Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Tom D Admin

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (39)  |   Threads Started (11)

1-39 of 39 Posts Page 1

03-05-21  04:30pm - 1388 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


I know the survey wasn't up for too long and not that many people voted, but thank you for your feedback.

Because things have been a bit slow - especially after the incredible number of reviews last month, I've decided to make a change that falls in the middle of the road.

The Grand Prize cannot be won by the same person in two consecutive raffles in a row, but they remain in the running for 2nd and 3rd place prizes.

The winners of 2nd and 3rd place prizes remain eligible for all prizes in the drawing immediately following their win.


We will try this rule for a few drawings and see how it goes. If there are so many reviews that it becomes unnecessary, we will go back to the old way.

Thanks and have a great weekend! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-04-21  10:05am - 1389 days #9
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Once again, I feel like we're going over old territory and this is why I waited to respond, but judging by the drop in reviews coming in - I should have known that the issue wouldn't simply go away.

I appreciate that Tangub had been a member since 2010 (he disabled his account) and so with tenure comes a sense of perhaps both duty and entitlement to police other members.

But in the end, approving reviews is my call to make (or another staff member's if I am away). And there is no need to call out other Porn Users for taking a different approach than your own. In fact, you should hold back anything other than constructive suggestions.

Though we have general guidelines for reviews, if someone occasionally departs from those standards, I think it keeps things fresh. And so drdoug who had started to participate more recently wrote passionately about something important to him.

The only thing I am super strict about is the minimum word count of 350.

I was hoping with the departure of other PU members who also felt compelled to act as self-appointed review cops to avoid threads where people tear each other down. But times are tough and stress often gets misdirected.

Alybator did nothing wrong back, but Tangub may not have realized that the rules changed a few years back regarding reviewing multiple channels on the same network. Please feel free to review any site with an active listing on TBP (except clones).

On both The Best Porn and Rabbit's Reviews, we review entire networks in one big push with every working login. So why would it be different for someone on Porn Users who have paid for a membership that gives full-access to multiple sites?

It's too bad that Tangub left, but even if some yearn for the good old days, it seems to me there has long been a cliche rather than a community. And by being less rule-focused, we're more inviting and inclusive. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

01-21-21  07:29am - 1431 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I am so sorry - I had the correct total in the reviews column but did not carry it across the final totals.

I have corrected it - but did not change the date at the top because you did in fact earn them before the last tally.

Cheers! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

01-13-21  12:03pm - 1439 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


Here's the deal on the 2021 Raffles:

Drawings will now be held the second week of each calendar month, so the next one will be held on February 10, 2021. Any entries earned during the suspension period will be included.

After feedback from some Porn Users about the prize structure, we will change things up:

1st Prize: $300
2nd Prize: $200
3rd Prize: $100


What remains unchanged and I cannot restate this point enough, the raffle is a random drawing. Someone with fewer entries may win instead of someone with more.

Still, those who contribute more still enjoy better odds when it comes to winning. But everyone stands some a chance!

The entries will be assigned according to the existing criteria.
Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

12-07-20  06:43am - 1476 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


No one needs to worry that recent events, including some long-term members' departures, have gone unnoticed. I have noticed, as have their fellow Porn Users - whether or not they jumped on the bandwagon or not. People choosing to take such severe action requires me to take time for some serious reflection rather than resorting to an immediate reaction.

Pausing and pondering is about more than careful contemplation. I will be away for several weeks - I am visiting my family and I feel I need to self-isolate before seeing them. Others may not agree, but my parents are elderly and that's what they and I feel comfortable doing. Someone will monitor Porn Users, but any changes will have to await my return.

I had initially planned to run the next raffle for five weeks instead of four, so I'd be around for the drawing. But given that one of the issues for departing members was the raffle structure, I will simply suspend it for now. It'll most likely be back in the early part of 2021 - and if anyone writes reviews during the suspension, they will count toward the first new drawing.

