Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » What Makes You Say "No"?
1-50 of 51 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

08-12-08  05:17pm - 5938 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA
What Makes You Say "No"?

This post is somewhat inspired by Drooler's "Freckle/Mole/Tat Test" thread. Only here I'm talking about finding a scene that you would normally like but for some reason or another you just not inspired to do the download. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:22pm

08-12-08  06:02pm - 5938 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Excessive photo shopping is my deal breaker more than anything else. If I want to look at digital plastic looking crap, I'll go join one of those 3d porn/cartoon sites - and I've had no interest in joining one of those 3d porn/cartoon sites. So why do so many porn producers photo shop their pics until the models look they have been dipped in lacquer?

08-12-08  07:05pm - 5938 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I have to agree with Wittyguy that tattoos can be a big turn off for me. I'm not talking about a couple of small discreet tattoos located here and there, but instead those gigantic tattoos that usually cover an entire area. Good examples are: Sleeves, the all back tattoo, giant tribals just above the buttock, anywhere near or on the breasts. Take a look at any recent phots of these pornstars to give you an idea. Tera Patrick, Jewell Denyle, Janine, Monique Alexander. All of these women started their career with few if any tattoos. It isn't the case anymore.

The second thing that makes me say no is Plastic Surgery.
I'm still quite shocked when I see an actress/model that I thought was beautiful, and who's now got the bolt-ons, the new nose, the fake lips and the modified eyes. It makes me a little sad to realise that the girl I thought was gorgeous is no longer there, instead what you now have is an artificial person less recognizable with her face but with her tattoo(s).

I agree with Pink Pather that Photoshop has pretty much destroyed modern photography. Now pretty much anyone can take a picture since so many studios rely on photoshop to photographers, but even their work winds up going under the knife of a computer tech. What happened to showing a human being with all of it's imperfections visible. I'll take an average looking women with all her imperfections anyday to an artificially created one. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-12-08  08:23pm - 5937 days #4
MargulisAZ (0)
Suspended

Posts: 49
Registered: Jul 06, '07
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Fake boobs, instant turn off. I HATE fake boobs. I would rather have nothing, and I'm serious, than fakes. And I also agree that big tats are gross.

08-12-08  11:18pm - 5937 days #5
NMC2008 (0)
Active User



Posts: 40
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: Los Angeles, California
Excessive Photoshop - I like to see her natural skin, not an ultra smooth pallet of digital paint.

Hardcore Photosets - No cocks in my photoset please.

Closeups - If I wanted to see inside the vag I would be a gynecologist, when I fuck a chick I do not take a moment to stare into her vagina.

Bullshit Photos - I don't want to see you at the mall or brushing your fucking hair or painting your fence or hugging your pet or coloring in a coloring book(little lupe I am looking at your ass) or some boring ass shit, I want to see you modeling for the camera in various positions and awesome hot clothing and such, model for me and work the camera.

I am not too much a fan of solo chick sites as you can see. lol.

08-13-08  02:16am - 5937 days #6
light487 (0)
Active User

Posts: 1
Registered: Aug 13, '08
Location: Sydney, Australia
Too many closeups - Closeups are great but if I wanted to look at pussy all the time, it wouldn't matter what content I was downloading. Same as NMC2008.

Too much cock - There's a lot of the POV stuff going around these days. I am not paying to see cock.. I am paying to see the girls getting fucked by the cock.

Fakeness - Fake tits, fake schoolgirl, fake anything. If it looks fake, I don't bother. It's like all those toilet and shower scenes where it's just another shoot location, rather than a practical use of the place.

Fake Orgasms or Lack of Orgasms: This gets a mention all to itself. Producers and video makers must think that the paying customers are idiots to think we can't tell a fake orgasm after watching 100's of videos. It may trick the younger audience, and it may have worked 10 years ago.. but times have changed.

Ugly Co-Star: Enough said..

I usually download videos, not photosets, so all my comments are about videos really.

08-13-08  11:07am - 5937 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Amazing! It seems all of us have quite a bit in common when it comes to dislikes .. like all things fake, from breasts to orgasms. Plus over sized tattoos, plus the doctoring of pictures with Photoshop etc. until the girls all start looking like Barbies (my constant complaint). So how come there are so many successful sites out there that specialize in "fakery" and why do so many of them get high ratings? Webmasters, pay attention, there is a potential huge market for the natural!

To answer wittyguy's question: I never, ever download a video or a set of pictures that contains fake breasts .. for me that is the worst offense of them all!

