524 days #13
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
Originally Posted by Claypaws:


My PC cannot play 1920x1080 video at all. There will be lots of people with old PCs for whom 1920x1080 is useless.

That's why I still provide all videos at SD resolution too. I think it would be unfair not to supply that.

My PC's monitor is 1920x1200 (24 inches) so I find that 1920x1080 looks noticeably better than 1280x720. Whether it's worth the extra storage is a debatable.

I know some of my customers playback StripGameCentral videos on their FullHD LCD televisions (40+ inches) so they always want the FullHD version where available. Other customers always play them netbooks or small laptops so the lower quality versions will do.

I've got a 2 year old 11 inch netbook that can comfortably cope with playing HD video files, so I think PCs that can't cope with HD must be a reducing minority, but while they are still around, I will keep catering for them too. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

08-03-12  04:45am - 4524 days #14
Peelarry (0)
Active User

Posts: 32
Registered: Jun 22, '09
Location: Germany
It's true that you don't see a big difference between 1920 and 720. Very important is the bitrate.
Sometimes a SD video with a high bitrate looks almost like HD in low bitrate.
Normally my prefered resolution would be 720p in a good birate. But the problem is the storage capacity and download speed.

Actually I use a 2-Terrabyte USB-Disk for Porn and this one will be full in the next months, so I plan to look for contetnt I can delete. But that content is old and in a bad quality, so it won't give me back much disc space.

08-03-12  05:07am - 4524 days #15
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
When I encode FullHD videos for my website, I use 2.25x the bitrate I use for HD (1280x720). It's really not worth the higher pixel count without the bandwidth to support it. Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

08-03-12  06:07am - 4524 days #16
Claypaws (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 144
Registered: May 16, '12
Location: UK
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


That's why I still provide all videos at SD resolution too. I think it would be unfair not to supply that.


I've got a 2 year old 11 inch netbook that can comfortably cope with playing HD video files, so I think PCs that can't cope with HD must be a reducing minority, but while they are still around, I will keep catering for them too.


My PC copes happily with 720p HD (1280x720).
It is only monster 1080p HD (1920x1080)that it cannot play.

SD (less than 720p) I would not bother to download at all.

What I am saying is most PCs will play 720p, but I suspect quite a lot will not play 1080p.

My PC is 8 years old and works perfectly and fast for everything except 1080p video. I see no point in building a new PC just to be able to play 1080p video.

It is good to see a webmaster continuing to provide content in a choice of resolutions.

One huge source of confusion is the use of terms such as HD, SD, full HD, all of which mean nothing as they have no standard definition. It would be more helpful to refer to them as 720p, 1080p etc or quote the full dimensions, such as 1280x720p, when offering a choice on a website.

On the rare occasions that I watch video (I am more interested in photos), I play it on a 60 inch projector screen at 1024x768. 720p video looks excellent on that.

08-03-12  11:40am - 4524 days #17
Ed2009 (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 509
Registered: Sep 12, '09
Location: Wales, UK
My understanding is HD is 1280x720, FullHD is 1920x1080. If you were selling a television only capable of 1280x720 and advertised it as FullHD it would be an offence (in the UK - don't know about the US - I don't know if you have an equivalent of our Trades Descriptions Act?).

SD is trickier as there never was much of a standard pre-HD. I used SD to refer to videos which are 720 pixels wide (usually 405 high for widescreen or 576 for standard DVD resolution - but even that varies around the world). Webmaster of StripGameCentral and A Measure of Curiosity.

08-03-12  04:00pm - 4524 days #18
Claypaws (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 144
Registered: May 16, '12
Location: UK
Interesting. FullHD and HD are perhaps a bit more standard here in the UK than I thought they were. Maybe there is little or no ambiguity in FullHD then: it means 1920x1080. The problem comes with HD, which can mean either 1280x720 or 1920x1080 and I have seen both uses for HD on various websites.

And, as you say, nobody knows what SD means except that it is not HD or Full HD.

It will probably get worse too. In a few years, there will be 2560x1440 video, which they will call UltraHD or something like that. Then we will have UltraHD, FullHD and HD. It will be a bit like HiSpeed USB and FullSpeed USB where I can never remember which is which

If it were generally called 720p, 1080p, 1440p, it would be much easier to know what was being offered.

By the way, I do not own a television.

08-04-12  03:25am - 4523 days #19
Claypaws (0)
Suspended Webmaster


Posts: 144
Registered: May 16, '12
Location: UK
This is something I may post in a few places if the need arises. I have at last found a way for my old PC to play 1080p mp4 video. It is a somewhat obscure setting in VLC player that I had overlooked and never seen mentioned in any of the many threads I had read on specialist video forums, including the VLC forums.

Tools>Preferences>Input and codecs>Codecs>Skip H.264 in-loop deblocking filter

Set this to "non-key" or "all"

Close VLC player and then restart it. It only needs to be done once.

With that setting, 1080p mp4 video plays without freezing.

I have not yet established whether the setting has a degrading effect on 720p video though it is easy to change if it has. I also have not checked if 1080p looks any better or worse than 720p. To do so requires downloading both options from a site that offers them. I will try this over the next few days. The 1080p I have tried does look better than 852x480 mp4, which is all that was offered as the "SD" alternative to 1080p "HD" on the site I got them from.

My preference would still be for 720p video because the file size is smaller and it generally looks excellent. But at least I can now play 1080p when there is no other reasonable quality option.

1-18 of 18 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.