Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » So called Newbies - again
1-12 of 12 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

04-14-10  06:34am - 5328 days Original Post - #1
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
So called Newbies - again

Please first take a look at this link:

https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47731


1) We got a review here, that other PUs - in a friendly way - says: Hey, let's get some more details! With good reason, in my opinion.

2) It turns out, that the (new) PU behind this review apparently has made or plans to make other reviews under a different name - WHY?

3) Ok, now someone (here: badandy) spoke out here - and then this (new) PU in question states, that he/she won't do anymore reviews.

I think the speak out by both badandy and pinkterton is friendly and maybe guiding the way it should be for so called regulars/veterans...

Generally PU-members has been, yes: friendly in at least 90 % of all replies towards some VERY short reviews made by so called newbies - review that - like in this case - is generally NOT a very big help for others here.

OK - some of us 'veterans' makes looooooong reviews - but - again generally - I want a lot of facts and also opinions about sites I've never been at before - that's the kind of help that's importend to consider a new site to join...

"I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Apr 14, 2010, 06:52am

04-14-10  09:48am - 5328 days #2
GCode (0)
Active User



Posts: 386
Registered: Feb 23, '09
Location: USA
adultporn did not do this review. He is referring to the comments made by badandy400 in 350Z review for Miss Hybrid in which adultporn got 'called out' for when adultporn questioned the review of the Miss Hybrid site and was being called a newbie. This response was to tell badandy400 that he/she felt that they were not a newbie because they have done reviews under a different name and changed it awhile back. I really don't kmow where this thread is going but all the discussions here are getting a bit old in relation to this person did that or that person did that, let's do this or that. Can we just go back to the threads that I used to enjoy having discussions on?

My 2 cents... Sexted From My iPad

04-14-10  10:43am - 5328 days #3
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
By all means - did not realize this (thread) had ANYTHING to do with Miss Hybrid and all that jazz - does it? Not to my knowledge.

This (the thread) was - in my opinion - an example of 'newbies' doing a review and the replies, the way we/regulars/veterans answers newbies ect.
Nothing else - and this user have already stated the wish to forget all that former palaver - so GCode: I'm not really getting your point here? "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle"

04-14-10  10:54am - 5328 days #4
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Regarding item #2 ...

While user adultporn did say he'd previously posted under a different user name, to my knowledge, he's not the one who posted the review you linked to.

BTW, we have let adultporn know he's allowed to use only one user account. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

04-14-10  11:01am - 5328 days #5
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
Ok, Khan - and thanks - did not know about the specials concerning adultporn. This (thread) was bottom line just a reflection on 'newbies'-reviews and the (good) remarks/replies made by badandy and pinkerton... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle"

04-14-10  12:25pm - 5328 days #6
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Denner, just so you (and others) know ...

When we accept those very short reviews from new users, they don't typically earn any points. Also, we'll usually give them a little coaching (in the staff remarks) so their future reviews will be more thorough. Of course, if they're too brief then they're just not accepted as a review. In that case we suggest they add more info or resubmit as a Comment. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

04-14-10  12:42pm - 5328 days #7
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
Did not know that (lordy, lordy for a regular/veteran/old timer - am I slipping?)

Actually, I did not know that TBP/PU-staff interfered with the length ect. in those reviews in question.

They (reviews with one or two lines at pros/cons/bottom line) often stay on the PU day after day - and SOMETIMES some 'regulars/veterans' makes a reply - most in the direction of 'more details, please'.

I think it's just great that those, maybe new PUs get some guidance about the general ideas of reviews from you TBP/PU guys...
"I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle"

04-14-10  02:15pm - 5328 days #8
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Well, its not so much interfering as it is maintaining minimum standards.

For instance, I'll often point new users to our page showing them how they can earn points for their reviews. https://www.pornusers.com/profile_points.html Sometimes, I'll point them to the forum thread: What should a PU review include?

But yes, we do try to coach new submitters without scaring them off. Sometimes they accept the suggestions and go on to become great submitters. Other times, they send me an email telling me what a rat bastard I am for not accepting their super-short blurps.
Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson
Edited on Apr 15, 2010, 09:28am (Khan: typo)

04-14-10  07:09pm - 5328 days #9
GCode (0)
Active User



Posts: 386
Registered: Feb 23, '09
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


By all means - did not realize this (thread) had ANYTHING to do with Miss Hybrid and all that jazz - does it? Not to my knowledge.

This (the thread) was - in my opinion - an example of 'newbies' doing a review and the replies, the way we/regulars/veterans answers newbies ect.
Nothing else - and this user have already stated the wish to forget all that former palaver - so GCode: I'm not really getting your point here?


Ok let me clarify. adultporn is not chancler. In #2, you said the user adultporn is creating a new name to write reviews because of badandy400's response to add more details to the Brazzers review. However, adultporn's response has to do with what badandy400 wrote to him about adultporn being a newbie and criticizing 350Z's review but being a newbie himself in 350Z's review of Miss Hybrid, here is the discussion: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47577

I'm now beginning to understand what is going on here. Denner, it's not your fault, but you misunderstood the whole reply in the review and replies in https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47731

To clarify more, I'm thinking you thought chancler was adultporn and when adultporn responded to badandy400 asking for more details. But, in reality, adultporn was not chancler and was just letting badandy400 know what the deal with the videos at Brazzers was with no affiliation as the member 'chancler'. Then, adultporn responded to badandy400 about doing reviews under a different name in response to a different reply in a different review.

Maybe I'm way off base but I think this thread started as a misunderstanding but was totally appriopiate under the circumstances that Denner based his thread off of in regards that he thought adultporn was chancler. Sexted From My iPad

04-14-10  08:35pm - 5328 days #10
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
I remember getting a little coaching on my first or second review back in the day. I wear my dunce cap proudly!


04-15-10  12:32am - 5327 days #11
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
Originally Posted by GCode:


Ok let me clarify. adultporn is not chancler. In #2, you said the user adultporn is creating a new name to write reviews because of badandy400's response to add more details to the Brazzers review. However, adultporn's response has to do with what badandy400 wrote to him about adultporn being a newbie and criticizing 350Z's review but being a newbie himself in 350Z's review of Miss Hybrid, here is the discussion: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47577

I'm now beginning to understand what is going on here. Denner, it's not your fault, but you misunderstood the whole reply in the review and replies in https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47731

To clarify more, I'm thinking you thought chancler was adultporn and when adultporn responded to badandy400 asking for more details. But, in reality, adultporn was not chancler and was just letting badandy400 know what the deal with the videos at Brazzers was with no affiliation as the member 'chancler'. Then, adultporn responded to badandy400 about doing reviews under a different name in response to a different reply in a different review.

Maybe I'm way off base but I think this thread started as a misunderstanding but was totally appriopiate under the circumstances that Denner based his thread off of in regards that he thought adultporn was chancler.


Ok, guess I misunderstood that specific review/reply completely - thanks for clarifying things....still I think the input did some good concerning 'newbies reviews' in general - see above... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Apr 15, 2010, 06:38am

04-16-10  02:19pm - 5326 days #12
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
My only and negative I have on my account is due to giving a 100 as a newbie.
I have no simpathy for bashing newbies persay.
After all I got the shaft ( i thought so then )
After all these years being a member I am still stuck with a
negative Since 2007

1-12 of 12 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.