08-13-08  02:03pm - 5937 days #8
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:22pm

08-13-08  07:31pm - 5937 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Another big no for me is not so much about the girl, but more about the complete scene/movie. I call it the crappy camera work syndrome. I've stopped counting the number of movies or scenes where you're watching it and wondering what exactly the cameraman, director, producer and editor where doing or thinking when they were making the movie or scene. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-14-08  03:36am - 5936 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Having just tossed out an otherwise lovely photo -- due to the idiotic cropping away of the right 2 inches of the girl's ass -- and having just given up on some pic galleries thanks to the brainless stamping of the girl's hair with the site's fucking watermark even though there was plenty of dead space elsewhere to put the bleeding thing without ruining my enjoyment ($30 subscription and thank you very much), I'm all set to go on this topic.

Before PU came along, I used to fantasize about posting a list of DO'S and DON'T'S, which should be printed out in large type, framed, and placed in a prominent place in the offices of nude and porn photographers and websites throughout the world:

1. Never, ever let the watermark touch any part of the girl's image.
2. Never, ever crop away any part of the girl's body (exception: about 3 body inches down from the upper thigh).
3. Include as many shots of the girl without her hands on her butt as there are in the exact same pose and orientation (Teenrotica, take note!).
4. Sunglasses, hats, all clothes come off at least 50% of the way into a gallery.
5. Drop the cliches: NO MORE angel wings, girls holding empty picture frames, etc. (See the PU user poll "In nude photosets, which is the most tiresome cliche?")
6. NO BLURRINESS!
7. Natural skin and natural skin color, NOT lobster red or any other weird alterations (Sepia? Who wants pics of the girl that make it look as though she's living in the goddamn 19th Century? And leave the "lucite look" for furniture, picture frames, eyewear, and shoes.)
8. Composition: No photos in which the girl takes up less than 50% of the frame. (Your subscribers are not interested in calling long distance.)
9. Lighting: Aim for "even" lighting. In other words, no pics of girls brightly lit in some places, and lost in shadows in others.
10. Don't just post corrupted files and walk away. Subscribers obviously do not appreciate image files with the bottom part being nothing but grey emptiness. So check your work before you post it on the web and fix problems before you go live with it!

There's probably more, which I can add later. It's a good start, anyway. If the do's and don't's above alone were adhered to throughout the porn and nude photography world, there would be a lot of happier porn users, I'm sure.

Fat chance of that ever happening, though. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Aug 21, 2008, 11:46pm

08-14-08  08:27am - 5936 days #11
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Um for me the first and I am surprised no one has said it yet is the Dumb Ass talking by guys.
Its seems like its the new trend or some bullshit.
Just shut the fuck up, guys over talking kills it. I have dumped many scenes at many places because the guy just goes on and on, IF WEBMASTERS READ THIS?????
Its the customers Fanatasy not the male actors. Tell them to shut up. I read that all the time in reviews complaint after complaint yet they still keep right along allowing that in the film. What really gets me to is POV that should be focused 100% on the girl and they guy just rambles on and most do that huh? geees just shut up already.
If I want to hear a guy i'll down load gay porn.

Second for me, is yet the tats, too many out there, back in my day a tat was cool now its just like hair cuts every dumb ass wannabe has one.
I nice leg one or a small one on the lower back ya thats ok, but do not take away from the true beauty of the person please.


Thats my tow pet peaves. Since 2007

08-14-08  09:02am - 5936 days #12
MargulisAZ (0)
Suspended

Posts: 49
Registered: Jul 06, '07
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Oh my god did you hit a nerve with me here. I can't count how many times I've wanted to shoot the camera man out of frustration in certain scenes. Especially when it's either a hot girl or something really hot is going on, and the camera is anywhere but where I want it to be. GGGRRRRR!! I've been SOOO angry at times because of this, haha!

08-14-08  09:07am - 5936 days #13
MargulisAZ (0)
Suspended

Posts: 49
Registered: Jul 06, '07
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Yep, I remember it's either exploited teens or exploited college girls where the guy NEVER shuts the fuck up. Even the models were visibly annoyed. I kept almost nothing from those sites.

08-14-08  01:04pm - 5936 days #14
plan b (0)
Active User

Posts: 15
Registered: Apr 25, '08
Location: Oregon
Agree on the fake boobs. That's easily my #1 turn-off. I'd rather see natural A cups than fake DDs.

08-15-08  07:09pm - 5935 days #15
biker (0)
Active User



Posts: 632
Registered: May 03, '08
Location: milwaukee, wi
Hello Wittygut:

I agree with most everything brought up here. I would like to add one of my peeves that seems rampant through the industry.

