Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Reveen (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (96)  |   Threads Started (0)

51-96 of 96 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2

01-08-13  02:37pm - 4366 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by bibo:


A few (possible) reasons:

3. lazyness
Few people actually read reviews or site comments before joining a site. I guess that's one reason why so many bad porn sites are getting away with their business model.


I'd guess that more than a few people join sites mid-wank and when they start thinking with their rational minds, buyers remorse sets in.

01-08-13  02:35pm - 4366 days #4
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
And the two niches combined to make a mature lactating woman in erotic lingerie who does an extended strip and proceeds to get banged and creampied

01-07-13  02:28pm - 4367 days #8
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I wouldn't mind if Jennifer Love Hugetits went into porn, she's already doing that tv show set in a massage parlor

01-06-13  01:53pm - 4368 days #15
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


Try JustNips

A decent softcore site.

Cap'n.


I've seen samples from that site for years but I've never really been very impressed. The standard of women on the site is pretty variable but thats not really the issue, amateur girls is the sites niche. The thing I don't like about the photo samples I've seen is the bland neutral backgrounds which the girls are shot in front of, they do absolutely no favours for the girls. Even worse is the harsh lighting used which is not sympathetic to the girls at all, if they were shot in a nice room with some soft lighting they'd look far more attractive. As it is the pictures are about as erotic as a police arrest photograph.

As for nipples and aureoles, I'm not a fan of tiny boyish nips but neither am I a fan of huge plate sized aureoles like say Lindsay Dawn McKenzie has. Somewhere mid-sized is grand although I do like puffy nipples which are quite uncommon, someone like Koika from Met-art would be quite er prominent, Polly B from Met-art is another example.

12-29-12  08:12pm - 4376 days #32
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


I suspect your comment is in regards to what reveen wrote in response to one of my post. I may be wrong and if I am then I'm sure reveen will correct me but I think that he meant to say that seeing a vagina getting penetrated isn't as important to him as seeing a hot well shot scene.


Thats pretty much exactly what I was trying to say.

I was being a bit flippant when I said that seeing the girls pussy in detail isn't important, of course its great to see a beautiful pussy but taken in the context of the rules of japanese av and in the context of the movies as a whole that it isn't a deal-breaker for me. Its amazing how soon you get used to the mosaic and how your mind can reinterpret the data its getting. I would hate to have the removal of the mosaic law change the way that av movies are shot.

For example my latest av fascination is the actress Rico Yamaguchi, she only ever did 12 av movies but by god she looked so amazingly beautiful getting fucked in each one that its worth putting up with the mosaic.

12-28-12  06:35pm - 4377 days #22
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


The Japanese people tend to do some pretty weird stuff in their porn but they can still turn out some really good porn. Of course most of us don't watch it because of they have to legally mosaic genetalia or face repercussions. If there is one thing that must change before they can make it anywhere else in the world then that is it. If they don't chnage the law which means and chnage in mentality then they will never be able to make any major advances anywhere else. There is some Japanese porn that is now made for Export that does not contain any mosaic but it's quite small because most Japanese performers are leery of shooting those movies because it can affect their Japanese porn career in a big way.

There was a recent article about Japanese porn and the article was saying that it's doing quite even in these recessions time so maybe the pressure to sell outside of Japan is not there yet for any porn studio to put pressure on law makers.


**On a side note**.
I'm all for seeing Japanese women but I'd rather see them with Caucasians or African American and not with other Asian men. I'd also don't want to see excessive use of semen which seems to be a fascination with Japanese and let's not even talk about all the tentacles.


I usually agree with quite a lot of what you say on other threads but I pretty much disagree with everything you just said

I hope the Japanese keep making porn the Japanese way and don't bow to pressure from "the West".

I don't particularly have a problem with the mosaics, I know what a vagina looks like and I'm not particularly interested in looking at some other guys cock in any kind of great detail

One thing that the mosaic does do is that it forces the Japanese directors not to focus on the genitals. One of the most incredibly boooooooooooooring things about western porn is watching minute after minute of a cock thrusting into a vagina. The japanese directors tend to focus on the whole scene more and also and even more importantly they focus on the actresses face more while they're being fucked.

The fact that the japanese actresses don't give the trout-pout porn-face that American and a lot of European porn girls do is a big improvement also.

Japanese porn isn't just about tentacles or extremity either, there is lots of vanilla porn as well, a lot of it with higher production values than the USA, especially when it comes to labels like Alice Japan, S1 and SOD Create/Star. There is lots of porn where the actresses play the part of the viewers ideal wife or girlfriend, so they make a nice dinner and after are a demon in the sack

Another great thing about Japanese porn is that tattoos are pretty much verboten and I can't recall any Japanese actresses with any piercings, certainly no facial furniture and no genital piercings. Japanese porn actresses generally have the bodies of normal healthy women whose boobs maybe sag a bit or whatever. Fake boobs are rare in Japanese porn, even amongst the big boob girls I can think of maybe two that have plastic tits.

