Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Reveen (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (96)  |   Threads Started (0)

1-50 of 96 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >

09-11-18  07:25am - 2295 days #2
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
It's the left that is responsible for what happened to Miss America, not the right. It's the constant onslaught of gender ideologues who reject the concept of differenes between the sexes and the media, most of which is on the left that made the Miss America pageant fold like a house of cards.

your "Trump is a racist aaarghtafaalgjlagh" outburst is a deflection from the facts in this case and would seem to be evidence of trump derangement syndrome.

07-15-14  07:34am - 3814 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
If any of those chicks got within 6 feet of a naked flame they'd spontaneously combust with all that hairspray

07-03-14  07:11pm - 3825 days #31
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


You guys would all be pretty surprised ( maybe not ) how far in I am about our Constitutional rights.

I like my freedom to do what I feel I need to live my life as a free man. If it means owning a gun, watching porn, getting married if Gay, or running a church. The US Constitution gives us all rights to support what we enjoy in the pursuit of life and happiness.


The rights under your constitution are not absolute. The state can enact reasonable laws that curb rights, for example you cannot own a fully automatic machine-gun, you cannot marry your sister, you cannot libel or slander people with impunity, you cannot go into a crowded place and shout fire and cause a panic that kills people.

Choosing not to run porn ads doesn't seem like too chilling a curb on speech. Now if it was a ban on porn searches then that would be different but then porn searches on google are largely useless as they usually bring up tube sites rather than actual websites that produce porn...thank the flying spaghetti monster for places like pornusers

06-02-14  10:17am - 3856 days #12
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by David19:


I'm curious what you think of beach voyeur sites like ilovethebeach.com. Such sites feature photos of topless (and sometimes nude) women in public contexts like the beach. The women are topless by consent, but they haven't consented to be photographed and definitely not to have their photos used on a porn site. There is an implied sexualization of these photos--the women are being used as topless models on a porn site when that may not have been their intent


I figured that at least some of the subjects of Ilovethebeach's videos were plants because an inordinate amount of them seem to have massive boobs. Also the videos on that site are "too good" if you know what I mean, 5 minutes or more focused on the same person without being spotted? Very little camera shake, zooming in and out, all without suspicious looks?

Anyway, in any case, they are being filmed in public areas and so aren't subject to the same protections as if they were on private property.

03-26-14  03:12pm - 3924 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by YankeeBastard:


When I visited Boston I went in an adult shop and they had a wall full of vibrators...


You should have informed the nearest building code inspector about this flagrant structural defect immediately

03-17-14  02:27pm - 3933 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I ask, where would the world be without these classic Cannuck porn vids: "The Dark End of Whitehorse", "The BBW of Blubber Bay", "Who's Pole at the North Pole?", "My Big Beaver in Big Beaver", "Sluts Who Live in Smuts", "Blow Me at Blow Me Down" and the high school sex ed film "Conception Bay". Then again, all this potential Canadian smut just makes me want to Blame Canada in general


You forgot From Russia With The Love Bone, Spaghetti-Hos and J-Roc's Greasy Trailer Park Girls Gone Wild by Nova Scotia's "finest" porno producer J-Roc

02-10-14  11:15am - 3968 days #4
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Vorsprung durch technik as they say in germany

02-08-14  12:59pm - 3970 days #8
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by EverNight:


Another MAJOR advantage the average person gets from buying a PC from a manufacturer is the included software. That software would cost many hundreds of dollars if you had to buy it yourself. When you factor that in the value from building a PC diminishes greatly, again for the average person.


Can you give some examples of bundled software that would add up to that much?

If you mean stuff like MS Office, you can get free equivalents like OpenOffice that do just as good a job. At least when you build yourself you can keep things lean and not have your computer stuffed with bloatware.

If you open up a typical Dell pc you'd see that they use the cheapest parts possible and the cooling tends to be as basic as possible. I built a gaming pc for my nephew recently, the parts and OS together came to about $800 and it would better than an equivalently priced Dell. Of course I didn't charge for for my labour and time which would have put the price up

01-18-14  07:06pm - 3991 days #28
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


As predicted in my initial post above, the fed court of appeals nuked the net neutrality law today. Nothing is going to change overnight as the legal process is not over yet but unless the government passes an actual net neutrality law (the net neutrality provision that just got nuked was an administrative rule, not an actual law passed by Congress and signed by Obama) plan on changes in the next year to two.

Here's a link.


It's disappointing but shouldn't be seen as a surprise really. The american justice system is in thrall to the major corporations there. The corporations can afford the best and biggest law firms and the judges themselves almost always seem to side with the corporation over the individual or the public good unless you are extremely lucky in finding an independent minded judge.

Ever since the courts decided that corporations could be regarded as persons under the law their power has grown and grown. Their ability to lobby and shovel money to politicians and political parties cannot be curtailed and thus they have effective control over politics and justice, over the legislators and over those who interpret legislation and how it is applied to the law. How are private citizens meant to battle against this concentration of power? It makes a mockery of what America is meant to stand for.

It's not just America where this happens of course but because America is the biggest economy on the planet, what happens there affects everybody.