When a couple are hard at it I don't like to see the models looking at the camera. If you are making it with someone then look at them. It ruins the scene if they paying attention to the camera, which means me, and not the person they are suppose to be screwing.

It makes them appear to looking for some approval from someone other than the person theit having sex with. If you are going at it with someone, then you should be paying attention to them.

It looks so fake that I get turned off by it.

I like fantasy with sex and this just pops the bubble. Warning Will Robinson

08-16-08  12:44am - 5934 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by biker:


Hello Wittygut:

I agree with most everything brought up here. I would like to add one of my peeves that seems rampant through the industry.

When a couple are hard at it I don't like to see the models looking at the camera. If you are making it with someone then look at them. It ruins the scene if they paying attention to the camera, which means me, and not the person they are suppose to be screwing.

It makes them appear to looking for some approval from someone other than the person theit having sex with. If you are going at it with someone, then you should be paying attention to them.

It looks so fake that I get turned off by it.

I like fantasy with sex and this just pops the bubble.


I don't object at all to someone not liking the girls looking at the camera, but the truth is for me is that I do like that. Of course, it depends completely on HOW the girl is looking at the camera. Example: A video I got of Layla Rivera getting it belly-down flat in which she's facing the camera and starts moaning stuff to the viewer (as the plumbing churns visibly in the background). Layla pulled it off for me just fine.

What I don't like, though, are excessive, lingering frames of the girl's face as she's getting it. Man, I HATE that. I came here to see the action, not a prolonged closeup!

It all comes down to the fundamental sensibilities, and the people making the stuff can have the best equipment, the best babes, the best everything and fuck it up royally because they just don't "get it" -- or maybe they just don't care. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-16-08  01:18am - 5934 days #17
Colm4 (0)
Active User



Posts: 117
Registered: Sep 22, '07
Location: Holland
I'm totally turned off by piercings. A belly one ok, but in the tongue or 'down there' is something I hate.

08-16-08  06:47am - 5934 days #18
MargulisAZ (0)
Suspended

Posts: 49
Registered: Jul 06, '07
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I don't object at all to someone not liking the girls looking at the camera, but the truth is for me is that I do like that. Of course, it depends completely on HOW the girl is looking at the camera. Example: A video I got of Layla Rivera getting it belly-down flat in which she's facing the camera and starts moaning stuff to the viewer (as the plumbing churns visibly in the background). Layla pulled it off for me just fine.

What I don't like, though, are excessive, lingering frames of the girl's face as she's getting it. Man, I HATE that. I came here to see the action, not a prolonged closeup!

It all comes down to the fundamental sensibilities, and the people making the stuff can have the best equipment, the best babes, the best everything and fuck it up royally because they just don't "get it" -- or maybe they just don't care.


Totally agree about the face shots. In one of my recent reviews, for Explicite-art, that's one of the points that I made, how the camera man spends too much time zooming in on the girls face's and not on the action. Very annoying.

08-16-08  03:54pm - 5934 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Colm4:


I'm totally turned off by piercings. A belly one ok, but in the tongue or 'down there' is something I hate.


Me, too, and I agree that the belly-button ones can be ok, but pussy and tongue piercings are just self-mutilation as far as I'm concerned.

Or the ones through the eyebrow. Then the girl has it removed and has this hair gap where it used to be. Real smart, huh? Vanity works in some pretty twisted ways sometimes.

I remember when Asia Carrera (a member of Mensa, btw), had this large spike thing affixed to her pussy. She could've mugged unwary pedestrians in dark alleys with that thing.

There's no accounting for tastes. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-16-08  05:59pm - 5934 days #20
malikstarks (0)
Active User

Posts: 108
Registered: Nov 19, '07
Location: Florida
For me I hate hardcore scenes where the girl keeps on half her clothes, huge dissapointment, I don't care what she has to hide. Your doing a porn shoot for crying out loud!!

Also I'm into legs and feet so I usually prefer vids and pics with no shoes (especially tennis shoes!?). Although this is not always a deal breaker.

08-17-08  07:04pm - 5933 days #21
squirrel (0)
Active User

Posts: 17
Registered: Jul 15, '08
Location: US
I hate tattoos. Always ugly, all the time. I just can't believe how these young ladies choose to disfigure themselves so much.

Especially those damn ASS ANTLERS! Crimony! Take one of the most erotic areas on a woman's body, and they may as well have an advertisement for Pepsi or something like that.

Sheesh!

I also despise nipple rings and studs and such.

If you're an aspiring nude model with this crap on your body, you won't make any money from me. If you're a photographer trying to make some money by shooting nude photos of models with crap like this on their bodies, you won't make any money from me.