As regards the men in Japanese porn films, I've seen a few with black or white american actors and they generally act as dumb and assholish in JAV as they do in american porn. Japanese male porn actors seem more like normal guys for the most part, theres less of an emphasis on the guys looking like body builders plus an above-average sized penis in Japan is more like an average-sized penis is in Europe or America so there isn't this thing of the males needing to have 11 inch penises or whatever. I wonder if the obsession with having huge penises in American porn is some sort of repressed homosexual urge or something.

Personally I prefer the nakadashi finish rather than the bloke clambering around to pop on the girls tits or face, its a more natural ending to a scene imo so the japanese emphasis on that is fine with me. The bukkake facial stuff I can take or leave.

For the most part I gave up on western hardcore about 5 years ago and have subscribed to sites like Actionjav, jsexnetwork and asiamoviepass since, they're all incredible value for money.

12-28-12  04:33pm - 4377 days #21
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by graymane:


In this regard, let me seize on this opportunity to say unequivocally, and uttered with every fiber of my being ..........
The Jap noises by far sound a helluva lot better than the phony screaming, Oohing, awwwwwwing, and other sundry non-sensible, ear-piercing, earth-tremors coming from many US and European women.


Agreed. The high pitched whimpering in japanese porn is a bit of a stereotype really, these days there seems to be a loss less of it and most of it that remains seems to be in the school-uniform type porn where actresses are portrayed as being younger.

For the slightly older actresses like Yuma Asami they sound more like normal women making normal sexual noises and less like the hyper-agressive shouty banshees you get in american porn.

As well as that there is a lot less "porn-face" and mugging to the camera by the actresses which is so irritating in american and european porn.

12-20-12  07:22pm - 4385 days #33
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


I, too, am horrified when a woman is casually called a whore or slut or bitch. This is exactly what motivated me to make this post. There is a certain dignity to every human life and that dignity should not be casually violated. However in the bedroom everything goes if "playing mutually satisfactory games" enhances a couples sex life. At least that has always been my view.


Aye pretty much my view too. In a healthy relationship this type of thing is talked about and boundaries set and whatever happens inside those boundaries is fair game.

The problem with typical porn is that there isn't a context to place the what is said in, so we don't know if the girl is actually turned on by the guy shouting "Take it bitch" or "get on your knees whore" or if its borderline abusive. Added to that is the often unnatural setting and the sometimes ludicrous positions that the girls are being made to adopt can take away from the girls dignity.

12-20-12  07:11pm - 4385 days #32
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
"You should imagine my relatives' reaction to my German, Micha. After 56 years in Canada I am neither fish nor fowl. I meet a Canadian for the first time and he'll ask, where were you born (even though my wife swears I have no accent [Smile] ) and every time I go to Germany for a visit I am being asked if I am an American! [LOL]"



I've met a few people from Canada who think I talk like a Newfie. I've never even visited Canada

12-19-12  10:34pm - 4386 days #16
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by graymane:


Thank you very, very much, Holliganzo, for that sound advice.
However, Being the novice that I am, my suspicions actually has also been along the same lines of what you've so thoughtfully posted here... its just that unless somebody who's trustworthy, and really knows what he's doing, personally gets a handle on my problems and do whatever necessary to get rid of these vermin-intruders once and for all. I've had my Operating system restored and stripped clean more than once, only to have the intruders re-appear.
Unfortunately, seemingly most PC attackers are smart, an' i'm further convinced they simply set-up-housekeeping once they get a foothold in the right places .....and at sometime during this invasion overrun your virus program and take command, thereafter easily getting a free ride anywhere they wanna go.


Well DBAN (Darik's boot and nuke) http://www.dban.org/ will thoroughly clean a hard disk but its not something that you would do lightly. It erases all data on a hard disk and overwrites it, once thats done you reinstall windows. Be warned it can take ages, the one time I've personally used it it took about 10 hours iirc.

12-19-12  10:19pm - 4386 days #15
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I use Norton. How will these solutions interact with my Norton? I hate setting up a protection solution and buying two years of coverage just to change to another one. I'm hoping the solution would not disturb my continued use of Norton.


Once the problem is dealt with you can uninstall anything you needed to put on the pc to repair it go back to using norton again (although I have to say I'm not particularly a fan of Norton)

12-15-12  04:39pm - 4390 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Hi, I went the whole way with method 3 but the infection was dealt with by malwarebytes once I was able to get access to windows (which is the really infuriating part of the virus) Although it was a bit of a pain it did the job and the instructions given on the link were accurate (unlike a lot of software instructions) and most importantly it did the job. At least I have the kaspersky recovery disk now in case I ever get hit by this crap again.

