|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Turn-on or Turn-offs |
| 1-27 of 27 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 09-08-08 11:21pm - 5948 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Turn-on or Turn-offs pics that seem designed to help you get through the exam to become registered as a gynecologist - turn-on or turn-off? Feel free to add your own "turn-on or turn-off?" question to this thread - as well as answering mine | |
|
||
| 09-09-08 02:29am - 5948 days | #2 | |
|
shooterbo (0)
Active User  Posts: 185 Registered: Apr 25, '07 |
Turn on....would love that job! On/off?.....girlfriend watches you fuck her girlfriend....intently! Happened to me. | |
|
||
| 09-09-08 02:45am - 5948 days | #3 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Actually, if it were part of med school, the pics would probably be a tad "different" from the ones we usually see in porn. And by "different" I certainly do not mean "pretty." Just start with yeast infections and take it from there ... But of course I do get the real point of the question. Can't answer in an absolute sense because I'd feel a yearning if photosets didn't have at least a few good closeups of heaven on earth. But stretching, fisting, specula, and the various forms of "rocketry" that are brought into the fold(s) take things well beyond my interests. And COPIOUS AMOUNTS, PAGE AFTER PAGE, are just a nuisance to me. That's what's become of Karupspc, for instance. There used to be a better balance of poses and the girl's butts were shot in the ways I really liked. Not always (too tall an order), but often enough to reward a return every 3-4 months or so. Now it's very rare and it's been that way at least since all of the technical improvements were made to the site. It's become something like Teenrotica, with a really obvious emphasis on (Cookie Monster voice) "Pussy, pussy, pussy, good for me." At least it's not as bad as SimonScans. There's a site I've just completely given up on. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 09, 2008, 02:49am | |
|
||
| 09-09-08 08:41am - 5948 days | #4 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
Hmmm Id say that the entire experience of the female body is what is the turn on. I mean in reality I wouldn't just have my face planted there so , in my own defense I also do not see continued staring at a moist hole a turn-on if its missing the rest of the body. In my own thought process this is not reality ( porn use) its part of relaxation and fantasy and having it around relaxes me in life . God knows that sexual tension while it can be a great assets is more a nuisance too so without good porn its be a waste to just stare at a hole . Cybertoad Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 09-10-08 08:16pm - 5946 days | #5 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Yeah - my feeling exactly - I was looking at a set of a really hot model at DDF - and when it got to dozens of pics of the pussy and showed nothing of the rest of her bod - no tummy, no legs, no boobs - I was thinking - this is just anti-hot. 21st Sextury often gets it right with the camera going in and out and not just diving in, never to return. In The Crack is way too tunnelish for my tastes, though it has more appeal to me than the rough gape stuff. | |
|
||
| 09-11-08 07:05pm - 5945 days | #6 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
It's a big turn off for me as well this unconceivable need to concentrate on only one body part at the expense of the rest, or to zoom so close that you can give the model a clean bill of health. Are there no professional photographers left or is it just that every guy with a camera thinks he can take pictures? A major turn off is something similar happening in videos these days. The need for directors to concentrate on a specifc section at the expense of everything else or to keep on zooming to the genitals. I believe that it's the same thing that's happening to pictures. Now everybody that has a video camera thinks he's a director. Hell these people couldn't direct traffic let a lona a porn movie. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-12-08 09:20am - 5945 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Maybe they are zooming in on the genitals because the model is reading a book or having her lunch while making some enthusiastic noises just to keep us fooled. :-) | |
|
||
| 09-12-08 07:19pm - 5944 days | #8 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Thanks for that one. it was piss hilarious. Of course now you've spoiled the illusion for me. Because everytime they start zooming on the genitals. I'll have a visual of a girl enjoying a nice ham and cheese on rye. Our discussion on eating lunch made me think of a major turn off. Whenever the girl is chewing gum. Is there anything less sexy than a naked girl chewing gum during sex. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-12-08 11:03pm - 5944 days | #9 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
Um pehaps one chewing chew LOL Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 09-13-08 08:17am - 5944 days | #10 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
It's so true about porn movies. It's not as true as it was before Zero Tolerance, Jules Jordan and Third Degree brought back extended tease sequences, but for a while you would see a hot girl come out in a hot outfit and within 15 seconds, all you would be seeing was her vagina. I'd be screaming "This could be anybody you morons! I want to see this woman!" | |
|
||
