|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
WeeWillyWinky (0)
|
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
| 11-01-15 08:03pm - 3338 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User  Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I see that I got some kind of award for most active user in October, with 0 (count 'em) Zero points! Lol. https://www.pornusers.com/users_monthly.html Some kind of glitch? Or is it my early Christmas present for being a good chum? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-19-15 09:39pm - 3381 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
When I was twenty, in 1984, and when I wanted porn, I had to go into a convenient store and slink into the back where they had the naughty magazines, the really good ones where you couldn't even see the cover photo, only the title of the mag. I'd basically go into these places at night, in the wee hours, when there was hardly anyone around, because I felt like a creep as I nervously fumbled through those deliciously tempting mags in search of Cheri, Club, or one of my faves, the British Mayfair.  When I'd selected two or three, I'd of course pick up a few other things, like a can of Coke I didn't want or a bag of chips I didn't want. If I was lucky, it was some old guy at the register. If I was unlucky, it'd be that lady that looked like Alice from the Brady Bunch, and the ordeal would be all the more embarrassing. I'd plunk down my items, you know, the things I really came in for: the Coke and the bag of chips, and then the magazines. If I remember correctly, it was anywhere from 7 to 10 dollars per magazine; or it could have been less. My memory fails me. When I got home with the magazines, I remember that exciting feeling of having new porn to look at. What a feeling! But, inevitably, after plunking down that much money, I'd be lucky if there was a dozen or so pictures in each mag that would actually do something for me. The rest would be the usual cliched poses, the same old same old. I didn't buy porn flicks until I came out West in 1989. To buy some X rated movies on video cassette I had to drive about ten miles to the edge of town to a small shop next to a tattoo parlor. The guy at the counter had a gun at his hip. This is Arizona, mind you. Usually the place would be empty, but sometimes there would be one or two gents shuffling about, and occasionally a woman. Here's where I really spent a good portion of my paycheck. These movies went for upwards of 30 dollars. OR - a better way, I'd send away for adult entertainment. I spent over a hundred clams on three of the then famous Buttman flicks. Since I'm more of a panty/tease/softcore guy, I'd send away for panty oriented videos, and these went for anywhere from 20 to 30 dollars, and they were usually pretty terrible. You were lucky to get a few good scenes out of the 30 or 60 minute videos. By and large, sending away for porn was mostly a waste of money. I always felt very guilty, and very stupid, winding up with a sub-par product and having paid far too much for it. But now, I can go to In The Crack, do a few clicks, and download a 30 minute video that is right up my alley, and is of the utmost quality, and the download takes about thirty seconds. Now that's just ONE clip, among thousands that are available there. Just a short time ago, that single 30 minute video, if sold separately as a DVD, would have gone for anywhere between 20 and 30 dollars. So, I consider ITC's monthly subscription charge of 35 clams to be a steal, quite literally! And it is! With my high speed connection and my super-duper Apevia gaming computer (which is sitting next to me and is WAY smarter than I am), I could probably download their entire catalog in a few days. Or less. I don't even know, because I can't imagine even wanting to download that much material that fast. The reason I wanted to start a thread on this is because I've seen people discussing prices of various websites, and it looks to me that the subscription prices have remained pretty much the same, even while the content on offer on these sites has increased, in quality and quantity, in remarkable fashion. I would not think it strange or wrong in any way if a lot of the premier sites started to bump up their sub prices, due to the fact that the quality of their content has increased, but I have a feeling that this would cause a lot of people to boycott those sites or simply not join them. Segue into non-porn areas - "skip a little brother"... There are many great musical artists and bands nowadays that simply cannot make a living recording and touring because people are reluctant to PAY for the products these artists create. People would rather just go to Youtube and listen to the whole album for free, or download it from some other site. It seems to me that if you like an artist's music, and that music has a definite positive value in your life, that you would want to compensate that artist by paying for the opportunity to consume what they have produced. We have no problem with the simple trader principle in daily life. If we want a loaf of bread, we pay for it; if we want new batteries for our flashlight, we pay for them; if we want a professional to cut our hair in a certain way, we have no problem paying for that service, etc, etc. But when it comes to something like music, for some reason a lot of people have qualms about paying for it, even though they consider it a good thing, a benefit to them, and a thing of value: of even greater and longer lasting value than a haircut. Just as one concrete example: There's a great Doom Metal band called Solitude Aeturnus. They have many thousands of fans around the