12-09-12  09:42am - 4396 days #3
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I had this police virus about 6 months ago, it was a pain in the hole as it basically locked windows down but I removed it using method 3 in the following link, booting my pc with a kaspersky rescue disk.

http://malwaretips.com/blogs/remove-police-trojan/

If that hadn't worked I would have just formatted the C:/ drive, its things like this is the reason I only put windows and application files on C:/, not data.

11-12-12  11:50am - 4423 days #21
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
This may be one of the reasons that I've turned away from American porn in the last few years and mainly look at european or japanese porn which luckily are not as badly infested with this tattoo plague as the US is.

Tattoos and piercing still repulse me and I don't see that changing. It beats me why anyone would want to "enhance" their body in this way but different strokes for different folks an all that I guess.

11-03-12  09:03am - 4432 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I've checked my old emails because the name dhdmedia rang a bell. Apparently they were the billing company when I joined the justinejoli.com site in 2007. So, while I don't have any recent dealings with the company I don't recall any problems with them back in 07. Edited on Nov 05, 2012, 07:27pm

10-18-12  04:10pm - 4448 days #37
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


^And what's wrong with fried egss? I love fried eggs.


I prefer nice juicy melons meself

10-17-12  05:24pm - 4449 days #35
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
just a couple of little fried eggs is all she's got

10-05-12  02:33pm - 4461 days #12
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Two sites I've wanted to do for years:

EbonyStain.com

HijabHotties.com


burkabeauties.com?

10-04-12  12:49pm - 4462 days #4
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Amazingly bigboobedblondes.com isn't already taken!

10-02-12  08:41am - 4464 days #26
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Denner:


I see the same thing......those drives are getting more and more expensive.....wonder why...since most other kind of hardware is going the other way....


I wonder are they still blaming the floods in Thailand? Maybe, maybe not. I think a real problem in the HDD market now is that there are only 2 manufacturers, Seagate and Western Digital. With such a monopoly, price-fixing is always a danger plus there is no real competition to drive prices down.

6 months ago I built my own computer for the first time and used a case that had the capability for 6 hard drive bays. At the moment I'm only using 3, one has an ssd for the operating system and I have two Samsung F4 EcoGreen 2TB 5400RPM 3.5 Inch SATA-II Internal Hard Drives. They aren't the fastest drives in the world but then they don't need to be as they are just for storage of movies and porn. I bought the 2 drives for £84 each six months ago, I checked amazon.co.uk just now and they are at £92 each.

10-02-12  08:29am - 4464 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by gaypornolover:


Are you sure it was Verotel who rejected your credit card? If your card is working normally everywhere else and your account is in good standing, it's more likely your credit card issuer declined the transaction as potentially fraudulent to protect you.

This is very common - I often get my card declined via Verotel and other sites, but it's the credit card company doing it because it looks suspicious to them - for example it's in a foreign country and a foreign currency.

They do a security call, I tell them the transaction was genuine, I confirm they declined the transaction the first time and simply pay again - this time they are expecting it so they allow the transaction to go through.

I'd talk to your credit card company - tell them the transaction you tried was genuine.


I've had that problem before with both verotel and ccbill, where I tried to sign up to websites while abroad and been refused because the transaction was suspicious or whatever, then tried to sign up to the same sites at home and had no problem whatsoever.

I think with at least some of these cases that its down to the billing company. It seems that with some cc processors if the ip address of the computer you're on doesn't match the country that your credit card number is registered in, your signup will be declined. I'm pretty sure its an anti-fraud measure and it may also be a way of preventing people getting around regional pricing issues.

Talk to your CC company as GPL said and also get in contact with Verotel, it may be a security measure of theirs that is inadvertently hindering you.

10-01-12  01:44pm - 4465 days #64
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


Just had to revive this to add Brazzers!

Cap'n.


Its interesting that Brazzers do use regional pricing but Twistys doesn't yet they are both Manwin companies.

Housewifekelly.com is another one to add to the list, it's a great solo amateur hardcore site but it's moved to regional pricing as well.

Just for the hell of it I checked one of my old favourite solo-model sites which is loooooooooooooong dormant, Alisonangel.com and not only is it charging regional pricing but its passing off old material as new. When I saw updates there for 2012-09-28 and 2012-09-25 I started thinking "Holy Shit Alison Angel is back???" but then when I checked the set names against my own files, its all 4/5 year old material that their trying to claim is new. Pretty shady move imo.

