Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: KET924aab (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (60)  |   Threads Started (2)

1-50 of 60 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >

10-07-14  08:53pm - 3729 days #9
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I often edit some of the photos, but always keep all of the originals. The edited ones get a filename extension. I do a fair amount of cropping, fine rotation with cropping, and occasionally I use Paint to airbrush out an annoying blemish or two.

Once I'm done going through a photoset, my favorite pics from the set get copied to my favorites folder for the model. This consists of my favorite pics from all the photosets I have from her across many sites.

A pleasant hobby indeed!

04-23-14  10:14pm - 3896 days #13
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Interesting question pornpundit!

For me, I would be happy to see a return to prominence of good ole regular stripping and fucking. Instead, it seems that there is general trend in porn toward extremes, strange fetishes, and too much anal. Now I know that some people are into these things, but the pendulum seems to have swung too far in that direction in recent years. I don't know if it's just a passing fad or not, but I hope so.

04-23-14  09:45pm - 3896 days #12
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by jook:


I think this will happen if it already hasn't. I'd love to direct my own video from my computer, i.e., a custom video. And it should be economically feasible. My guess is that someone is already developing a program to do this. Or has it been done?



Jook the whole webcam business basically involves you directing a model to do what you would like to see. There are a number of sites where the performers include couples--if you are into hardcore. The drawbacks are less than top notch video quality (this will certainly improve over time), and the expense (most private shows at webcam sites will end up costing more than a month's membership to a typical porn site, sometimes 2 or 3 times more).

LPee23 mentioned clips4sale, and I checked that out last year, but I agree the prices seem a bit high. But they are custom vids.

Along the same lines, there are an increasing number of models at MyFreeCams.com who will do custom videos for prices less than that. You basically email them with your request, and then tip them whatever fee they charge. They make the video, and then post it on an offline website that they give you a password for. Last year I had a model do a custom strip and masturbation vid for me for 300 tokens (a bit less than $30). It was in 720p HD, and she did a great job. MFC also records all of your private shows, in essence, making you a custom video of them (though again, the resolution isn't that great).

Of course, there are relatively few porn stars who are also into webcamming, so if you have a short list of porn stars that you are interested in, you are probably out of luck. But its not hard to find models you really like at the bigger webcam sites.

I predict that 10 years from now there will be plenty of webcam sites or other sites where models will do custom videos for reasonable prices. And the camera and video resolution will probably be full HD quality. I may get back into webcam sites if and when that happens. Late last year I decided to cancel my memberships at the 2 webcam sites I used, mainly because the video quality just doesn't compare to true HD vids or photography I can get from regular porn sites. They were also just too time consuming, and ultimately too expensive.

02-13-14  07:49pm - 3965 days #23
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Biker, here is a thought about external hard drives. I use them exclusively for porn storage, because if my computer should happen to need repair, then I can take it in to a shop without having to worry about the tech finding porn on it. Also, if family members (nieces, nephews) come over to visit, it is easy to disconnect them and put them in a safe spot.

Now, if I can just figure out how to stop Chrome from showing my favorite porn sites when it loads up!

02-13-14  07:39pm - 3965 days #16
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I follow several dozen models, and use Indexxx to keep tabs on them. I've found Indexxx to be the most complete model index site. Pornteengirl has better set previews for some models and sites, but has a lot fewer models.

As for what attracts me to a specific model, I like girls in the 20 to 25 age range, natural B or C cup boobs, and attractive. There are lots of those, but I couldn't really tell you why I pick this one or that one as a fav.

02-13-14  07:29pm - 3965 days #17
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I remember the day I got my first personal computer, a Gateway 286 with 2 megs of RAM and a 40 meg hard drive. And it had a modem. Windows wasn't around then--this was a MS-DOS machine. I think this was in the late 80s. A friend came over and we spent several hours dialing into various bulletin boards, downloading crappy porn images. That was my first online porn.

Later in the 90s, I used to waste a lot of time on UseNet, downloading pirated images. I noticed watermarks on a lot of them, and even checked out a few websites, but the quality was still too low for me to use that as my main form of porn. Plus, the signal to noise ratio was pretty low on UseNet.

