Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: iknowwazzup (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (132)  |   Threads Started (12)

101-132 of 132 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3

01-30-17  07:22am - 2900 days #2
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
There's definitely some validity in what this French pornstar says, but much like happened in the music industry, not to mention the television and movie industries, her explanation is in an oversimplification of reality. It's not as dire as she says and perhaps it wasn't realistic to think that as the porn industry grew that performers would always be well paid - oversupply of people providing services leads to less demand and lower wages.

As to quality deteriorating, I find that questionable. Prior to tube sites there was an overabundance of choice when it came to porn and it could be argued that when it was being mass-produced quality wasn't actually so great. And in fact the sites that continue to survive or even thrive today have production values through the roof in comparison to their predecessors - or even their own older productions.

One thing that this argument about free or pirated digital content always lacks, no matter what industry one is talking about, is that once most distribution shifted from hardcopy to digital, the cost of distributing content was dramatically reduced. Of course, there is still bandwidth to contend with, but compared to paying for the production of DVDs and their shipping, it costs a lot less. And therefore the loss of profits is at least partially offset.

Really what has happened in many industries is that they've had to wake up to the fact that consumers will no longer pay for the same old, same old. And that if you're not going to deliver something as physically tangible as a packaged CD or DVD, people will expect value to be demonstrated by the actual content itself. Churning it out with little creativity just doesn't cut it anymore.

Oh, and it is worth noting that tube sites are not limited to showing pirated content. The major players in the porn industry all own their own tube sites and use them to promote their content. And if there wasn't a way of still making money, they wouldn't be spending time and money on expanding and developing those channels. I think that they've all realized that it isn't just a question of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" - I think that they've realized that there is money in them their hills!

01-19-17  10:23am - 2911 days #7
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Forgive me if I am wrong, because I generally suck at math. However, assuming the ones you already downloaded were representative of the file sizes of all the rest, if you could have downloaded 11 a day, it should have taken only 16 days to download all 180 videos.

Anyway, it seems like the second subscription worked for you and it should give you some leeway. Because even though I think that you could have downloaded it all in just over two weeks, I can imagine that it might get annoying to have to keep checking to see when you the download limit block had lifted.

Also, you might not have time on certain days to download anything or if you're like me, you might even forget on a hectic one!

At any rate, I hope you get/got all those videos that you wanted!

01-12-17  02:06pm - 2918 days #14
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Divinx - Great tip! Thanks so much.

I've gotten to a secondary biller accidentally (probably by making an actual typo) when I didn't even want to, but then I've sometimes wondered how to get to one on purpose when I've wanted to.

12-08-16  10:41am - 2953 days #8
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Well, I haven't had this happen, but I did once have a female friend overhear a discussion I was having with her husband about porn. I guess that up until there had been sort of a "don't ask, don't tell" policy between them.

He wasn't watching anything weird, but the fact that he works at home so he doesn't even have to put clothes on over his boxers. So I think that she worried that once she'd left for her work that he did nothing but jerk off all day!

12-01-16  05:50am - 2960 days #14
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Personally, for $50 a month, and sorry for my being a bit vulgar here, I think someone should pop out of the screen and blow me! To be fair, I can feel that way about a lot of things that seem overpriced - well, not even necessarily unfairly expensive - just really pricey.

I already think $35 is pushing it a bit, but for a site with high production values, multisite access and high-def downloadable flicks, I might sign up for a month or two. Most of that time wouldn't be spent leisurely enjoying the site, but rather making sure that I did manage to download the scenes that seemed most appealing.

Oh, and I don't mean that I'd need to focus my time because I'd be downloading a lot of material. I am not one of those folks who try to download entire sites - quality counts for more than quality. And for that kind of money I'd want to be selective and find the best ones according to my tastes. Edited on Dec 01, 2016, 05:53am

11-28-16  10:44am - 2963 days #6
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Late to the game, but I'll just consider these Cyber Monday deals.

Amanda
There's no greater administrator!

PS- Sorry, because there's probably a rhyme that's better more than a bit, but I simply don't have enough time really now to think of it!

11-23-16  06:53am - 2968 days #3
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Personally, I think that just as Trump has emboldened the alt-right crowd and made at least some of their views seem like more mainstream opinions than extremist or fringe, we need someone very vocal to get conservatives to view liberal ideas as being more compatible with conservative values.