world, and by most accounts they have achieved at least a moderate level of critical acclaim as well as popularity among fans of Doom Metal. Sad thing is, while their last full length CD, Alone, released in 2006, is arguably one of the best albums ever recorded in its genre, the band has not recorded another album since, even though, according to Wikipedia, and according to the main founders, the band is still extant. This is one of the best bands in its genre, and every member of the band has a day job, because they haven't sold enough CDs to be able to produce music for a living. My theory, with respect to SA's lack of success, is that many people have a warped sense of value. There are probably thousands of fans of Solitude Aeturnus who haven't been to a show - which is understandable since they don't tour extensively - and haven't purchased a single SA track on iTunes or Amazon, or wherever, because they think that paying for music is something only a "chump" does. That was a term used by someone I argued with at some forum, at some time in the past. "Yer a chump if ya pay fer music!" was the essence of his argument. Bottom line is this: I think, if you value something, you should WANT to pay for that value. Only a chump - without a moral compass, with no ethical standards, and with no concept of value, wants to sit back and get something for nothing. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 20, 2015, 01:34am | |
|
||
| 01-24-15 11:13pm - 3619 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hey fellow fellers (and ladies), It's me, your friendly neighborhood drive-by poster, WWW. As I've said, I don't want to abandon this forum since (as I've also said) I find it to be one of the most civil on the Net, but my activity will be scant, and there will be moments of busy-ness interspersed with great yawning gaps of absence. Not that any of you should care, since the forum is going on swimmingly, as I see. Just dropping in and keeping y'all up to date. That's the good news. Now for the bad news: Looks like I've got Peyronie’s disease. It aint no picnic. I was born with some problem with my winky that my parents never satisfactorily explained to me, a problem which required surgical intervention. At any rate, my unit, though with a pretty wicked left hook, was serviceable from my devirginization and all through my ten year marriage. When I went on the net to compare winkies, I was quite relieved and actually overjoyed to see that my curve was not abnormal at all, and that, in fact, a rod-straight pecker is actually in the minority. Size-wise, I was dead average at exactly 6 inches. But that's beside the point. The point is, I had no complaints from the scant number of ladies I bedded with. (Or is that, with whom I have bedded? One must NEVER! end a sentence with a preposition...or...a preposition is not something you want to end a sentence with... (skip a little brother.... [Python humor]...) Anyway, since my separation in 2005 and subsequent divorce two years later, intimacy with the fair sex has been absolutely nill, save for a one night stand that didn't stand, if you get my deflated drift. A few years ago, I began to notice a tissuey hardening (not the enjoyable kind) in my sadly neglected johnthomas, at the top. Over time, this hard tissue grew, so that it now takes up almost the entire width and length of poor little willy, down the top. This makes any erections slightly painful, and makes even more embarrassing the already embarrassing task of the infrequently-necessitated self-servicing (pipe-cleaning). To describe how drastic this is, you should know that Mr. Happy nearly makes a right angle when titillated and doing his best impression of a zeppelin. What's even more humiliating is the shrinkage. I don't think that my trouser trout would extend even to four inches, if I could straighten it, which I can't. Now, there is simply no way I can woo a woman with this relatively new malady afflicting me. I was already shy and not exactly a ladies' man, as some of you may remember, but now the situation is almost hopeless. I can't seek medical help because I have no insurance - which is a big no-no here in Rome....I mean Merica, have precious little money, and already owe many thousands of dollars to two hospitals in two states. My love life was pretty much a disaster but now my secret, private love life is equally plagued, so I don't take the pony out of the shed unless I'm in dire need, which, frankly, hardly ever occurs. I guess I should be thankful for that. But, there are times when my libido comes full bore and the need for feminine contact is poingantly alive in my noggin...and in other places. The horrible irony is, since I've lost a great deal of weight, shave my head, and whatnot, I am told that I'm better looking now - at fifty - than I was when I was twenty! Not that that makes me terribly handsome, but I have noticed more attention and compliments from women. ACH!! Oh well, I have my two strapping young sons who are on the cusp of manhood, and I have gained a decent amount of attention as a poet - not fame-wise but by widely published poets around the world with whom I associate online - and healthwise: except for the tricky-dick, I feel like a spring lamb. I'm doctor free, take zero medications, and despite a gamut of tests in recent years there are no major health issues with me, save for ulcers which caused me to spend 4 miserable days in a hospital in Vegas. Horrible! I have not shared this info with any other forum, or anyone else except my brother, who's also my room-mate. I just wonder if there are any of you guys out there with a similar debilitation? If so, please share. Misery loves company!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Jan 24, 2015, 11:20pm | |
