Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Drooler's Nudity Law
1-6 of 6 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

05-16-10  04:24am - 5334 days Original Post - #1
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Drooler's Nudity Law

I hope D. won't mind me posting this, but it is too good an idea not to promote it!

Quote Drooler:

'Frankly, I think that a 10:1 maximum allowable full:mid nudity ratio LAW should be passed and then vigorously enforced. For one thing, you'd get more skin at sites like OnlyTease. That would be nice!'

Now, let's see if my interpretation on this is correct.

There must be 10 explicit full nudity items for each coy nude item?

If that is it, I would certainly support that one.

Enforcement:

Well, for that you are going to need Inspectors.
& I think you would not have any difficulty finding recruits here.

I volunteer for that job!

Excellent idea, my friend!

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

05-16-10  09:19am - 5334 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I think that is an excellent idea. There is nothing more annoying than reading the words nude something and then you discover that you see nothing because of the angle of the shot or the positioning of hands, arms or objects.

I'd much prefer the job of breast inspector. I could be sent all over the world to investigate whether they are real or implants and if they are implants then to probe more deeply the quality of said implants. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-16-10  11:25am - 5334 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm anti-standardization, personally. A lot of guys come on here complaining about how sites have sets that are all the same one after the other, following the same formulas in each photo-set or vids and then endorse a rule that is calling for that exact thing.

Personally, I'd rather live with the "confusion" rather than increase the pressure to standardize in what ultimately becomes a result more boring than it would be otherwise.

Of course, I've probably got more tolerance for clothed and semi-clothed tease than many on this site.

There's a lot of full nudity around - including of many of these same models. Why does every photo-set or vid need to be exactly the same thing?

05-16-10  11:47am - 5334 days #4
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
It doesn't.

All it really needs is accurate labelling so less precious time & patience is wasted.

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

05-16-10  12:25pm - 5334 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Maybe instead of Underwriter's Laboratories, we could have something like "Undergarment Laboratories" ... and for hardcore, "Undercarriage Laboratories."

I'm kind of with Pink Panther on resisting standardization. I mean, I wouldn't want it to be taken too far. Good grief, the industry has standardized itself enough already with the perfunctory blowjob and cum shot, for instance.

Yet I agree it would be nice to go to a site and have it quality guaranteed to meet standards of things like "enough nudity." There's plenty that can be done with a nude model that a baseline standard couldn't hurt much. The artists at work wouldn't have to be too cramped.

And those that reject the imposition of the standard would in no way be required to adhere to it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

05-16-10  07:51pm - 5334 days #6
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


A lot of guys come on here complaining about how sites have sets that are all the same one after the other, following the same formulas in each photo-set or vids and then endorse a rule that is calling for that exact thing.


I swear I only do this once a week--at most! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

1-6 of 6 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.