My first online porn site membership was to TeenDreams in the summer of 2006. I haven't bought a porn mag since, and have been exclusively digital since then. I still have a couple of boxes of porn mags in my storage unit, but they are going to dumpster very soon.

06-08-13  06:10am - 4215 days #620
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Hi Khan,

Please add stunning18.com another new site on the Met-Art network.

Thanks!

06-03-13  03:53am - 4220 days #17
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I see a good looking girl with big boobs! Don't know who she is.

05-30-13  06:05pm - 4224 days #5
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Late last year I was looking for something new and different from the usual rotation of porn sites I had. I was familiar with TBP, and went over there and did some searching. I pulled up some site, and clicked on the Porn Users link. The user reviews definitely added value over and above what I was getting from the TBP review, so I spent a little time looking at reviews on Porn Users. Didn't take long before I joined up! I think we have a lot more liberty here to not sugar coat things, and little things that can really irk you never seemed to be missed by Porn Users comments and reviews. It's a great site, and I hope it's here for the long run!

05-11-13  03:22pm - 4243 days #4
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Isn't this sort of the universal problem that hoarders face?


Sounds like a good idea for a new reality TV series.... "Porn Hoarders" LOL

05-03-13  09:41pm - 4251 days #19
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


You are correct. Almost all of MetArt's photo sets start totally naked.


Monahan, I'm guessing you're not a current member at Met-Art, because most of their sets do start fully clothed, and there are very few fully nude sets. I did a count on the last 80 sets (about 3 weeks worth), and 51 of 80 started with the girl clothed (no breasts or pussy showing). Are you thinking of Femjoy?

Despite the high percentage of intially clothed sets, the models typically lose the clothes fast, and there are very few good strip sequences. The photographer Antonio Clemens does the best job of photographing strip sequences.

Messmer, I also counted how many of the last 80 sets had panties. It was only 25 of 80, and maybe half of those had the full frontal shots you describe. Met-Art is a good site, but strip-tease and panties are not their forte.

04-11-13  10:13pm - 4273 days #3
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Messmer, I think its part of the general trend among photogs and porn sites of neglecting the slow sexy strip tease. How many times for example have you seen a photo set or video where the cameraman focuses on the girl unbuttoning her blouse or top one button at a time, or slowly unzipping it if it has a zipper? Then making her bra straps fall one at a time, and giving some sexy cleavage views and nipple peeks before taking off her bra. Then getting her jeans/pants/skirt off in a sexy way. Then letting us enjoy some sexy moves while she's wearing only her panties. Then some sexy panty tease with both front and rear views. If a girl does that right, I'm rock hard before she even takes her panties off! And you mentioned one of my pet peeves--for some reason we almost always get the rear view only when models take their panties off. How about pull them down nice and slow to the mid thigh level, then pull them back up, turn around, and do it again. But sadly, such videos or photo sets are next to impossible to find. In most cases and for most porn sites, its let's get to fully nude in a hurry. Very frustrating for a panty lover like me!

I'm going to post a review of All Panty Pass very soon. My one month membership just ended there, and sadly, I find it hard to recommend the site.

04-05-13  09:52pm - 4279 days #2
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Bastard, check out My Free Cams. They don't call it free for nothing.

04-03-13  06:42am - 4281 days #12
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Get well soon Khan!!!

04-01-13  10:16am - 4283 days #40
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I used to burn DVDs, but that stopped when I got a laptop 2 years ago with an HDMI output. I would like to find a good video editing package.

03-18-13  08:58am - 4297 days #23
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Oh, and from a long time ago, Christina Leardini from the Playboy Specials magazines. Not sure if she was ever a Playmate. Her tits were perfect before she went under the knife.

03-18-13  08:52am - 4297 days #22
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I second and third the post-surgery disappointment with Aletta Ocean. She was gorgeous in her early work!

Does anyone know if Dillon Harper has gotten fake tits? I thought I saw her on the free tour at Bikini Riot.