08-13-12  03:35pm - 4514 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
I'm not really into cam shows and all that but I though this was funny, a cam girl who doesn't seem to get the concept...

http://guyism.com/humor/cam-girl-breaks-down-during-live-session.html

07-11-12  10:14pm - 4547 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by elephant:


Oh I forgot another classic, flange


Flange is one of the best as is the word coined by the Inbetweeners, Clunge

Geordies (aka people from Newcastle) call it the Nunny

07-10-12  08:25pm - 4548 days #18
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Claypaws:


Modern graphics cards have a PCI-E interface. That refers to the shape of the male copper pins on the edge of the card. They fit into the female PCI-E slot of the motherboard. My motherboard predates PCI-E. Its graphics card slot has a different shape, called AGP. You cannot buy AGP cards anymore. PCI-E cards do not fit.


Also your psu may not have the right connectors for the graphics card. I built my current pc about 6 months ago and threw in a Gainward GTX560 phantom 2gb card and it required 2 6 pin power connectors from the power supply unit.

There are some amazing motherboards and cpu's out there, I don't regret upgrading one bit. Next upgrade I plan on making is to install a ssd and throw the OS on that, should go like greased stink

07-09-12  01:39pm - 4549 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


I always marvel how different tastes are because I prefer to see my models warts and all. Well, genital warts I wouldn't care for either, but you know what I mean. In other words I prefer natural, even if the flaws are obvious, to a cover-up. A bit of make up, fine, but not to cover some innocuous pimple. Leave it be, Reveen.

As one example of my dedication to natural, I am presently subscribing to Art-Lingerie but only download the videos because the pictures are enhanced to a point where the model almost looks artificial. Especially painful were a couple of sets with Faye Reagan that had to be left on the site because she looked like an idealized Faye Reagan and not the porn star I was familiar with.


I'm not talking about Air-brushing models, I'd be against that as well but when someone is going to do a photoshoot or video then a bit of body makeup to hide some spots is no big deal. I don't mind appendix scars or a bit of cellulite or what have you but I draw the line at big angry spots on a models arse

07-09-12  10:24am - 4549 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Well the first thing is , Size most videos of hi-res are bigger sometimes 4-5 time bigger depending on how they were done, format etc. The second is details, in do you need to see a vagina with razor burn details and pimples ? Well some HD's will do that and give more details then some including me want to see. I still like subtle 80's porn.
Third , is most sites with HD do not put out as many updates is my experience as HD is more expensive to have users download due to bandwidth and storage and production can cost more because edit time cost more. It is not unusual for a 20 minute video to have been 25gigs before being edited down to 3-4 gigs .
Is it worth is is up to the individual. I think some scenes were great because of HD , but I don't have to have it, the actors and what they do is far more important. to me anyways.


I have to agree with that, sometimes HD does not flatter a model. Not only razor burns but pimply arses are such a turn off, especially when so many of the in-out in-out scenes focus on the arse, blecch!

I recall, probably at least 5/6 years ago now a video of Faith Lightspeed (aka prolific model Ariel/PiperFawn etc etc) in which she had a massive genital wart, I shudder to think at how repulsive that would have been in HD.

The things that would probably work the best in HD are the high-end stuff like Joymii or SexArt where they might at least have a make-up artist available who could use concealer or something to cover up pimples and stuff.

07-05-12  01:28pm - 4553 days #14
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Just had a quick look and you are sooo right! Princess Cameron possesses Grade A boobs!


Glad you like, her sister was quite nice too http://content.coedcherry.com/princess-c...on/827546/pics14.jpg Most of the content on her site was I think, made around 2005-06 and then she pretty much disappeared, probably made enough money to get through college I guess.

Dawson Miller is another girl that had great boobs, the story that she gave is that the content on "her" site was all done in a 30 day period. After the site went up and her family heard about she got christianity and claimed she was duped into the whole thing...yeah right. Still, nice boobs anyway http://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/xvmu...iller/1#video=x5y7ty

Alison Angel of course is another girl with phenomenal boobs who went from the solo-model scene after her boyfriend heard about her site lol

Rosanna from Abby Winters was another favourite, absolutely gorgeous boobs http://lapcave.com/abby/amateur/Rosanna/images/14.jpg unfortunately she hasn't been seen since AW went to holland.

Gabi B from Met-art is another girl with small-ish boobs that had a nice bit of droop http://www.themetart.com/g/gabi-b/fvft/

Alex Sim-Wise and Lucy Anne Brooks from Only Tease are another pair (fnarr!) I can think of with those type of boobs

07-05-12  11:02am - 4553 days #9
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


To get away from mammoth boobs for a moment, I wish they had a site that featured slightly drooping, smaller boobs! Yes, you heard me right.