2020 has been a challenging year for everyone. Though this recent development on Porn Users is yet another challenge, it's not all doom and gloom because up until recently, we had more engagement on the site and better numbers in terms of traffic. It also confirms what most of us have been already thinking - 2021 is bound to be better.

Your contributions to this community have always been appreciated and I apologize wholeheartedly to anyone who feels otherwise. I am grateful any time someone helps me look at things from a different perspective. If it's too challenging to think outside the box, you should at least consider it from all sides. So I wish everyone all the best - no matter what comes next.

May 2021 bring health, happiness and a whole lot of porn! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

09-09-20  02:39pm - 1565 days #4
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Sorry, I was away on vacation and someone else approved those reviews. But it remains my fault that when I retroactively went over what had been posted while I was gone, I messed up Pinkerton's points total.

I do try to verify each person's points a final time before the actual drawing to catch any errors like that. Rest assured that Pinkerton has received all 30 well-earned points - 5 reviews, each earning 6 points for being on a site with no active Porn User reviews.

Thanks for your diligence and for looking out for your fellow member! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

07-30-20  06:37am - 1606 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I read over the review and I can see that even though the word "streaming" was used multiple times throughout with no mention of "downloads" at any point - somehow that might be asking someone to read between the lines.

At least before the issue was highlighted at the top of the page as it clearly is now.

However, as a rule of thumb, given that more and more sites are charging extra for downloads and other entries in the movie category are streaming-only sites: Downloadable videos are a major selling point and we tend to really emphasize them when they're available.

As to your criticism of the IMPORTANT box added - I will change streaming to STREAMING because that seems crucial in your mind in terms of anyone noticing it.

Otherwise, I can confirm after visiting the site and the linked VOD site - you can individually purchase some scenes for download. Nevertheless, I will remove that detail from the box because apparently, it remains confusing - after all, many people skim-read.

The error reporting function does work - it prompted the change to the review. But because someone from Adult DVD Empire had already responded to you in February, it wasn't immediately clear that you were still unhappy with how things were handled.

Hopefully, now, you will feel that this matter has been more thoroughly addressed. It is fantastic to see someone so passionate about porn - even if it involves criticism of our team - feedback good or bad is important. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

07-09-20  02:22pm - 1627 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


There was a mixup with someone writing a review based on the House of Taboo channel that appears on Kink.com rather than the full site. The person realized their mistake and asked me to delete it right away - which I did.

But I want to address a question/comment from tangub, which isn't visible now that the review is deleted.

Though House of Taboo is from the same people behind the DDF Network, it was always offered as a separate standalone membership and still is. It, unlike DDF, looks the same inside.

After signing in myself, I can verify that there are 1,279 scenes (the Kink.com channel gives you just a sampling). The most recent HOT update is from early June, but that's presumably at least partially pandemic-related.

Otherwise, comparing the current number to the last review done by our team (for Rabbit's Reviews in April 2019), they've added just under 30 videos in the last 14 months.

Just thought I should explain why we've kept the review up on TBP and RR!
Tom Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

07-02-20  12:00pm - 1634 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Badges have been disabled - they have not functioned properly for years and new members had no way to earn them. The only way to level the playing field was to remove them.

The same issue has existed with the points. Ideally, instead of zero, any mention of them would disappear entirely, but that isn't an option at present.

I am in complete agreement that it would be preferable for both these features to be reinstated and fully functional - but for now I do not have the resources to make that happen.

I would hope that if it prevents the trust score functionally from working, I can at least get that restriction removed. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

06-30-20  05:19am - 1636 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


All raffle related details are now in the Announcements toward the bottom of the Porn Users homepage. I am beyond frustrated that there are links all over the place that go to the outdated info, which I can't edit, and for now I can't even disable them. But things have been wonky for a while now, so I guess we'll muddle through.

Thank you for the feedback already received and the excellent background information provided by legacy member exotics4me!

Here the raffle price structure and guidelines for earning entries:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=112951

Here is the current tally of entries earned:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=112952

Here is where the winners are announced:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=112953 Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

06-19-20  05:42am - 1647 days #15
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
The message on sites is intentionally vague - as a business, we cannot burn bridges. There are plenty of temporary issues that can easily be resolved through dialogue.