Americans are going to have to realize that the real enemy isn't Iran or North Korea or some other nebulous outside threat, the real enemies are the political class, the justice system and most of all corporate interests.

12-20-13  11:21am - 4020 days #3
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
There is another way to open a bottle, this time with a feather

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8p0-gJF65q8

12-14-13  02:02pm - 4026 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:

And in Canada we walk on the sidewalk and drive on the pavement like the Americans.


And in Ireland we walk on the footpath (or "de footpat" if you want the correct pronunciation ) and we drive on the road.

There are a couple of other Americanisms that slightly wreck my head like "math" instead of maths.

Or "two thousand thirteen" instead of two thousand AND thirteen

12-02-13  04:25pm - 4038 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Denner:


But took a look at the drive - and it says Seagate.


The reason for that is that there is basically 2 manufacturers left in the HDD business, Seagate and Western Digital. They bought out the HDD manufacturing business of most of their competitors.

All the other so-called manufacturers buy hard disks from WD or Seagate, put their own enclosures around them, some proprietary back-up software on the disk and stamp it with their own logo.

Unless you're getting a knocking sound from the drive (which indicates a problem with the read/write heads touching the disk) then the problem is usually solvable by taking the disk out of the enclosure and putting it in a different enclosure or slapping it into a spare bay in a pc.

@graymane - If you don't mind me saying, I think you're being overly cautious about data theft and hacking. Starting and stopping external drives in the manner you seem to be describing isn't going to do much for their health and is probably a more likely cause for data loss than hacking would be.

07-26-13  08:37am - 4168 days #22
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by slutty:


Just heard about this on my 2-day old NPR podcast today, I try to stay current (but have been falling behind)! Assuming this goes through, will any of the brits here sign up? And I guess more importantly, would PU be one of the blocked sites?


I'd imagine pornusers would be blocked, after all it has porn in its name

What this will do is force people to use proxies. Already the UK and Irish governments have been trying to block piratebay for years without much success and TPB has dozens of proxy sites now.

There was another message board post I saw yesterday which summed up things really well. Since I agree with it, I'll copy it and save myself from typing everything out

"they can't block the pirate bay. How are they going to block millions of porn sites!
The truth is that they can't.

I don't mean they 'shouldn't' or they 'won't do it effectively' - I mean *they can't filter the internet and still have it resemble the internet.

There are really two separate issues here, filtering *content* like porn and filtering *sites* (that have porn content).

ISPs cannot filter content. Why not? Even if they monitor every byte that goes between your computer and a site on the internet, they can't stop encryption. The same type of encryption that protects us when we buy something from Amazon.co.uk or check our g-mail. At the core of encryption, we've got math problems that are computationally hard to solve. And we're decades away from that changing (if it ever does).

Anyone who wants to, can encrypt data between themselves and someone else. The ISP can't read it. The government can't read it. It doesn't even take prior sharing of private keys or anything - and everything can be observed, it doesn't matter. Encryption is awesome.

If the block all 'unrecognized' traffic (this, they could do) - it would break the internet. Everything would be sent encrypted. Logging into sites would be an invitation for everyone to sniff your password. Buying anything online would be the same as giving your credit card number away.

If they don't - they'll never be able to stop people from downloading/uploading/sharing encrypted content. And that encrypted content can be *anything*.

The other issue is blocking individual sites that allow content they don't approve of. There are two ways you can attempt to do this....maintain a list of every single site in the world that contains content you don't like (blacklisting) and prevent people from connecting to them.....or, maintain a list of every single site in the world that is 'safe' to visit and blocking everything else (whitelisting).

Blacklisting can't work. And neither can whitelisting....

All anyone needs to do is connect to a server that is not on the blacklist and then make the request from there to the blacklisted site. Easy as pie. VPNs/proxies/ssh tunnels - I paid 2 euro per month for a US based server so I could get the US version of Netflix before it was available in Ireland.....and there are countless ones available free, online. There are legitimate uses for VPNs and proxies. If you disallow them - you've fundamentally broken the internet. Businesses in Ireland depend on them. If your whitelist includes them - anyone can access any site they want by connecting through one of these sites first.

Besides all of that - many sites are easily classified as either porn or not porn. Many sites I visit are primarily not-porn, but have adult content. It would take an effort larger than the UK could muster to actively police all of these sites to block just the sections of content....and any site that offers https:// connections prevents any content-based filtering from occurring.

At it's very core - this *cannot* work. They can't filter the internet. It's just not possible. Physically, logically, this entire debate is really, really pointless, because it can't be done. It's not even 'really impractical' - this is 'impossible'. This is like passing a law that is going to 'block gravity' or order the sun to stop shining so much."

07-23-13  06:33pm - 4170 days #17
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Before we start getting too off-topic here A post I saw on another forum really pointed out what will happen with this block

"There's nothing simple about having an opt in, incidentally. Because it also requires the setting up of a database of harmful sites to be blocked. And that raises all sorts of questions regarding who decides which sites are to blocked, what criteria they use, whether sites can appeal their blocking, whether the list is publicly available etc.

You don't see anything wrong with putting control of what sites can be seen in the hands of a few individuals?"

How many thousands of porn sites will they have to check through? Inevitably some will get through the block and someone will sue the government.