|
||
| 08-16-14 12:24am - 3781 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
http://fourhourworkweek.com/2014/07/30/n...oze-no-masturbating/ You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-29-13 05:49pm - 4224 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hello gentlemen (and gentleladies), Just wanted to drop in and touch base with you fine people here. I know I haven't been active in quite some time. Basically, I've had exceptionally low "T", and there are long stretches where the thought of sex (for me, that means: looking at porn) not only fails to interest but actually irritates me. I dumped all my naughty stuff, which amassed to upwards of 800 gigs - which I imagine is a piddly amount nowadays - and turned my mind to more "spiritual" avenues. Reading a lot about transhumanism, collective consciousness, quantum field theory, and the sometimes uncanny parallels between the ideas of a few modern theoretical physicists and ancient religious texts. I've also been busy with my poetry and my music. That being said, while I type this I have a window open full of vintage photos of gals in their unmentionables. Oh how I wish I had my teens and twenties in those years, prior to this wretched era of thongs and tattoos! Cheers!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on May 29, 2013, 05:55pm | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 01:58am - 4615 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
It's bad enough that: 1)trendy magazines and gay fashion designers have convinced women that being 89 pounds is sexually attractive to the average male, and that 2) being 89 pounds; and it being the case that an unwieldly percentage of that weight comes from ridiculous silicone breast implants which make these women look like scarred, starving mannequins or bizarre, animated Barbie dolls - - - No, this outrage isn't enough. Now we have somehow gotten it into the heads of women that having large, or puffy areolas is somehow a dire negative when it comes to the matter of appearing attractive to men. I can't possibly describe how appalled I am at the idea that some poor woman, with beautiful, large, dark, or puffy areolas, is at this very moment wondering why she was so cursed, and is checking her bank account to see if she can afford having her breasts mutilated by some money-grubbing, unscrupulous physician, in order to have more "attractive, youthful-looking" breasts. The world is truly upside down. It's gone from drastically insane to catastrophically insane. I know there are those of you out there who actually prefer small areolas to large ones. But would you want your wife, or your lover, who happened to have large or thicker areolas, to be surgically altered? Do you think that would make her breasts more appealing to you? If so, please explain it to me so I can understand. Because to me, it seems monstrous and obscene. I DO understand that in some cases, a cosmetic, surgical modification would be helpful. I am not ranting against women with various deformities who are seeking help. I am in full support of those women. What I am addressing are the great numbers of women who have naturally large, thick areolas who may be vulnerable to the nonsensical idea that they are beset with a physical attribute which is in some way inferior and unattractive. Ugh....Long live large areolas! Ladies, they are beautiful! Don't give in to the nonsense. http://www.jromano.com/BreastEnhancement...AreolaReduction.html Look at the comments to the next link here: http://www.makemeheal.com/answers/viewMB...qid=3648&eid=202 doctors, or make-believe doctors, soliciting photos from women concerned about their breasts. At least there is one doc with the ethical wherewithal to tell the questioner that her areloas are perfectly fine, but these guys are clearly in the minority. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on May 04, 2012, 02:13am | |
|
||
| 05-25-11 12:24am - 4960 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Anyone know what happened to Lorna Morgan's site? It used to be listed here I think but now I get no matches. On a google search, I get matches, but when I click on what looks to be her official site I get a gazillion pop-ups, which did not happen the last time I visited her site. I finally decided that Lorna possesses the most amazingly stupendous breasts I've ever seen and I decided also to go ahead and join her site once and for all, which I have never done. Now I'm stumped.  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 01-04-11 09:13pm - 5100 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Go JETS!!!!!   Any and all anti-Jet talk will be treated with the light-hearted derision it deserves.   You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-24-10 04:39pm - 5202 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
While perusing a site I won't mention I saw a photo set entitled "Latex gloves while swimming". The sample pics show the model in the pool with yellow latex gloves. Wow. Can someone explain that one to me? Any other bizarre fetishes worth mentioning (barring illegal ones, of course, and leaving anything in the scat category out, for pity's sake)? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 06-26-10 09:01pm - 5292 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hey guys, I know there are a plethora of sites centered around the Almighty Blow Job, but are there any sites which focus on giving oral to a woman? I know this features in plenty of mainstream porn but I really don't wish to hunt around too much for what I'm looking for. I'd probably rather watch a girl go down on another girl, and I know there are plenty of lesbian sites, but again, I am looking for something fairly specialized. What I'm looking for is a place which features cunnilingus given skillfully to the point of climax. Hopefully NOT faked. Does such a site exist? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Edit, June 29 - Wow, I guess that's a resounding NO!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Jun 29, 2010, 09:18pm | |