Domain names are valuable commodities and new management teams or new owners can often reinvigorate old sites. So we may resume linking to any that we feel has changed for the better.

In this specific case, when you sign into Legal Porno, you are now redirected to a new members' area under the Porn Box domain.

Even though we've been assured you get the same content and we are not questioning the validity of that statement, we know people are wary of redirecting domains.

We would like to do a fresh listing/review of PornBox - but obviously, the LegalPorno has established traffic - so we're still waiting for the new domain to be submitted.

To be very clear - Porn Box might be the same or even better than Legal Porno. We simply cannot confirm until we've been given the chance to thoroughly access it. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

06-15-20  02:48pm - 1651 days #2
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
It is in fact shuffled before I put it into the randomizer - I wanted it to be as random as possible, so it just made sense to me.

One of the sorting options on Google Docs is to randomize a column rather than sorting A-Z or Z-A. So I always make sure to that before I cut and paste into the random site.

Thanks for mentioning it though! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

05-20-20  08:54pm - 1677 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I am sorry you feel that way - though I will admit I don't feel much shame that I don't spend much time policing the off-topic discussions on an adult message board. The comments are preapproved and it would be time consuming to manually check each one.

But even without the cap locks, it's clear that you feel adamantly opposed to people discussing politics and others feel the same way, too. So ignoring rather than reacting to rightwing rants or rhetoric from any other wing for that matter isn't going to work for you.

I will have to try to come up with a solution that doesn't require a lot of heavy monitoring or censorship.

And in the meantime, I applaud Homegirl for playing the role of a diplomatic hostess at a fancy dinner party. It's always best to steer the conversation away from politics before the guests reached across the table to strangle each other with their cloth napkins or stab one another with their butter knives! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

04-29-20  07:22pm - 1698 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I have had no luck, so far, finding where that red square ticket graphic you mentioned is housed in the back end to update how it looks. However, I will update the FAQ page it links to over the next few days.

I can tell you that I will be taking the same info that is found on this thread announcing the new raffle:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=5965

The basic breakdown though is:

Reviews get 5 entries.
Five forum posts or review comments get 1 entry.

I manually track the points and report my tally at least once or twice a week here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thread.html?threadid=5974

Thanks. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

04-29-20  07:04pm - 1698 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Yes, I did give you 7 points. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

04-20-20  07:50am - 1707 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


Hi Everyone,

There are certain sites on The Best Porn that we feel deserve extra love. Generally, these sites are trending in terms of search traffic and people aren't finding out enough about them on Porn Users.

So with that in mind, the first three new reviews of the following sites will earn six entries into the current raffle (ending April 29, 2020):

Julia Ann Live
Sexy Hub
18 Videoz
Cum 4K

And a gay site this time around, too!
TXXXM Studios

We may add to this list from time to time and I will change the title so you know that something new has been added. If we find that this experiment works, we'll do it for future drawings, too.

Thanks! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on May 19, 2020, 06:54am

04-14-20  05:35pm - 1713 days #9
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Unfortunately, RagingBuddhist everything is pre-approved and I missed this individual's recent posts, even though his previous ones were deleted. I have removed his remaining active posts and suspended him.

I know that you enjoyed these recent posts biker, but they are what we consider SPAM. The user had registered as a webmaster without providing any proper credentials, only a questionable URL.

Thanks for your understanding! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on Apr 14, 2020, 06:08pm

03-30-20  02:27pm - 1728 days #9
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SindrarPendra posted on March 30, 2020.

Old-n-Young and condoms

On website Old-n-Young with model Ilona C on 29 June 2018, in the photograph 112.jpg you can see a fine curvy line that forms the leftover from the rim of the condom, one colour above it and a different colour below it (computer software was used to hide the condom). It is interesting to look at it when zooming in and zooming out. In the photograph 114.jpg, you see the shining reflective surface of the condom at the top, you see the leftover from the rim of the condom as a horizontal line (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 22:38 you can see one colour at the upper part, a horizontal line and a different colour below it (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 19:30 you see the relective surface from the condom.