Also, I'm not one for believing in conspiracy theories but I think there is a legitimate concern over a government deciding what sites can be seen. So today its porn that they go after, next will it be protest groups? or animal rights organisations? or political blogs? consumer-rights groups? I don't know if I'd trust any government not to try and block opposing groups. We're getting into the area of thought-crime here.

And also, what if someone releases the names of those that are on the non-blocked list? "Well we'll hire Mr Smith because he's not a pornhound, but Mr Jones is a dirty dawg so we won't hire him" etc etc

07-23-13  10:02am - 4170 days #13
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Forgive my ignorance, but I'm surprised Ireland doesn't have stricter porn laws already considering the majority Roman Catholic population (for example, elective abortion is largely illegal). Still, like abortion, I think trying to restrict porn can lead more people to simply break the law regardless of the consequences.


I can see why you might assume that. With regard to physical distrubition of erotica/porn regulations are still pretty strict in Ireland. Hell you couldn't even buy Playboy in Ireland till about 20 years ago, the most you could get from a newsagents was H&E (Health and Efficiency), an extremely tame nudism magazine (perhaps some of the UK posters here might remember the thrill of getting one of these as a teenager lol).

About 20 years ago, when the various scandals surrounding the Catholic church broke there was a massive disillusionment with the church. Around that time homosexuality was legalised, contraception was allowed to be made available over the counter and not just with a doctors prescription and sex shops were legalised. Abortion is still a hot topic with mainly people over 50 objecting under any circumstance and those under 50 more tolerant. Church attendances since the scandals have fallen dramatically with most attendances being made up of pensioners.

Online porn has rather flown under the radar as it were in Ireland with no regulation as to the distribution or consumption of it (although I think there are harsh restrictions on production here, but its too small a market to sustain local production anyway). Everyone I know uses porn and certainly until now there's been no discussion in political circles about restricting it, sort of a "if you don't talk about it, it doesn't exist" attitude if you know what I mean.

07-22-13  01:34pm - 4171 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I'm from Ireland so this doesn't directly affect me....yet. Usually if the UK does something then our government follows suit like a bunch of sheep.

This is a curb on peoples freedom. Governments know that ordinary people are reluctant to speak up in favour of porn so they can bring in this type of censorship without much protest. The same goes for when they say they are monitoring everyone's email and web traffic so as to "prevent terrorism", governments are taking away civil liberties and there is barely a murmur about it.

On the bbc news today David Cameron was talking about banning "violent porn" but just how do you define violent porn? Is spanking included? How about bdsm? Rough Sex? This kind of law gives police and judges wide powers to define what is or isn't "violent" and your fate could rest on the whim of some old decrepit magistrate.

Another disturbing part of this is how politicians and trashy tabloid gossip-mongers like The Daily Mail link normal pornography with child pron. In the BBC article one member of parliament said, "filters would make a difference, saying that the killers of schoolgirls April Jones and Tia Sharp had accessed legal pornography before moving on to images of child abuse." That kind of assertion that there could be a causal link between normal porn and child pron and thence to child murder is absolutely outrageous. Its ridiculous that someone using logic as faulty as that could be responsible for implementing legislation.

07-11-13  12:01pm - 4182 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Randyman:


Doesn't matter what kind of company it is, they'll go after them if you file a complaint. I used them to recover funds from an online sex toy store that tried ripping me off.


In the UK the Office of Fair Trading or perhaps Trading Standards would be the closest but I've not heard of anyone using them with regards to internet porn.

If I was having a problem with a porn site I'd go to the billing company first and my credit card company second.

04-10-13  03:44pm - 4274 days #8
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
a quick taser jolt to the nuts before a scene does wonders

02-26-13  06:23pm - 4317 days #19
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I guess they're the same type of account, though people rarely use checks anymore for everyday transactions and you usually have to pay for any checks, i.e. banks don't want to give them out just for opening a new account--pay up, assholes!


I think there's some mixup in terminology here. Current accounts are accounts used for normal day-to-day banking, they can be used with checks (although thats getting pretty rare), they are mostly used with atm cards and online banking.

Banks are really fucking around with customers these days, the latest ruse is to try and convince people to switch from having an overdraft to having a short-term loan, which is generally more expensive for customers and less flexible for small businesses.

02-22-13  08:30am - 4322 days #15
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:

To me potty humor just isn't funny.


Don't ever watch British tv then

In the right circumstances fart humour is extremely funny imo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JdJipPOhno

02-10-13  11:46am - 4333 days #13
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I rune ho swap externals so when I am full down load I can put a mini fan right on the drive my DL exteral drive runs ice cold.


There's a nice little utility called CPUID Hardware monitor from http://www.cpuid.com/ which you can use to monitor all kinds of temperatures including hdd temps.

If an external is running hot then thats down to a poorly designed enclosure, my samsung externals run ice cold as well.

02-10-13  11:41am - 4333 days #12
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by davel60:


I have never had an external drive fail, but have had numerous internal drive failures. As storage keeps getting bigger and cheaper, I am upgrading and transfering my collection to new external drives. The capacity of hard drives today is simply amazing.


