|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Spencer (0)
|
1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
10-16-12 10:20am - 4450 days | #10 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
I'm actually probably not the best person to ask about tube sites. I obviously see several paysites per day, and get access to some pretty awesome material inside. For that reason, I never even visit the tube sites at this point when I'm looking for porn. The few times I have, the experience has been more annoying than anything. The quality is horrible, the clips are short, their search features don't find what I'm looking for, and it's just too much work. On a business side, they take away from me making money by offering up content for free (often illegally) that someone would normally have to pay for. So it's not just that they're annoying to use, they also hurt my personal bottom line. | |
|
10-15-12 06:01pm - 4451 days | #5 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
fap = jack off, jerk off, masturbate, choke the chicken, fap fap fap, etc. At least I hope that's what it meant!! It took me a few days of poking around to kinda understand what all was going on. | |
|
10-15-12 03:35pm - 4451 days | #2 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
They finally let me out of my box today to talk to the world outside of a review. It's been interesting to see what questions pop up Thanks for posting the link. I'll try to check back in here as well in case anyone has anything to add! | |
|
03-29-10 12:20pm - 5382 days | #44 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
Interesting read for sure! I wanted to touch a little on the subjective scoring and info on the content scenes themselves. I can only speak for myself, but how fun or interesting the content is always comes into play in a review. At minimum, I always try to describe what type of content they offer (nude? non-nude? hardcore, softcore?), if the models are hotter (or uglier) than usual, or anything else interesting. However, if you look at the number of sites reviewed per week, there are quite a few of them. In any given week or month, there are very few unique or original sites or scenes to comment on. It's difficult to get excited about a site that offers the same type of content as 90% of the other sites we look at. As I said, I do my best, but more often than not, there's just not a lot to say. The other 10% always get special consideration and info give, within reason of course. From there, it's tough to even know what to comment on really. One guy might get turned off by fake boobs, while another doesn't mind them. The same goes for MILFs, Latina girls, Russian girls, girls who don't talk, girls who talk too much, camera men who ask too many questions, cumshots in the wrong place, etc. There are way too many personal tastes to comment on all of them. On top of that, so many people's interests are opposite of each other. I have a friend who loves to see cum all over a girl's face and in her mouth, and another friend who never wants to see it at all, period. Which side should I write about? Usually, the scenes are so middle of the road that nothing really gets mentioned either way. I guess I just wanted to let you know that it's always on my mind at least, even if there's not a lot to talk about at times. | |
|
11-09-09 05:52pm - 5522 days | #10 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
Hi all! I wanted to give you an update into our findings on the join and cancellation policies for this site. We signed up for a trial membership a while back and watched everything very closely. While we did not get any erroneous charges to our credit card, we did find their billing practices to be shady at best. Immediately after you join, you're presented with a landing page with a link to login to the member's area. Unfortunately, if you hit the main (large) link, you'll also be hit with an upsell. You'd need to click the smaller link below to login with this upsell. The wording they use is confusing enough that I almost click the upsell link without realizing it. Then, on the cancellation page, there's another pre-checked cross-sale well below the submit button on that form that'd be easy to miss. This is in addition to the two standard cross-sells on the join page of course. Because of this, we've decided to ban all sites from this company. Of course, the pages will stay up on our site, but there will be a large warning, and no reviews or links to the site will be listed at this point. If you have any questions on this, feel free to post here or email us. We only choose to do business with those companies that treat users honestly and fairly as best we can. | |
|
09-30-09 10:22am - 5562 days | #3 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
I also just updated the site facts for Idols 69 to show the zip file availability. Thanks for pointing that out! | |
|
08-24-09 04:54pm - 5599 days | #2 | |
Spencer (0)
Active User Posts: 118 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Denver, CO |
That's an interesting discussion that I won't get into right now, but I did want to let you know that I updated my review with the info you posted here. A new "major con" was added, and the score taken down a notch. It may not necessarily matter to a new user to the site, but long-term fans should definitely take note. Thanks for pointing that out! https://www.thebestporn.com/review/expliciteart/ | |
|
1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
|