When someone like Sessions talks about various reforms in regard to immigration and criminal justice, he is actually talking about greater government intervention. And that means big government getting even bigger - something that most conservative folks are very much against. Some don't even care if it's supposedly for the greater good - more government involvement is never the right choice.

When he stands against legalization of cannabis, he is essentially blocking an opportunity for massive revenue from a "sin tax" - the only kind of taxation that most Republicans can readily get behind. An immigration crackdown also presents issues for many highly profitable corporations that save huge amounts of money by utilizing undocumented workers. The bottom line counts for many conservatives.

I just think that rather than trying to pull on the heartstrings, we need liberal thinkers who can present the practical side to their views. And then instead of it being us versus them, we can keep someone like Sessions in line due to pressure from Republicans as well as Democrats.

11-22-16  11:20am - 2969 days #10
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
What they've done in one my local movie theaters is an attempt to give you value-added pricing. So one of their screening rooms has more comfortable seating and you can book a specific seat online - instead of dealing with your typical first come, first serve, scenario. They also have a dinner and a movie option where you (and your date) can order an actual meal along with alcoholic beverages to eat on a little table that's attached to your chair's arm.

I feel too old and too bitchy to deal with fighting the unwashed masses for a seat, so at least the first idea of assigned seating does have some appeal. However, it's been a long time since I saw a movie that justified the price of admission. And that's what the movie business doesn't seem to get - the more people have to pay the higher their expectations are raised and the more dissatisfied they feel if a movie fails to live up those expectations.

I never feel disappointed with what I see on a streaming service, because the cost of an entire month of unlimited viewing is less than going to one movie in a brick and mortar theater. Not to mention the fact that I don't have to leave home, I can pause the film if I need a bathroom or snack break and if I get a bit bored I can play a game on my tablet while watching.

Some people really like the theater experience, but to me, it is stressful and generally unpleasant so a movie as to be pretty special to make it worth the effort.

11-18-16  02:23am - 2973 days #6
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
The first deal seems like a better choice. And although I concur with pat362 that a year is big commitment, IMHO, these two sites bring you enough content that even if you don't like all of their network sites, you should still feel like you're getting your money's worth.

11-09-16  12:09pm - 2982 days #3
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Amen to that. I feel like America might end up getting screwed and the lack of a condom will be the least of the worries.

11-03-16  07:16am - 2988 days #8
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I wholeheartedly agree with mbaya about the girl finishing the guy and not him doing it himself, but I think that some guys (even the pros) seem to have difficulty when it comes to climaxing just from oral stimulation.

I also am in agreement with mbaya that a true blowjob movie shouldn't involve penetrative sex. And I would also suggest like thirstyfish that ideally a BJ shouldn't turn into a handjob either, even if it's not practical for it to be completely hands free.

I think thirstyfish was also the first to bring up the not being so into the whole extreme "Face Fucking" thing - although he worded it slightly more politely. As Cybertoad correctly explained - part of the fantasy of receiving a blowjob is the idea of having your manhood serviced - but I think that is hotter for me if it seems like the girl is worshipping the cock.

It's actually a turnoff if a woman appears to be humiliated, punished or degraded by the act. But in general that's not a turn-on, although I will say that even if I am not always into BDSM, it often somehow manages to incorporate punishment and humiliation without any sense of degradation. Whereas sometimes more mainstream porn gets a bit gross for my personal tastes when it goes anywhere near those concepts. Edited on Nov 03, 2016, 07:20am

11-01-16  12:24pm - 2990 days #3
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Actually, I might just have a new favorite, because someone at work showed me a photo this afternoon of a dude who dressed up like Justin Timberlake from the SNL skit "Dick in a Box" a while back. It didn't seem like a very timely choice of costume at first until he pointed out that the word "ballots" was written on the box and inside there was a Trump doll.

Oh, and the guy's wife dressed as a waitress in a Hillary wig with a silver platter of envelopes marked "Top Secret" - she was supposed to be Hillary's private mail server. A bit more of a thinker, but I like the two-finger salute this couple's costume is giving to the two-party system.