I think I may have seen 2 or 3 boob jobs that I would say improved the model. Thats out of probably hundreds that I've seen.

03-11-13  06:03am - 4304 days #8
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Also Dracula, your ISP should have a speed test available on their website, and if they don't I'm sure you can google one up. Its always good to know what kind of speeds your connection gets, and how that varies by time of day. If its too slow, you should probably upgrade. There is so much porn! And so little time!

03-11-13  05:42am - 4304 days #16
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Yeah Marcus, I'm long winded, so I struggle with it sometimes too.

03-09-13  02:53pm - 4306 days #26
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Wittyguy, I was wondering what you were talking about until I noticed that "too much information" was a link.
I've seen a similar story on some emergency room TV show.

Did you see the slideshow on antique vibrators just below the story? Now that was an eye opener! They also had a pornstar slideshow. So the Huffington Post has figured out that sex sells too.

03-04-13  06:46pm - 4311 days #14
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Well apparently Foxnews.com doesn't want to be outdone, because they currently have a story on Miss Delaware, and this feature on celebrity sex tapes:

http://www.foxnews.com/slideshow/enterta...cmp=features#slide=1

I guess sex sells regardless of your political stripes!

03-04-13  04:44am - 4311 days #10
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
CNN.com seems to be running a couple of porn stories a week. The one I just saw was a real hoot!! If this link doesn't work, just go there and search for man's prized porn collection stolen.

http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t3#/vid...-your-porns-gone.cnn

03-03-13  06:33pm - 4312 days #29
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I do hit the fast forward, but also the pause button in some solo vids when the view is just right. I've even used slow mo on some scenes.

I use Capture Wiz for video capturing at the webcam sites, and it also has a very good screen shot utility. I done a couple of complilations using Windows Movie Maker, but I haven't really mastered it yet. I wish there was something easier, but maybe I just need to take the time to learn the program.

03-01-13  12:10am - 4315 days #3
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
LOL, I totally missed that thread. Looks like an interesting site. Thanks Count Dracula!

02-28-13  08:12pm - 4315 days Original Post - #1
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA


I guess the mainstream sites like CNN.com use these porn stories to boost viewership. I saw a couple of doosies there today.

Miss Teen Deleware resigned after a hardcore porn video of her surfaced. Here's the link to the story on TMZ

http://www.tmz.com/2013/02/26/miss-teen-...ng-resigns-sex-tape/

I couldn't find what website it was. Anyone know?


Then Girls Gone Wild has filed for bankrupcy. 16 million in debt against 50 grand in assets. Ouch! Here's the TMZ link:

http://www.tmz.com/2013/02/28/girls-gone...pter-11-joe-francis/

02-28-13  07:44pm - 4315 days #12
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Welcome to Porn Users! New input and reviews are always appreciated.

02-21-13  12:46am - 4322 days #13
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
When I first read this, I was thinking "what porn are they looking at?" All the porn I've seen shows a variety of shapes and sizes of pussies. Now, if they wanted to say that porn makes women feel strange if they don't shave their pubes--that I could agree with. And if they wanted to accuse the US/Los Angeles porn industry of promoting fake tits; yep, I could go along with that (thankfully that trend hasn't caught on in Euroland). But I certainly don't see a preponderance of small, neat, and symetrical labia in American porn, or any other porn for that matter. And I should know, because I love that kind of pussy, and look for them on all the sites I join. But in the real world and in porn land, I'd say maybe 10 to 20 percent of women have small labia. The majority have medium sized lips. And while my preference is for the small and neat, I really do luv licking em all!