With model Lita Phoenix on 2 September 2017, in the photograph 192.jpg you can see a straight horizontal lightgrey line (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 15:07 you see the shining surface of the condom (computer software was probably used to hide the condom). At 21:07 you can see the condom (computer software has been used to hide it).

With model Eveline Dellai on 8 February 2018, in the photograph 82.jpg the masked condom is clearly visible (probably computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 95.jpg you can see a lot of blurring just above the balls (computer software was used to hide the condom). And at the top you also have some blurring and some artificial darkening. In the video at 17:00 you see a straight line with one colour to the left and a different colour to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 19:20 you see a straight vertical line with a different colour to each side. At 25:50 you clearly see that the cylinder has a different colour from the part below it (again a masked condom with software). Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-30-20  01:39pm - 1728 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SophiaCarol posted originally on March 26, 2020.

beauty4k and condoms

With the website beauty4K with the model Mina on 15 August 2019, in the photograph 99.jpg you see some of the shining reflection of the condom (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 130.jpg you see a little part of the condom at the top, and at the bottom you see a horizontal line with one colour above that and another colour below that (computer software was used to hide the colour). In the video at 23:38 you see the masked condom to the right. At 30:34 you can clearly see the rim of the condom.
With the model Veronika Clark on 1 July 2018, in the photograph 124.jpg you see three different cylinders of colour, to the left at the top you see some blurring, and to the right you see some of the leftover from the shining reflective surface of the condom. Computer software was used to hide the condom. When you zoom out, you see that it forms a vertical line to the left, with one colour to one side and a different colour to the other side. In the photograph 160.jpg, the cylinder is the masked condom, and at the bottom just above the balls, you can see the blurring (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 14:58 you see the lighter band just above the balls that forms a division between the cylinder above and the balls (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 22:22 to the right you can see a little bit of lightgrey, that are some leftovers from the surface of the condom (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 16:27 you see the blurring at the bottom, and the masked condom above (computer software was used to hide the condom).
With the model Lita Phoenix on 24 February 2016, the condom is already visible at the top with the image of the scene on the website. And some blurring at the bottom (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 168.jpg you can see a part of the condom at the top (computer software was used to hide the condom). And you also see some blurring at the bottom. In the photograph 190.jpg you also see a part of the condom at the top. In the video at 21:32 you see the shining cylinder at the top, and below that a mat cylinder (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 29:32 you see a curved line with one colour above it, and a different colour below it. At 20:37 you have a dark shining cylinder in the lower part (computer software was used to hide the condom). Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-30-20  01:38pm - 1728 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SophiaCarol posted originally March 25, 2020.

creampie-angels and condoms

With the website creampie-angels with the model Mina on 16 January 2020, in the photograph 155.jpg the top cylinder is the masked condom (computer software was used to hide the condom). You can see a horizontal line of blurring just above the balls. In the photograph 114.jpg (when you zoom out) you can see a vertical line to the right with one colour to the left and a different colour to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 14:50 at the top left, you can see a leftover from the condom (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 20:48 you can see the masked condom to the left (computer software was used to hide the condom).
On the website creampie-angels with the model Mary Rock on 29 November 2017, in the video at 13:55 you can see a lighter colour to the left, and a darker colour to the right, and between these two regions a straight line (condoms are used and being hidden with computer software). At 21:07 you can see the leftover of the rim of the condom, one colour to the left, and a different colour to the right (condoms are used and being hidden with computer software). With the photograph 113.jpg you can see a dotted straight line to the left, one colour to the left and a different colour to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 134.jpg you can see the blurring that was used to hide the rim of the condom. (computer software was used again).
With the model Roxy Dee on 20 April 2017, in photograph 105.jpg you can see some blurring of the rim of the condom when you zoom in. And in the same photograph 105.jpg (when you zoom out) you can see one colour in the upper part and a different colour on the lower part (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 121.jpg you can see one colour on the upper part, and a different colour on the lower part (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 15:57 you can see the shining colour of the condom in the upper part, and the mat different colour in the lower part, divided by a straight line (computer software was used to hide the condom). Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-30-20  01:37pm - 1728 days #4
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SophiaCarol posted originally March 24, 2020.