11-01-16  07:02am - 2990 days Original Post - #1
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States


I just saw Heidi Klum's costume where she had five other women wear prosthetics on their faces so they looked like clones of her. It made my mind briefly drift to the reverse gangbang action on this site I saw a while back called Fuck Team Five. Of course, if I was a dude faced with a handful of supermodels - all right, really any kind of ladies period - I would just have the worst case of performance anxiety in the end!

Anyway, I think the best costume that I saw IRL was this girl in a white lab coat with a pen-filled pocket protector, thick-rimmed nerd glasses and her hair in a bun. She also wore a black miniskirt, thigh-high stockings and patent leather pumps along with a stretchy mohair sweater over a 1950s cone bra. She said that she was a "rocket scientist" and kept cracking wise about making missiles go ballistic. She kept purring that she knew how to press all the right buttons to make 'em go BOOM! All in good fun, of course, but did she make fellows swoon.

What's the best adult costume that you guys saw? Well, and by "best" I don't necessarily mean sexiest, it could have been the scariest or the funniest, I guess.

10-31-16  07:29am - 2991 days #2
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I doubt that there's a medical reason for it, because creampies normally follow sex without condoms and so the women would already be exposed to some level of risk.

Sometimes in porn, though, there are certain acts that command higher pay for whatever reason. People can speculate as to why that is, whether something is riskier behavior, somehow socially taboo or possibly more physically uncomfortable for the performer, but that's probably not the deciding factor for why it actually happens or not.

In the end, I bet what often dictates whether more expensive things happen in a scene is the economics. Does the studio want to pay a performer or performers more money to do certain things in the hopes that the resulting footage will generate more revenue?

09-12-16  08:47am - 3040 days #9
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I totally agree with some other folks about there being too much of a good thing when it comes to resolution. And it isn't just in the world of porn, I find that a lot of television shows and movies have suffered for it, too.

I always find it funny that people think that higher-res images are more realistic, because when you look at a person, object or landscape with the naked eye, you don't actually see the same level of detail in real life.

Your eyes can only focus on a relatively small area within your much larger field of vision, which is significantly broader than the size of even the largest screen. Whereas depending on how close you sit to the screen, you can focus all at once on a large portion of what's happening.

In real life, you will also have to deal with other factors such as lighting conditions, visual distractions, etc. Whereas video footage tends to be brightly lit with background distractions controlled during production and you can be much more concentrated while viewing it, too.

I think for me that 1280x720, 2000k is about as good as I need a file to be. It also uses up a lot less of my bandwidth limit and that's important, because I refuse to pay the $30 extra my ISP charges for unlimited.

09-07-16  08:28am - 3045 days #4
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I was very much looking forward to a funny knock-knock joke

09-01-16  12:12pm - 3051 days #48
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I binge and purge every few months to counteract my tendency to hoard...

I move the videos and photos that I find myself going back to every so often into a favorites folder. While everything else stays in the general folder and gets watched one last time and then deleted.

After all, I kind of feel that sometimes it's the thrill of the hunt that I enjoy more than looking at the porn. Well, I mean beyond initially viewing it the first few times, because normally it seems hottest when it's freshest.

07-25-16  08:12am - 3089 days #10
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
It happens all the time - and I guess that for many site owners, they see that it's more a problem for long-term existing members or those that may return to a site every six months or so. With new customers, they may figure that it doesn't matter.

I don't know if anyone else remembers an advertising campaign from years back for one of the major television networks during their summer season of reruns? The slogan was something like, "If you haven't already seen it, then it's new to you!" I think some porn sites live by that very same motto.

Still, as much as fashions haven't changed as drastically during the late 90s through to the 00s and the current decade - so recycled content from those periods doesn't necessarily smack you in the face the way something from the 70s or 80s would - you can still tell when something isn't shot recently. And the older the content is, the more likely that you might have seen it somewhere else.

I guess that some sites sort of run their course, but the owners want to earn every last penny possible from the content. I don't think that's as much of a letdown if you've paid somewhere around $10 to join and there are unlimited downloads. But if I am going to pay around $30 and not be able to download anything (granted, for me, a lack of downloadable content is reason enough not to join in the first place), I definitely expect truly fresh updates on a regular basis! Anything less seems like a ripoff!

07-19-16  11:35am - 3095 days #4
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I feel like PU is a very useful tool in the ol' box as far as finding porn sites worth checking out. Sure, you've also got sites, like Rabbits Reviews and The Best Porn, but it's always great to read opinions straight from fellow users about what sites have to offer.

