Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Kody (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (26)  |   Threads Started (0)

1-26 of 26 Posts Page 1

09-15-20  08:07am - 1559 days #12
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
While I understand they make it, nothing about it feels sexy to me.

08-10-20  12:57am - 1596 days #12
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Wraith0711:


Yeah the trust votes were truly earned. I don't understand why the playing field needed to be leveled. This is going to cause a mass exit of long time users and rightfully so.


Agree with that. They were not easily given in most cases. On top of that, as a newbie these trust votes actually helped me navigate the porn world as a consumer:

I could immediately tell who were some of the long standing reputable members because of their high trust rating. I joined at least 5 sites based on reviews from these members because I didn't have to worry about it being part of a marketing effort.

On the other hand, there were many positive reviews from people with low trust votes where I became interested in the site and said "I'll suspend my judgment and see how this user does first".

07-24-20  02:04am - 1612 days #11
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I agree with the plastic surgery and overacting. I would say on a more general level, what turns me off immediately is "fakeness". When I see the female (or male) model is putting on a show like an actress (instead of putting on a show because she enjoys being watched), I get flaccid pretty quickly.

Another turnoff is when I have a feeling the male model disrespects the female model. I do like degrading or rough sex, but when I can tell that they genuinely don't respect her underneath, it doesn't matter how vanilla the video is, it will turn me on right away.

06-26-20  02:22am - 1640 days #4
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Wow, I had never heard of these practices before. What an odd choice to make.

06-23-20  01:38am - 1643 days #16
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Tom D Admin:


The message on sites is intentionally vague - as a business, we cannot burn bridges. There are plenty of temporary issues that can easily be resolved through dialogue.

Domain names are valuable commodities and new management teams or new owners can often reinvigorate old sites. So we may resume linking to any that we feel has changed for the better.

In this specific case, when you sign into Legal Porno, you are now redirected to a new members' area under the Porn Box domain.

Even though we've been assured you get the same content and we are not questioning the validity of that statement, we know people are wary of redirecting domains.

We would like to do a fresh listing/review of PornBox - but obviously, the LegalPorno has established traffic - so we're still waiting for the new domain to be submitted.

To be very clear - Porn Box might be the same or even better than Legal Porno. We simply cannot confirm until we've been given the chance to thoroughly access it.


Thanks for the clear communication, Tom. Especially the first part, where you explain the attitude PU takes towards this issue.

06-16-20  01:27am - 1651 days #11
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Wraith0711:


I can honestly say I have never seen this happen. What site/sites do/have done this?


It used to happen on AfricanCasting sometimes. I of course would've preferred every update to be a new one. But the fact that these "recycled" scenes were better caused me to not get annoyed with it. I think other members were though, because they have stopped the practice now.

06-16-20  01:25am - 1651 days #10
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC

06-15-20  01:57am - 1651 days #7
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Wraith0711:


Yeah that practice is infuriating, I hate when sites recycle their own content. I don't mind this when they at least re-encode the videos to a different format, like wmv to mp4 or remaster them.


Another situation in which I don't mind, is when they completely re-edit the original scene. Make it better, add some parts that were originally not in it, etc.

It becomes a problem for me once they use this as a strategy to no longer post any actual NEW scenes ever.

06-15-20  01:51am - 1651 days #21
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Wraith0711:


a poetic river that requires a bag of popcorn to read.

Haha I loved that last sentence. Especially the alliteration

06-10-20  04:23am - 1656 days #13
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I think one of the problems here is that when you are giving an explanation about why a specific site is "de-listed", there's no way of doing it without somewhat "listing" it.

Even if we'd have a list with all sites to avoid, those sites would still "technically" be promoted on here by their mentioning.

In the case of shady billers / bad customer service, that's one thing. But in case of abusing the models, there could be people that genuinely don't care, or even WANT to see it. Those people would then still find the site through the listing here.

