Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Wittyguy (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1138)  |   Threads Started (83)

51-82 of 82 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2

03-22-09  01:52pm - 5754 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:52pm

03-19-09  05:23pm - 5757 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:46pm

03-12-09  05:11pm - 5764 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:46pm

02-25-09  03:22pm - 5779 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


There has been some discussion about people wanting to expand the forum into non-porn topics since the regulars here seem to have regurgitated most of their porn peeves and propensities. Since I happen to like politics, I'm starting a little niche here for people to sound off on whatever government is doing to oppress their high standing sensitivities.
_____________________________

In case you missed it, here's my review of "Tuesday Night Minority Smackdown" (aka - Obama's speech not called a State of the Union speech and the republican response). In the blue cornor, we had the silver tongued "Black Barrister" from Illinois firing up the majority of fans in an address before Congress. He came out with some vicious knee pumps to the groin of republicans by declaring they broke America and that we need to reclaim our healthcare, education, and economy. He got the support of the crowd by tossing around money like it grows on trees and by promising to fix everything that ails them with his intoxicating chant of "mo money, mo money" for all while firing up a money machine in the ring between rounds.

In the red cornor, there was the puny "Pakistani Kid" masquerading as the Gov. of Louisianna trying to respond after the fact. He claimed his opponent was nice guy only to come back with an illegal eye gouge by claiming the stimulus package was a waste of money and that only small government and lower taxes will prevent Armaggedon (probably a future pay-per-view event) from happening.

The winner? No contest, the Pakistani went down in defeat like a bad case of salmonella peanut poisoning. Not realizing that the rules of the game have changed, the Boy from the Bayou kept saying only small government and lower taxes would win the day. He forgot that no developed country in the last 100 years has seen it's nonmilitary part of the government shrink except after losing a war or succombing to revolution. He also forgot that with a 13 to 14 trillion dollar deficit staring America in the face when he runs for President in 2012 that his campaign slogan of "cutting your taxes to fix our deficit" will sound about as realistic as Paris Hilton getting her Ph.D. in astrophysics. He screwed up more by forgetting that no developed country has contained health care costs without some type of nationalized (aka big government) program and that Medicare and Medicaid will go broke within a decade without a major overhaul. The old school republicans are heading for extinction, they just don't know it yet. Edited on Feb 25, 2009, 03:30pm

02-12-09  08:36pm - 5791 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:09pm

02-11-09  02:45pm - 5793 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:11pm

02-10-09  05:50pm - 5793 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 03:08pm

01-26-09  03:51pm - 5809 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


OK, basically I'm trying to figure out why there aren't more porn deals out there in this crappy economic doldrum. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:28am

01-06-09  01:29pm - 5829 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Apparently a company (AEBN) is coming out with a virtual sex device for men that is be released sometime this year. The device will attach to your willie and be connected to the internet. As you watch a porn video, apparently you'll be able to feel in a very life like way exactly what is going on. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:32pm

12-17-08  01:46pm - 5849 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:17pm

12-15-08  01:32pm - 5851 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:19pm

12-02-08  06:45pm - 5863 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:10pm

12-01-08  10:34pm - 5864 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Christmas has come early for some, while others are hoping it never comes again. In case you didn't know, and none of you did, you have all been judged and it is now time for the 2008 Forum Awards (known by it's nickname, the "PUey AWARDS" - named after the contents of my fridge). All the nominees (put forth by me) were judged (by me) and the awards are now handed out (by me ... I'm running a dictatorship here folks, not a democracy). The awards and prize list is long (this automatically gets "Windbag Post of the Year") so strap on your kevlar cod pieces and kiss your downloading ways goodbye for a few minutes.

[Note: If you can't handle having won an award, lost an award, failed to receive your prize or feel that you have been inaccurately portrayed in this thread please direct all complaints to me at: wittyguysucks/google.beefdepartment@theinternet.com. All awards are humorous in nature, unaffiliated with the PU/TBP staff and not presented on national tv, so get over it!]

Without further delay, let the ceremonies begin! This is a black tie only event so please change into something more appropriate than your porn viewing attire; you know what I'm talking about ... the crusty old "choo-choo train" footsie pajamas ... with the cut out crotch ... with the handy-wipe dispenser / credit card / jump drive bandolier ... or is that just me?