The female body can be beautiful. But not if you ugly it up with a bunch of crap. STOP IT NOW!

:-)

08-18-08  03:00am - 5932 days #22
NMC2008 (0)
Active User



Posts: 40
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: Los Angeles, California
Originally Posted by MargulisAZ:


Oh my god did you hit a nerve with me here. I can't count how many times I've wanted to shoot the camera man out of frustration in certain scenes. Especially when it's either a hot girl or something really hot is going on, and the camera is anywhere but where I want it to be. GGGRRRRR!! I've been SOOO angry at times because of this, haha!


Well I advise you to steer clear of Bang Bros and Incredible Pass, every site on those networks have this annoying "feature". Blowjob Ninjas "USED" to be the only exception but it has went the way of the dodo.

I cannot stand the rambling guy either but it's not going away anytime soon because it seems that these guys do it to annoy their customers, I swear I think that is the case because they aren't talking about shit, they are hooting and hollering, shit, what next a studio audience voice track machine like old ass sitcoms?

This pisses me off to no end, I deleted my entire Bang Bros folder after viewing a 10 scenes per series and got the same jibber jabber from the camera man and the actor and sometimes the actress gets in on the conversation, who are they shooting these movies for? Seriously!

09-03-08  02:34am - 5916 days #23
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
A new - and very definite - turn-off - ruined assholes. I just saw some pics from FTV Girls of a cute blonde named Allison - cute except that her asshole looked like she had been gang-banged by a group of just-released ex-cons that forgot that pussies existed - yecccchhh!!

09-06-08  06:58pm - 5913 days #24
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


A new - and very definite - turn-off - ruined assholes. I just saw some pics from FTV Girls of a cute blonde named Allison - cute except that her asshole looked like she had been gang-banged by a group of just-released ex-cons that forgot that pussies existed - yecccchhh!!


I'll second this one. Did not see Allisson, but sadly I do
remember many pornstars with some nasty gape or prolapses rectum. Here is a good example Mila Shegol.
http://www.freeones.com/html/m_links/Mila_Shegol/. I love watching anal sex, but I some point actresses have to stop and really think hard about switching to a different opening than their ass. If you gaope and can no longer contract the muscle properlly then stop. Long live the Brown Coats.

09-06-08  09:43pm - 5912 days #25
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
In video spitting can ruin an otherwise perfectly good sex scene for me. (I just don't get it!) Another might be a girl do the fake, repetitive moans that are just so not natural it turns me off.

09-07-08  03:17am - 5912 days #26
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by squirrel:


I hate tattoos. Always ugly, all the time. I just can't believe how these young ladies choose to disfigure themselves so much.

Especially those damn ASS ANTLERS! Crimony! Take one of the most erotic areas on a woman's body, and they may as well have an advertisement for Pepsi or something like that.

Sheesh!

I also despise nipple rings and studs and such.

If you're an aspiring nude model with this crap on your body, you won't make any money from me. If you're a photographer trying to make some money by shooting nude photos of models with crap like this on their bodies, you won't make any money from me.

The female body can be beautiful. But not if you ugly it up with a bunch of crap. STOP IT NOW!

:-)


You said it, man. "Always ugly, all the time," so "STOP IT NOW!"

Examples (sadly, just a small percentage): Nikki Nova. I hate to criticize her. I think of her as an icon -- make that an institution -- of softcore. She's still showing up at Aziani and Marquis and if you ask me, she's still hot as a motherfucker. But that tattoo ALL OVER HER BACK is ridiculous. Pisses me off.

Daisy Marie. Such a natural beauty in EVERY WAY. So why'd she have to go and have that boob job and ALSO a huge ugly-ass tattoo all over her back? Shit.

Tristan Kingsley. Have you seen how absolutely beautiful she is? Breathtaking! So what's with those hideous tats? (Gasp!) Let's just hope (against hope, probably) that she doesn't get a boob job. That would really finish her off. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

09-07-08  05:20am - 5912 days #27
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Examples (sadly, just a small percentage): Nikki Nova. I hate to criticize her. I think of her as an icon -- make that an institution -- of softcore. She's still showing up at Aziani and Marquis and if you ask me, she's still hot as a motherfucker. But that tattoo ALL OVER HER BACK is ridiculous. Pisses me off.

Daisy Marie. Such a natural beauty in EVERY WAY. So why'd she have to go and have that boob job and ALSO a huge ugly-ass tattoo all over her back? Shit.



I have to agree about Niki Nova. A truly beautiful woman, but that giant back tattoo is just not appealling at all.

In defense of Daisy Marie's back tattoo. She started her career with it. She didn't get it after a number of years in the business. I do wish she hadn't gotten the bolt ons, because she had nice natural breast.