Conversely I've never had an internal drive fail but have had several externals fail. Externals are just internal drives in an enclosure with usually a seperate power supply.

Given the work that they have to do, hdd's are incredibly reliable, what happens is that sometimes a bad batch comes out from a factory and that gives a brand a bad name for a while. The only HDD manufacturers left are Seagate and Western Digital, some people swear by Seagate, some people swear by WD but in real terms, aside from anecdotal evidence there's little to differentiate the two.

02-09-13  06:58pm - 4334 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by anyonebutme:

Desktops tend to be better for people who don't take care of their possessions. Break the monitor? Replace just the monitor. Break the laptop screen? Replace the whole laptop and pay someone to pull data off the laptop hard drive.


Huh? Sorry but were you drinking when you wrote that?

I've got a laptop and a desktop. And I take extremely good care of my desktop, after all, I built it myself so I should know how to maintain and take care of it.

And if you break the screen on a laptop, then you can plug a monitor into the vga or dvi socket and easily transfer data yourself. Unless you've knackered the gpu and then you really are screwed

02-09-13  06:54pm - 4334 days #10
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Dracula:


I think you get a bigger bang for the dollar when you go with a desktop. Laptops offer mobility, but if you don't really need that, go desktop.


And if you go for a desktop get someone to build it for you, that way you'll get better parts and better value for money. Plus with a decent case you'll get lots of bays for installing multiple hard drives giving you major storage options.

Although, why make it an either or situation? You could have both a relatively inexpensive laptop for mobile use with a decent desktop as well.

02-07-13  11:57am - 4336 days #116
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I listen to it, I would say her responses were allot like a drug addict would say. My signature may in away make me a Hypocrite by saying in a sense the women in porn sell their bodies like prostitutes. Yet I watch them. But I am also not delusional or justify why I watch and enjoy it.
I think the fact it is done on film makes it no less prostitution. I think that word is misunderstood by many.


Its because of the social stigma regarding prostitution and indeed the negative perceptions of sex in general fostered by the monotheistic religions over the years that have ingrained a "sex is bad" attitude amongst so much of the general public.

I don't frequent prostitutes but I have no problem with anybody using them, same with porn. As long as both adults are consensual then then why should there be a problem with it? Its time society got over it and accepted sex, porn, prostitution as being normal human activities and quit being so uptight and "holier than thou" *rant over*

02-06-13  07:48pm - 4337 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Oh I thought this was going to be about the names they
have like:

Dick Butkus
nnamdi asomugha
chris snee
reggie nelson
chansi stuckey
david clowney
oshiomogo atogwe
willis mcgahee
osi umenyiora
paul puzluszny sp?)
yeremiah bell
akin ayodele
channing crowder
haloti ngata
chad ochocinco
tj houshmanzadeh
d'qwell jackson
dallas clark
brandon merriweather
lofa tatupu
julius peppers
plenty more


And dare I say ................................................................................................................................ Dick Trickles .


Wasn't Dick Trickle a nascar racer?

Weirdest soccer players names I can think of right now are Marco Boogers and Danny Shittu

02-06-13  11:07am - 4337 days #110
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


That is just sad sad sad...... why would anyone do that to themselves ! tsk tsk tsk !


I wonder is it some aspect of body dysmorphia or something. That girl was beautiful before surgery now she's got a fish face and square tits, who in their right might would actually think thats a good look?

02-05-13  07:33pm - 4338 days #107
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by jberryl69:




Seriously, what the fuck?


See, she went into the surgeon and said "I want to look like crap" and he thought she said "I want to look like carp"




01-25-13  06:02am - 4350 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I recently read something similar about Tide detergent. Supposedly they have such an established brand (around since the late 1940s) that they don't have to lower their prices, and they are still #1 nationally. The article was actually in relation to thieves specifically targeting Tide to resell for quick cash. But it also made the point that customers--who would otherwise be buying cheaper brands of every other product they get from stores that sell Tide--feel that being able to afford Tide is a sort of personal status symbol.

I guess that H.L. Mencken quote "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." is alive and well.


Yeah, its exactly the same with Kelloggs Cornflakes, there are millions of exactly the same cornflakes brands but people don't want to be seen to be buying a "cheap" brand

Car manufacturers do something similar, like General motors will put out 2 cars that are exactly the same under the hood but one has Chevy styling and the other has Buick styling and slightly more affluent people will buy one brand because they think that brand is inherently better despite the objective evidence being that both are the same!

01-24-13  06:02pm - 4350 days #8
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Trader Joe's (a retail grocery chain in the U.S.) has increased the price of their $2 bottle of wine to $2.49.


I've heard from a few restauranteurs that they put their really shitty wine that they want to get rid of on the the mid-price section of their wine list because people never order the house wine because they think they'll look cheap

01-24-13  11:52am - 4350 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


^^ Yes and I found it - (one wonders the difference between Disks and Drives in the System Information file) it IS NTFS. I must have a brain fart from 10 years ago.


On first installation a disk asks what file format you want to use, NTFS or FAT32, NTFS being the default usually, perhaps you just misremembered.