To me there is nothing as sensuous as putting my cupped hand underneath a breast like that and lift it up to my lips. You can't do that with the firm or sometimes underdeveloped breasts of teens nor with those over-inflated "enhanced" monstrosities that stick out straight! Size b or c with a droop that's my dream breast!


I know EXACTLY what you're talking about and thats my favourite type of boobs because its what you naturally find on a woman. I do like D and DD as well but not any bigger, like those chicks on score with boobs bigger than yer head lol

Someone like Princess Cameron had gorgeous boobs, its a pity her site was one of those "shoot a lot of stuff in a short period of time and never update the site again" type of single model sites.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdda6b_...n-dancing-strip_sexy

07-01-12  09:02pm - 4557 days #58
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Hey there, I just wanted to let you know (especially the non-US Met-art fans I guess) of what feels like a small victory, albeit a completely accidental one.

I was doing a websearch on something unrelated and completely by accident found a link to a Met-Art promotion on one of the websites I visited in that search. There was a blog entry on the site entitled Met-art Network for $49.95 a month.

So I went to the link, thinking it might be a scam on for it to go to a proper met-art promotion offering the full Met-art network (including sex-art, TLE and the rest). So I keep going through the sign-up process fully expecting to get hit with the Euro price at the end, but I didn't

Not only that but each site is billed separately at $9.95 per month so if I want to drop 1 or 2 sites and keep the others I can, woo! Met-art used to be one of my favourite sites, for a few years I subscribed to the yearly membership at $99 until they went to regional pricing so it makes me really happy to be able to reacquaint myself with some of my favourite models

I'm guessing that site rules prohibit me from posting the link but maybe the admins here could include the promotion on the review page or tpb or something. If not then try searching for met-art network july 4th special or something. And I'm sure US metart fans here wouldn't mind some of that $50 action either

06-26-12  12:00pm - 4562 days #36
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


I was going to suggest that you can still purchase many movies made in the 70's but since you don't want to see any bush then I won't.


I have some softcore German films from the 70's like the Schulmadchen series and the Hausfrauen report series but American hardcore films from the 70's do nothing for me. I prefer shaven or neat bush but the rampant tawny undergrowth that many of the 70's chicks kept between their legs is slightly revolting tbh.

06-26-12  11:53am - 4562 days #6
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


I could be in left field on this one but I always thought that Big Ben refered to the clock so renaming the tower won't affect that. The only thing that will change is if someone ask for the location of Big Ben. In that case the people will simply say in Elizabeth Tower as opposed to Big Ben Tower.


Big Ben actually refers to the bells inside the tower but over the years that name has commonly come to mean the tower itself.

It dosen't matter what official name they give it, it'll remain Big Ben to everyone except some over-officious twats. Its the same as the Willis tower in Chicago....the what? I hear you say? When I went on vacation to Chicago last year everyone still called it the Sears tower and probably always will.

06-22-12  01:14pm - 4566 days #5
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


My pleasure

I know the 1080p high resolution files are about 1200MB, but they also offer 720p and 540p, so my guess is the 540p files are around 200-300MB. That said, the HD quality is very nice, so I personally think the extra download time is worth it. Just leave the computer on overnight


I was last a member of Orgymax/Tainster/Whatever-they-call-themselves this week back in September last year. You are pretty much correct in your estimates, a 25 minute HD clip comes in at about 1.25Gb, a medium quality clips about 700mb and a normal quality clip at about 350mb.

The HD really does suit the pissing sites quite well, I'd gotten quite disenchanted with those sites around 2009/10 as the clips got kind of lacklustre but the HD really helped out plus they got Bibi Fox back and she really is the Eromaxx piss queen. One of the unwritten rules for female models is that if you appear on a piss site then you'd better be willing to take it on the face and glug down a bit of the golden shower and for a while too many models appeared not to want to go along with this. One of my other favourite regulars on the Eromaxx sites was Tatiana Milovani, she was never afraid to get into the action plus she had a piss stream like a laser beam unlike some who just dribble it out.

The best era of Partyhardcore imo was between 2004 and 2007, you were always guaranteed some cute amateurs plus they always had one of their own site models to get the party started. I remember one of my favourite euro big-boob models Petra Mis did a stint on PH in 2005. In latter years it seems like more and more of the amateurs are chubby chicks which might appeal to some I guess.

Another issue with Partyhardcore is that with its format of 4 clips of 30 minutes each released at a rate of one per week then if its a bad looking set of girls, your stuck with them for a month. Added to that, the first clip in each "film" has very little sex or nudity as its the male strippers doing their thing to get the party heated up, its usually the 3rd and 4th clip in a sequence which have all the action.

As you said its mostly amateurs on PH so part of the fun is seeing them get more and more inhibited as the night goes on, starting off going topless, then getting encouraged to give handjobs and blowjobs, then hopefully getting horny enough to get boinked.