I read somewhere that the reasons why some of these women get the excessive tattoos and breast job is because they wish to leave the biz, but can't do it on their own, so they start altering the things that their fans like. After a while you can't get jobs anymore because no one wnats to hire you, and therefore you are abligated to leave the business. I don't know if that is true, but it does make sense. They certainly don't do it for the fans, because I've read enough forums to know that the majority of us do not like fake boobs, and excessive tattoos. Long live the Brown Coats.

09-07-08  11:10am - 5912 days #28
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I read somewhere that the reasons why some of these women get the excessive tattoos and breast job is because they wish to leave the biz, but can't do it on their own, so they start altering the things that their fans like. After a while you can't get jobs anymore because no one wnats to hire you, and therefore you are abligated to leave the business. I don't know if that is true, but it does make sense. They certainly don't do it for the fans, because I've read enough forums to know that the majority of us do not like fake boobs, and excessive tattoos.


Interesting theory. I've seen the "poison pill" approach used in relationships, and I've actually used it myself, although it was with behavior rather than alterations of appearance. And it's been used on me, too. (I played dumb and got a little last laugh out of it.)

And of course it's used sometimes in business, as in "No, you don't want to buy us out. Not now."

But I really doubt that Nikki Nova, for instance, had that huge, and obviously expensive, color tattoo etched into her back because she was tired of her own popularity. After all, she's still showing up on some sites anyway. All she had to do was say, "OK. That's all now. I'm moving on to something else." (As did, for instance, Sanja Matice.) It isn't like she thought, "Aziani, Danni, and Marquis will be it from now on. How can I make sure of that? (Snaps fingers) I know ...!"

No, I'd be more willing to accept the theory that, as women do regard their bodies as "canvases" of a sort, that some of them just take it further than others do, and to us PornUsers, some of them just take things too far. And even some men aren't "immune."

If it can happen to Michael Jackson and Joan Rivers, why couldn't it happen to Denisa Keltnerova/Veronica DaSouza (now it's Eva something), who had a second breast enhancement and went blond, or to Susana Spears (got a boob job), or to Layla Rivera (major boob job), etc.

But I didn't realize that about Daisy Marie's back tat. Thanks for the info. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 07, 2008, 11:17am

09-07-08  12:19pm - 5912 days #29
little rabbit (0)
Suspended

Posts: 2
Registered: Jan 08, '08
I am totally sick of all that :

- porn with guys. I really don't like that. To see a cock don't excite me, on the contrary.
- pro-models casting. At the first second of a movie, a pro-model's play isn't natural.

If faked boobs, the worst, but even if not, pro-models haven't a natural play, and look like standart models : the Barbie®'s look, if you see what I mean .

So, I am totally sick of all is faked, and appears obviously as faked.

But lesbian play (no guys movies) can also turn me off very quickly.

If women have sex after 15 seconds, it's all but magic.

None eroticism, just performing sex, and boring play.

A magical opening, where I can discover models' charms, a little a little, eventually with a teasing opening : there is a good stuff.

Close-ups are very nice, if there is other else than close-up, and if the camera don't come back again and again toward pinky close-ups, or focuses on eating tongues.

There exist good photographers and good directors, but they are pretty rare. And with lesbians, if the shoot isn't good (and good lesbian shoots are pretty rare), the video is totally crappy, and I understand that a lot of people think lesbian niche is really boring.

Because a lot of lesbian videos are really boring.

But when they are good, they are pretty good :oD Edited on Sep 07, 2008, 12:24pm

10-08-08  09:18pm - 5880 days #30
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
I just realized I never replied to this thread and am surprised to see that my numero uno "deal breaker" wasn't directly listed. That is the model's face - good body, good performance, et cetera - that can all be destroyed by a model with a less than attractive face. Porn is a factor of two things for me.

One is the fantasy of the activity being performed - roleplay, be it simple or complex, is a crucial factor. Porn doesn't require too much consideration for the viewer's willing suspension of disbelief because the activities being recorded are really being performed. Granted the best porn ties in an engaging story that in and of itself can entertain you, but like documentaries of sharks eating things - the viewer is going to be engaged, even if we threw that baby seal into the tank with the shark, it is still a shark eating a baby seal! So curiosity drives a large amount of my porn viewing.

The second factor is simply that I love looking at beautiful women. Be they fashion models, porn stars, or just a person I walked by on the street. For me, beauty begins at the face. I can appreciate a particular example of a specific body part, but if gut-wrenching face is attached to that, I won't be able to keep it from my mind. In video, action can overcome a mediocre face - but in photos, I just have to move on.

