|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
KET924aab (0)
|
| 51-60 of 60 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | Page 2 |
| 01-07-13 05:47pm - 4384 days | #8 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
Yeah czechlesbians did look pretty interesting. | |
|
||
| 01-07-13 11:44am - 4385 days | #5 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
LOL jeberryl69, How about Jennifer Garner-I was a huge Alias fan! | |
|
||
| 01-07-13 11:39am - 4385 days | #5 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
Thanks Kahn, I didn't know that thread existed, and I would have never guessed! | |
|
||
| 01-07-13 04:36am - 4385 days | #54 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
What we really need are monitors that we can easily rotate from landscape to potrait orientation. That would solve the problem. I thought Apple made one some years ago. | |
|
||
| 01-07-13 04:31am - 4385 days | #2 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
Rudigar, what is CFNM? Also, have you tried Abbey Winters. I've never been a member there, but I think I saw some group lesbian scenes on their free tour a while back. | |
|
||
| 01-07-13 04:29am - 4385 days | #15 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
I agree Messmer, and another thing about the internet and digital porn is that is so much easier to manage and access your collection as compared to the old days of paper mags, VHS tapes, and DVDs. I went digital in 2006, and haven't looked back. I don't think internet porn is going away--I think I read somewhere that it accounts for something like 25% of all internet traffic. I am curious as to how the Russian law defines porn (hardcore only?, etc). I'm guessing that it does not include webcam stripping, because there are plenty of Russian girls still on the webcam sites. Also, does anyone know if the Ukraine falls under the law? I would think not, but then what do I know. | |
|
||
| 01-05-13 02:43am - 4387 days | #41 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
Capn, I gotta disagree with you on a couple of points. Just like hodayathink, I like the vertical format for a majority of the shots where the model is standing, so that she completely fills the view. On the other hand, lets say you have a model at a beach. A landscape shot with the model off to one side, and then the sand and water on the other takes advantage of the scenery. So what I like to see in a photo shoot like that is BOTH types of photos. One shot in landscape that shows the landscape, and another vertical shot focused on the model. The vertical shots obviously dont use all the available screen space on most wide-screen HD TVs, laptops, and monitors, but I usually set my IrfanView to show the entire photo, and then enlarge with magnifier as needed. Point 2, gyno close ups-I love pussy close up shots, and if there aren't a few good ones in every set, I'm disappointed. Having said that, a photo set should not be exclusively close up shots. Some of my favorite poses are full body shots. As you see from the varied responses here, you can't please all of the people all of the time. In my opinion the photographer should do the shoot with the idea of pleasing as many people as possible. Thus, every photo set should include a variety of photos, landscape and vertical, good variety of poses, full body and close ups. The custom zips that some sites are using can also help you to download only what you want. Hopefully those will become commonplace. I do agree with you on the angle shots--very annoying. KarupsPC is one of the worst offenders. I just joined them a couple of weeks ago (for one month), and I think its gotten worse than it was the last time I was there a couple of years ago. They use it a lot in the solo videos too, so I have to keep tilting my head! Very aggravating. I'll be posting a review of Karups pretty soon for anyone whose interested. Happy new year to all! | |
|
||
| 01-01-13 12:03pm - 4391 days | #31 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
Claypaws, Thanks for your response and excellent insights regarding photo lighting! I guess perhaps there are more photographers out there trying to do artistic nudes than I realized, and what I thought of as bad technique really isn't. I will say this though, when I join a porn site, I'm not going there to find artistic photos--I'm going there to find photos of beautiful naked women that include the poses and general level of explicitness that I prefer. So when I come across a photo where there's a shadow obscuring a girl's pussy, I don't find that artistic, I find it annoying. The artistic qualities of the photos are of secondary importance for me. I suspect that this is true of a majority of porn users. I wish more photographers could keep this in mind, or at least try to please most of the people most of the time. luv lickn clit | |
|
||
| 12-31-12 01:37am - 4392 days | #14 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
I just checked out the free tour at Wowgirls, and it looks really hot! Another site added to my list of sites to join. | |
|
||
| 12-31-12 01:16am - 4392 days | #13 | |
|
KET924aab (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 18, '12 Location: California, USA |
I had a membership at Hegre-Art a few years back, and they definitely had quality photos, but were not consistently explicit enough for my tastes. I would say that Met-Art, Femjoy, and MPL Studios are all defintely working joining for a month, as they all have a focus on quality (they don't always succeed, but they do it better than most). I second the positive reviews of ALS Scan--excellent video and photo sets there, and a site I really need to get back to for a month. Ron Harris is another site with quality work, although some of the photo sets were more tease than please for me. I haven't seen a couple of the sites that Drooler mentioned (TorridArt, Wowgirls), so I'll have to check them out. One thing I have noticed over the years is that a good number of photographers could improve their lighting. I hate shadows that obscure what I want to see. I guess some of them may not be full-time pro photographers, and so they can't afford a bunch of pro-level studio lighting gear. But even a lot of outdoor sets suffer from harsh shadows. I'm not a pro photographer, but it doesn't seem that difficult to go out at the right time of day, and orient the model in the right direction with respect to the sun, and maybe use a longer lens so your own shadow doesn't get in the way. I think 15 to 18 megapixel photos are the max size that I'd prefer (15 megapixel is roughly 3000 by 5000 pixels). Any larger and the zip files get really big. I don't like photosets that are one gig in size and larger--they fill up the hard drive way too fast! | |
|
||
| 51-60 of 60 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | Page 2 |
|
