|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
exotics4me (0)
|
| 551-600 of 664 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 11 | Page 12 | 13 | 14 | Next Page > |
| 04-15-09 10:54pm - 5730 days | #12 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User  Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
On a side note Gcode, I feel obligated to tell you that Gabrielle's old content has one big difference from her newer content. Not a big deal to some but she was once a "hairy" model, very hairy in the pubic area/thighs and what originally pushed me away from her, hairy armpits. I had not even thought about that until I went back and was checking out the hardcore sets on ATK Galleria, she had hairy armpits in those. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-14-09 11:16pm - 5731 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Your bet is right ha ha! She is much better known as Gabrielle Lupin, she also goes by Piper Fawn and Ariel. Here are a few sites I'm a member of right now and how much content they have of her. Twistys as Gabrielle Lupin 26 picture sets and 7 videos ATK Galleria as Gabriela 22 photo sets and 9 videos (including rare b/g videos) She does go by different variations of those two Gabriella, Gabrina, Gabrielle, Ariel, Ariels, etc.. She doesn't have much hardcore that I know of. There are two b/g on ATK Galleria and if I remember correctly, she had a hardcore set on Dream Stash. In Focus Girls, Sapphic Erotica and Only Cuties have their own strange name system that rarely matches the name that the model is usually known as. As established as Eve Angel is, she is listed as Daphne on those sites. The other members probably know of more, she is a pretty big star. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 14, 2009, 11:20pm | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 11:29pm - 5737 days | #95 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
See Squirrel, when you continue to tell me that I misinterpreted what was said, that is saying I'm wrong. Something that I don't think anybody here has understood is that we are all men here. How many times have men been talking about something pertaining to women, and thinking, how positive and open-minded we were being, until a woman joins the conversation and tells us how much shit we're full of? I don't expect you or Pat or several of the others to say, "Yeah, it was offensive" because that would go against what you all have already said. I don't expect you or anyone else to say, "Yes, you understood it, I just said it wrong". So, until we get several women, especially those with implants on here to tell if it was offensive to them, I don't see a point in continuing to go back and forth about it. Keeping in mind, my original post was based on my wife's reaction to the thread, so I know of at least one woman who took it as negative towards women. The next part, I don't think you understood my point when I mentioned you saying to look inside myself. As I said, it is a problem that psychologists go through these days, when a non-psychologist tells a psychologist how to find something within themselves, or in another similar situation, when a non-lawyer tells a lawyer about law. I have had this happen multiple times on here and other forums and always use this example. When you go to get your car repaired do you give the mechanic advice on how to fix it? I look inside myself daily as part of my job. And looking within one's self is often the best answer to psychological problems. As for psychologists being skeptics and analytical. I'm not in most cases. I'm never skeptical of a patient, why would I be? I'm there to earn their trust. The only way I become close to analytical can be read above in the questions asked of a female patient who wants implants. There are many different types of psychologists. My concentration or expertise is in positivity. Instead of taking a patient on a journey into their past to find a problem, I take them in a positive future that is the solution to repair their past wounds. I find that taking patients to their past only brings up more hard memories that they are already dealing with. If I can help them believe in themselves for tomorrow, they can in turn, forget about yesterday. I chose to be this type of psychologist because the positive future road is what helped me myself with my past. I also believe in working with my patients to understand that what happened 10 years ago, can never be changed. But allowing it to change the way they approach the future can be negatively effected by continuing to dwell on those things from their past. And while I do agree with you completely about bad doctors, both medical and mental, it is a shame that the ones of us that strive to push our field have to be grouped in with those bad ones. In my 5 years of direct patient work, I refuse to recommend any type of pills for a patient. As I said on here one time before, I've never believed in treating a chemical imbalance with more chemicals that will only serve as a stopgap until the pill wears off and they need more, eventually leading the patient to dependency on the drug to be happy and feel normal. I do agree also that the discussion has stayed civil for the most part, but even so, there has been a couple of pretty immature jabs at me in some of the posts. I read the part about your relation to a female with implants, and how it had changed her in a positive way, which I guess made me wonder why you were still so much against the surgery. At this rate, we'll top 100 replies. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 07:40pm - 5737 days | #92 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Damn, Drooler, all I did was explain why I thought you were talking to just me. In your reply, it said that you weren't talking to just me "per se". So I replied and explained the misunderstanding on MY part. How was that sarcastic? For that matter, let me make myself very clear if I haven't already. I do NOT hide behind sarcasm. If you're still going on the objectification of women and how that makes me a hypocrite since I am a porn fan too, you've not followed along. I told you earlier in a reply that I KNOW I objectify women, but I do not do it in a negative way. And there is no way any member can say this thread is not negative because they are not females with implants. And yes, you can go all Aristotle about it and go "Well, what is the difference, negative, positive, it is all objectification" but that doesn't change my feelings towards the negativity in this thread. If you want me to answer something directly then say, "Answer this" because as you can see, I have 5-6 people, I have been responding to and I can't keep up with everything asked, I even said, "If I forgot something, let me know". There was NO need in making this personal. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 12:44am - 5738 days | #85 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Sorry doubled it from above. Just a quick one on this one, I quoted, I believe Pat earlier, though not the only one, his was the most obvious that asked why women do not come to men and ask what men want. If you read that different than me, then I don't know what to tell you. I read things directly and it said women should ask men if that is what they want. As a matter of fact, when I first said that quoted part it was directly below the post by Pat that said it. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 12:37am - 5738 days | #84 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Messmer, the theory you are talking about, I should have said more to further what I said about it was originally by Sigmund Freud in his introduction to the nature/nurture discussion. I'm sure as with every study, historical book, others have tried to change, or even further it, but the original can be found in the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, Nature/Nurture chapter. The belief was not a physical attraction according to Freud, it wasn't even so much a mental attraction, as it was men craving to be nurtured by a woman like their mother nurtured them. Depending on how much Freud you have read, as much as I respect his work and do consider myself a Freudian Psychologist, I will be the first to say the old man was a pervert. Many of his theories took on sexual descriptions. And while I agree with most of the quoted part, though it isn't really specific. The numbers I have say that in the first 10 years after implants, the suicide rate does not increase at all. In the 10-20 years after implants it goes up 3 times as much and more than 20 years, up 5 times. That comes from the American Psychologists Association website. I do think that changes the study in some ways. After 10 years, who knows, maybe the woman has a new issue with maybe her weight now or aging issue. The one thing I don't agree with in it is that plastic surgery cannot treat a lack of self-confidence. How many overweight people do we know that had no confidence until they lost weight? Depression, whole other story there. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-08-09 12:12am - 5738 days | #83 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I don't think it is so much that the posts are that long, but when we quote and entire long post, then type out a whole new post below it, it becomes very long then, which is again, why I cut this down to the first paragraph, but will comment on several parts of the full post. The first thing I think we need to do is to understand that I'm not hurt by being mocked. My point was, I don't like taking that much time to post long or longer threads to be mocked. As I told someone on here a few weeks ago, it is nothing more the dummying down what I said in my posts and I won't take the time to do that. I also think, similar to the discussion about us all being of different ages, in some cases, large differences in our ages, that there is also is an environment, location difference between most of us. I doubt that you or some of the others were around when I explained this back a year or so ago, so I will try to keep it short. Do a google search for Hollenbeck District gangs. Most people know of Compton, Watts, in California, because of pop culture, rap music, movies, even Sanford and Son, it was supposed to be set in Watts. Hollenbeck is where I grew up, and its name isn't that well known. But it is a roughly 15 mile piece of land in California, on those 15 miles are 34 known and armed gangs. My job in psychology isn't the reason for any sensitivity, my raising in Hollenbeck is. It was that raising that made me go into psychology. I can look back at old yearbooks/annuals from elementary school and of my 10 closest friends in those, only 3 lived to graduate high school, because