|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Fox News Megyn Kelly fantasies |
| 1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 12-21-14 01:27pm - 3654 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Cum Play John (0)
Active User Posts: 38 Registered: Aug 01, '13 Location: Tampa, FL |
Fox News Megyn Kelly fantasies Not yet sure of the morality of the day when virtual reality finally makes it possible to actually do all the things that most straight men dream of doing to Megyn Kelly. It's one thing, of course, if she sells her 3D body scan to Private.com for mass production in the head visors of a new, souped-up Private Villa 4D game. It's another if some World-of-Warcraft hacker produces a 3D composite body image and suddenly 10 million (100 million? 1 billion?) men are having repeated oral sex with her visage for prolonged hours on end. ("Megyn, aren't you done obsessing over the tip of my penis YET?!") What happens when she goes out on a date and hears talk of "Megyn Loves to Open Up with Anal After an Intense Night of Broadcasting" at the local bistro? Would that be fair? Would that be moral? We have to balance two moral quanta in this utilitarian equation: One quantity would be the emotional damage conceivably done once Megyn found out everything men want to do with her. (But is she really that surprised? She learned that, surely, by age 14.) On the other side is the democratizing liberalization of human sexuality when the average Joe, to paraphrase Dennis Miller, can go home, open a can of Pabst Blue Ribbon, and fuck the living hell out of Megyn Kelly. Particularly liberals would enjoy this, but I can imagine conservatives would too. Not least, because MSNBC doesn't have anyone remotely close in hotness. Cum Play John | |
|
||
| 12-21-14 06:06pm - 3654 days | #2 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I gather from your post that you are a huge fan of Megyn. I'm not but then again I avoid watching Fox regardless of how the hot the people who appear on the show are so I'll avoid talking about her and limit myself to celebrities in general. The technology to create virtual characters that resemble their celebrity counterpart already exist. The most recent Tron movie is a good example. You have 65 year old Jeff Bridges playing both the older looking character of Flynn as well as the younger looking character of Clue. Jeff had to wear some type of head gear that had motion catching cameras on it but it was so that animators could match the computer generated characters facial expression to the real actor. I think what we do not have are computers that are capable of animating a virtual character in real time or more precisely if we do have them than they are not being used for that purpose because the cost of buying one means that only huge corporations or Government agencies can afford them and they aren't animating virtual porn characters. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 12-23-14 10:45am - 3652 days | #3 | |
|
Cum Play John (0)
Active User Posts: 38 Registered: Aug 01, '13 Location: Tampa, FL |
Probably true, your last point, but then again porn does tend to revolutionize technologies first and drive down price points. There's a grey zone about public photography of people; I wonder if there will be a grey zone about 3D simulation of them for sex acts. Seems highly likely. Then again, creative freedom could be cited. Someone who makes the first interactive version of Angelina Jolie (sans consciousness for the marionette) will have likely done humanity a very double-edged favor. Cum Play John | |
|
||
| 12-23-14 06:31pm - 3652 days | #4 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I don't think porn revolutionises technology so much as people try to incorporate certain technologies into porn in the hope that it will be like it was for VHS. It may not be a bad idea or at least it wasn't a bad idea a few years ago but I think these days anyone looking to make a killing by coming up with a porn related piece of technology may be barking up the wrong tree. Porn made VHS the home video technology that it is and it also killed the superior Beta format but that was in the 70's and one of the two formats was going to be a winner regardless of porn. It's just that porn put a few nails in the Beta coffin. These days porn is in a transition phase where quality is no longer an important part of the final product. In large part because the people making it don't have the care or talent necessary to make it better and those that do don't have the return on investment needed to make it as good as they would like to. Therefore anyone wanting to introduce a new piece of technology would have to suffer through many years of little to no return on their investment and I can't see anyone having that kind of cash. I'd like to point out that someone has already created a virtual reality Angelina character. You just have to look at Beowulf to know that they needed to scan her whole body to create her animated character, You can`t tell me that one of these geeks didn`t save the file on his drive. Of course she will never sign off on her likeness being used in anything as lurid as porn. Her likeness is worth millions and you don`t mess with that by appearing in porn. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 12-24-14 08:23pm - 3651 days | #5 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended  Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