Anyway, I did a little exploring on that site, and I think I found out where the blogger girl (who is Australian) came up with the notion that the porn industry is promoting small labia. Turns out, its the Australian porn magazine industry (and their censors) rather than the American porn industry. Apparently in Australia there are 2 classifications for porn mags--unrestricted and restricted. The unrestricted mags seem to be available for purchase by anyone of any age (you'd never see that here in the USA), while the restricted are for age 18 and older. There are censors who review each magazine prior to publication and decide which category the magazine goes in. If the labia are showing, it gets restricted. If all you can see is a "single crease", it gets unrestricted. So magazine editors have staff people whose job it is to photoshop out the labia. I'm not talking about a little touch up here and there--its completely altering and faking the photo. There's a link to a video that shows this on the blog:

http://largelabiaproject.tumblr.com/post...om-australias-abc-tv

Now that's pretty bizarre!

And if this is the kind of porn that Australian women are looking at, then I'd have to agree that its promoting an unrealistic view of whats normal. But to blame porn in general, or American porn specifically, doesn't make sense to me. I think that's a case of using an easy scapegoat. Most women have pretty negative views of porn, and if someone on TV or on a blog says that porn is responsible for the increase in this rather bizarre surgery, they just take their word for it.

I'd give a good chunk of the blame to the plastic surgeons--almost all of whom never saw a body that they didn't think they could "fix". And they have a huge financial incentive to promote this, since surgeons of all kinds really rake in the dough when they're in the operating room.

I wish the blogger girl the best of success in helping women overcome their insecurities about their "lady bits".

02-17-13  07:59pm - 4326 days #4
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Probably the best lesbian site I've been a member at was Sapphic Erotica, but its been a couple of years since I've been there. I liked Lez Cuties, but there were too many toys and too much anal action there for my tastes. 21st Sextury and DDF also had some great scenes on their networks. I like lesbian porn where the girls are really into kissing each other (as opposed to sticking out their tongues and wagging them), and where they lick pussy like there's no tomorrow. I do like strap-on toys and those long double dildos, just not in every scene. I'm not sure what you mean by authentic lesbian porn (real couples maybe?), but its usually pretty obvious when the girls are really into what their doing.

ALS Scans has some great scenes too. Edited on Feb 18, 2013, 06:49am

02-17-13  12:00pm - 4326 days #10
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I think the warning sign to look for from the crowds trying to do things like this is the mis-guided notion of "protecting children". Here's a quote from the article by an advisor to the interior minister (the one behind this): "This move is not anti-sex. It is anti-violence because young children are seeing porn and acting it out,".

What??? Anti-violence??? How does acting out porn (if that is even happening) constitute violence? It seems as if this person is equating all porn and all sex with rape. And what kind of data or statistics do they have about children in Iceland acting out porn? If they were really interested in preventing children from seeing porn, why not a law requiring porn blocking software on all computers and other devices?

I had to re-read the last part of the article several times to calm down. One of the legislative members (a woman) said the proposed law has "zero chance" of passing. But the article does remind me of the anti-porn remarks made by Paul Ryan in the US presidential election last year.

02-15-13  10:25pm - 4328 days #16
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


I really don't give a rat's butt whether the dude is wearing a rubber or not. I care only about the director making sure the dude's hairy ass is not getting in the way of my seeing all parts of the babe and how she maximizes her sexuality by her moves.

*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.


LOL! So true.

02-15-13  10:18pm - 4328 days #7
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Whiteflag what's your opinion on the topic?

02-15-13  10:11pm - 4328 days Original Post - #1
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA


Hello fellow porn users,

I just saw this on CNN.com...Iceland is trying to ban internet porn.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/15/tech/web/p...index.html?hpt=hp_t3

It doesn't look like it will pass, but I'm still glad I don't live there!

02-15-13  05:16am - 4328 days #2
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I wonder how many webmasters have even heard of Porn Users or checked the reviews of their site here. It wouldn't suprise me if that was a big number. I think it's always a good idea to email webmasters directly with suggestions and complaints.