I did a search on the WD smartware software and it seems like other people are having similar problems to you, it looks like it may be frequently backing things up, god only knows if its affecting anything else http://community.wdc.com/t5/WD-Software/...-software/td-p/17358

If it was my disk I'd uninstall the WD smartware tool, but since it isn't mine what you do is up to you If you want rid, then Start => Control Panel => Programs and Features

Don't blame me if it all goes wrong however

01-24-13  11:40am - 4350 days #50
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think Barbie is behind the fake breast craze. They all want to look like Barbie .. which is fine when they are fully clothed but take off those clothes and it's a horror to most. I tie my theory to the fact that enhanced breasts are mostly popular among North Americans where the dolls were the most prevalent and popular. Because of this most red-blooded American males don't want to see small to medium breasts any more because they remember their youth and Barbie's "super size me" plastic breasts!


Hmmm do they also pattern themselves after the Ken doll?

01-24-13  11:37am - 4350 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


^ Hilarious, Reveen. Thanks for the laugh. In Canada the "Kerryman" would have been replaced with "Blonde" to spare sensitive feelings.


I thought Newfies were the butt of canadian jokes?

01-24-13  06:01am - 4351 days #3
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Danny Healy-Rae is an utter cretin and does not represent the majority view in Ireland, Healy-Rae family are considered a laughing stock of the country. Also it may not be a surprise that Councillor Danny Healy-Rae owns a bar. There is absolutely zero chance of these permits actually being issued.

Kerry men are the butt of jokes throughout the rest of Ireland for being thickos, heres some for you

How do you recognize a Kerryman on an oil rig?
He's the one throwing crusts of bread to the helicopters.

Have you heard about the Kerryman who cheated CIE?
He bought a return ticket to Dublin and didn't go back.

A Kerryman rang Aer Lingus and asked how long it took to fly from Dublin to London?
"Just a minute sir", said the girl on the desk.
"Thank you", said the Kerryman, and hung up.

Have you heard about the Kerryman whose library was burned down?
Both books were destroyed, and worse still, one hadn't even been coloured in.

How do you make a Kerryman laugh on a Monday morning?
Tell him a joke on Friday evening.

A Kerryman was attacked by a robber and put up a spirited fight before parting with his purse which contained only 15c.
"You mean to tell me you put up all that struggle, all for 15c?"
"No," said the Kerryman, "I thought you were after the E50 i've hidden in my left
shoe".

What do you call a Kerryman on a bicycle?
A dope peddler.

A fellow was explaining to a Kerryman how nature sometimes compensates for a person's deficiences.
"For example", he told him, "if a man is deaf, he may have keener sight, and if a
man is blind, he may have a very keen sense of smell".
"I think i see what you mean", said the Kerryman, "I've often noticed that if a man has one short leg, then the other one is always a bit longer".

A Kerryman went to insure his car and paid E20 to have it insured against fire.
"For E10 more sir", said the agent, "you can insure it against theft also".
"That would be a waste of money", said the Kerryman, "who would want to steal a
burning car?"


Kerry workman to his workmate: "Don't come down that ladder, Mick. I've taken it
away".

A Kerryman got a job as a lumberjack, but try as he might, he couldn't meet his quota of fifty trees a day. By chance he saw an ad in a shop window for chainsaws
'guaranteed to fell 60 trees a day'. So he bought one, but the best he could manage was forty trees a day.
So he took it back to the shop and complained that there must be something wrong with it.
"Let me look at it", said the man in the shop. So he took the chainsaw and switched it on.
"What's that noise?" said the Kerryman.

A Kerryman wrote the following letter to the editor of a newspaper:
Dear Sir,
Last week I lost my gold pocket watch, so yesterday I put in an ad in your LOST AND FOUND columns. Last night I found the watch in the trousers of
my other suit. God bless your newspaper.

01-24-13  05:48am - 4351 days #7
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by jberry169:

[QUOTE=jberryl69]
BIOS info via regedit

Wish I could copy and paste the regedit info, but as I said yesterday is correct with regard to Version & Release Date - the only additional information I learned is that the BaseBoardProduct is 0X231R which is more what I thought I'd find when I first went looking. I did print it to an XPS file and I could print it via screen capture and make a photo out of it, but trust me - all the pertinent info has been revealed.


Is it a Dell computer?

Originally Posted by jberry169:


With regard to the formatting system I actually do not know where I came up with that at the moment. So, I'm going to have to ask just where I did because I can't find where to locate it now. I'll need HELP with that.
[/QUOTE]

Click start then click Computer. Right click the disk in question and left click Properties. It should tell you on the properties page what the file format of the disk is.

01-23-13  07:52pm - 4351 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


Here ya go Cybertoad -

Ram - 4GB
Processor - IC i5 CPU Quad processor
OS - W7/64 bit
2.0 or 3.0 USB - 2.0

Stuff like that might help also if you know what bios you are using? Just noticing this so I'll need to reboot the computer. Will edit this Dam Cybertoad, this seems way too simplistic but when I looked it says, A01 8/11/2009. Is that correct?


Its not a bios that I recognise, however the following link will show you how to find your Bios version. http://pcsupport.about.com/od/tipstricks/ht/biosverwin.htm
Just one point to note when you are following the instructions, because you have windows 7 you won't have a Run box, instead just type regedit into the "search programs and files" box and hit enter, then continue following the instructions from there.