I agree that I'm not wildly interested in continuous close-ups of a model's face - though an occasional close-up might be interesting. However, on the same note - I tire of my screen being filled up with genitals slapping together. I like the camera to step back most of the time, to casually watch the whole show and only occasionally punctuate the scene with a proper good closeup.

There are many other things I might nitpick about - a collective of little problems can easily prevent a download. However, to answer the question simply: The overarching, single, most common reason I skip a download is finding I'm not attracted to the model's face. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

11-04-08  06:43pm - 5853 days #31
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User



Posts: 708
Registered: Oct 29, '08
Location: UK
Sorry I'm late on this thread but I just joined. So much that has been said here is something I have wanted to scream about for years. I just have to add my pet hates - which are basically just about the same as everyone else.

1. Tattoos - toally sick of them. Total turn off.
2. Fake breasts - totally sick of them. Total turn off.
3. Too many close up gynaecological shots.
4. Focus on some idiot guy's face for about 2 minutes as he pulls faces, when what I want to be seeing is the girl's body.
5. Too much talk from some brain dead guy, followed by more talk from some other brain dead guy, when what I want to be seeing is the girl's body.
6. So much make up and surgery, the female looks like some 50 year old woman who is trying to look 18, and ends up looking 80, even though she is probably only 35.
7. Sex with underwear on. I know this is actually a turn on for some people. Just a matter of taste I suppose.
8. Cheap disco music in the backround.
9. Cheap disco music played LOUD.
10. Piercings.
11. Too much oral and close ups of oral. Again I know this is a turn on for some people. Just a matter of taste, once again, I suppose.

11-05-08  05:56am - 5853 days #32
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Like TheSquirrel, I also just recently joined. A few of mine:

1)Would have to agree with the damn cameramen that won't shut up.

2)Tattoos especially huge ones covering all of the back. Really not even fond of the tramp stamp but I can live with those.

3)Bad boob jobs: 9 times outta 10 I prefer ladys with natural breasts. Every once in a while I'll find one with fake that I really like, example Nicole Graves. But I just can't stand the ones with nipples pointing two different ways.

Those are probably my 3 biggest ones.

11-05-08  12:25pm - 5853 days #33
williamj (0)
Active User

Posts: 102
Registered: Sep 29, '07
Location: usa
Tattoo's and fake tit's. Will

06-04-09  09:40pm - 5641 days #34
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Well, here's one that's got me. Jayme Langford had fought to get an invitation to go along with Jana Foxy/Jordan on ALS Scan's Caribbean trip - she got the invite, with a bit of angst - then she shows up with a heart fucking carved into her wrist - a bloody ugly fucking repulsive mutilation - for a trip that's all about being completely nude all the time - what a fool! The thing is so repulsive that I can't stand a single pic of her where it's visible. I hope they pull any such pics from the photos of the trip. It's that anti-erotic. It seems incredibly dis-respectful of Alex and the ALS Scan crew to be going on a trip like this that she had to know was going to be rather expensive and then go mutilate herself like that before-hand. I don't get it. I sure wish I hadn't given my vote that she be invited - I figured that Jana would be crazier with her friend there - that may have happened, but Jana's fucking nuts anyway.

06-08-09  02:10pm - 5638 days #35
linzi1 (0)
Active User

Posts: 3
Registered: Jun 08, '09
Location: Birmingham/UK
The thing I do not like is fake boobs, I prefer natural, natural and big is my preference but I would rather natural and small instead of big and fake, especially the boobs that are like round balls when they come out their bra's

Linzi x

06-09-09  05:33am - 5637 days #36
lietuvagirls (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 10
Registered: Mar 20, '09
Location: Ryga Latvia
Hello,

I think I won't be OT, because it's all about what you like and what you can get for your INDIVIDUAL NEEDS.

We are technically running site karinasexdiary ( actually just started ), it's all about girl Karina from Lithiuania, she's girl without any limits for sex, she's pure amateur, but likes all things about sex, so we offered her to have her own site and let the members to request custom shootings ( photo , video, and it may be with other her friends, because she's the swinger ) just for their membership fee, of course, there are some limitation for request ( 1 per month ) and for scene places, because she is amateur and don't have studio, but in general, do you agree with idea of CUSTOM PORN, where you can directly influence content. Actually we are just starting, now we uploaded just first sessions of photo, now we are waiting for members to request custom content and we are ready to WORK FOR YOU.
We are reading this thread and trying to figure out what you like best, but if you have some individual needs and want to get content in our site by your scenario, you are always welcome. You can write anything to our girl by email: karina@karinasexdiary.com she will evaluate if it is possible for her to meet your needs and discus technical possibilities with our staff regarding your request, and you'll get answer from her when she can do it.
We are helping her in all technical stuff and believe me, she's worth to be seen in action... ;) Real and natural Eastern Europe girls http://www.lietuvagirls.com Edited by Staff on Jun 09, 2009, 06:28am (Khan: removed direct link)

06-09-09  07:05am - 5637 days #37
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Things that make me say "No" - webmasters posting advertisements for their sites in the guise of posting in a thread.