First, the POSTER CHILD OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to Toadsith! The man is a machine, already earning the nicknames "The King of Prose" and "Captain of the PU Hindenberg". He truly qualifies as a legend in his own mind after cranking out roughly 350 posts, accounting for nearly 10% of all forum activity. His prize is a Cyrillic alphabet keyboard, which should mitigate his "posting promiscuity" (commonly know as "pp syndrome") and leave us responding to his future posts with the stock phrase "It's all Greek to me". Don't worry, we love ya Toadsith ... at least we say we do ;)

Next, we have the AVATAR OF THE YEAR AWARD, which proudly goes to Drooler! Drooler wins this one by "a nose" with his avatar matching his screen name; features a face only a mother could love (sweeping the suburban soccer-MILF vote); and remains tasteful while still suggestive of unpleasant bodily secretions. Drooler's award includes his avatar being used by the SPCA in their spay and neutering program (their slogan is "Prevent someone's future pet from being digitally adopted by some perv and posted on a porn website"). He also gets his avatar used as a background photo prop in an upcoming "Spermswap.com" video.

Honorable mentions go to Colm4 just because I like Spongebob; RagingBuddhist as another case of avatar matching screen name; Monahan (sorry to say that "Penguins Go Wee" will not be the next Disney release); and Pazuzu for the self portrait/alien-predator/homemade costume look that is simultaneously both admirable yet undesirable.

The SANITATION MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN (aka JANITOR) OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to Willy Nelson ... I mean Willy The Groundskeeper ... I mean Khan! Yes, Khan, the unheralded and all knowing, who lurks around the basement of the forum 24/7/365 picking up the trash, fixing the broken systems, riding herd on the staff, reading all the stuff we leave lying around, kicking the troublemakers off the premises and giving fatherly advice to the wayward ... sort of like a catholic priest ...but in a good way! Khan's prize is a PU embossed mop handle made of "rich Corinthian leather" (obscure Ricardo Montalban commercial / Wrath of Khan reference) and he gets to serve as an evolutionary role model for offering definitive proof that janitors do in fact walk upright.

The ERUDITE THREAD/POST OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to Cybertoad for this thread "What do you think about porn and wearing ...". Little did he know that by asking a benign question about porn stars wearing crosses he would get responses ranging from how to secretly calendar sex with your girlfriend, a historical review of the Christian church's use of the cross, a comparison of the Pythagorian Theorem as it relates to Einstein's theory of relativity, to a deep and pointless discussion of what was best described as "post-modern Judeo/Christian value statements as they relate to public iconology" that drove at least one contributor underground. As a prize all contributors to this thread will receive coupons good for an extra "25 bonus points" on their next college entrance exam and a free lobotomy to ensure no tumors are afflicting their frontal cortexes (Any replies with the phrase "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy" will also immediately receive electroshock therapy).

THREAD TITLE OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to NYGiants03 for his thread "BOOBS!!!". Simple, direct, and oozing of grade school humor it drew a huge number of views. NYGiants is awarded a free boob job for himself (didn't some Vegas entourage type guy win a bet a few years ago by having implants and keeping them in for a year). Next time you see him his avatar will sporting a sweet set of DD's courtesy of Dr. Moreau Jr., an unlicensed Mexican prison doctor, and these babies come with the exclusive "mostly hepatitis free" guarantee. Honorable mentions include the threads "I've been unfaithful" by Messmer and "When your ready, where do you put it at?" by Cybertoad.

Our first double winner is Toadsith snatching another PUey for BEST POST OF THE YEAR AWARD with his April 25th post in "What should a PU review include". Freakishly long (stand up and take pride in your "length" Toadsith), insightful, logically laid out and a must read for all who post reviews on PU. It's probably the most referred to post in the forum. Seeing as Toadsith has already be bestowed with the "Second Order Grand Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo" (the only higher award is the Congressional Medal of Porn given posthumously to those who lay down their life for the forum), his prize is having his avatar printed on t-shirts across the nation promoting porn literacy ("Be a perv, be like Toadsith").

The REVENGE OF THE NERDS AWARD goes to BadAndy400 and Cybertoad! BadAndy wins for his contributions to the "Porn Mart" thread. Using his Ouija Board (I'm waiting for the "Wii Ouija" to come out :) and his Magic 8 Ball, BadAndy managed to decipher the unwritten conspiracy between porn site marketers and TBP revenue streams. Cybertoad is a co-winner for his superbly geekish use of statistics in the "Adult Industry Failing?" thread. There, Cybertoad proudly demonstrated how the automakers should have laid their pleas for a government bailout by producing more stats than a bad college football BCS ratings poll. For their prize, both will be appointed Undersecretary of the Treasury and required to fix America's lack of economic confidence and return the government budget to the black by February 1, 2009. Failure to do so will result in them being assigned to Dick Cheney's next pheasant hunt.