Anal-angels and condoms

With anal-angels with the model Marselina Fiore on 17 January 2019, in the photograph 101.jpg you get several cylinders of different colours and below that a lighter cylinder (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 85.jpg to the right you can see some of the leftover from the reflective surface of the condom (computer software was used to mask the condom). In the photograph 128.jpg you see a horizontal line at the top, and just below that a grey line. At the bottom you have a strange blurring of colours. Human skin does not look like that. Computer software was used to hide the condom. In the video at 17:45 you can clearly see the reflective surface from the condom to the left, and the mat area to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 19:49 you can see a vertical silver line that is a leftover from the condom (when you pause on the right frame). At 24:01 to the right you see part of the condom like a second artificial skin above the first skin (computer software was used to hide the condom).
With model Roxy Dee on 17 August 2017, with the video at 12:43 you can see the leftover from the rim of a condom, above it you see one colour, below it you see a different colour (probably computer software was used to hide the condom). At 18:07 you can see the artificial look of a condom to the right, and the skin to the left, divided by a straight line. On the photograph 125.jpg, you can see the blurring where they have hidden the rim of the condom with computer software, when you zoom in. And with the same photograph 125.jpg you can see one colour above the line and another colour below that line, when you zoom out (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 173.jpg you can see the blurring of the rim of the condom, one colour above it and a different colour below it (computer software was used to hide the condom).
With the model Ann Rice on 1 October 2018, in the photograph 99.jpg you can see a little bit of the shiny reflection of the leftover from the surface of the condom to the left, divided from the mat cylinder to the right, and a vertical line to the right with two different colours on either side (computer software was used to hide the condom). You see the same elements in the photograph 108.jpg. In the video at 18:38 you see part of the silver surface of the condom to the left (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 20:50 you see some of the shining reflection of the condom to the left (again computer software was used to hide the condom). Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-30-20  01:35pm - 1728 days #3
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SophiaCarol posted originally March 23, 2020.

Anal-Beauty and condoms

With the website anal-beauty with the model Nika Charming on 20 January 2020, in the photograph 096.jpg at the top you see some of the shining reflection of the leftover from the condom (better visible when you zoom out). Computer software was used to hide the condom. With the photograph 081.jpg you have a straight line to the left and a straight line to the right with a different colour above and below that line (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 16:57 you clearly see three different areas of colour (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 19:40 you clearly see a straight horizontal line and a different colour above and below that line (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 21:11 you see the shining reflection of the condom at the top (also at 21:41).

With the model Dila on 28 November 2013, on the photograph 94.jpg you can see a horizontal line where you would expect the rim of the condom. (computer software was used to hide the condom). When you zoom out you can see a lightgrey line that divides two different colours. In the photograph 124.jpg you can see one cylinder in one colour to the left, then in the middle another cylinder in another colour, and then to the right another cylinder in another colour (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 15:17 you can see the masked artificial condom to the left, and the human skin to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). But in this case the software has gone wrong, and created an unnatural effect from the left to the right on the balls (when you pause on the right frame). At 17:30 you can see the mat skin to the left, and the shining surface to the right, divided by a vertical line (computer software was used to hide the condom).