Yo, Pat..... Are we talkin' 'bout the same "Angelina" ??? ..... specifically our genre's long-winded chatterbox who, incidentally, then, now, and I suspect always will do all her shoots strictly solo.....and with her equipment she'll never be pounding the pavement thus jus' taking what she can get. I'd argue she'll likely always be having her own web site. I'd also venture to predict her low-profiling will continue wielding a firm grip on porn's ranking centesimal formula for however far this gal wants her success to go -- which, unarguably, obviously excels mainly on her incredible anatomical architecture that few girls of porn can only hope to approach. A gal so gifted with bodily dimensional perfection that I'd argue even Our world's perennial, literary-master-of poetic erotica, God of Love and venerably unstoppable genius (Adonis) That even he (Adonis) would struggle heralding from his mastery of prose -- awarding justifiable accordance to we lust-abiding -- all of whom share amongst the whole of the weaken male -- stashed amongst archives of his many monumental literary works. And Pat .....is this the Angelina who flashes those big, unmatched, expressive, dancing eyes that goes to the jugular amid our favored fantasies? If we're sizing up the same gal..... I'm coming after your hard drive.  As usual and always, , acted upon, and related to us in his exceptionally decipherable manner.  Attributable to one of PU's finest ....Pat | |
|
||
| 12-25-14 10:07am - 3650 days | #6 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
The Angelina I'm talking about is Angelina Jolie but I'm now really curious about your Angie because I must know whop it is but can't picture her in my mind. Please add a link so that I can see what she looks like. Of course that won't stop me from commenting on your post. Women like Angelina fall under three different groups but they each have some things in common. They are all gifted with an amazing body and a beautiful face. The first group are women who through circumstances(luck) or location can earn a decent living doing mostly semi-nude, nudes and solo softcore stuff. There are plenty of women like that to the point where I believe this market is now over-saturated and few women can earn a decent living doing that. My guess is that these women were not stripper or prostitutes/escorts and therefore sex was not something they were used to in their prior occupation. The next group is about the same but sadly for them they have to transition to harder stuff or find another line of work. Their performance tends to reflect their dislike for what they now have to do and that means you are watching a beautiful woman fucking horribly on screen. That also means that they will usually burn out faster than most women and they will leave the industry with health problems and an addiction to at least alcohol or drugs. The last group is again taken from the above pool of women but these women choose to transition to the harder stuff. I'm sure there is more than one reason but money is often the most important in their final decision because hardcore pays a lot better and these women still do the softcore stuff which means they can earn a very good living. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 12-31-14 09:17am - 3644 days | #7 | |
|
Cum Play John (0)
Active User Posts: 38 Registered: Aug 01, '13 Location: Tampa, FL |
I'm a bit morally ambivalent about porn because of the concerns you just raised, though I pause before your distinction between the second and third category. Barring obviously exploitative films that do not involve consent (a category I cannot imagine watching) it would strike me that the second and third category are one in the same. Hot women realize they can make more money doing porn and they do so: I don't think this falls into easy class exploitation meme except insofar as ALL porn might be argued to be exploitative. It's a difficult debate. On the one side we have the pro-porn feminists like Camille Paglia and on the other those who cannot conceive of videos of sex for sale as not subjugating women. I tend to side with Paglia, and not just for self-interested reasons. That does not mean, however, that there isn't certain stuff out there too hard for me to watch -- or even, quite plausibly, a kind of unconscious act of self-abuse for the woman to participate in. I could easily see where one could witness a porn model enduring what will likely be a traumatic experience due to her own lack of familiarity with future consequences of certain rougher stuff. But then again, it's extremely difficult for the viewer to always determine when that threshold has been passed. I see your point though if you mean, by the distinction, that there are some women who enjoy porn and many who don't. Cum Play John Edited on Dec 31, 2014, 09:26am | |
|
||
| 1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