As you hinted, part of the advantage of this network is the back catalog of material, with most of the sites dating back to 2004 or so. Even with their slow release schedule, theres more than enough material on their sites.

06-12-12  08:28pm - 4576 days #52
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thanks, Toadsith, you made my day! Glad you enjoyed our Steakhouse Burgers! Why did they withdraw them from the American market? Not enough demand? Or the health craze?

And please send those roving Canadians back to my side of the border, our local merchants are missing them badly! Traitors, one and all. Not only that but don't they realize that not all Canadians live within a couple of minutes drive from the border and have to look on with raging envy as they get their chicken and cheese and other goodies practically at half price just because of someone's protectionist ideas!


I may not be Canadian but I am looking forward to the CFL season starting this week, GO ROUGHRIDERS!

Its the third best thing to come from Canada after Rush and the Trailer Park Boys!

06-12-12  08:23pm - 4576 days #16
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


I will always have a fond spot in my heart for Abby Winters. It was the first erotic site (I hate to call it porn) I ever subscribed to. And I agree with you completely that the randomness of the clothing the girls wore added much to the excitement and color of the site.


I was going to mention the old Abby Winters actually. Between 2005 and 2007 it was a great site, sure there was a lot of average stuff but the gems were good enough to make the subscription well worth it. Nowadays, I took a look at the new AW site and it just looks generic and all the originality it had is long gone.

Girls like Paula, Armine, Chloe B and Rosanna were magic, there was a feeling that the girls were genuine and not just porn stereotypes. There was one series of vids that Rosanna did where she dressed and undressed numerous times with various different bras, panties, dresses, jeans etc, awesomeness

One thing I did dislike about AW, as with almost every multi model site is that I would have liked to see the best models more often and not have constantly have average models just because they are "fresh faces". I'd rather see 6 great models do lots of pics and vids for a site rather than dozens of average bored girls.

If AW had done a www.paula.com or www.rosanna.com I would have been so all over that its unreal

06-12-12  06:22pm - 4576 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Bless you, Thomas! Second one from the U.K. to agree with me today. Maybe it's a European thing??? (See my note on having a German background)

And I completely and utterly agree with you when it comes to lingerie ... that's been my consistent beef in many of my posts: there are simply not enough shots of women clad in their erotic finest. Just some very abbreviated casual wear and then nudity has been the norm for some time.


I'd agree with much of what you say, it certainly is tough to find quality these days.

I like to see women in good lingerie for sure but even normal everyday panties and bra are fine (as long as they aren't dirty and ratty!) as long as there is a good strip. Only tease is great for this, the major problem with their network being in the name, its all tease and no-payoff, a lot of the girls don't even do full nude.

What I'd ideally like is a sort of a hybrid of Only Tease and something like I feel Myself, a good strip followed by a good masturbation scene. It seems though that you either get one thing or the other, rarely both.

06-12-12  05:59pm - 4576 days #49
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


Yep, I agree as well! There is no fairness in regional pricing. The way they usually do it with Canadians is to take U.S. Dollars and convert them to Canadian Dollars at today's rate and charge accordingly. I think it should be done this way with all countries.


That option is there in the CCBill menus that the webmasters have access to, its up to the webmaster to select it rather than the CCBill suggested pricing (ripoff) or custom pricing (usually ripoff).

06-12-12  11:01am - 4576 days #46
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Claypaws:

I doubt that our politicians would look very sympathetically on complaints from customers about inequality in worldwide porn prices. But producers do need to make a profit in order to stay in the business of fulfilling our addiction. If it is a question of a producer either surviving or not, maybe they have the choice of charging more to those who are accustomed to paying it, or increasing their equitable price for everyone. It is hard to say which choice would give them the greater income.

In the UK, are we not used to paying more than the US for everything except healthcare? Everything from hard drives to petrol costs very much more over this side of the pond. But I would rather have it that way than have ambulances require payment before they will take me to hospital.


I think broadening the argument to other products is a false argument. There are tangible reasons for physical items to be more expensive in one country than another. Also an argument like "well we pay more for other stuff anyway" is a weak argument.

Porn downloads are intangible items, the cost to send bits to europe rather than the USA are so negligible as to not matter.

I don't think local taxes can be used as an excuse either because if the website is paying local taxes then this is already factored into the price that the website charges. The website doesn't collect a higher tax rate off foreigners than it does local customers. If there was a local tax rate of 20% and an "export" tax rate of 30% then I think this argument would have merit but I think as it is the tax argument is a red herring.

I think this argument really deals overwhelmingly with sites that originate in the US or that do most of their business in dollars, thus they fix their prices based on the dollar (like met-art). I've found the incidence of Sterling or Euro-denominated websites imposing regional pricing to be much lower than that of american websites, perhaps US members could mention if they've been charged regional pricing by European websites?