With the model Marselina Fiore on 1 June 2018, in the photograph 96.jpg the cylinder at the top is larger then the cylinder at the bottom (computer software was used to hide the condom). The top cylinder is also shiny and the bottom mat. In the thumbnail of 100.jpg on the website you can clearly see the rim of the condom (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 17:04 you can see part of the condom to the left (computer software was used to hide the condom). At 19:44 the upper cylinder is the masked condom, then you have a lighter cylinder and then a very dark area below that. Human skin does not look like that. Computer software was used to hide the condom. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on Mar 30, 2020, 01:40pm

03-30-20  01:33pm - 1728 days #2
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
SophiaCarol posted originally February 11, 2020.

teenmegaworld and condoms

On the website creampie-angels (part of teenmegaworld) with the model Mary Rock on 29 November 2017, in the video at 13:55 you can see a lighter colour to the left, and a darker colour to the right, and between these two regions a straight line (condoms are used and being hidden with computer software). At 21:07 you can see the leftover of the rim of the condom, one colour to the left, and a different colour to the right (condoms are used and being hidden with computer software). With the photograph 113.jpg you can see a dotted straight line to the left, one colour to the left and a different colour to the right (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 134.jpg you can see the blurring that was used to hide the rim of the condom. (computer software was used again).

With the website beauty4K (part of teenmegaworld) with the model Leanne Lace on 20 July 2019, you can see in the photograph 89.jpg a lot of blurring that indicates that computer software was used to hide the condom (zoom in on the photograph). And when you zoom out of the photograph you see the range of colours that are not compatible with human skin. In the video at 25:13 you can see the leftover from the rim of the condom, and the leftover from the material of the condom above it (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the video at 28:45 you can clearly see the condom (just pause the video at the right frame). With the photograph 73.jpg, you can see one colour to the left, a different colour to the right, and this divided by a straight line (condoms are used and hidden with computer software). It is interesting to compare the two photographs 73.jpg and 89.jpg. In 89.jpg you do not have a straight line across the complete diameter, and in 73.jpg you have a straight line across the complete diameter.

With the website X-Angels (part of teenmegaworld) with the model Kris the Foxx on 26 September 2019, in the video at 14:32 (when you pause) you can see two different colours divided by a straight line (computer software was used to hide the condom), and also at 14:32 you can see a lightgrey rectangle that is a leftover from the condom. And at 18:30 you can even see the leftover from the rim of the condom (not the large lighter area, but above that a fine light line). Computer software was used to hide the condom. In the photograph 139.jpg on the horizontal part above to the right you can detect some blurring of the photograph (computer software was used to hide the condom). In the photograph 158.jpg to the left side you can detect a lot of blurring of the photograph, you also detect the leftovers from a curved white horizontal line, and the reflection of the condom on the upper part (computer software was used to hide the condom). Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on Mar 30, 2020, 01:40pm

03-30-20  01:30pm - 1728 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


As one member seems obsessed with the apparent digital removal of condoms, I have decided to create a thread for all of their posts related to the subject.

First of all, it is in fact a process that has been used by some companies. The only articles I found referenced a gay studio, but clearly the tech does exist and maybe others use it, too.

https://www.salon.com/2014/01/26/making_condoms_disappear/

I have taken the liberty of transferring some of SophiaCarol's previous site feedback and are asking this member to post future comments on this topic here.

Of course, anyone else who wishes to post is free to do so. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-20-20  07:43pm - 1738 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
We have delisted DDF Network from both The Best Porn and Rabbit's Reviews. We apologize to anyone who signed up and feels they were ripped off.

They had initially reassured us that other than a rebranding, members would still have access to the same content and features. Clearly that wasn't the case.

They have promised to issue immediate refunds to those who joined through our links. If you have any issues, please contact one of our support teams.

Click here for Rabbit's support:
https://www.rabbitsreviews.com/ContactUS.aspx

Click here for The Best Porn support:
https://www.thebestporn.com/contact.html Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-20-20  04:26pm - 1738 days #13
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
For me, I made it clear that I had the final word on what gets approved or what doesn't get approved. PERIOD!

You're free to make constructive comments about what you might like to see added to someone else's review.

But accusations and overly negative comments - however, strongly held your convictions may be - are best left unsaid.

If you need some perspective to keep yourself in check, read the news - it generally gives helps me realize what counts.

Porn sites reviews are not life and death - and that's coming from someone whose earning a living because of them.

