|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
troglodite (0)
|
| 1-4 of 4 Posts | Page 1 |
| 01-03-09 10:43pm - 5831 days | #6 | |
|
troglodite (0)
Suspended Posts: 4 Registered: Apr 09, '07 Location: Huntington, WV |
I have joined a couple, though I don't recall any that were among my favorites. I did a month at Callista Model and another at Brooke Marks knowing that I was joining a non-nude site, and I also have been at some semi-nude sites like Katie's World and Karen Dreams. All of those sites were interesting, but I don't nearly as often go back and sift through the content I saved from those sites as much as I have for some of the better full-nude sites I've joined like Brooke Skye, Little Summer, etc. I've come to learn that if a girl can look good enough in her tour, I'll eventually probably end up joining (unless she doesn't speak English - kills the "girl next door" image for me I guess) if the reviews and content look interesting enough. She has to kind of push the envelope of non-nude though. I don't think I'd ever join one where the model was fully clothed all the time. Basically - I'm a sucker on rare occasions, but those are fairly few and far between. :) | |
|
||
| 07-31-08 09:11pm - 5987 days | #14 | |
|
troglodite (0)
Suspended Posts: 4 Registered: Apr 09, '07 Location: Huntington, WV |
Yikes - I see Brooke's site has gone from golden to garbage. I never needed support thankfully when I was a member, but I could tell during my last membership there that things were coming to an end. She stopped with the updates and started re-releasing content. There were 192+ videos when I was last a member (my brooke collection spans 3 dual-layer DVDs!), but if they're recycling content now, then that stinks! Little April used to be that way, where you could only get about 40 of her 60 sets at any given time. Also - I appreciate some of the suggestions on sites to check out, but that wasn't my goal here really. Basically it was just a rant (apparently a good word for it!) at how some webmasters have become masters of deception. I want to get some content of value when I sign up to a site. Otherwise I'd be trolling the p2p networks for generic porn. I'll do them a favor and not expect every site to provide 100+ gigs of content like you'll get from the giant megasites, but I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for at least enough content to interest me for longer than an hour! And if a girl isn't gonna show me more than her upper half, then don't make a tour that suggests otherwise! That's the main stuff :) Glad to see I'm not alone in my experiences. All we can do is continue to churn out mediocre marks on the reviews! | |
|
||
| 07-30-08 06:22pm - 5988 days | #4 | |
|
troglodite (0)
Suspended Posts: 4 Registered: Apr 09, '07 Location: Huntington, WV |
I've subscribed to Topanga's site several times and actually have reviewed it here :) Her site is another example of one that's no longer updating, and it wasn't updating for all that long either. She never did camshows or interacted in any way with her members - yeah you allegedly got her email address when you signed up, but where's the proof that you're actually talking to her and not a slimy webmaster? Some sites that IMO set great examples - Brooke Skye updated for like 2 years with new scenes in HD every few days and frequent camshows. I dream of finding another site like hers, though it would be hard to match her supreme hotness! Real Peachez was great a while back when I was a member there. Karen Dreams is amazing if you're into the softer side of things. | |
|
||
| 07-30-08 03:27pm - 5989 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
troglodite (0)
Suspended Posts: 4 Registered: Apr 09, '07 Location: Huntington, WV |
One look at my list of reviewed sites probably gives it away that I'm a fan of solo model sites. With that said, I've been extremely annoyed with the sites I've joined in the last year. Why you might ask? Let me count the reasons: 1) Launching with no content - I've always loved PU because I can see a list of recently released and newly discovered sites. I love finding a brand new model that catches my eye. However, this has also been one of the biggest problems. For some reason, webmasters like to launch these sites with next to no content. I joined a newly released site yesterday (sexystarr.com) with 14 picture sets and 4 videos, 3 of which are from the same shoot and done in horrendous-looking night-vision. If I had paid $5.95 I might be decently happy, but instead I'm out $24.95 for a site I finished downloading in an hour. I joined GNDCali a few days before that. Same situation - 44 picture sets is nice, but a measly count of 4 sub-par videosets ruined it for me. 2) Fizzling out after a month or two - Then there's the site that launches with big plans, a decent amount of content, but stops updating 1-2 months after opening up for memberships. I joined idreamoferica.com about 2 months ago and maybe saw one video update and one picset update in that entire month. The webmaster during that time thankfully saw fit to offer his customers access to all of the sites in the network, but a quick look around showed me that out of the 3-4 solo girl sites he operated, none of them were updating regularly anymore! Not one of those sites had more than 20 short videos either. How long was Trixie Teen's site up before it finished updating? Yes there are exceptions, and I understand a site can only update for as long as its talent will agree to shoot content, but if a webmaster expects me to fork over $25-$35 for a solo model's site, I would hope to at least get a good 50 videos out of it. 3) Misleading tours - Sometimes models can be a master at teasing their members (Callista Model - great example) but other times it's the webmaster doing the teasing. They'll take the most revealing footage they have and stick it in their site tour or preview video in hopes that you'll fall for the trap and join the site. Of course when you ultimately discover that 90% of the site is non-nude, it's too late. Or maybe they'll pull another trick out of their hat and play part of an episode that hasn't been (and may never be) released on the site. I've had that happen several times. Maybe they'll state "I update my site 3 times a week!" and then not update at all (Princess Presley - her site lasted a good month and a half or so!) There's nothing more annoying than dishonesty. If you show me something in the tour, I expect to see it in the site! 4) Interaction - Anyone who is a fan of these sites knows you can always expect to see promises of private member camshows "coming soon". Usually the model claims to be working on getting her hands on a webcam and setting it up to work with her site. Personally I think I could do this in a day with a trip to Walmart or Best Buy! When they do finally happen, the model will do 2-3 shows on camz in front of 8 bazillion people and then never be heard from again. Other models offer a forum or a blog, or maybe an email address, but there's very few that seem to take interaction seriously. That's all I can think of at the moment. Needless to say I've been a little disgusted lately at my experiences. It seems there's very few sites left out there in my genre that really care about the surfer. It's no wonder people download their porn from p2p software. The stuff you pay for is hardly worth it! What do you think? | |
|
||
| 1-4 of 4 Posts | Page 1 |
|