of gang violence. Talking about that and about gangs to most people is a joke. They believe gangs are all made up of middle class kids that are trying to rebel and be tough. But those gangs in Hollenbeck, that date back to the 1930s, with one that is still going today called, "White Fences" gang, are mostly very poor people who use the gang as their jobs and livelihood. Because of that, I never took the option of making fun of others, because I wouldn't be here today if I did so growing up. I think that could be one of the most important things about these discussions. Even as I told Drooler earlier in this thread, if a group of women were here making fun of men, I would be the first to defend those men. It is in my nature to do that. There are no women members actively posting here and I would have to wonder what kind of situation we have, when talking about staying civil, if there was say two female members and both had implants. This is why I mentioned it is a public forum. I don't think you or I or anyone else believes a woman with implants would respond too kindly to being called mentally inadequate. While it is your opinion and we do have freedom of speech, I would still say that a very ugly situation would come from it if a woman with implants read that. You also said if something needs to be said then say it. I did, and you see what it turned into. As a longtime blogger, the most common comment I have received as a compliment is "Everything you say has a lightning rod tied to it". I don't know why that is. As for restraining myself, I do so because of how I was raised. We didn't speak our minds fully or we wouldn't be here if we did. That is the main point or points I wanted to make in reply to this post. I do want to say that most any member here can say that I don't lose my temper or hold grudges, I just thought some boundaries were crossed and there are no hard feelings or anything like that. Last, I do want to show you one thing that most psychologists deal with, at the first of the post and in another post, you mentioned that you were trying to get me to look inside myself. Yet, you don't agree with most psychology? Think about that for a few minutes. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-07-09 08:02pm - 5738 days | #82 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Just a quick one on this one, I quoted, I believe Pat earlier, though not the only one, his was the most obvious that asked why women do not come to men and ask what men want. If you read that different than me, then I don't know what to tell you. I read things directly and it said women should ask men if that is what they want. As a matter of fact, when I first that quoted part it was directly below the post by Pat that said it. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 08, 2009, 12:43am | |
|
||
| 04-07-09 07:27pm - 5738 days | #80 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Just wanted to touch on this part Drooler, my own time away from PU on other forums over the years, I was just used to when I see a name in quotes in a post by another member, that the post is directed at who is in the quote box in the post. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 07, 2009, 08:04pm | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 11:34pm - 5739 days | #65 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I cut your post down to one paragraph, not because I'm just responding to this part, but because the posts are becoming so long. A few things Squirrel. You said that you would like to see more psychology from my posts. Then as you said, you might be making a dig on the subject and as you can see below your post, Panther did a bit of jabbing as well. Why would I waste my time posting to be mocked? The few times psychology has came up, this is the exact thing that happened each time. A good example, you said, "I am giving you the ammunition to hit back". I don't want it nor do I intend to "hit" back. I have nothing to prove here. To bring this all down to a base level. On the sensitivity part. This is a public forum and as I have said before, I respect those who run it and I respect the fact that the forum and site works based on new members joining, as one of the parts of success. Having said that, maybe I do restrain myself at times in my comments. If this were a private forum then I wouldn't restrain myself. As of right now, in your most recent post you called every woman with implants stupid and mentally inadequate. And then you call me sensitive to this thread, even though you also say that you are superior to them. I don't think this forum promotes superiority of any kind. I'm also not for sure how I'm being negative. I've responded to as many of the members as possible, with respect. The only reason you could see my opinion as being negative is because it disagrees with some of the posts. Hopefully, this forum or no forum will ever become one where everyone agrees with each other. To end, if my point wasn't clear earlier in the thread it is now, as you have said the natural woman is superior to other women with implants, AND not just physically, calling those with implants, mentally inadequate. The question I asked about if you would leave your wife if she wanted implants. You didn't answer that, instead, twisting it around in an analytical way. Turboshaft had no problem answering it. It was a simple yes or no question. My guess is, you aren't being as honest and in our faces with your answers as you say are. Answer the question, yes or no, would you leave your wife if she got implants. Simple yes or no will do, it includes hours upon hours of talking to her about it. But she still wants them. Staying or leaving? And to turboshaft, as you can see, it isn't as clear cut of an answer as you thought it would be. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 09:00pm - 5739 days | #64 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Hey Panther, last I checked, I haven't diagnosed anyone. Though I do remember a certain someone telling members last week that some of us have too many emotional ties to other members. Ahem. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 06, 2009, 09:04pm | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 06:41pm - 5739 days | #60 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
This is more or less a response to several of you. There is no way I can keep replying to each member. To answer the first thing messmer, you're not going to get a clear cut answer from a psychologist or from even a woman. Roughly 350,000 women had breast augmentation surgery in 2007, in America, alone. Anything that I say or any member or any person says will be based on maybe knowing 10 out of those 350,000. I can speculate based on experience with patients, but that is all it would be is speculation, but it wouldn't be a clear-cut answer. One thing to remember for the members is that I don't come here to defend myself and my occupation. You either take it or leave it. It isn't the first time it has happened and it most likely won't be the last time it happens. My comments that set off the last 10 or so replies were not based in psychology, but for me to say that my time in psychology doesn't change the way I think about some things would be ignorant of me. My problems were simple really. I felt like the word "mutilation" was a bit strong. And here is why and what I saw from that. Part of my job is going to suicide calls, accident calls, working with veterans who have returned from wars, and many of them are mutilated, especially the families of those who are in accidents, including botched suicides. To compare those mutilations to a well-bodied, living, person showed the close-mindedness of the members who said that. It shows WHY some women think they have to improve their bodies for men. As you can read from my post that said the overall open-mindedness of the forum dropped with this thread. To further that, tattoos were called mutilations. There are cultures of people, including American Samoan, that look at the tribal tattoos as beautiful and a show of their heritage. Disliking those is one thing, comparing those to accident victims is downright disrespectful and even more so to the families of those accident, war, botched suicide victims. I know many Latinas from southern California that have tattoos that connect them to their neighborhood or area they grew up in, without those, not so much in 2009, but a few years back, they could have been attacked in gang wars without the tattoos. And in doing so, it shows how much importance men put on the bodies of females, as my very first post said, "There is more to beauty than boobs". Now, anyone could say it is the look of natural boobs we like and that is positive, it is telling women you don't have to change for us to make us happy, but what if before she met the man who tells her he doesn't mind her small boobs, what if she wanted larger ones? Would you all, as the posts would lead me to believe, leave a wife if she decided to get implants? Squirrel said that for a "supposed" psychologist, I misinterpreted the comments. As a real psychologist, it is not my job to interpret the way non-psychologists do. Most of my thoughts go beyond the obvious thoughts. If not, why would people go to a psychologist to find out why they have this or that deeply embedded issue? They could just figure out themselves. Men who want women with large implants, from my experience have nothing to do with messmer's Freud theory about the unconscious mind wanting to return to their mom's breasts. Keeping in mind, that Freud theorized in the 1800s and implants were not available or known of until the early part of the 1900s. My belief from experience is that most men who, these days, want a woman with big breasts, even if implants, is no different than a man wanting a $200,000 sports car, a bigger pool in his yard than his neighbor has, nothing more than men wanting to show their big breasted wife off to their friends and co-workers. To say, "My wife has bigger boobs than yours". I believe it was Home Depot that made a commercial about the one guy built a deck on his house, then his neighbor built a deck and gazebo in his yard, and so on. In this day and age of men who find worth in themselves in how rich they are, in how many women they have been with, I do believe that is the biggest reason some men want their wife or girlfriend to have bigger boobs with implants. From the female side of it, there are many different reasons. Of those 350,000 women who had the surgery in 2007, what is the chance that they all did it for the same reasons? None. If a female patient comes to me and says she wants to get implants, then I am going to take several things into consideration. One of them that very few people talk