|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Alybator (0)
|
| 1-6 of 6 Posts | Page 1 |
| 02-27-21 04:24am - 1301 days | #8 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
It didn't just happen to be me. You also got an attitude with KayTBuffs when she was reviewing regularly. Would you like me to quote it? She reviewed Love Hairy, I'm going to paraphrase and link it. https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=110757 She said in the review the site was 19 years old based on the content being 19 years old. You had to correct her, "The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years." You then in the next reply said you could see how the content being 19 years old would give the impression of the site being 19 years old. That is exactly what she said, snobbery and elitism. If you hadn't corrected her and just posted a reply saying it's a compilation site with content that's 19 years old, it would be different. Instead, you corrected her, then laughed at her response. Now, you say it could have been anyone, it just happened to be me that got mentioned like that poor Adult Time review was the first poor review that's ever been posted? I also will say it's funny that you said for me to get over myself. Do you understand the way conversation works? If you didn't name me, I wouldn't have replied, then you wouldn't have anything to say get over myself about. Which shows the problem you have. You stir things up then you run away. You'll come back and do it again, then you run away. If you weren't so touchy you would realize my post was agreeing with everything you said except naming me. I don't treat anyone like a therapy patient until they show how unstable they are. You started a thread just to bash someone. That's not elitism either is it? It seems you lost the concept of the site. It's here to review porn sites not to review reviewers. | |
|
||
| 02-27-21 12:29am - 1301 days | #4 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
Why did you name me? Are you sure you want to do that? You instigated this by naming me. Pinkerton reviewed 11 or 12 sites from VIP4K last month, the same thing you're complaining about me doing. He's been here 14 years. I have been here 1.5 years. He also reviewed all or nearly all of the sites from the Fake Hub Network. I don't see his name being mentioned like mine was. MarcDC reviewed all 23 Dogfart sites and even the mobile versions. I reviewed 10 of them and the network itself. I don't see his name listed on here and he's been here 14 years. LKLK who I knew when I was a lurker as lk2fireone regularly reviews network sites. I don't see his name listed on here. I came to Porn Users after 6-7 years as a lurker. A former staff member asked KayTBuffs and I to join to add female perspective. I started out reviewing much more expansively than now. I also was reviewing sites no one else reviewed and paying premium prices for those sites. Transsexual, Bisexual and gay sites with many of those costing $30-$40 a month for 1 site. When I would come look at the raffle results I would see a bunch of "old timers" with a gluttony of network site reviews they paid $10 for. All I did was follow the lead. My reviews of Dogfart also showed differences between the sites and I could have reviewed the other 12, but I didn't. As a therapist, I often find that people complain about things they are or were guilty of. I looked back in your review history here on PU. See below where 80%, 8 out of your first 10 reviews, came from networks. Those are all quotes from your reviews. "Included as one of 4 free bonus sites when you subscribe to 88 Square" "Part of a good network of 15 solo sites" "Part of a network of 13 sites" "Part of a network of 13 sites" "Part of a network of 13 sites" "Access to 9 other sites" "Recently added as a free bonus site" "gives access to another 13 solo model sites." As I started this post out with you don't want to do this with me. If you had named everyone that's guilty of network reviews or if you hadn't named me specifically, then I wouldn't have done this. It makes it even worse that you said "There's a limit to the number of times I can read the same reviews of the same old networks by the same small group of users". That sounds like a personal control problem you have. You want people to only write reviews for sites you're interested in? If you have anything else to say to me other than, "I shouldn't have singled you out", I will continue to look into your profile's past and see just how many different network sites you have reviewed. This is what happens when you instigate someone while being hypocritical and not naming anyone else who has done the same. Just because you've "had" to read other Dogfart reviews is no reason to get upset over mine. You do know you don't have to read every review? I would even say you have a bigger issue with the staff than naming a member. If they go back to just allowing a review of a network as a whole and maybe one or two network sites or only standalone sites, I will comply, but this is how things are being done right now. I didn't make that choice. | |
|
||
| 07-27-19 10:32pm - 1881 days | #11 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
As a child, teenager and early twenty something in India, I did not watch many movies. Bollywood was becoming popular, but I didn't like the Bollywood style of movie. I like those dorky comedies like Austin Powers, Superbad and Napoleon Dynamite. One that is coming out that I want to see is Good Boys. If you have not seen the trailer for it look for the "Good Boys red band trailer". I have not had this much anticipation for a movie before. | |
|
||
| 07-25-19 09:18am - 1884 days | #19 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
It went there because Zoey said, "but I'm sure those girls are cumming hard. You know why? Because THEY LIKE IT!" It had nothing to do with the scenario. She posted something that is not true. Women can orgasm from extreme emotions, fear being a major one, emotional, mental and physiological changes all can cause orgasms. I brought rape in to show a situation where a woman possibly had an orgasm and DID NOT LIKE IT. My experience comes from 21 years of living in the brutal repression of women in India. I moved to the United States 13 years ago and have been a Sex Therapist for 7 years, a Women's Psychotherapist for 3. I had been enjoying my time here. I still don't understand why she picked my first post to reply and mock my opinion. She had 2 posts in the previous 4 years. You don't think it made me feel singled out? She disagreed with multiple things Freddie talked about, but didn't reply directly to Freddie. I will let it go. | |