02-15-13  04:58am - 4328 days #5
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I think BabyGetReal hit just about all the nails on the head. For me the number one thing that makes any porn movie good is when the girl looks like she is genuinely enjoying herself and wants to be there. That is a very hard thing to fake. Good porn movies have real girl orgasms, and I love it when "girl cum" drips out of her pussy (though not every girl produces that much natural lube). The best B/G hardcore I've seen was with real amateur couples. I've come across a lot more girl/girl hardcore that I would call good, and I think its because girls in porn are a lot more comfortable with each other than they are with the guys hired by the production companies (who most of the time they just met on the set right before the video was shot). When both of the girls are really into girls it makes for some very hot porn. Girls like Eufrat, Nella, and Jo Guest seem to genuinely enjoy their girl/girl shoots. Other things that make a porn movie good are upscale locations and furniture on the set, relatively little close up time (I want to see whole bodies most of the time in a B/G vid, in contrast to a solo girl vid where I like about 1/3 to 1/2 of the time to be close ups of face, boobs, ass, and pussy), and something other than an ending where the guy jerks off on the girls face. I've grown to loathe facial cumshots over the years.

I wouldn't peg the amount of "good" B/G hardcore at only 1%, but I wouldn't put it higher than 5% either. The recent emergence of "heartcore" sites like X-art and Joymii seems to be an effort to correct a lot of what's wrong with hardcore, and their popularity indicates that they are hitting a positive chord among porn users. I still haven't joined X-art yet (so much porn, so little time), so I can't say from my own experience how "good" it is. I do think real amateur hardcore has a lot of untapped potential. Unfortunately, the problem with most amateur hardcore is that it's usually crappy from a technical standpoint (lighting, set, etc). It would be nice to see the big companies out there like 21st sextury, DDF, etc, start sites with true amateur hardcore that was shot professionally. I tried finding such a site on PU and TBP, but gave up after I failed to find anything interesting that was rated 80 or above.

02-11-13  09:10pm - 4332 days #20
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
LOL Pat362!

I have both a desktop (7 year old XP machine) and a laptop (2 year old with a 1080p 17" monitor). HD vids look great on my laptop, and so much better when I plug it into my 60" TV. But my desktop monitor is a 19" monitor with a lot more top to bottom space than my laptop, so I view all my photos on it. I'll be upgrading my desktop soon. The new all in one Macbook types look really nice, but I am still concerned about heat buildup. So I'm thinking about getting a custom-built desktop using a mini-tower and a big monitor. And I'm going to look into monitors that can be rotated (I know I've seen those in the past--don't know if they are still made). Over the years I have come to appreciate the ability of desktops to be upgraded as time goes by. You can add memory, hard drives, CD/DVD players, etc. I don't do any really heavy processor intensive stuff, so I dont need a new processor every few years. I try to start out with a machine that has top of the line CPU, and my desktops last a long time.

02-11-13  08:36pm - 4332 days #11
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Messmer, sometime around 2005 I pretty much gave on porn too. At that time I was a magazine buyer and occasional video renter--I didn't go digital until 2006. I was completely frustrated with the total inability of the magazine editors to select a good set of photos--it seemed as if they were following a "script" of what they thought was good, but what they selected just didn't work for me. And most videos I rented back then I would now recognize as B and C grade porn. I knew there were websites for digital porn, but I had not been impressed with the photo quality of material I had seen on newsgroups--most photos were tiny by today's comparison. But eventually I did discover digital porn (I think TeenDreams was the first site I joined). I actually found some photo sets that I had seen in magazines, but these were the full 100 photo plus sets. And what do you know, most of those sets had photos I really liked, but of course, the magazine editors didn't select those. So I went digital. Fast forward to a couple of years ago. I was starting to get bored again. I was having trouble finding what I really wanted--that being video of a hot girl doing a nice slow sexy strip with a lot of tease and then masturbating to a real orgasm with just her fingers. There was a lot of material like that out there, but very little that I would consider really good. Then I found the webcam sites. Wow, I could tell a girl exactly how to strip and what to do, and record a video of it. The only thing lacking was good resolution. The best and most watched porn I have are the "custom videos" I make of private webcam chats. If I could only keep 10 videos from my entire porn collection, probably 7 or 8 of them would be webcam chat videos. They weren't cheap, but all things considered, they were well worth it. If you are looking for custom made porn, it is out there. I think I remember from other forum threads that your "niche" is mature ladies doing good striptease. There are plenty of women out there on the webcam sites who can do that for you. And its not necessarily at a $3 or more per minute rate--MFC girls will do a show in free chat for you for a set amount, and Streamate girls are open to customizing an inexpensive Gold Show if enough people join. I suggest you try it out. You can go over to MFC and see a lot there without spending a dime. If you do try it and like it, just don't go overboard with it.