about is if her mother had larger breasts than she has. Mother/daughter competition is actually stronger than father/son competition. There is one reason. I would ask about her female friends, if they have bigger breasts, and maybe even more importantly are those friends with big breasts more successful than the woman wanting them. There is two. I would ask if she was married, and if not, how many of her female friends are married, and if they have bigger breasts than she has. Three. I would ask if she has sisters, and if they have larger breasts and if they are married and/or are more successful. You have to start at the very basic needs of women to find the answer, success, self-image compared to friends/family, marriage, and eventually you can go into the parts that maybe she has an older brother who brought his friends over and they made jokes about her training bra. The society based reasons, maybe someone told her she is "blossoming into a woman" when her boobs first developed and if they didn't develop much more, she believes she never blossomed into a woman. The worst part is, this is only scratching the surface. And messmer to end with a quote from the reputable Freud, "The only thing I ever figured out about women is that I will never understand them or their thoughts". Hopefully this explained everything that I hadn't replied to by the other members, if not, let me know. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 06, 2009, 06:44pm | |
|
||
| 04-06-09 05:12pm - 5739 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I'm a true blue Dodger fan, and am pretty excited about the season. It was kind of hard watching Lowe pitch that masterful game against Philly on Sunday. I'm just hoping Manny continues his torrid pace he was on once he put the Dodger blue on last year. I would love nothing more than an all LA world series. That Angels outfield looks very impressive with the addition of Abreu, three 5 tool players out there and I think Morales will be a fine replacement for Tex. You all just need to get those arms healthy, Lackey, Santana and Escobar. I watched Lackey pitch a game last year in person, when healthy, he is one of the most dominating pitchers I've seen. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-05-09 06:03pm - 5740 days | #53 | ||
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Well messmer, you're being quite short-sighted. Are all women natural? No. So by saying about natural women, "We are happy to marry them" means the not natural women, whether tattooed or implants, are screwed because us men say they are not perfect and can't be perfect because they don't fit our image of what perfect is. Not being degrading...except to all women who don't fit your image of what a woman is supposed to be. That's not degrading to not natural women?
The point there is simple. We don't know that all women get them because they feel inferior. I used the example of the gorgeous Euro model Zafira, one of her boobs was bigger than other in their natural state, it bothered her, she has been one of the world's top models for several years now, it never stopped her, but it just bothered HER that one of her boobs was bigger than the other, so she had implants that didn't even look to increase her size. And again, what is the belief that we can tell people what they should and shouldn't feel inferior about? And again, who says they get implants because they feel inferior? My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | ||
|
|||
| 04-05-09 05:45pm - 5740 days | #52 | ||||
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
First Pat, this is the quote I was referring directly to, "Is it possible that women somehow think that implants will appeal to man and therfore get them without first asking us whether we want them". Now, I'm not trying to hang you Pat, as I think most of the thread had already said indirectly that women make a decision to change their body for men, and that as I told Drooler, is bullshit. It shows a feeling of male supremacy over women and all I did was say that I think it was sad that men still believe everything a woman does to her body is for us. The message, as I told Drooler, was not a caring message. Read the first post and many of the other ones. It was about simply, "I do not like women with implants because I don't find those attractive." It wasn't about the poor woman who had something bad happen, there was posts about that, but it wasn't the reason for this thread or else the title would be, "Breasts, why we want women to understand that we're not as superficial as they think we are".
There is positive and negative in everything and there probably is something positive here, but and I quote, "who loves fake breasts, it's just I find them ugly, like a bad mutilation", "but those artificial looking cones stuck on the chest practically draw your eyes to them and take away from the beauty of the whole person." Those were comments made in the first few posts, and there is nothing positive there. I'm not even for sure that there is that much positive here. Because the majority of the posts are based on the belief that women change their bodies to impress men, that was the negativity. I guess if you believe that we should tell fat people to stop eating as positive and a way to help them, then you could find positivity in this thread, but outside of some long reaches, there really isn't much.
