Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Cameramen just keep slippin' and slidin' over their own flaws.
1-5 of 5 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

04-09-15  10:47pm - 3544 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Cameramen just keep slippin' and slidin' over their own flaws.

Yesterday I saw a foot adjoined to a leg, shot right out there on a hardcore scene in progress. I know it wasn't a third-party performer because his lower limbs are clothed in jeans with torso slightly clad in a plaid shirt.
You get far-to-many shoots sprouting shadows all over the place from lackluster camera-work.
Needless to say those kind of added attractions wasn't purposely injected to add overtime to the cameraman's pay-check .... and certainly not put there to provide erotic appeal to the scene.
Cutting to the chase, we have what I call the sniffer-cameraman .... because he inordinately dwells on rear-end coital close-ups, wherein his nose is buried in the womans' sexual orifices, and we see her male performer's balls dangling over, in front of, and around the lens ... almost always for a dizzyingly extended length of time. Let me not forget depiction of ungodly volumes of the male's genital hair, giving us microscopic views of root formation and anything crawling on the surface.

May I say all the above spills over onto other grinding annoyances beleaguering we who pay for this stuff.

A few samples:

Ever notice women in the throes of constantly lip-reading, and/or casting amply those fleeting glances off camera for instructions of what to do next?

Arousal assessed damages of those and countless other such scenes should weigh in at being tantamount to one's ball's suddenly clamped in the jaws of a starving Parana.
Not mentioned are many behind-the-camera need-be....and may I include directorial shortcomings that never-grow-old.
Invitational are naturally out for any views you wish to add?

PS .....
Starving artists? Not now nor forever in the porn industry.

04-10-15  10:08am - 3544 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Yesterday I saw a foot adjoined to a leg, shot right out there on a hardcore scene in progress. I know it wasn't a third-party performer because his lower limbs are clothed in jeans with torso slightly clad in a plaid shirt.
You get far-to-many shoots sprouting shadows all over the place from lackluster camera-work.
Needless to say those kind of added attractions wasn't purposely injected to add overtime to the cameraman's pay-check .... and certainly not put there to provide erotic appeal to the scene.


You must be subscribing to "Girls Out West," graymane. The owner of the site, Annie, almost made it her trade mark to be in a scene. Either partially or fully. It shocked me the first few times I saw it but because I liked what she filmed I learned to put up with the casual atmosphere.

And I agree with you when it comes to glances to the camera for direction! Very annoying!

04-10-15  02:49pm - 3544 days #3
biker (0)
Active User



Posts: 632
Registered: May 03, '08
Location: milwaukee, wi
It is reaching the point where the only site I join anymore is DDF. I keep trying other sites and they are less and less professional. I prefer lesbian and solo performance sets and they are rare in the porn world. Now add the poor quality, as you have mentioned Graymane, and the choices get very small.

What is getting on my nerves is the poor support systems websites are using. This is not just porn, it extends throughout the internet. My last disappointment was about my password. Even though I didn't leave the site, they closed me out. I had trouble with my password trying to get back in. I used their,"If you don't remember your password we will send you your password to your Email", button. They say if you don't get a message in five minutes check your junk mail. I tried three times, with no success, and finally went to their billing service, who got me my password in just a few seconds after I verified it was truly me. With the correct password, I still could not get into the site. I went to website's own support to ask what is going on. After an hour, with no reply, I contacted the billing service again and all they could do was cancel my account. I agreed and got a refund. I finally got a reply from the porn site, six hours after I contacted their support. I responded with, "I canceled my subscription." All this started after being a member for only a couple hours. Warning Will Robinson

04-10-15  10:31pm - 3544 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Nice rant, guys .... stirs up memories of yesteryear, at about the start of year 2010 when I discovered this great site ....
Knowing a privileged moment when it's soundly introduced, I tossed my hat in the ring here at Porn users, sort out and learned from the pros, saddled up with some of the toughest porn-rants combing the web and set out to make misbehaving webmasters stay at biting their nails for fear of PU's wrath.
Although most of PU's ardent fighters have drifted away, our legacy and arsenal of power is still alive and well.
Be assured PU won't be holding its tongue sounding off for what it's always espoused to and believes in that'll improve porn's image.

04-11-15  06:48am - 3543 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I can imagine that it's a precision job to get those "from behind" closeups without treating the viewer to the spectacle of hairy dangleberries. The fucking surface can't be bouncy (bed springs) for one thing.

There are some scenes of Anjelica (our Russian queen) that allow a good view of her delectable pussy and ass from underneath. It helps greatly that her frequent partner's balls are usually packed close to the undercarriage and not swinging around. Plus both of them are youthfully thin.

It's easier, I'd think, to get the shot from about 35 degrees off the crack line and about 15 over the fuck surface, so the guy's leg might be there but not in the way. I've got several scenes that work in such fashion so long as careful planning is in evidence.

But the problem that Graymane is addressing is that not enough videographers do the blocking (theatre term) that well.

Why hasn't anyone written a manual for this, or better yet, created a series of instructional videos? Maybe it just hasn't been translated from the original Russian, or Czech, or whatever. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

1-5 of 5 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.