|
||
| 04-20-10 01:48pm - 5360 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
A site I joined has a great deal of pic sets offered in RAR files. I downloaded a program for opening this type of file but I cannot figure out how it works. Bear in mind I'm a techno-retard.  Anyone familiar with this kind of file? And to add: this site is dismal  in many ways and a scathing review will be up in a few days. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 12-08-09 08:02am - 5493 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I'm 45 and over the past year or so I've noticed a sharp decline in my sex-drive. Not only does viewing porn do less and less for me, but I rarely feel the desire or the need to "punish the monkey". I can go several days without so much as a glimmer of interest, whereas even a full year ago it was hard to go even one day without a purge. Nothing in my life-style or dietary habits has changed, no medications to speak of, or anything of that nature. No religious or spiritual "stirrins" either. I've been without a mate for nearly five years, but that never presented too much of a problem. Am I just getting old or what? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 11-30-09 12:15pm - 5501 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hi guys, just a little question here. I ordered a new PC over the phone yesterday, a CybertronPC X-Cruiser 2. I selected it from a Tiger catalog because it seemed to have really good specs and, in particular, a good video card, which is important to me because I want to be able to watch Hi-Def stuff, which I can't do with my current puter, which is seven years old. Also, it was in my price-range. Problem is, I'm a tad worried because I can't find any reviews of this machine which dwell on anything other than its gaming capabilities. It is a gaming system, after all. In fact, user-reviews seem to be scant across the net for this PC. Anyone out there know of this make and/or model? Is it going to serve my needs as any computer would, or is it like, specifically rigged for gaming? I'm a techno-dunce and this is probably a stupid concern, but there it is. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 10-20-09 07:54pm - 5541 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
If there has been a thread on this already, will a mod please delete this one? Okay, I just joined a site (Busty Ones) which is excellent in every regard, but so far every vid I've downloaded contains a music track. I am reluctant to actually use the word music, since it is basically modern elevator music. In the vids I've seen, of two of my favorite models, you can't hear anything but the music. These are just strip-tease vids so far, glam stuff. As I said in my comment at Busty Ones, here's the way I see it: We have five senses which enable us to experience the outside world and others. Video, as it is, can only give us access to a beautiful woman via two of these senses: vision and hearing. What possible sense does it make to cut this already limited access in half by not allowing us to hear the sounds the model is making? Being able to see AND hear the girl, the sounds in the room, the rustle of her clothes, her breathing, her voice, even her feet on the floor, all add to the experience of being in her presence and bring a sense of intimacy. Music destroys this intimacy, in my opinion. Bear in mind, I'm not talking about hardcore, or even masturbation vids. I'm talking about solo strip/tease content. Oh for more sites like In The Crack where you don't have any mind-numbing tecnho-synth-noodling acting as a barrier between you and the model. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-29-09 10:52pm - 5562 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I tried to make use of the "submit error report" utility at TBP's review of Idols 69 and was told "you are no longer allowed to submit site fact errors." Does that mean me personally or that it is too late to report an error to the current review? Anyway, the TBP review states that pic sets are not zipped. They are. There is a small link in blue at the top of each set for the zipfile. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 29, 2009, 10:55pm | |
|
||
| 10-17-08 10:40pm - 5909 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Just wondering what the rest of you folks think about pregnant women. Is it sexy, or is it the opposite? I'm not asking, is a pregnant woman sexy just by virtue of being pregnant. What I mean is, take a woman you already find sexy. Would she be sexier to you if she became pregnant, or would this be a problem for you sexually? Or would it make no difference? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 07-03-08 03:26pm - 6015 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I know this isn't exactly porn, but I am curious about what you guys think of the subject of...well...dolls. Please read further, as I am not exactly advocating these things! And I'm not talking about those flimsy blow-up atrocities that you can buy for 20 bucks and which sell mostly as bachelor party props and gag gifts, I'm talking about realistic, life-size dolls, made mostly of silicone, such as the ones refered to on this Wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealDoll A female friend of mine and I had a discussion at work about these dolls and out of curiosity I went looking for them online. I remember seeing something a few years ago about them but never gave them much thought afterwards. I've never used a sex aid of any kind, except visual. I don't even use lotion. I'm a mano-purist of the most orthodox order. Nevertheless, I remember being impressed by how realistic these things looked. It seems the art of doll-making has literally gotten down to a science these days. Some of the photos I've seen of items from various companies are simply stunning. I swear there are a few pics wherein I would not have been able to tell the doll was not human unless I had known beforehand. I would link to a pic but don't know if that's allowed (it would be a clothed pic). Anyway, after doing a lot of looking, and particularly after seeing some video demos, I concluded that there would be no way I could own one of these dolls, even if I had the five-to-seven grand to plonk down. As many critics of these dolls mention, there is an inevitable linkage between the sexual use of these dolls and necrophilia (NOT that the people who copulate with them are necrophiliacs or necro-curious, just that there arises a mental association due to the nature of the dolls). The one factor which sealed the deal for me, insofar as having a patently negative impression foisted upon me, is the fact that these dolls are HEAVY. They average about 115 lbs (sorry, don't know it in kilos), which is about what a real girl of similar proportions would weigh. EEK! Imagine how it would be to lug your "partner" around, to position her, the sheer gravity of having one of these things lying next to you at night! I know myself very well, and as soon as I tried to get one of these dolls out of the shipping crate I would feel like a creep. Not only that, but these dolls are cold, though I believe there are many inventive ways of warming them up temporarily. The Japanese - and why am I not surprised - are really keen on these dolls and have several companies which create them. Some of them look more real than their Western counterparts, though I have to say some of them look too young. The Japanese are taking steps to do away with the bothersome similarities to necrophilia by placing sensors in the dolls which cause them to move and react when touched, though I don't think they are marketable yet. I saw a few fascinating vids on Youtube showing engineers working with these animated "robotic" dolls. Like I said, I'm not advocating the sexual use of these high-tech dolls (though I adamantly hold to an "each to his own" attitude towards them), and in fact I can say that I would never own one myself, but I do find the technology involved fascinating, to say the least. I think the common reaction, among men and women, to these dolls, is a sense of amazement followed by a strong sense of revulsion, which was pretty much how it went with me. I'd be curious to know what you guys thought about the subject. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 04-24-08 11:27pm - 6085 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I want to ask you guys a couple of questions I ask myself all the time, which are: 1)Are you actually going to make use of all this porn you're downloading? and 2)Can you, in theory, reach a point where you have obtained enough porn? We all know what porn is essentially for. We all have pet monkeys which, for some reason, need to be punished on a regular basis. But seriously, how much material does one person need in order to keep his or her monkey satisfactorily punished? How bad can one monkey be? Obviously porn is also good for stimulating actual relationships, and I don't mean to overlook or downplay that. I think that I collect porn - mostly pictures and ninety percent softcore, though I'm into well-done hardcore and am developing more of an interest in video - because instinctually I am a higher-order primate (well, slightly higher-order anyway) who is keen on hunting and gathering things I need and storing up for the future. In the back of my mind is the knowledge that everything can come tumbling down and I really don't want to be short on necessities when the lean season comes. In other words, I think the act of collecting this stuff is satisfactory on a deep, primal level all by itself and is pleasurable even if a huge percentage of the stuff I'm collecting is stored away and forgotten forever. When I got married at thirty-two I gave away all my videos and threw all my glossy, paper girlfriends away. It sucked royally, but at the same time it gave me a chance to build up another stock-pile, which, as it turns out, I need more than ever now that I'm divorced (and the divorce had nothing to do with porn, by the way, as my ex liked to watch porn almost as much as I did). I now have much more material than I can possibly use, nor do I even worry about ever using it. The important thing is to keep gathering it up. I have to confess one other thing. I'm older now and maybe a bit jaded, but I hardly ever feel the desire to discipline the chimp while I'm downloading or surfing sites. I take care of all that later, before I go to sleep. There's no doubt, however, that the material I view and collect is a major contributor to getting the job done. If it weren't, I don't suppose I'd even bother collecting it. Anyway, while downloading and feeding my hobby I'm too busy filing, naming, re-naming, clicking, smoking, etc, to even notice the monkey. Sometimes it's an awful lot like work. Is this unusual? Anybody have any thoughts? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
|