I've only been here a couple of months, but like everyone else here, I'd hate to see you go.

And I'd hate to see a dude give up on porn too.

02-08-13  06:55am - 4335 days #5
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Rearadmiral, these are very good questions. I dont have anywhere near that amount of porn, but my two 1TB drives are now full. I just ordered a 4TB drive, which will allow me to load all the porn I have on my two 1TB drives onto the new drive, then use the two 1TBs as backups (to be stored in my storage unit in case of theft/disaster loss at my home). I am very selective about what I download, and I am currently going through my old material and deleting the lesser quality stuff.

As for your Unknown #1--I think its unlikely that you will wake up one day and find any major site has just disappeared. But I do believe that going forward, there are many porn sites that are going to have to do something about the size of their collections. Most only go back about 10 years. With HD now becoming the norm (and HD2 on the horizon), the bigger sites are likely to find their archives becoming prohibitly large as the years go by. It is going to become increasingly difficult for some sites to store (and more importantly, coherently organize) their entire collections. One solution for these sites would be to keep only about a decade or so worth of material. Stuff older than that might be subject to deleting. I was a member at KarupsPC about 3 or 4 years ago when they deleted a large number of photo sets and videos from their early years. They gave a 6 month warning to members to download what they wanted from the early material. Some sites might not be so thoughtful to their members when the time comes.

As for Unknown #2. I have only had a few external drives in my life, and none has failed on me so far. However, I have had several internal drives fail (1 personal, 2 at work). There really is no difference between internal and external drives, so I do believe in the value of backing things up, particularly if the content is no longer available for download online. And don't underestimate the amount of time you might need to re-download a bunch a material if one of your drives fails (do you even keep a list of what you have on each drive?). There are probably quite a few freeware programs out there that will do a sufficient job of scrubbing your drives.

02-02-13  09:53am - 4341 days #3
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Steve, what exactly is it?

01-30-13  12:18pm - 4344 days #2
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I am reminded of the line in the song "Romeo and Juliet" by Dire Straits: "Hey, you and me babe, how about it?"

01-30-13  12:10pm - 4344 days #13
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I wish the bigger networks out there would have a "nice pussies" or "perfect pussies" site on their networks. If enough of them had such sites, it could be a niche. The site would basically be a solo girl photo/video site where all the girls had nice pussies. Or alternatively maybe the bigger photo sites could let users rate model's body parts (boobs, ass, pussy) in addition to an overall rating, and then have a search feature where you could rank the girls by their pussy rating.

So what is a "nice pussy" or a "perfect pussy", and more importantly is there any general consensus on what constitutes one? Well, here's my definition of a nice pussy: the clitoral hood and labia are fairly smooth as opposed to wrinkly, the clitoral hood is not too short or too long, the labia are symetrical in shape and not too big, there are no odd or unusual flaps or ridges of tissue in the vaginal opening, and there are no "second labia" present (note: "second labia" is a term I came up with to describe the small ridges of tissue that sometimes occur on the sides of the clitoral hood and labia minora. They are generally a lot smaller than the labia minora, and often merge into them). Just thinking off the top of my head of a girl who has a nice pussy, I would say Carli Banks. Most girls have what I call a "fairly standard pussy", which is to say their labia are a little too big and a little too wrinkly for my tastes.

I'm not so sure if that is a consensus definition. I will say this, I often notice on webcam sites that when I am in a room where the girl has a nice pussy, and she's showing it in her free chat, a lot of users will comment "nice pussy" when they first come into the room. This leads me to believe that most people would agree with my definition. On the other hand, if you use the user search tags on Met-Art with terms like "perfect pussy" "beautiful pussy", etc, you come up with a range of shapes and sizes. I'm curious as to what others consider to be a "nice pussy".