Perhaps these US dollar websites are under the false impression that Europeans are wealthier than them? Perhaps they've been living under a rock and haven't heard of the "Euro Crisis" (with Spain now requiring a bailout there is a good chance that the entire Euro may collapse). Or perhaps they just think that we are rubes and are gullible enough to pay over the odds for their sites (which clearly some subscribers probably are).

I don't see why I should be charged more than an American for no good reason (and there is no valid reason for regional pricing in my opinion) and I don't see why I should be subsidizing other users just because they are one nationality and they are another.

06-12-12  08:15am - 4576 days #26
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


The XP I use is 64bit, would that not run the programs you refer to, CT?

Cap'n.


Even if it dosen't run them natively then you could use them in compatibility mode or set up a virtual machine to run them with microsoft virtual pc http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/default.aspx or another virtualisation program like vmware player.

06-12-12  07:06am - 4576 days #8
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


How about Open Office?

That is a free equivalent of Microsoft Works.

Their Excel substitute Calc is very good for jobs like that.

Cap'n.


Aye, another vote for Openoffice from me, both the excel and word equivalents are good and free from some of the quirks that word has.

I used to use word 2003 for years but if I tried to copy in text from a web page that was too large in size, word would crash. I found that if I copied the text into notepad and then into word it would work, it seems like word (the 2003 version anyway) doesn't like dealing with html and will bork itself where openoffice is ok.

06-12-12  06:52am - 4576 days #11
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by pat362:


^Let's say that they use your method and the site gets a mediam score of 80%. There will still be a review with a very low score and this might create doubts in possible customers that the low score review is the accurate one and the higher score ones are fake reviews. At least with a limit of 50 then you can damage a sites overall score but at least you don't necessarily torpedo it to death.

I have joined some sites that deserve a much lower score than 50 but I normally mention that in my review so at least people reading it will know that the site is to be avoided at all cost.


I'm not a reviewer so I can't comment on that side of it but as a customer, if you look at how a site scores in comparison to sites in the same genre then you quite quickly see how it ranks and you can tell that a site that scores over 80 is worth considering and a site below 60 is to be avoided at all costs.

Thus whether a site scores 50 or 0 is sort of irrelevant seeing as how they mean the same thing, certainly for sites that have a good number of reviews, if a site is consistently at the bottom of the rankings then you know what that means.

What this rule does avoid is something which can often happen with reviews of products on Amazon, where a customer will give a product a score of 1 because they got something which wasn't what they expected (normally because they didn't read the product details or description) and if a product only gets like 2 or 3 reviews then an unfairly low review can directly affect sales. The vindictive customer is something that you need to be careful of, just as you need to be careful of shill reviews, this site lives and dies by the trustworthiness of its reviews and it generally does a good job of striking a balance.

05-25-12  08:29am - 4594 days #7
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Doctor Blues:


I'm very simple in this regard: as long as he doesn't spit on her, slap her (especially her tits, I mean what's up with that? they're to be FONDLED!) and treat her like he hates women, he can really do anything he wants except talk too much or be a raving egotist (here I'm thinking MILF Hunter)


I'd agree with most of that. I hate it when the males in videos talk too much, especially all that "suck it bitch" stuff. Assertive is fine but if they need to give instruction then whisper it or say it in the models ear, we don't need the stunt dick thinking he's the director. Also some actors seem to treat the girls with contempt, they don't seem to realise that the girls are the stars, the fellas are props.

Another thing that really ruins things is when the stunt dick starts showboating to the camera. It seems to be particularly prevalent in Eastern European videos, where the guy will start flexing his biceps to the camera while screwing the girl or start doing pushups or something equally as stupid.

Theres also that thing where some stunt dicks use positions that are just plain dumb or degrading like when they have the actress balanced on her shoulders with her body straight up in the air and the guys penis is pointing straight down, that just completely depersonalises the actress and makes them seem more like an object than a human being.

Message to stunt dicks: Just have sex normally, forget the bloody camera is there, we're not interested in your bodybuilding routines or weightlifting skills, we want to see good-looking women getting screwed. Know your place!

05-15-12  07:13pm - 4604 days #17
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:

As CCBill say they are requested to do it by the Webmanager, I take it they must each get a cut of the loot.

Cap'n.


Helpfully CCBill make their webmaster configuration instructions public so we can see that CCBill make the options available and its the webmasters that have to choose (I know that this has already been said on previous threads but there is no harm in reiterating it)
http://www.ccbill.com/developers/demos.php#admin-demos

There is a choice of 3 settings for regional pricing, Daily Dynamic which is fairest and uses actual real-world exchange rates, CCBill recommend which uses unfair rip-off rates and Custom which allows webmasters to set the prices themselves.