Please be kind to one another and let this matter drop because it isn't going anywhere - for me the subject is closed. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-17-20  04:51pm - 1741 days #4
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I did read through and approve the review and as much as mbaya is entitled to his opinion, it my decision to make. It would be odd to talk about a network site without mentioning the network, especially when the members' area is integrated and some usability features aren't site specific.

I made it clear to mbaya that if a site is listed (with the exception of clones) and the system allows you to write a review, you can go ahead and do so. There have been a slew of rereviews from any number of members and I am sure there are others not following this old rule of one year.

If the interface doesn't police against it, I am not going to play bad cop after the fact. The reality is the reviewers for both Rabbit's Reviews and The Best Porn end up doing updates on some of the same sites more than once a year depending on what pool of people are available when the work comes through. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-10-20  11:09am - 1748 days #14
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
I've noted AntonioClemens.com down and am following up again on the previous ones in the thread. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-06-20  03:33pm - 1752 days #13
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
While I appreciate the enthusiasm some of you have expressed for Bang Bros and that you haven't had negative experiences when canceling, too many others over several years have had issues.

They have been listed, delisted and relisted - on both The Best Porn and Rabbit's Reviews, so they've had their chances.

And at a certain point with such a popular and long-established network, any shady shenanigans, whether consistent or inconsistent, start to wear a bit thin in terms of their trust and reliability.

Of course, I am thrilled to learn some people haven't gotten burned! Because let's face it - they've got lots of hot porn. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-05-20  08:31am - 1753 days #2
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
UPDATE from DDF Representative - In a nutshell, the content is still available, but a bit trickier to find, while they continue to rework their new and rebranded interface. You can read his entire response to BubbaGump on the review. https://www.pornusers.com/review/ddfnetwork/ Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-04-20  12:10pm - 1754 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


First, let me heartily thank BubbaGump for giving us a head's up about a recent negative experience with the DDF Network, which has recently rebranded as Porn World.

And then let me direct you all to read the BubbaGump's comment on our most recent PU review here:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ddfnetwork/

I can tell you that the change was already on our radar and we had been in dialogue with the folks at DDF about it. We had been given limited, but reassuring info that the change would not negatively impact our users.

However, with the latest development, we have already initiated further follow up and will make sure to keep you all in the loop as we find out more info.

I invite BubbaGump and anyone else already affected to contact me at tom4pu@gmail.com with any further questions you would like to have answered or details you can provide. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on Mar 24, 2020, 12:16pm

03-03-20  02:55pm - 1755 days #7
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Yes, it is too bad that this site is no longer part of the content provider's actively promoted site portfolio. But their marketing team has chosen to have the site URL redirect to the network domain and tour - presumably because it attracts more new subscribers.

This change doesn't come as a complete surprise because after updating only every other week in 2018 and posting just five scenes in 2019, there hasn't been an update in over a year. So it's clear that this collection has been on their back burner for a while now and that why we haven't been and won't be reviewing it. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-03-20  09:11am - 1755 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
You wouldn't review Gapeland on its own, you could mention it in a review of 21 Sextury. If you type "gapeland.com" into your browser, you are redirected to 21 Sextury with no specific Gapeland tour, so that's a fairly good indication that we won't review it separately.

As you may have noticed, we've linked to other channels our 21Sextury.com review with full reviews, like DP Fanatics and Anal Teen Angels. These have separate tours on their own domains rather than immediately redirecting you to 21 Sextury and are active concerns.

There are times you may find a listing for a site on The Best Porn that does redirect in a similar way to Gapeland. Exceptions can be made, though they are relatively rare, but also sometimes an old listing falls through the cracks or is visited enough that we leave it intact for our users.

I hope this info helps? Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-02-20  09:06am - 1756 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


Here's my email: tom4pu2gmail.com

It's a reliable and direct way to reach me, but I also monitor the other contact channels.

I try to check it throughout the day Monday through Friday - keeping in mind that we're not in the office on the weekend. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

03-02-20  08:26am - 1756 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace


Hey everyone, I am starting a new Sites Not Listed On TBP thread for 2020. I guess that it's better late than never even if we're into the third month of the year.