Of course, another definition of a perfect pussy would be any one attached to a girl who is in the room with you and saying "fuck me".

01-27-13  06:59am - 4347 days #30
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by bibo:


Wow, Laura is a real hottie! I never noticed her until now, but I'll keep an eye on her. Thanks, elephant!

On a completely unrelated note: I wish that all the EU girls would stop their multiple name madness. It's really hard to keep track of all the different aliases.
And some of them should consider chosing more appropriate names. I mean, a girl named Nutella or Assol...

Btw, this girl with blue short hair, Ebba, she's pretty cute in my books.


Bibo, I think it's the site managers giving them different names. That's why a model index site like Indexxx is indispensible! Unfortunately, if the girl has a common name, you've still got a lot of looking to do. I've seen Nutella and Assola (or whatever her name is)--I guess those names are fine in their native languages.

01-27-13  06:55am - 4347 days #29
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Originally Posted by elephant:


Hi Luv Lickn Clit

Good to meet a fellow Lotus fan, yeah she is amazing, I'm not a fan of solo girls much, only the amazing drop dead gorgeous dreamy girls make it on my shortlist for solo stuff, Lotus is one of the cutest around, she flirts well and has a great smile and eyes, two of the things I go for first in a girl is the eyes and smile. I agree with you her pussy is really great too, have to say I'm a massive fan of a neat and tidy one and she is lucky she has a really neat one.

Laura is on
18onlygirls.com (b/g)
beauty-angels.com (lez)
clubseventeen.com (lez)
creampie-angels.com (b/g)
euroteenerotica.com (lez)
firstbgg.com (b/gg)
fuckstudies.com (b/g)
rubateen.com (b/g)
trickymasseur.com (b/g)

No not Abby Cat, the Abby I like is also called Abbey, Abbie, Abbiy, Abby C, Angel, Anjelica, Chelsea, Ebbi, Ira, Katherine A, Kathy I., Krystal Boyd, Ksusha, Megan, Snejanna, Vera. She has done all the sites pretty much. You can find all her work on Eurobabeindex

Nata is a rare rare girl, so amazing, she has https://www.pornusers.com/review/helensplanet/ and https://www.pornusers.com/review/eronata/ but I feel her best stuff is from 18 Virgin sex.com, Nubiles and watch 4 beauty as those solo sites are no longer updated I don't think.


Thanks Elephant! I know Nata (Natasha) and Abby (Katherine)from Met-Art, though they both have a ton of stuff elsewhere. Nata is another blue-eyed beauty with a nice pussy!

01-20-13  08:44pm - 4354 days #30
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I first came across tube sites when I googled a model's name in an effort to find other websites that featured her. So I clicked on a couple of them, and yeah, you could watch a crap quality video, and get links to websites, but the bottom line for me was that the quality was crap. The model index sites and free tours are what I use now when I'm looking for more material on a specific model. In addition, the few times that I've been to tube sites, my anti-virus software invariably got a serious workout. I've never run into anything that it couldn't handle, but I dont' like to take any chances, so I avoid any site that my antivirus flags. I've never used a torrent site, since I am more than willing to pay for content that I like (are people using these to distribute pirated HD porn vids?). As for studios going out of business, I think its a stretch to say that tube sites are the reason--the quality is just too crappy. I think the global recession is as much to blame as anything. On the other hand, file sharing of HD quality vids would obviously be a problem. I consider that stealing, so I don't do it.

01-20-13  05:58am - 4354 days #20
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Elephant, Lotus has one vid each on DDF (the EuroTeen site) and KarupsPC. I love her dreamy blue eyes, and she's got a nice pussy too. What are the sites for Laura, Abby and Nata? Is Abby, Abby Cat?