| 09-13-08 01:44pm - 5944 days | #11 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You are so right! To me the chewing of gum is an obvious sign of indifference on the model's part to what she's doing. We all know it's mostly for the money (forgetting some exhibitionist amateurs) but couldn't the girl try to look a bit more enthused if that's the living she chose? | |
|
||
| 09-13-08 01:46pm - 5944 days | #12 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
My sentiments exactly, PinkPanther! | |
|
||
| 09-13-08 01:52pm - 5944 days | #13 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I never did mention my biggest turn on, and that is to see a girl undress slowly, with lots of "intimate apparel" to get rid off. That's with pictures. In videos, my biggest turn on is a) to have a lead-in story followed by b) a girl undressing slowly with lots of "intimate apparel" to get rid off before the main action starts. :-) | |
|
||
| 09-13-08 02:22pm - 5944 days | #14 | |
|
mr smut (0)
Active User  Posts: 107 Registered: Dec 27, '07 Location: Germany |
That's a real turn off! I always want to see a model's face because I love facial expressions especially if the model has a real pretty face. A few close-ups are o.k. but only a few and to show the genitals only for minutes within a video is a total nuisance! | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 09:43am - 5943 days | #15 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I agree that they offer more tease. The problem is that for the most part the girls usually wear tramp clothes, and the tease is pretty short. I want to see the girls wear a nice sexy dress or some nice pants and underwear (Commando style is not a turn on). I want the girl to slowly undress on the screen. You can't tease us with a girl wearing clothes in one scene and the next she's naked. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 03:39pm - 5943 days | #16 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I absolutely, completely agree!!! That's what I keep looking for and never seem to find. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 03:46pm - 5943 days | #17 | |
|
Monahan (0)
Active User  Posts: 348 Registered: Jan 17, '07 Location: SF Valley, CA |
this, frankly, is the one thing that puts FTVGirls over the others in its genre...real babes in real situations with normal attire. Yes they get into fisting, lots of toys, etc., but the tease stuff with a peek at PTA* is really fun. *Pussy, Tits and Ass. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 04:08pm - 5942 days | #18 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I don't mind the fisting or toys. I actually would love it if they had more anal themed stuff. My big problem is that it is essentialy a site with solo models. There is little interaction with other women and unless mistaken, no men. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 04:12pm - 5942 days | #19 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Here is another thing that a modern filmaker could add in his movies to get tons of customers. I'm stuck at having to look at porn that's nearly 20yrs old to get that, or lesbian material. Why is it that most lesbian porn still involves a scenario, kissing, undressing, foreplay, and plausible sex??? Mindf you I love lesbian porn, so I'm not complaining. I just wish that straight porn would have that as well. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 06:17pm - 5942 days | #20 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
What, in your opinion, is the best site in lesbian porn where the videos are in HD, or very close to it in quality? | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 06:24pm - 5942 days | #21 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I agree. My only problem with FTV is the fact that the older material is not very good in quality and I'm almost through with the newer stuff (HD at 8000 or wmv at 2000 bitrate). But I'll definitely return to the site after I give them enough time to acquire more updates that will make it worth my while. | |
|
||
| 09-14-08 10:06pm - 5942 days | #22 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Chewing gum doesn't bother me - in fact it's an audio treat to listen to the smacking - even better is a girl with a sucker slurping away - mmmmmmm!! | |
|
||
| 09-15-08 07:30am - 5942 days | #23 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
I agree. some times play boy can be more erotice that allot of sites because its tamer , problem is light porn never gets down and dirty. In real life thats exactly how it goes some foreply, som good stuff and some other better stuff LOL Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 09-15-08 07:46pm - 5941 days | #24 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Have you seen the new Evil Angel movie "Lollipop Lesbians"? Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-15-08 07:53pm - 5941 days | #25 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
The only one I've ever been a member is Strapon Lesbian but their videos are not in HD, at least they weren't the last time I was there. I am thinking of joining either Lez Cuties or something similar. Most of my lebien porn is from DVD's. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-16-08 10:46am - 5941 days | #26 | |
|
asmith12 (0)
Active User Posts: 79 Registered: Oct 17, '07 |
Ditto. Motto: "All niches except for boring one!" | |
|
||
| 09-16-08 10:59am - 5941 days | #27 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Pat. I got some lesbian porn from video box but the quality wasn't great so I was hoping an HD rich site existed somewhere! | |
|
||
| 1-27 of 27 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