06-09-09  07:21am - 5637 days #38
lietuvagirls (0)
Suspended Webmaster




Posts: 10
Registered: Mar 20, '09
Location: Ryga Latvia
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Things that make me say "No" - webmasters posting advertisements for their sites in the guise of posting in a thread.


Sorry if you don't like us, we just want to listen to our potential customer needs and trying to give opportunity for you to get exactly what you want from porn site, because you write "I say no for.... I say yes for...." so we are trying to do our best for you to come to our site and say: "I want you to make for me... "
Sorry one more time ,if it is bad idea and it's not a place where we have to discuss customer needs and offer solutions... Real and natural Eastern Europe girls http://www.lietuvagirls.com

06-09-09  08:35am - 5637 days #39
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Hi Pinky, they have posted about ten posts and think PU is ok with it as many of us place links to other sites as well. They havent broken the rules and posted a review on their own site which would be no no. I am ok with having webmasters be involved in the forum.

But, lietuvagirls, this seems to be a fine line a webmaster rides on PU, I would say to email the webmasters here if you have any concerns or questions on what you can or can not post if unsure. Posting the wrong stuff is what I have seen in the past get a webmasters account disabled. Nice to see you here, there is a fine line in solicitation and providing information.

Cybertoad Since 2007

06-10-09  06:05am - 5636 days #40
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
As a quick aside ...

karinasexdiary has now been added.
You can enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/katrinasexdiary/ Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

07-08-09  12:29pm - 5608 days #41
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I hate fake tits, tattoos and a lot of moaning. These things are such a big turnoff, beyond my capacity for words. As far as real women, if they are game I am not turned off.

07-13-09  08:25pm - 5602 days #42
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Man, VideoBox posted some vid today - some extreme throat-gagging piece of shit - the cover of which is so fucking repulsive that I can't even look at the home page while it's there - yecccchhhh!!

There are things that make me say "No" and then there are things that could put me off porn forever - this is in the latter category.

Luckily I had downloaded the latest ALS Scan Caribbean vid - Amia Moretti and Tanner Mayes cavorting like the ultimate horny little beach nymphs - mmmmmm!!

07-13-09  08:31pm - 5602 days #43
GCode (0)
Active User



Posts: 386
Registered: Feb 23, '09
Location: USA
I agree with that statement PinkPanther. I just have never been in to extreme sex in general and especially extremely hard blowjob scenes which include gagging or vomiting. Plus, even aggressive sex turns me off. I just am not in to the excessive aggression towards women in porn or submission type sites.

I just joined ALS Scan and I can say I am extremely happy so far with the content. Plus, it just seems most the models are really enjoying themselves which creates extremely well videos and photo shoots. I'm going to check out that vid right now that you mention it :) Sexted From My iPad

07-14-09  08:08am - 5602 days #44
monty2222 (0)
Active User



Posts: 49
Registered: Feb 20, '09
Location: Denmark
I'm in much the same vain as the two above posters, aggression towards the women (choking, slapping, spitting) and especially the blowjobs where it's forced down the girl's throat is a big nono in my book too.
Another thing that turns me off is pierced (especially male) genitals, I can almost feel the pain of it getting caught in something. :-(

That's the two things I'll try to 'screen' a scene for before I download then if it has too talkative guys it can result in a quick deletion, in some scenes it might work (notably if the scene had a setup), but often it's just BS or him monotonously (and loudly!) groaning 'oh yeah' every five second. And finally too long close-ups on the guy wincing or having to stare at his asshole because the camera wants to show penetration at all costs can also send the scene to the trash can. Edited on Jul 14, 2009, 08:12am

07-14-09  08:58pm - 5601 days #45
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
For me, it's not all "hard and rough is bad" - in fact, I'm a big fan of Evil Angel stuff and my fave porn performers have included Debi Diamond, Careena Collins & Keanni Lei - all of whom are well known for doing intense work - but there's the fun of seeing women who want to do the craziest stuff and look good doing it - and then there's just disgusting shit. The first is a turn-on, the later definitely a "not".