07-08-16  07:22am - 3106 days #42
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Yeah, I so concur. It would be totally cool if there was a discount offered on the ATK sites!

06-06-16  08:59am - 3138 days #6
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I think trimmed and partially shaved or waxed is cool, but I don't like when the pubic area is devoid of pubes.

Somehow I have seen enough chicks like that to get used to it, but I find with dudes it looks particularly odd when they're completely hairless down there!

06-02-16  07:14am - 3142 days #5
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I blame Barbie dolls!

It must be shocking when a girl grows into womanhood and realizes that she has weird protrusions coming out of her breasts and that her crotch is not actually going to remain as smooth as plastic. Of course, seeing a real man versus a Ken doll must be even more of a shocker. After all, poor Kenny is even less anatomically correct than his girlfriend Barbie is - by at least a few inches at minimum!

On a more serious note though, women's bodies can seem a mystery, but I bet that there are some dudes who could learn a thing or two about how to have better orgasms. Not that the standard ones aren't great in all, but if you try out some of that tantric stuff - you can totally blow your mind, not just your wad! You can also take things to the next level for your lady with it, because it helps you last longer.

05-25-16  07:43am - 3150 days #27
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I assume the dream with VR would be to film various possible outcomes based upon what a user does. Not just when we're talking porn, but also video games with AI opponents and even possibly for movies or television shows down the line. After all, the ability to interact within a virtual reality world is really what would make it more than merely a glorified 3D experience.

Have you ever checked out the site Life Selector? It is kind of a choose-your-own-adventure porn site. You have choices to make at certain points in a scene and then whatever you choose affects what happens next. Clearly, it's a bit less complicated than what would be required to create a similarly interactive VR experience, but the concept is there to be expanded upon.

Nevertheless, I feel like it still might end up being nothing but a fad. There was a lot of hype about 3D television and we all know how that turned out. I am just not sure that people really want to wire themselves up to a bunch of expensive equipment just to spank the monkey and it would also affect the production costs for the studios.

Also, I already find that increasing the resolution of images has made for some pretty gross porn. I mean who really needs to see some performer's inflamed razor bumps in 4K, for example, coming at you in sharper than life clarity? So, now, do I really want to see a pimple on someone's butt not only in 3D, but also be able to reach out and touch it? I think that if I wanted that level of reality, I'd just stick to actual reality.

05-19-16  09:16am - 3156 days #5
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Of course, it is wrong to steal, but...

I wonder what kind of money a paramedic makes in Italy. I find more and more these days that people are underpaid, even in high pressure positions. And then surprise, surprise, some individuals will feel that taking things while on the job is merely their way of evening the score.

And you have to think that someone would only pull this kind of stunt as an act of total desperation. I means short of the person being very, very stupid. After all, anyone with any common sense isn't really going to think that a famous person's family or friends aren't going to notice when his pricey Rolex goes missing. Even if the guy had a lot of watches - it's just not something that's going to pass unnoticed - once the dust has settled.

Of course, stealing from a dying or already dead person is a pretty disgusting thing to do, even if you are feeling a bit desperate about money. Unfortunately, people who feel shortchanged can have an incredible sense of self-righteous entitlement when it comes to them trying to equal things out by taking what isn't really theirs to take.

04-29-16  11:51am - 3176 days #4
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Yeah, I would say that Mr. Skin is pretty much the premier celebrity porn site on the market. And so I wouldn't risk spending much on any of the others. Even if some of them turn out to be decent enough, they're unlikely to offer anything different from what Monsieur Skin has got!

04-11-16  08:51am - 3194 days #4
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Clearly, it had been a while since I visited, but I really enjoyed Dreams of Spanking. It had women spanking other women or men as well as men spanking women or other men - with nicely shot scenes with creative storylines.

However, after tracking down the blog of the woman behind the site - Pandora Blake - it seems that it fell victim to those UK regulations. She links to its now defunct homepage where it explains what happened.

I think as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult who has agreed to participate in both the punishment itself and the filming of it, the government really has no business interfering.

The UK also banned squirting porn, because of a scientific research suggesting that the origin of female ejaculate was the bladder. That had it fall under the same category as pissing porn - which is banned under their obscenity laws.

