Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » request - not sure how this could be achieved though
1-10 of 10 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

02-05-09  08:38pm - 5798 days Original Post - #1
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 12
Registered: Dec 22, '08
Location: PA
request - not sure how this could be achieved though

As stated in the title, not sure how this can be achieved, but a logical request none the less.

Would be nice if there was some separate page on here where users could review bonus content that sites offer and have a list of sites that offer access to the content.
E.g. PluginFeeds(.)com, Holio(.)net, PlatinumFeeds(.)com to name a few.

Some bonus content is clearly better than others, would be nice to get ratings in the system.

02-06-09  08:38am - 5798 days #2
Rick (0)
Suspended



Posts: 401
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Interesting request. This was something I almost implemented soon after the launch of TBP many years ago. It got to be too complex and it didn't appear that users cared enough about the bonus content (plug-ins) to make it worth the effort. So instead, we really didn't even mention it. Since then, nobody has ever requested or been interested, until today. :)

Plug-ins seem to be almost completely dead now from a business/webmaster stand point, but you still see them on sites. The problem with the proposition is tracking all the feeds and what sites they exist on. It's a major hastle and would take away resources toward more important site facts. Plus identifying each feed and it's source is sometimes impossible. There are a few decent feeds out there though and probably best for discussion in a thread here on the forum to those interested.

Definitely curious what users think about feeds (bonus content). I've always wondered if others even pay attn to them. The Best Porn - Ultimate Consumer Guide to Porn
Porn Users - Porn Review by the People
Ranks.com, Inc., Chief/Founder

02-06-09  10:19am - 5798 days #3
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 12
Registered: Dec 22, '08
Location: PA
I certainly look at them, but it is dependent on site.

On sites like NaughtyAmerica, RealityKings, or VideoBox (or any other major, quality website) I don't even think about looking for bonus material because the content the site provides is so good and updated to the point where bonus material isn't even necessary. However, if bonus material is available it is certainly a plus (I don't consider networked sites "bonus" material, btw).
On a lot of other sites that I have looked at the content is either really lacking, really bad or non-existent where you have to ask yourself "where is the beef? maybe in the bonus content?".

I certainly don't put much weight in bonus material when rating a site, but if its provided it certainly helps.

02-06-09  10:30am - 5798 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There are a few sites where the Bonus Material is worth something - both Nubiles.net and Teendreams have bonus material that is worth something. Twisty's added NicoleGraves.com as a bonus site for members and that's definitely worth something.

KarenDreams.com has bonus material that is sample sets from lots of different sites - that's fun quality material, though nothing you couldn't find at Freeones.com's message board easily. Still, it's good looking stuff.

But the plug-in drek that is the "bonus" on most sites? What's the point? It's crap. They would score higher points with me to not have it, since it's such poor quality garbage.

02-06-09  10:43am - 5798 days #5
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 12
Registered: Dec 22, '08
Location: PA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


But the plug-in drek that is the "bonus" on most sites? What's the point? It's crap. They would score higher points with me to not have it, since it's such poor quality garbage.


Not all of its crap.
PluginFeeds is superb quality. Yes, I know that download links are not there, but with the right (and free) tools, downloading the streams is a snap. Hell, like I commented on CDGirls, there is text on the CDGirls' page telling members to get a stream downloader to download the PluginFeeds streams. The majority of PluginFeeds material is low quality 320x240 WMV split-scene, however they have been working hard at making their content worthwhile to site owners - they have updated their layout, added HQ images for all sets, re-encoded movies into HD full-movie flash streams, tagged all videos with dates, etc.

PlatinumFeeds offers a library of over 5000 DVDs to stream from. Again, all are WMV streams, but with the right tools...

Holio is complete crap, not even worth going into.

Vivid bonus is just crap, its the same as the website content, which is next to nothing to begin with.

Hustler bonus is good, since it is a dupe of the main site content. The content is low quality, but in the form of a free bonus, you can't complain (in the form of a full site, like lfpcontent.com, then there are grounds to complain).

There are a lot of them out there. I'd say maybe a third of them are actually worthwhile and are high quality with real updates. A lot of them, by themselves, put many porn sites to shame. Personally, I think PluginFeeds with its network of sites, offers more than a lot of porn sites I know.

When I get a chance I'll look around for some bonus feeds and review them.

02-06-09  12:29pm - 5798 days #6
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:35pm

02-06-09  02:04pm - 5798 days #7
Rick (0)
Suspended



Posts: 401
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: Las Vegas, NV
For my own reference, look for the following poll question tomorrow (Feb 7th)...

"Do you pay any attention to 3rd party video feeds (plug-ins) in members areas?"

Appreciate the feedback! The Best Porn - Ultimate Consumer Guide to Porn
Porn Users - Porn Review by the People
Ranks.com, Inc., Chief/Founder

02-06-09  02:29pm - 5798 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I see most bonus content as junk that's used to just pump up the numbers of scenes and sets sites can advertise. The majority of bonus content is just small clips of videos and tiny pictures that most of us here won't even take the time to glance at. A few sites have decent bonus sites but they are few and far between. The other problem with the plug in bonus sites is that they often don't work and that they frequently change so giving a review on what a site has to offer as "bonus" may not even apply a few weeks later.

Another issue is how to define "bonus site". Some sites that are networked call the other sites "bonus" material and some call them "exclusive extra material", some just call them network sites, etc. so you don't really have any consistency among the sites thus making it harder for consumers to draw the line.

My take is that if there is the odd good bonus material that you note it in the review and leave it at that.


I quote Wittyguy here as his statements very much reflect my own experience, too. When a site says, "Bonus Content!" I immediately translate: "Add-on Crap."

I do appreciate good bonus content, but it's as rare as a perfect day.

And for TBP to keep track of all those mostly worthless, poor-quality, years-old small-sized crappy vids and .jpgs that have lost so much data from being passed around that they look as though they were bruised up in a back alley?

Forget it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-07-09  03:03am - 5797 days #9
atrapat (0)
Active User



Posts: 182
Registered: Apr 19, '08
Location: Non-USA
Looks like Pluginfeeds consists mainly of older episodes of Pink Visual Pass. Checking Trashman's related CDGirls comment I noticed all these sites available from Pink Visual: Backseat Bangers, Her First Anal Sex, Desperate Teens (Teens For Cash??), Her First Lesbian Sex.

PU rules most certainly wouldn't allow a review of these sites from viewing part of the content at Pluginfeeds but why not leave a comment? Just an idea.

02-07-09  03:06am - 5797 days #10
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 12
Registered: Dec 22, '08
Location: PA
Originally Posted by atrapat:


Looks like Pluginfeeds consists mainly of older episodes of Pink Visual Pass. Checking Trashman's related CDGirls comment I noticed all this sites available from Pink Visual: Backseat Bangers, Her First Anal Sex, Desperate Teens (Teens For Cash??), Her First Lesbian Sec.

PU rules most certainly wouldn't allow a review of this sites from viewing part of the content at Pluginfeeds but why not leave a comment? Just an idea.


Thats exactly what it is...Pink Visual content (with marginally better actress tagging)...except more of it that any DVD site offers to date.
VideosZ offers a lot of Pink Visual, but not as much as is available on PluginFeeds. And although it is just reproduced content (which is what Bonus Feeds are most of the time), it at least is content you probably have never enjoyed previously unless you have been a long time member of VideosZ - no other site I know of, especial of the CDGirls type, offers Pink Visual material.

1-10 of 10 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.