Also, Lotus (Hannelie) has a vid at Femjoy too. Edited on Jan 22, 2013, 07:19am

01-14-13  02:11am - 4360 days #3
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
I feel your frustration dude. The pre-checked cross sells are highly annoying, but unfortunately I think they are here to stay. I've only been duped once (got joymii when I joined femjoy), but it turned out OK since I found some good lesbian scenes to download there. But I still remember being pissed about it for several days. I just said to myself, hey live and learn. It won't happen to me again. The next time I encounter it on a site I join, I'm going to email the administrators and let them know how unhappy I was to see it. If we want to keep this in check, I think that's the best way to do it. If you boycott the site, but they never know you did, that's not going to make them change their mind about doing it.

01-13-13  08:17am - 4361 days #9
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Some Met-Art Girls

Macy B
Mia D
Chantelle
Vittoria

Other Euro Girls

Anita Pearl
Caprice

USA Girls

Amia Moretti
Carli Banks
Riley Reid
Sensei Pearl

and many, many others!

01-13-13  07:25am - 4361 days #17
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
There have definitely been negative trends in porn over the last decade, particularly in hardcore porn: the general trend toward more extreme and sometime abusive sex, too much anal sex, gagging blow jobs, extremely large dildos and fisting, pissing, speculums, etc. I also don't like what some models do themselves with the excessive tattoos and piercings. I think fake boobs are acutally less common than they used to be, or maybe it's just I won't subscribe to a site where they are prominently featured. I don't like very much current hardcore porn, but hardcore porn has never been my first choice in porn. I'd much rather see a beautiful girl do a slow sexy strip proceeding to full nudity with some good closeups, and ending with masturbation to a real orgasm.

But the postives outweigh the negatives for me. While its true that the perfect porn site doesn't exist, I am still able to find large amounts of quality material that I like. And this is for a price that is way cheaper in comparison to what would have been paid 15 to 20 years ago.

01-08-13  02:55pm - 4366 days #555
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Khan,

Could you add microminimus.com?

Its a photo/video site run by the folks at Wicked Weasel bikinis. I'm not a member yet, but from the preview pages it does look like there is nudity there; maybe not as much as bikini-dare and similar sites, but definitely not a non-nude site. Thanks! Edited by Staff on Jan 09, 2013, 07:24am (Khan: corrected/edited direct link URL)

01-08-13  02:50pm - 4366 days #5
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
good luck creamcummer! that's a pretty specific niche!

01-07-13  06:48pm - 4367 days #4
KET924aab (0)
Active User

Posts: 60
Registered: Dec 18, '12
Location: California, USA
Yes Admiral, IMHO it is the golden age. The Fort Knox of golden ages.

I remember the days of perusing mags at the local adult store. I would often look through a dozen mags just to find one to buy--and that was usually just for one or two photo spreads, sometimes just for one or two photos. I was always amazed at the incompetence of editors in selecting good photos. In those days, each girl had maybe 6 to 8 pages of photos, with about 20 to 25 total photos. Today, the average photo set has well over 100 shots. In the better sites, they almost always have the photos/poses I prefer. Each model has multiple photo sets (and videos), and most sites have 100s if not 1000s of models. There are thousands of websites out there, with each niche catered to by dozens to 100s of sites.

For video, I remember paying $5 a tape to rent a VHS tape. That was in addition to an annual fee at whatever shop it was. All you had to go by was a few photos on the box. Disappointment on viewing the tape when you got home was common. Today, $20 to $30 gets you access to hundreds or thousands of HD quality videos, and you can preview them with a flash player before downloading them for your permanent collection.

Many magazines have gone out of business--they just can't compete with digital porn. And I really don't know why anyone rents videos from a bricks and mortar shop anymore. Why bother getting in your car and driving over to the seedy side of town, when you can just point and click from the comfort of your own home. I wonder if any of the shops I used to go are even there any more-I doubt it.

I'm old enough to remember the first IBM and Apple desktop computers in the late 70s and early 80s. In those days no one could have even dreamed about the internet that we have today. It really is incredible. Sometimes its almost laughable how we nitpick the shortcomings of the sites we review. Today's porn is hugely better in terms of both quality and value than what we had in the old days. And I am of the opinion that it will only get better. These are great times that we live in!

1-50 of 60 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.