I had a look at some webmaster forums and although some webmasters thought that it was unfair and refused to use it, some others had different opinions like: (http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=939760 )
"If the owner of a site you're pushing with regional pricing puts his price on the tour, then he's a fucking moron and you shouldn't be promoting it in the first place.

I've NEVER placed a price on my tour....It's my job to sell the customer to the point to get him to click on the join link.....You never tell the price until you absolutely have to and by then, you should've already sold the customer enough to where he/she will accept the price...

The other day, I got a $141 sale off of my $99 option....I regularly get $40 sales from my $29.99 option.....Europeans will pay 99 euros just like Americans will pay 99 dollars.....However, the person who has his price on the tour with regional pricing is just shooting himself in the foot.
"

and
"I've been using regional pricing on my own site since the feature came out, and it's been great. I don't mention a price on my tour, just tell the customer exactly what to expect. so by the time they get to the join page, there are no surprises."

So not only do these two particular webmasters want to rip off non-US customers, they want to deceive them as well.

As customers of porn sites over the years I'm sure we've all fallen victim to a scam or two like ye olde pre-selected cross-sale and the dodgy billing companies where its almost impossible to cancel the credit card charge, regional pricing is yet another scam. You learn from your mistakes and as customers if you get stung once you become wary. The porn business gets given a bad enough name by "normal people" and then it goes and pisses off its customers.

05-15-12  12:18pm - 4604 days #13
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Drooler:


The research doesn't show that part of the brain shuts down when viewing explicit sex. It says that that part of the brain -- the primary visual cortex -- becomes less active in terms of the blood flow to it. That's not a "shut down."


Well yeah, the blood probably has more important places to be going at the time

05-15-12  10:59am - 4604 days #14
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by Capn:


If an internet subscription sells for $19.95 in the USA & the Webmanagers are making a satisfactory profit based on that, what justification is there for charging folk subscribing in other jurisdictions more when the costs are the same?

It is simply profiteering!

Cap'n.


I could understand if there was a small amount tacked on due to exchange rate difference or something but the differences are often so huge that it can't be anything other than profiteering.

One common trick that comes up on CCBill is that if a site advertises itself as $29.99 when you go to the CCBill page to sign up the fee becomes �29.99 which when you convert to dollars is currently about $38.50 but when the euro was stronger a few years ago it used to be about $45. I don't know how much of that $8-15 difference went to the webmaster and how much to CCBill but it was a huge profit on top of the existing profit made per subscription.

I guess that CCBill thought that perhaps people were gullible and couldn't tell the difference between euro prices and dollar prices or perhaps they thought that customers didn't care and that their need for porn superseded rational thought and consideration of value for money.

Either way its a pretty shady way to do business and shows the contempt that they have for customers. I can only speak for my experiences in subscribing from euroland but I'm guessing customers in the UK, australia and other territories have been treated just as badly.

And as someone else above mentioned, this isn't an issue of workarounds, its a matter of principle really. Just because we subscribe to porn doesn't mean that we have to be treated as fools or suckers.

05-12-12  11:07am - 4607 days #15
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 96
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by BadMrFrosty:


As an aside, has anyone ever heard a webmaster try and defend this practice? I would be interested in hearing why they think its acceptable.


I've lurked here on and off for ages but this is something that really annoys me.

Up till about 2008/09 I used to subscribe to 4-6 websites a month, then regional pricing was brought in by CCBill at first, then by other processing companies. The massive differences between dollar and euro prices were so high that it was obviously price gouging by the payment processors and webmasters so I subscribed to much less sites from then on, maybe 0-1 sites per month and usually to sites that didn't engage in this practice (which isn't many unfortunately).

I did ask one webmaster about this and I explained the reasons that I wouldn't join the site because of the unfair pricing model to non-americans. I should note that I had previously been a member of the site before regional pricing came in. This is the reply I got

"Hey,

First let me say thank you for previously joining my site, I hope you enjoyed your time with me.

As for your reluctance to join a pay site due to its use of regional pricing you will find most sites today use this, not all but most. Those that don't usually apply it to subscriptions that renew automatically after the first month.

Anyway I'm sorry you will not be returning.

Take care
"

I didn't pursue it any further because frankly I couldn't be arsed, if a webmaster doesn't want my money then I'm not going to chase after them to make them take it!

I don't get why a webmaster would find it preferable to get no money, rather than some money, its not like I was looking for a sweet deal or anything, I just wanted to pay the same price as Americans are paying. I don't see why I should pay more just because I'm in a different geographical location, these are purely digital products/services and the cost of supply is no different whatever part of the world I'm in.

51-96 of 96 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.