As one of my fave strip club dancers said a week after seeing Gia Paloma do a feature stint, with a thoroughly disgusted look on her face, "Is it hot to see a woman shove a baseball bat up her ass? No, not hot!" Well, unless it's Jay Sin directing Amber Rayne in his utterly unique candy-coated filthy style. He could probably pull it off and make it look like a lot of fun.

07-14-09  09:20pm - 5601 days #46
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by monty2222:


I'm in much the same vain as the two above posters, aggression towards the women (choking, slapping, spitting) and especially the blowjobs where it's forced down the girl's throat is a big nono in my book too.
Another thing that turns me off is pierced (especially male) genitals, I can almost feel the pain of it getting caught in something. :-(

That's the two things I'll try to 'screen' a scene for before I download then if it has too talkative guys it can result in a quick deletion, in some scenes it might work (notably if the scene had a setup), but often it's just BS or him monotonously (and loudly!) groaning 'oh yeah' every five second. And finally too long close-ups on the guy wincing or having to stare at his asshole because the camera wants to show penetration at all costs can also send the scene to the trash can.


I'm not a fan of the aggressive stuff either. For example, Sasha Grey is one of the hottest porn stars out there (IMO) but I hardly keep any of her scenes because they are way too hardcore with the spitting, slapping and gagging.

07-15-09  10:41am - 5601 days #47
monty2222 (0)
Active User



Posts: 49
Registered: Feb 20, '09
Location: Denmark
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


For me, it's not all "hard and rough is bad" - in fact, I'm a big fan of Evil Angel stuff and my fave porn performers have included Debi Diamond, Careena Collins & Keanni Lei - all of whom are well known for doing intense work - but there's the fun of seeing women who want to do the craziest stuff and look good doing it - and then there's just disgusting shit. The first is a turn-on, the later definitely a "not".

As one of my fave strip club dancers said a week after seeing Gia Paloma do a feature stint, with a thoroughly disgusted look on her face, "Is it hot to see a woman shove a baseball bat up her ass? No, not hot!" Well, unless it's Jay Sin directing Amber Rayne in his utterly unique candy-coated filthy style. He could probably pull it off and make it look like a lot of fun.

Oh, I didn't mean to tie you up on my opinions, just that we had some common ground, that things can get so extreme that the cover is enough to turn us away. That baseball bat thing certainly sounds disturbing. :p

Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I'm not a fan of the aggressive stuff either. For example, Sasha Grey is one of the hottest porn stars out there (IMO) but I hardly keep any of her scenes because they are way too hardcore with the spitting, slapping and gagging.

Oooh, how many stills from Sasha scenes I have looked through and then refrained from downloading... :-(

07-15-09  06:55pm - 5601 days #48
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
My taste in porn goes from one extreme to the next. I can enjoy the hard stuff one minute and turn right back and enjoy just as much some nice soft porn. Of course my idea of hard does not include the use of face slapping, blowjob gagging, spitting, chocking, calling the performer deregatory names.

I much prefer the sex to be a balance between hard and soft. There aren't many scenes like that anymore. I find that today's hard porn exist more because the people making them simply have no talent and trash is easier to make than quality.

I'd compare it to swearing in comedy. It's easy to get a laugh when you swear, but only the great comedians can get them without ever using a swear word. Anyone can make gonzo porn and it sells but only the greta directors makes movies that we will talk about in a decade. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-15-09  10:13pm - 5600 days #49
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by monty2222:


...That baseball bat thing certainly sounds disturbing. :p


Disturbing, but interesting nonetheless. :) At least let me see it once (or a couple dozen times) before throwing it on the trash heap. I am definitely not a baseball fan, but nothing beats a good baseball bat scene every now and then. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

07-15-09  10:53pm - 5600 days #50
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
One of the most classic examples of a scene that made the producers say "No" or wish they had said "No" was a gang-bang vid that Careena Collins did. She is/was a seriously kinky woman and was in a pretty intense BDSM relationship with a rather large Black guy. For some reason, before the scene started - the one they were paying her for, they suggested that she get started with her guy to be "warmed up". She said, "Are you sure? We get pretty damned intense together." They said, "Oh, yeah - go for it." Well, apparently it was way too much for the producers - cause they didn't use any of that footage. You can hear a minute or so of her getting smacked and howling before the main scene starts and she was so battered that the guys in the gang bang look kind of freaked out from the beginning - and what could have been a hellaciously hot scene was easily the most disappointing gang bang vid that Careena did.

On the other hand, the 3-some that she did in Taking It To The Limit 6 is astoundingly hot - easily one of my fave porn scenes - as is the 3 some that she did in Car Wash Angels.

1-50 of 51 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.