|
||
| 07-25-19 04:35am - 1884 days | #15 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
Did I say something wrong? I'm not for sure what I did to deserve this reply. I thought maybe it had something to do with me talking about human nature. North Americans seem to be offended by human nature talk. It says you can only control so much of your life. Ask some of those gay men you spoke for. My proposed solo man scene had nothing to do with his dick. It was showing an intimate experience where the straight woman viewer would feel like she is the center of his attention and the object of his desire. If you are a woman that does not like hearing that women like that, it is okay, but we are back to human nature again. It could be a gay man watching a gay man that makes him feel like the center of his attention. It could be a straight woman making a straight man feel like he is the center of her attention. I was creating an emotional and mental attraction. Something most porn does not have. Why you said gay men would be the only ones watching has to be because you believe to see the guy's dick? Which puts gay men backwards by about 35 years. That is why I felt like I said something that upset you. You were very careless in this reply. You correlated dick pics with a porn video. I guess because both have a dick in them? I was a member of a dating site last year and received a lot of unsolicited dick pics. I didn't complain about it. The part that makes me wonder is if these friends of yours were complaining about a boyfriend or husband sending them dick pics? If so, it shows how women are now repressing men sexually. It does sound like something a group of female friends would talk about. If it is not a husband or boyfriend, they are the ones that gave him their phone number or added him on social media. Maybe they should spend less time complaining and more time raising their standards? A dick pic is randomly sent to your phone. It is not close to the same as signing in to a porn site and downloading a video. You said that women are just as dirty and nasty as men. Yes, men have porn. Women have sex toys. I don't get the point you were making. If a man is masturbating watching a 19 year old girl young enough to be his granddaughter masturbate that probably isn't as nasty as the woman with the 16" double dong dildo stuck up both of her holes. I have heard the sex toy industry makes more money than the porn industry. As all over the place as your post was. The worst part was when you said women being gangbanged by 10 men orgasm because "They like it". You combined liking something with having an orgasm. Everyday women are raped and experience orgasm during it. See how careless you are? You think they liked it? Or did something physiological, mental, emotional happen like they experienced extreme fear and it brought an orgasm on? Your post sounds like it came from a man's brain. Edited on Jul 25, 2019, 04:44am | |
|
||
| 07-22-19 04:14pm - 1886 days | #10 | |
|
Alybator (0)
Active User Posts: 6 Registered: Jul 13, '19 Location: United States |
The problem I have with "for women" sites is they are not for women. The porn industry heard women look for intimacy. They decided intimacy means soft kisses, spooning and lacy curtains blowing in the wind. The scenes themselves have not changed. Sex Art makes a "love making" scene with a naked woman and naked man having sex. There is hugging, kissing, oral, missionary, possibly even anal and a cumshot. Brazzers makes a "hardcore" scene with a naked woman and naked man having sex. There is oral, missionary, doggy, anal and a cumshot. Both are filmed from the voyeuristic perspective. There is nothing intimate about voyeurism. The sites filming scenes to appeal to females fail before the scene starts. The reason I think women do not talk about porn is there is no porn made for straight women. Maybe a straight woman is willing to watch lesbian porn or gay men porn, but are they going to be willing to tell others they watch lesbian or gay men porn? Women watch gay men porn because it has men masturbating in it. When you look at the differences between straight male options and straight female options it raises an important question. If you put the shoe on the other foot it makes more sense. Women search for lesbians and gay men. If porn was aimed at women and men just had the porn aimed at women or aimed at LGBT would men's top two searches be "gay men" and "lesbians"? If it was would straight men talk about watching gay men porn? In my mind, porn for women would be something like solo women for men. There would be a masculine man. He would say he saw the viewer at the store. He would then masturbate and say it is what he did after he saw her. It wouldn't require the whole industry to change. If intimacy is what straight women want it would take the solo man site to do that. You are never going to feel intimacy for yourself through watching two strangers have sex. It wouldn't be intended for women to watch with their husbands. It would be for her pleasure. There are over 1,000 websites with solo models for men. There are 0 for women. My belief is they don't think it will work because women will be worried their boyfriend or spouse would be upset with her for watching just a naked man masturbate. He would also be jealous. What man would be mad if his wife or girlfriend wanted to watch two hot college girls in a 69? The United States now believes women are okay with their husbands watching porn. She watches it with him to get the intimacy from him. There is too much belief in the facade generation. Those that deny their nature and natural instincts to be like everyone else. Women will say in private, "He does not look at me like he does the porn models." Nothing has changed there. We are still -- as women -- naturally insecure and jealous. If the porn industry does add solo straight men porn it will just be another problem for marriages, but because we continue to press for equality, it is easier to add solo men sites to make it fair, than it is to take away solo women sites for men. We give too much credit to the way our society has adapted and forget we are much better at lying than adapting. Human nature will never change. Only laws will restrict it, fears will repress it and the need to be a part of a group will put a facade over it. | |
|
||
| 1-6 of 6 Posts | Page 1 |
|