THE BALLSIEST THREAD/POST OF THE YEAR AWARD goes to Splatnet for his thread "DRM - The REAL Truth". Only a few webmasters dare post their Scrooge-like opinions around the forum, let alone a thread in defense of the DRM practice. He got some serious Gitmo' style treatment from some but despite his beating he kept on ticking. His PUey award includes a jar of spicy pickled Rocky Mountain Oysters to enjoy while he licks his wounds (those not familiar with this American mountain delicacy go here).

An honorable mention, and a serious one for a change, goes out to MargulisAZ who posted on 9-4 in the "What makes a Addict or Collector" thread that he had some serious life problems with porn and addiction in general and was disabling his account so as to climb back on recovery wagon. We all hope things are turning around for him.

Williamj also gets a runner-up nod for his "Something seems a bit odd with pornusers .." thread. Here he laid out his conspiracy theory regarding the big raffle winners and their allegedly cookie cutter reviews. His thread got replies like a turd draws flies, resulting in a back alley beat down that would make Mike Tyson cringe. Edited on Dec 03, 2008, 05:59pm

11-20-08  12:19pm - 5876 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:36pm

11-13-08  04:20pm - 5883 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:02pm

11-06-08  06:08pm - 5889 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


This thread is an offshoot of the "Big Brother Comes Knocking in the UK" thread (click here to link back to that thread: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...07&lastPage=true). That thread more or less has turned into a discussion regarding free speech and/or speech laws and how they apply to porn. Since the topic has expanded I figure it deserves it's own thread. So here's the latest.

As of Wednesday, the German's have decided that it is now illegal to sell or distribute porn featuring actors who have "a youthful appearance". I don't know exactly what that means exactly but I assume it means under 18. Considering how bizarre German porn can get why the heck is this a problem and why now? Hustler is now suing to overturn the law because it would ban the sale of their "Barely Legal" series.

Regarding another matter, John Stagliano and his Evil Angel websites are currently facing obscenity charges in federal court in DC. His "obscene" material consists of some squirting movies and fetish stuff featuring Belladonna. Unlike Max Hardcore's case which involved distribution via the mail, this case involves distribution over the internet. In my mind the defense is playing this smart saying that the "community standards" prong of the Miller test can't be applied to the internet because the website can't control the geographic reach of their sites. They are also arguing that the feds can't focus on whether just individual videos or trailer's are obsence; they are arguing that the "work as a whole" part of the Miller test must include the entire website or network. They are trying to get the whole case tossed. Whether they win or lose, the case will surely go up on appeal and maybe decide if the Miller test even applies to the internet.

For those who aren't up to speed on the Miller Test, that is a test devised by the US Supreme Court in 1973 to determine if something is obscene under federal law (state laws don't necessarily apply the same test if they even have obsenity laws) it more or less reads as follows:

When deciding if material is obscene the jury must find that:

1. Whether an average person applying contemporary community standards would find the work, as a whole, appeals to prurient interests;
2. Whether the work in question depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct as defined under State law; and
3. Taken as a whole, the work lacks serious artistic, scientific, literary or political value. Edited on Nov 06, 2008, 07:26pm

10-28-08  04:43pm - 5899 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:05pm

10-27-08  03:37pm - 5900 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:13pm

08-25-08  09:54pm - 5962 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 01:55pm

08-12-08  05:17pm - 5976 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


This post is somewhat inspired by Drooler's "Freckle/Mole/Tat Test" thread. Only here I'm talking about finding a scene that you would normally like but for some reason or another you just not inspired to do the download. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:22pm

08-07-08  09:21pm - 5980 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Just wanted post a thread saying thanks to Khan and the PU staff for their work here. We've had a number of spammer posts in the forum recently and those threads have been quickly removed or edited. Also, I imagine it has to be pretty mind numbing to got through and look at all the posts, not only here in the forum but the PU site as a whole. This still is a class site thanks to all your hard work. So I just wanted to say THANKS!!!