Here's a list of sites submitted since the beginning of the year that I've transferred from the 2019 thread. I am currently double-checking on their status.

Fit18.com
HardUpStraightGuys.com
Jamie-Young.com
DownblouseJerk.com
YoungBusty.com
LesbianOlderYounger.com
LustWeek.com
LANewGirl.com

Here are the missing listings that I can already explain:

PremiumBukkake.com - We're working on getting them relisted.

Gapeland.com is a 21Sextury.com subchannel on AdultTime, so we won't list it separately.

BangBrosNetwork.com - After multiple customer complaints about cancelation issues, which they seemed unable to fix, we are unlikely to list them again.

RedLightSexTrips.com - With our FOSTA (Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act) policies, we avoid listing any sites, like this one, Prostitute Movies and Tonight's Girlfriend, that openly reference prostitution.

EroBasa.com - We don't review non-English sites. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

02-28-20  08:26am - 1759 days #6
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
Thanks rearadmiral - I am confident I'll have fun and frankly, a little misbehaving never hurt anyone! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

02-28-20  08:24am - 1759 days #5
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
No problem with the "testing" post - I am guessing that you responded to my test post. Mine was to a deleted thread and that's why you got the page removed error. Sorry about that - but only threads can be deleted, there is no way to delete messages, even my own.

There is no "admin" option for profiles - just staff. I also realized that even though I fully completed my profile info when I set up my account, you can't access it. So I have now filled out the Experience field in the backend for my staff profile. But in brief, I've been in the industry for 15+ years.

Our offices are closed on the weekend, but I will be checking here throughout the rest of the week. Thanks in advance for your understanding and patience - I will do my best to be as responsive as I can.

I must apologize for not clarifying about next week's raffle, but no, there won't be one. The first under the new format will be on March 18th, but reviews written in the interim will earn entries into that drawing. So thanks for asking me - that's important for everyone to know!

Yes, the sites not listed are valuable as a tool for our team, so they're checked regularly. I realize my "autopilot comment" might have made it sound like that task could have been overlooked, but it's not a resource we want to let go to waste!

Thanks, mbaya, for taking the time to ask the questions that I am sure others had in mind, too! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

02-27-20  12:52pm - 1760 days Original Post - #1
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace




My name is Tom, but you can go with Tommy or Thomas or even a more creative nickname, like PU Guru or PU-Ca-Choo. Okay, okay, "creative" doesn't have to mean "clever" necessarily, but whatever you decide to call me, I'm here to introduce myself as your community's new admin. Now, I know that I can never replace Freddie, but since she's gone off to have the travel adventure of a lifetime, someone has got to hold down the fort and that someone is me. I am now your go-to guy for all things PU-related.

We've been on autopilot for the last while since Freddie's departure, but I will say that there had been some discussion of discontinuing the raffle before I agreed to take the reins. Nevertheless, I am happy to tell you that I think that I've come up with some ideas that will keep it going by breathing new life into it. Things still need to be finalized before I announce the details next week. But without giving away too much, it looks like you'll soon have a chance to win bigger prizes. There will probably be more ways to earn raffle entries - without making the rules too complicated for anyone, including me! And I also want to make the selection process as transparent as possible.

After that teaser, I hope no one is panicking about things not being the same. Change can definitely be good (or, at least, not completely terrible, if you prefer to remain skeptical), even with some bumps along the way. One thing I know after prepping for my new role here at PU, you folks know how to keep it real and that's the best way to keep our community solid! So I look forward to doing my part in making PU a positive and fun place for everybody to share their thoughts and experiences!

Cheers! Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials? Edited on Feb 27, 2020, 01:21pm

02-27-20  11:57am - 1760 days #2
Tom D Admin
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 39
Registered: Feb 27, '20
Location: Cyberspace
This is a test. Hello, I'm Tom, your PU admin today. Would you like to hear about our specials?

1-39 of 39 Posts Page 1


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.