Nearly all Bios's are made by either American Megatrends or Phoenix Technologies, all you need to find is which one it is and the version of that bios then.

In any case, I'm not convinced its a bios issue but its no harm to gather evidence in any case. I'm not convinced that your disk is borked either like Ragingbuddhist said although his point about FAT32 is the first thought that came into my head too. FAT32 is rarely used now, NTFS has completely taken over from it. FAT32 has file size limitations which means its not ideal these days.

One solution would be to get another disk (if you can't afford another then maybe you could borrow a disk or disks off someone?), copy over the files you want to keep and then format the disk as NTFS, copy everything back and then see how it goes from there.

The WD Smartware tool isn't one I've used. I used to have WD disks until a couple of years ago, but I've never used that tool. I found WD externals to be clunky, noisy and the enclosures to be not very well designed. I switched over to Samsung 2tb disks which I've found to be much better overall. The disks inside the samsung externals are actually made by Seagate which I find to be more reliable than WD (there are basically only 2 hard disk manufacturers left in the world, WD and Seagate, they then sell hard disks to other manufacturers who make their own enclosures. Mybook is WD's own brand of enclosure)

Most external hdd brands have management software, I usually refer to it as crapware since Windows can handle file transfer, file management, security and all other tasks quite well without any other crap sitting on top of it. I'd ditch the WD tool but thats entirely up to you. Another point regarding the tool is that sometimes software can have unintended effects on other seemingly unrelated software.

For example a few years ago I had Norton internet security installed on a pc and any time there was an intrusion detection from the firewall the sound in my speakers would go funny. I got rid of norton and put other security software on and speakers were fine again. Why did that problem happen? Who knows, some shitty coding in norton I'd assume.

The WD tool on your external hdd may be affecting how Windows interoperates with the hdd and slowing down everything from discovery when the pc is starting up to file management when the pc is running. Thats the most obvious logical theory to me atm anyway.

01-23-13  07:25pm - 4351 days #47
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


It worked enough to get her into Playboy, which in turn led to her becoming a full-fledged celebrity, so they made their money back many times over. Sometimes it's mainly a financial decision, and not a cosmetic one.


The fact that she gained financially through having fake breasts speaks of a certain unhealthiness in how society perceives how women look. In the before picture her breasts are in proportion to her body and she looks healthy and natural, in the after she looks like one of those blow-up sex-dolls.


01-22-13  05:40pm - 4352 days #23
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I don't have a top 10 list.

There are so many beautiful and attractive models in porn, in the past, and new ones coming out all the time, that to list them all, would take a top 1000 list or more


Thats where I take an entirely opposite point of view. I think there's very very few beautiful looking women in porn. There are many passable women for sure, but very few great ones.

01-18-13  07:43am - 4357 days #13
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Tits McGrath:


What is VB?


I'm guessing its reference to popular paysite videobox.com

01-16-13  08:33am - 4359 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


If you type your post directly into the message block, instead of using a word processing program and pasting that into the message block, I'm guessing you won't see the weird symbols when the message is saved and then brought up for viewing


either that or type it in Notepad and then paste to the message block, notepad is plaintext so it takes out anything odd that might be in the word processing program. It seems needlessly complicated but there may be some reason why he's not typing directly into the box.

As for Mad magazine, it has recently reappeared at my local newsagents so I've gotten the last few issues. Sure, some of the jokes were corny but thats almost what I expected, part of the charm of Mad. I don't have a nostalgic tie to it so I didn't get hit with a "not as good as it used to be reflex". Really, not many things are as good as they used to be, current music is mostly shit

And as for the price, it sounds like the OP is getting ripped off, it only cost me about 5 euro and stuff is usually more expensive in Ireland.

01-15-13  08:54am - 4360 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Last year I actually had to explain to them why I was no longer using a savings account that also stopped paid any interest. What the hell is the point of a savings account with a 0.0% interest rate?!

Sorry, I've descended into ranting again


I think I can go 1 better than that

Last year I stopped contributions going into an investment fund I had going with a bank. Cue a couple of terse letters from them telling me of the dire consequences of my actions and that I should promptly start paying them again, which I naturally ignored because I knew I was in the right.

Then a few days later I got a call from an "investment fund manager" at their head office asking me why I had stopped payments. I then explained to him that in the last year the taxes levied on my fund were MORE than the interest that the fund had earned, I said to him "Have you heard the phrase throwing good money after bad", which is what paying more money into the fund would be. "Ah I see" he said followed by him blathering on for a while about how switching to this account or that account would be better. I explained that I wasn't interested in doing any new business with his bank, that the fund managers (who take a hefty "management charge" every year) should have actually been managing and advising me proactively rather than just sitting there taking their fees and doing nothing.

01-14-13  04:39pm - 4360 days #25
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thanks, Reveen. Your answer is thought-provoking as well, and I actually agree with much you have to say.

I guess my question was provoked by the assembly line updates in a site I quit only recently. They had a handful of models they showed over and over, one of them actually has 59 sets to offer so far, probably up to 65 since I last looked. Now if that model wore normal, everyday clothes in one set, a nightie in another, erotic lingerie in a third, a dress in a fourth etc. then I could see the reason for collecting, but with most models (on that particular site) it was mostly a top, no bra, a jean skirt or jeans, occasionally worn with panties, but most of the time going commando, from set to boring set.