07-09-08  01:33pm - 6010 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Thought I'd start a thread about software and/or webservices that you find useful and that other PU users might not be familiar with. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:47am

06-12-08  12:56pm - 6037 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Just wondering if there are any websites that have now shut down that you enjoyed visiting before? Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 02:17pm

06-06-08  03:20pm - 6043 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 03:01pm

06-04-08  12:32pm - 6045 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 01:51pm

05-28-08  03:11pm - 6052 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Here's one that's been around for ages. To get your "pornstar" name, take the name of the first pet you had (that's your pornstar first name) and match that with your mother's maiden name (that's your pornstar last name). Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 03:12pm

05-22-08  07:05pm - 6057 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:23pm

05-22-08  06:03pm - 6057 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Time for a little creative fun. I'm looking for who or what fictional character would make the best pornstar. Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 01:50pm

04-25-08  05:06pm - 6085 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


[As a precursor, this thread was started back in 2008. Since then, this thread has been added to the "PU Review Rules" section as link for new members to explore in helping them write reviews. Feel free to read the whole thread (it is entertaining and thought provoking). However, if you just want the highlights try the "Toadsith Cheatsheet Post here and the "Revised Toadsith Cheat Sheet" for writing reviews. For writing reviews on a site where TheBestPorn has written a version 2.0 review, go here. All links are contained within this thread.]

OK, so how many of us have read a PU website review that says "Lots of hot girls but limited content available" and wondered what that really means. A lot of PU members say in their profiles that they don't like reading bad reviews. The PU support staff give a general guide to what makes a good review but no specifics are offered so we are basically left to our own judgment as to what we include in our reviews.

I have nothing against this format and I appluad PU for giving reviewers a lot of flexibility in creating their reviews. However, in this humble chimp's opinion, I think we could all benefit by including a few basic concepts in our reviews. The suggestions I offer are meant to take up minimal space in the review while providing some good basic information for all of us. My suggestions are also meant to help people with a range of technical skills.

So here are my basics as to what a review should include in order to benefit the rest of us.

First, take a minute and look at what other PU reviews have said, what the TBP has said and what the site tour says. If there is no TBP review or only an express review, then you should be prepared to say a little more. The same goes if you are the first PU user to review the site or if the website only has general information in their tour (ie: "50,000+ photos and 200 gigs of video"). If the "site facts" listed on TBP are out of date, be prepared to update those figures. Once you've taken this into consideration your review should cover the following:

A. Exclusive Content: Is there exclusive content or not. If you don't know it's fine to say you don't know.

B. Content Available: Don't just say "lots of videos" or "only a few pictures". Ambiguity doesn't help in this situation. If the website or TBP doesn't break it down real well, tell the rest of us what to expect in real numbers. I would like to know how many sets are available in what categories. A sample review might say "A mix of content with 250+ downloads in six categories including hardcore, solo and lesbian with solo being the largest at 100+". Again, what you say will vary depending on the site but specific numbers help more than general statments about content. If the content is high rez or bad quality, let us know that too.

C. Video Content: As I said above, tell us roughly how many downloads and/or streams are available. Also, please tell us what the download options and stream rates are. A sample review might say "150+ downloads and streams available with sizes up to 720x540 at rates over 1 meg per second". If you don't know the technical specs and site doesn't state them you could say "downloads available in small, medium and large format". Also, let us know if there is DRM, if there are consistent download problems or if there are problems with slow downloads. If you're worried about room in your review, you can always put this information in the "pros/cons" section since there is plenty of room to type in that section.

D. Pictures: A lot of PU users focus mainly on the videos, which is fine, but some of us are into pictures. Please let us know if there are pictures and what the maximum picture size is (1200x800 for example). If you don't know what the max picture size is you could say "max pic size is full screen" and we'll get the idea. If there is a big discrepency between the number of videos available and picture sets available please tell us. Ideally, I would like to know how many picture sets there are and in what categories. Also, let us know if zip download is available.

E. Bonus Content: Let us know if bonus content is available or if the site is part of a network.

F. Updates: Does the site regularly update or not. Again, just a quick note is useful.

I have basically drawn the line at these six categories. I know that other people might want to know other facts but I've tried to limit my suggestions in order to maintain maximum flexibility for the reviewer while giving the rest of us good information. I think the average reviewer could cover the concepts I laid out in about 250 characters which leaves plenty of room to include whatever the reviewer wants.

If I could impart any lasting advice it would be to use hard numbers in describing the content of the website in your review and not just general statements. Edited on Sep 01, 2009, 05:01pm

04-25-08  11:36am - 6085 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 03:06pm

04-22-08  12:40pm - 6088 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


Just a frivolous posting here but I am curious as to what other users think the next big trend in the porn universe will be or should be. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 02:03pm

04-18-08  12:26pm - 6092 days Original Post - #1
Wittyguy (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,138
Registered: Feb 04, '08
Location: Left Coast, USA


x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 01:47pm

51-82 of 82 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.