06-10-20  04:16am - 1656 days #2
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I read both articles. I found the part of giving alcohol / weed to the models also concerning. While it can easily be played off as making them feel comfortable and "bonding", I seriously have my doubt whether it's even illegal to film with an intoxicated model (for consent reasons).


Totally agree with your statement at the end about the interaction between John and Aiden. In an adult industry, people should be able to have adult conversations around it.

06-08-20  02:33am - 1658 days #27
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by tangub:


The only way to increase your chances to win realistically is to write 4,5,10 or 12 reviews a month to keep up with the big hitters here who like to monopolize the raffle. Unfortunately those who only join one site a month or now and then have virtually zero to minimum chance of winning anything under the new system.


Even if I had the time to do so, I wouldn't have the budget to join that many new sites haha. Mostly because when I do like one, I prefer to remain a member.

But I'm not here for the raffle either way. Before this thread, it had somehow escaped me that there was any raffle going on. I like to follow the forums though, and this thread caught my attention because it seemed "unjust".

06-02-20  04:32am - 1664 days #23
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by LKLK:


These are the rules for the old raffle:
(For historical purposes only.)
https://www.pornusers.com/raffle.html

The new raffle, which started a few months back, is held once a month.
The prizes are:
1st place: $500 Amazon gift card
2nd place: $50 Amazon gift card
3rd place: $25 Amazon gift card

Some people have complained the new raffle is not fair.
That people are cheating, or that the outcome is biased in some way.

But the PU staff maintain that the raffle outcome is random, and even post a page that shows the drawing for each winning position of the raffle.

The basic rule for the new raffle is that each review (that is accepted and approved and whatever other thing is needed) is given 5 tickets for the monthly raffle.

There are other ways to win tickets, but I'm not sure what they are.


The fact that it's not very clear how to earn tickets is already a sign that something's off indeed. At least some transparency on what could increase your chances to win is a basic

06-02-20  04:29am - 1664 days #12
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I personally don't think a 100 is theoretically unachievable. But in practice, it's very unlikely that a site ever will go above 95.

Yet the 100 should still be there. If it wasn't there, the 95 would become the near impossible score to achieve

For a site to actually score a 100, it would mean that I am unable to find ANY con about it.

There are sites I absolutely loved and gave 90+ score. But I've never in my life, come across a site that doesn't have at least one thing I can think of that can be improved.

06-02-20  12:58am - 1665 days #9
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by marcdc1:


Thanks for pointing out AfrianCasting and AfricanLesbians.

I've seen plenty of amateur sites and models with onlyfans.com keep up with their production.

I know many of those places are small business and may have less in funding in reserve as people cancel their porn memberships in uncertain times. I really hope they make it through. Most of my favorite porn is amateur made. I really worry about them.


It's the same for me. I always prefer amateur porn over porn shot in professional studios.

Who knows what this situation will do to them though. They have less funds, but on the other hand I imagine that amateur porn is easier to shoot (or buy) these days.

I think a lot of it depends on us as consumers. When people stop paying for porn, these sites may be the first to go out of business. There's always amateur porn on sites like Chaturbate of course. But there it gets too expensive for me.

05-29-20  04:15am - 1668 days #3
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I've indeed seen the "re-hashed" or "remastered" content happen on many sites.

Though I don't always consider it a problem. It's understandable that the entire industry is currently on a halt. If I like the site, I still choose to support them.

Dogfart has continued to update many of their sites in this period.

Both AfricanCasting and AfricanLesbians have continued their normal update schedule.

Many of the solo sites or sites run by amateur couples seem to be doing business as usual too.

05-29-20  04:03am - 1668 days #12
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Wraith0711:


The only solution I can think of is after submitting a selected number of reviews it triggers a flag for admins to review the accounts, what has been reviewed and such. If evidence of shilling is seen then all reviews from that member are pulled with the member being banned. Same for one and done reviews, after a set amount of time the reviews are deleted. If an account isn't logged into after say 6 months the account is flagged for deletion. Hopefully this would drastically reduce shilling. But the problem with this is this requires massive admin participation and I don't think this is any admins full time job. Maybe scrap the raffle and put it towards a full time employee to over see and maintain the site? If a prize is still needed then a way cheaper 1 year membership to the site of the members choice? Thoughts anyone?


