Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: jd1961 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (296)  |   Threads Started (18)

1-18 of 18 Posts Page 1

03-23-10  09:56pm - 5349 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Taking a good long look at the stuff I have downloaded the past few years (I got a new pc, so I had to organize everything), the common denominator I noticed about American porno is that it is now completely focused on the male. The slapping, the spitting, the violent sex positions,the caveman like hair pulling, the endless playing with their own dicks, every single video ending with the male pushing the girl away and gratifying himself complete with primal screaming as he masturbates once again for you the paying customer, the endless closeups of the males' faces, the angles that make it seem like you are pleasuring the male, the males' endless, pointless, banal chatter, and did I mention, the endless video coverage of males masturbating themselves, not to mention the males always wrecking the girls' appearances---their hair, their makeup, their dignity,

I can't pay for this garbage any longer.

I know Japanese are smarter than we Americans, but porno isn't hard to make! They understand it, we don't. I can live with the mosaic. Edited on Mar 23, 2010, 10:02pm

11-08-09  04:39am - 5484 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I'm old I guess, let me set that straight.

Is it just me, or are big fat asses on women in vogue in American porno?

Browsing through sites, I seem to be seeing this trend more and more.

Or is the "bottom" of the barrel being scraped?

Nothing makes me run away faster.

10-25-09  05:21pm - 5498 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


W7 was released Thursday---so far I like it.

Has anyone else upgraded?

And most importantly, how will it effect porn browsing?

09-29-09  07:20pm - 5524 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


He made a lot of porn in his day, including Sharon Tate, so this is on topic.

No doubt you've all heard of him being busted in Switzerland for fleeing his old statutory rape and /or rape conviction 30 years ago.

Should he be sentenced and locked up?

02-18-09  08:28am - 5747 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Something I find curious is that the porn industry rarely, or never portrays the missionary position. They have something they call the missionary position, but it isn't.

This illustration is the missionary position:

http://www.icame.com/images/kama%20sutra/Missionary.jpg

The man and woman are parallel to each other, the man's body is straight with his legs straight back,the woman's legs around the man's waist in the air in symmetry. The man and womanare face to face. The porn industry's "missionary position" have the man in an upright position perpendicular to the woman with his legs wide apart. The woman's legs are in 2 differnt positions, usually one up, and one to the side. There is no face to face contact.

You may think my observation is trivial, but remember, you never see the true missionary position. It's like it's against the law. You have every position invented portrayed, some of them quite ugly and circus like. Some videos will run the gamut of positions---except the missionary.

I wondered why this obsession against the missionary position? You used to see it all the time. I came to this conclusion: with the preponderance of "gonzo" porn, sex is portrayed as a sport. The missionary position is the only one that has face to face intimacy, and intimacy is the opposite of gonzo sex. The porn industry and the performers might feel uncomfortable with intimacy when they're fucking like animals. And of course, the image of every scene with the man jacking himself off onto the woman, instead of climaxing inside of her is one of individual gratification instead of mutual. therefore, the missionary position is anathema to the current porn scene.

Thoughts? Edited on Feb 18, 2009, 08:35am

02-04-09  06:11am - 5761 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I joined Manojob today (thanks Denner, it is a good site) and I checked out the forum.
There was a thread complaining about the hired guys playing with themselves, especially at the end of the scene. The webmaster (or he may have been the director) replied by saying that he has a hell of a time making these guys keep their hands off themselves! He said some of them just won't listen to him, and tell him they can't get off with a girl touching them!!! (yuck--a girl!)
He basically went on to state that most of the guys in porn are really creepy! I suggested that he might try hiring straight guys! So this explains a lot---maybe it's not always the producers' fault. But they try over there, and it is a quality site.

01-31-09  05:57am - 5765 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


What are your thoughts on the contemporary American porn scene?

I was browsing through TBP's listings, and it seems to me that all American porn has been reduced to what I call Circus Sex. Crazy, fast and nasty. The guys act like sex offenders who escaped from State prison yesterday, the girls like the cheapest street corner hooker. The sex positions are ugly and all exactly the same...like a freak show. Lots of spitting, hands in the girl's mouth, stepping on her face, stretching her butthole so wide that a truck could drive through, the slapping, the gagging, the bile. The endless shots of men playing with themselves furiously like some pervert behind the bushes. Quite frankly, the girls are mostly unnatractive, even ugly, what with their multiple tattoos and piercings and terrible hair styles.

WTF is up with this? Who is demanding the uglification of sex? Why are these companies giving us all this "zoo" sex? To whom is it being targeted?

I've looked at porn for a long time, and American porn used to be the cream of the crop. Now it's just so much bargain bin crap, IMO. Edited on Jan 31, 2009, 06:07am

01-24-09  04:13am - 5772 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


A lot of spam here lately. This forum is getting known, which means these creeps will be showing up more, not less.