I admit, as usual, to hyperbole in order to make a point .. but I am not exaggerating by much. I guess what I need is a high class picture site with a bunch of great models, but more importantly, with a bunch of inventive photographers who will make the effort to present the model a bit differently in each set. And who will stop assuming that the viewer can't wait to get to the choice bits and therefore ignore the erotic tease factor altogether in favour of a series of nude shots.


Are you referring to ATK there, I recall seeing something on another thread discussing the shortcomings of it. Its a site that I've seen get high scored reviews and praise and I've checked it out numerous times and have yet to subscribe to it. Given its description, its a site I should like but when I look at it, I'm just not particularly enticed. In the sample pics a lot of the models seem to be drenched in harsh light which is not very forgiving to amateur models and also a lot of the posing seems stereotypically porny for want of a better word, like they're shooting what they think the typical porn fan wants to see.

Just as a general comment for the atk-type sites I wish they'd tell the models that they don't need to eyeball the camera in EVERY shot, it is permissable to look away. I also wish the models would either do a proper striptease or else ignore the camera and do a voyeur type set, just don't do a half-assed strip with trout-pout stares at the camera throughout the set.

This has kind of gotten off topic but quality is also a part of getting value for money!

01-13-13  06:47pm - 4361 days #22
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


^ This is one thing I don't understand about you, Cap'n, or Reveen. I grant you that some models do look prettier than others but would you really want twenty sets of one, especially since the clothes they wear from set to set, as well as the postures, are often almost identical these days?

The body remains the same so you are just staring at something you're already familiar with from the first set on.

If, on the other hand, you collect 20 different models, at least the body shapes are different from set to set, even if they too should wear similar clothes.

Not trying to be confrontational, my friends. Just a different way of looking at things.


Its a good question and a fair line of thought to examine.

I think that can depend on the charisma of the model and the creativity of the photographer/videographer. I think where you have a situation where a model is booked for x amount of time and the photographer/videographer wants to do as many sets of photos and video clips as possible in that limited time then even the prettiest model could get samey. A problem with some sites is that they use the same location, the same outfits, the same lighting...but they do this with multiple models so all their sets end up looking samey over the course of multiple models.

However where the photographer/videographer mixes things up in regards to locations, indoor/outdoor, set design, lighting, clothing etc then this freshens things up. If depends on the creativity and skill of the person producing the photos and videos, models can look very different in different locations and under different lighting conditions.

Also, the enthusiasm and charisma of the model matters, if they are at ease with themselves and with the photographer/videographer then they can be confident to do different things on camera and do things from experience rather than needing to always take direction. When you have a model/actress who displays these attributes then its a pleasure to see them again and again.

As well, if you follow a model/actress over the course of several years then they can change quite a bit, weight gets gained or lost, hair colour and length changes, they have a pubic bush then they shave then they grow out a landing strip etc etc so the body definitely doesn't stay the same.

To add to that bear in mind that a lot of people gravitate to certain body types or facial features or whatever so certain other body types or facial features won't appeal to them. There is such a variation in body types that even someone who likes multiple types will find that there are a number of types that don't appeal.

Wow, this answer ended up being longer than I thought it would be but thats because its a thought-provoking question

01-12-13  06:25pm - 4362 days #16
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Agreed again, I have never subscribed to DDF because in all the samples I looked at the women wore way too much makeup! A bit too much glamor for my taste.


I subscribed to ddf a while back just to get the Wendy Star updates but the way they had her done up made her look pretty awful and the same goes for the other models. It put me right off ever subbing to that site again unless they completely change their style.

01-12-13  01:00pm - 4362 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Nice post, BubbaGump! I am with you all the way on this one! I especially like: "IMO, there is too much focus on volume and not enough focus on quality." I just dropped a subscription with two months to go because while the volume was there (ten picture sets a day) there was a monotonous sameness to them all. But I am really getting old, so maybe it is just me.


I'd pretty much agree with that, and I don't think its a sign or age

Oftentimes I'll check out a site and see some models I like but because they only have a set or two or a video or two each I won't bother subscribing because it just isn't worth it.

I'd rather have 20 sets of a model I really liked rather than have 1 set each from 20 models, of who I might really like maybe 2 or 3.

Some sites seem to have this idea that they must churn through as many models as possible whereas I think there is a lot of customers out there who like to see the same girl in different outfits or different situations or whatever.

I'd agree with Bubbagump about the tattoos, piercings, plastic tits, collagen lips etc, just don't like them. Fake tan is another thing that pisses me off, fair enough if a model has a natural tan but some sites, like ddfbusty are terrible for having their models with too much makeup plastered on and with having an awful orange skin colour

01-12-13  11:06am - 4362 days #4
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
My list would be fairly varied, some softcore, some hardcore, some current, some out of the business. I could list a load more but just off the top of my head

In no particular order an all that!

Alison Angel - She'll probably be always on my list, extremely cute and probably the ideal body type imo. Didn't look at her pictures and vids for ages but recently "rediscovered" her.