I agree with this.

Every new rule or system has it downsides. And there will always be somewhat of an "arms race" between the people managing the system and the people trying to exploit it. They find the new holes in the system and then proceed with their ways.

If systems are changed that cause long-term members to leave, that's an indicator the new system does more harm then good.

But if as a community, we are allowed to speak our mind when something looks off, and then decide together if there's evidence or not, I'm sure we can take care of it.

Maybe a percentage will go unnoticed. But then I assume that's also because they stayed pretty close to the behavior of a normal reviewer in terms of points and opinions. So in that case, they also do less damage.

When shills are being used to create falsified score (e.g. boosting the rating of a site that clearly has some serious issues if you read the other reviews), they will always be obvious to members that have seen this happen before.

05-29-20  03:41am - 1668 days #11
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I must admit I know nothing about this raffle. How does work (officially)?

If things are being cheated on (especially based on gender, or differences unrelated to how it works) that could easily be the beginning of the end for a user-based website like this.

05-29-20  03:33am - 1668 days #4
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by Homegirl:


I like vaginas clean and not smelly.
I like that she said she does not wear panties at all.
Gwyneth Paltrow gives out blow jobs and admits it when interviewed.


What do you mean with "give out blow jobs". To fans?

05-19-20  05:19am - 1678 days #44
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
As a fellow ebony fan this is an awesome thread to read. For my enthousiasm at least haha. The downside is that I've added some sites to my porn wish list so that may cost me some money in the future. But I'm sure it'll be wort it

Here are some other ones I like, that I think have not been posted yet:

African Casting (very good looking amateur models fucked by white guy)

Zebragirls (interracial lesbian)

African Lesbians (black on black lesbian)

Ebony Cum Dumps (black girls swallowing huge loads from white guys)

Exploited African Immigrants (european sex parties always featuring at least one black girl that is the center of attention, girls are good looking but content is older so quality is not up to current industry standards)

Before I ended up mostly focusing on amateur porn I was a fan of Skin Diamond and looked for scenes that featured her. I see she has her own site now (though I thought she retired): Skin Diamond. I've never joined it though, so I have no idea how much content there is and if it's good.

02-26-20  07:43am - 1761 days #9
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
I'd love more realistic "amateur" porn with believable acting. Not an easy thing to producer I guess haha

11-03-19  05:46am - 1876 days #3
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
LatinaFuckTour.com has nothing but Latina amateurs and some really hot scenes. There is also Exposedlatinas.com , which I have never been a member of but looks interesting.

07-26-19  03:52am - 1976 days #3
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
The amount of disrespect just for short term gain is crazy

07-19-19  06:52am - 1983 days #6
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Agree. Music videos in general are what led me to porn somehow haha.

06-03-19  04:56am - 2029 days #8
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Not sure if these are considered niches but it's usually very specific things that turn me on that are not easy to find:

-Real amateurs with clearly recognizable nationalities

(For example: thick accents that betray which country or city they are from so that they are clearly not pretending). Usually from Latin, African or Northern European countries (not sure why).

-Amateur porn that is of "lower quality"

(e.g. filmed with a cellphone) but still has very nice camera angles. More specifically threesomes or group sex.

-BDSM that doesn't involve any "BDSM gear"
(Focus on the power dynamics, only using bodies or regular stuff people have lying around the house.)

05-22-19  03:39am - 2041 days #21
Kody (0)
Active User

Posts: 26
Registered: Feb 03, '18
Location: NYC
Originally Posted by mbaya:


Yes she did kill the Night King. I called it on April 16th.

That was pretty impressive! What lead you to the prediction?

1-26 of 26 Posts Page 1


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.