Why not have some Porn Users members as mods?

I nominate Toadsith, he seems to be here often.

01-01-09  08:46pm - 5795 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Trust ratings that is!

Congratulations, you deserve it, your reviews have been very helpful to me.

05-15-08  07:57am - 6026 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


http://www.clubericacampbell.com/

I was embarrassed by the comments made about Erica's change that she courageously announced in public recently. Porn consumers are always insisting upon tolerance for our hobby. But when you demand tolerance, where do you draw the line in giving it? I think it's blatantly obvious she has been traumatized by her experience, and it should make us thoughtful instead of defensive.

05-05-08  09:25pm - 6036 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Do you guys think you could adjust your editing settings?
Most boards will allow for a few minutes of editing before the "edited x days ago" message appears. This allows for the editing of simple typos that occur.

05-02-08  04:52am - 6039 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Some may find this thread useful. I'll begin with my opinions:

Best: MPL Studios.
I had a speed problem, they diagnosed and corrected quickly and friendly.

Worst: Deep Throat Frenzy.
Had problem acessing the site. They basically told me to go "F" myself.

04-29-08  11:23am - 6042 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Something that has bothered me about porn for many years is the body part closeup.

I've seen photo sets where I have counted a dozen straight body part closeup photos, which is continued a few photos later.

I've seen videos where the camera will zoom in as close as possible for a minute or so, zoom back for a few seconds, then zoom right back in.

As far as I'm concerned, this may interest someone who doesn't know what a girl looks like naked, but I find it to be infantile. Someone here made a comment about this, and the webmaster wrote back sounding very surprised, as if he thought that's what people really wanted to see.

Is that what you really want to see?

04-24-08  03:53am - 6047 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Have you ever had a webmaster contact you off site as a result of your PU status?
And did any of them try to "bribe" you in exchange for a good score?
Or was the contact an innocent attempt for attention?

04-19-08  11:30am - 6052 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


What do you think of people who use PU once to slam a site, and then never come back?
This is not to say any criticism is unwarranted, but I have noticed recently quite a few people joining us to express their dissatisfaction with a site they joined, and then you never hear from them again.
I know the anti-shill measures are in place to protect the average scores, but personally I would like to see "one review wonders" removed after a time.

04-08-08  09:19pm - 6063 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I've never been a member, as I don't like lesbianism, but I read a comment here that they are splitting their material into 3 sites. How do AW members feel about this? Is it just another money grab?

04-08-08  03:59am - 6063 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I guess I'm getting old, but I have an affection for the old days. I saw my first porn in a XXX Theater. It starred the beautiful Annette Haven. My friend and I laughed at the dirty old men, and they did wear raincots LOL, but it was cool because it was underground. Someone here mentioned Marilyn Chambers, and she was quite famous, but unknown to the general public. And then videos came on the scene, and I collected my favorites like they were movie stars. I remember Traci Lords and Shauna Grant scandalizing middle America, one by being busted for performing at age 15, the other by blowing her brains out. It was all seen as seedy and disgusting. Those 2 events made a larger segment of the population aware of porn, and then came government intervention by way of the Meese commission which tried to make porn a crime again, but failed. And then came A.I.D.S.

It didn't seem as if porn would survive all this scandal, much less become a bastion of capitalism as it has today. Everybody and his sister has seen porn now, and a lot of those sisters strive to be pornstars! With the internet's arrival, people have used the privacy of their homes to view porn, and did you know that something like 80% of women keep their porn surfing habits a secret? And did you know that the majority of online DVD porn purchases are by women? And did you know that porn is freely accessible to children, who need only click "yes, I'm 18", or use the debit card mommy gave them to access it? And that's not to mention the mammoth amount of free porn available online, a never ending stream really.

So is all this a good thing? IMHO, American porn is gawd awful at this time, completely formulated. Even the strictly formulated sexual positioning would make a missionary bored! I search through the vast archives of TBP, and I see a lot of junk. Wal Mart porn. All the same. There are outstanding sites, but very few of them originate from the Valley Of the Porn. I also wonder if young people are imitating this crud in their personal relationships? Does little Johnny spend a romantic evening with his beloved by pulling his pud, and ejaculating in her eye while slapping her ass? Does he exclaim "fuck, yeah!" over and over while making love to the mother of his future children? It makes me cringe.

The only good thing I can see out of all this is the opportunity a place like this affords me to communicate with others who share the hobby of collecting video girls! thanks guys!

03-31-08  09:48pm - 6071 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I guess this is an obvious thread to create, but what is your favorite site? And why?

1-18 of 18 Posts Page 1


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.