Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Wauw..'protection' from stupid reviews.....
1-5 of 5 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

12-22-09  07:20am - 5442 days Original Post - #1
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
Wauw..'protection' from stupid reviews.....

Just curious - PU had three reviews these last minuttes - reviews which seemed even worse than useless. Do not remember the PU-name - BUT all three were deleted very fast - when trying to answer the 'joker'

So Khan: How are you guys so damn fast?

Great job, BTW "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle"

12-22-09  07:26am - 5442 days #2
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
In this case, just luck actually. Obviously, I'm checking submitted reviews and forum posts many times throughout the day. We try to keep things cleaned up around here.

For those wondering what Denner is referring to. We had three reviews submitted that were declined. Two for not meeting the minimum standards for a review (they may be resubmitted as a Comment) and one because it was based on a limited trial. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

12-22-09  07:42am - 5442 days #3
Denner (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,217
Registered: Mar 03, '07
Location: Denmark
Thanks, Khan - the question/reply to one of these reviews was specific HOW this new user could make a review based on a limited trial...... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle"

12-22-09  07:10pm - 5441 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yeah, I feel that comments about Limited Trials are warranted - it's good to know if trial members are worth anything - but to review a site based on a limited trial is clearly unfair.

12-23-09  07:17pm - 5440 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
The only time I would consider a review acceptable is if the limited trial is one based on time and not content. If you get full access membership for a couple of days rather than a full month then you should be able to have an opinion. Mind you these are rare. Most trial memberships are menat to wet your appetite and leave you wanting more. Long live the Brown Coats.

1-5 of 5 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.