Polly B - My current favourite met-art model, blonde, freckled, puffy nipples, simply gorgeous.

Lucy-Anne Brooks - Of Only-tease, St Mckenzies et al, one of the most prolific softcore models around. Doesn't even go full nude but is gorgeous and has the cutest small boobs ever.

Wendy Star aka Westy, Jannette etc. - Polish big-boob model, ok she's got funny teeth but she's still hot and has fantastic big boobs.

Petra Mis - Another big-boob model, this time from Czech Republic. Only spent a couple of years in the porn business but was extremely hot imo.

Rico Yamaguchi aka Rina Nakanishi - Former member of pop group AKB48, only did a dozen JAV movies but she was HOT and always very enthusiastic.

Yuma Asami - One of the veterans of JAV, she's been in hundreds of movies but is still hot and always gives a good performance.

Kotono - Retired from the JAV business but extremely cute and has gorgeous breasts with big puffy nipples.

Kotone Amamiya - Very beautiful JAV actress, does a lot of nakadashi movies which is a plus.

Bella Baby aka Bella Shepard and other names - Beautiful Czech model, always looks like she's really into fucking, even though she has some tattoos (which normally I dislike) she makes it on my current list.

01-12-13  08:15am - 4363 days #24
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by graymane:


Ya'know, to me there's something especially erotic about a black guy humping a white woman.
What I can do without, however, is the black guy's incessant alluding to how fortunate she is getting it on with a black man. It gets so bad at times it becomes verbally putrid.


Well I guess the dialogue in most american porn is awful (what little dialogue there is) but I agree that kind of stuff that you allude to is risible.

01-09-13  05:55pm - 4365 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I had a quick look at their site and it doesn't seem american-unfriendly (or any other type of unfriendly ) but neither does it seem to be particularly transparent or user-friendly.

Taking your last point first, it seems that they used to use DRM (an immediate no-no in my opinion) until 2010. There is an announcement on their news page and forum "Ladies and gentlemens, let us introduce you to new amazing featured format available for download MP4! No more DRM - and that's mean no more server licenses needed, you can use any player you like."

Regarding joining the site, there seem to be a number of options available. There seems to be a monthly join option where you get 180 minutes of downloadable video, every month you stay a member you get an additional 36 minutes every month.

There are yearly streaming and download options. There appear to be scene by scene and movie by movie streaming and downloading options as well.

Nowhere on the site can I find upfront information on the PRICE. Also if you try to join or buy a movie they want you to set up an account first which means they are harvesting your email address even if you decide not to join the site or buy/stream a movie/scene, thats shady in my opinion.

Also they seem to have some kind of weird credit card affirmation process which means you don't get an immediate download/stream. If you look at their support forum there are all kinds of concerns raised http://www.btsporn.com/forumdisplay.php?f=68

The site seems to focus on anal which isn't my interest really but even if it was, their business practices and lack of transparency would put me off having anything to do with them.

01-08-13  03:01pm - 4366 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by luv lickn clit:


good luck creamcummer! that's a pretty specific niche!


It is indeed...but while lactation doesn't do much for me, I have seen a couple of japanese porn films which starred lactating actresses. So when the OP put up this thread I checked the main AV sites and I found 1 lactation/nakadashi film on Actionjav and I figured if anyone would do this type of thing it would be the Japanese! So, one film out of hundreds/thousands, not sure if thats worth a subscription OP.

01-08-13  02:57pm - 4366 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


IMO it is good, but not as good as it has been.

A few years ago I regularly had between 4 & 6 subscriptions active. Now, I could not find that many sites regularly supplying the kind of material I like, & in any case the increases in price ' Regional Pricing ' have lessened the appeal.

Now I am lucky if I have 2 on the go at once.

To answer the question.
From my point of view, I think we have had the golden age.
It finished a couple of years back.

Cap'n.


Yes, we've conversed on the regional pricing thread once or twice

I too used to subscribe to 5 or 6 a month and for a most of 2011-12 I was down to zero sites. I've currently at 3 sites now which is probably the most I've subscribed to for 3 years. All of those sites are ones that have had some form of regional pricing but by dint of vigilance and some luck I've gotten on special offers. The ordinary Joe Blows who don't frequent sites like PU and TBP are the ones getting royally ripped off.

But...as the thread OP says, the value for money NOW, even with regional pricing is so far in excess of what it was only little more than a decade ago. I started getting porn in the late 90's and I'd get maybe 5 or 6 magazines a month and they'd be about £8 each.

Videos would be about £30-40 for a good 4 hour tape and you'd feel privileged to find a good one!

I hear some social commentators complain now about the availability of porn corrupting young people, and that is a genuine concern. But, porn is and always has been rated 18+, it is up to parents to make sure that they're kids are not getting a hold of porn, you can't blame legal consumers of porn for what the rest of society does.

For adults, more people seem to be realising that porn is not an essentially harmful thing, and that if its treated in an open and honest way that it can be beneficial rather than harmful to a relationship. Far from being an issue with my other half, me getting off to porn is part of the relationship, so much so that she regularly buys me books of erotic photography as xmas presents

1-50 of 96 Posts Page 1 2 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.