03-02-16  08:41am - 3234 days Original Post - #1
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States


Um, I notice that a lot of sites lately have stepfamilies getting their sex on... I am not sure how that makes me feel.

Now, I can kind of get the premise where an aging father remarries and his new young wife hooks up with his son who is closer to her age. I imagine a lot of wives wish that they could be with a younger, fitter version of their older hubbies.

However, I find it odder with stepbrothers and stepsisters. I guess that if it's like the scenario above and parents remarry later in life so the two families weren't raised together or truly blended, I can see that not being too odd.

Of course, they don't necessarily go into great detail as far as the back stories are concerned. I guess that they want your imagination to go to wherever it needs to go to get off?

I think that the other issue is that I have a stepsiblings and I can't even remotely imagining getting with any of them. Not that they're a bunch of ugos or anything!

What do you guys think - kinky or stinky?

03-01-16  07:33am - 3235 days #6
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I have heard that it crosses all kinds of boundaries when it comes to privacy...

But IMHO, privacy in this day and age is a myth. Online security is a fairytale told to us by big government and multinational corporations so we as citizens and consumers don't shy away from using smartphones, laptops, tablets and home computers for filling out government forms, submitting taxes, banking, shopping, etc.

Going digital has saved the powers that be an enormous amount of money so it is worth the risk for the big players. And realistically when something does go wrong that doesn't seem to slow the process down at all. Data breeches scare folks briefly, but it's hard to function completely offline in our society.

I suppose if you only use your device inside of a lead-lined room, never use the Internet, disable Bluetooth at the hardware level and disconnect your webcam then you might manage to protect your privacy. You won't have much fun though.

Anyway, all that to say that I am more than willing to throw caution to the wind on this one. Windows 10 is far superior to previous versions even if it shares a great many similarities with them. To me, it is the first time in ages that Microsoft has released a product that truly lives up to a good portion of the hype.

That's my two cents worth or my 0.0000461578 Bitcoins worth!

01-21-16  09:05am - 3275 days Original Post - #1
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States


I have a buddy who is celebrating a milestone birthday and this dude really digs burlesque shows. So, I was trying to think of some kind of online porn that would be up his alley.

I am pretty sure that I came across a photo from a site once that was shot in present day, but made to look a bit old timey. Like one of those pinup girls from the 40s or 50s.

Does anyone know a site like that? And is it any good? I'd give the cash as a gift so he could sign up for a month or two.

01-11-16  07:18am - 3285 days Original Post - #1
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States


Actually, what inspires this question is a little grooming accident I had this morning.

My eyebrows have to be trimmed about twice a week or they get as unruly as an elderly college English professor's.

This AM I accidentally took a chunk out of one eyebrow. DOH! So anyway, having a dirty mind, it got me to thinking about pubes.

I personally, like how nowadays you often see a little triangular patch or landing strip preserved above an otherwise smooth pussy. I prefer it to completely hairless muff.

Speaking of which, we all know the trick to make your dick look bigger is to clear away the brush around the base. However, I think it looks weird when a dude removes all the hair. It looks better to leave some up top.

What do you guys think?

01-08-16  11:11am - 3288 days #12
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
I am so glad that I found this thread, because I was honestly dumbfounded the first time I saw it happen in a video. I guess that I'd been living a sheltered life?

Anyway, it wasn't on a squirting site, so at the time, I just assumed that the chick had peed randomly while doing the deed.

Now I know that although maybe she did, there are other possibilities too and how to spot the fake quakes from the real wet ones. The plot thickens... Or maybe, it drippens?

01-06-16  11:21am - 3290 days #18
iknowwazzup (0)
Active User



Posts: 132
Registered: Jan 06, '16
Location: United States
Regardless of my username, I am actually quite a newbie when it comes to the world of online porn. Not because I was ever judgmental about it, but I was just always too busy. So, I really only started checking it out in a serious way in the last year or so.

Starting back in November 2014, I spent six weeks at home recuperating from an accident. I definitely got a bit of the cabin fever being stuck inside for so long! But instead of going all "Rear Window" about it, I opted not to spy on my neighbors with binoculars and instead ended up surfing the Interweb.

Long story short... Well, all right, clearly that ship sailed a paragraph ago! Anyway, you can only watch so many cat videos!

101-132 of 132 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.