No I don't find it sad that some women feel they need implants to feel good about themselves. Self-image is self-image for a reason, because it about what that person feels about themselves. It isn't something I can tell them to feel or it would be called "exotics-image". And seeing that we do not have a female in this discussion, it became a typical male thing of believing they do it all for us. So we tell them we don't like those implants. Maybe they do. Maybe when they step out of the shower and look in the mirror, they feel good. I am 100% positive that they wouldn't respond positively to being called a mutilation.
My wife doesn't want implants, she wanted men to stop trying to think for women and to stop putting women down for not being what men want them to be. And I disagree completely. If my wife or any other wife or girlfriend wanted implants then it is her right to get them without asking anyone's opinion. When I married my wife it wasn't just based on what she looked like, so why would I consider what she might look like if she had plastic surgery? Hopefully, you do give men more credit than that? We are talking about marriage, not just a porn star in that part. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | ||||
|
|||||
| 04-05-09 05:11pm - 5740 days | #50 | ||||||
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Sorry Drooler, the thread is about would we watch a porno with all implanted models or why would we want a woman with implants, not about "the thread IS about whether or not women should have their breasts enhanced". That's a world of difference as the question is asking for the attraction from a male towards a woman with implants, not the more care showing "should they". I think if you look back you will realize that.
You and I both know that to objectify someone can mean multiple things and it can be both positive and negative, as all things in life are. As for your definition to what is an object when we are talking about humans, I would say that your definition is right, but it isn't specific, and I would add to it that when someone uses another human as an object it is because they feel superior to them, both physically and mentally, and feel the person made into an object can not make decisions on their own, at least not better than they could for them.
Absolutely agree. The commercials for pills are turning men into objects in my opinion, but Drooler, until a group of women come to PU or an advertising agency comes here and starts a thread making fun of men for taking or for not taking then you have my word, I will be the first to voice my displeasure with that thread. Same goes for when a group of women join and make jokes about the men they have used. You're only assuming how I would respond based on my response in this thread. Agreed?
It means that you and I both objectify women in a mostly positive non-degrading way. This thread was positive, but it was slipping real fast into negativity. Plain and simple, my post was my feelings towards those who decide to be negative not just once, but over and over. It was my opinion, based on what I read that we have members who believe all women should look the way they want them to. Just like we have members that believe every website should only put videos up that they like. That is an old way of male thinking that is showing in more than one way and I spoke against it. Look at GCode's post up there. He says several times that he knows his pro-tattoo post would probably stir controversy. You don't think he felt that would be the case because he has seen the negativity that has seeped into this thread?
To me Drooler, this is where you really start going off the topic and showing what I guess is sarcasm. As a matter of fact, up to here, I really couldn't tell what was sarcasm and what wasn't. It did however let me know that for some reason, you thought my post was negative about men.
If I was trying to say something, I wouldn't cloak it, as you can see by me responding to your post and explaining it. Drooler, have I ever hid my opinions or been shy to making a controversial but relevant point on here? No. As for insulting men, maybe you should again, think about what I said, because my post was pro-male, I could not believe that men had been set back 50 years in our progress. The questions still are asked does a woman think we want her to have implants, no, they think they want them and that is the majority of women who get implants. Now, for why, it could be many reasons and I will give you that, some are to get men's attention, but I also know more than a few women who have them that did it because they were unhappy with their body, not anything to do with a man. And this thread stinks of men believing it is all about us and their desire to please us. That's bullshit from 50 years ago. And that more than anything I said insults men! My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | ||||||
|
|||||||
| 04-05-09 06:15am - 5740 days | #46 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
In Messmer's original thread starting post he asked, "What the heck is the attraction when it comes to watching or fondling bags of silicone implanted under the skin. Is there now a silicone fetish I'm not aware of?" So there is no confusion on my part. Unless of course, all the members have a porn star for a wife or girlfriend. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-05-09 04:06am - 5741 days | #43 | |||
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I'll give you the benefit of a doubt that you haven't read all the comments. There is 1950s era sexism here, that women should come to men before changing their bodies. You know, like men own them. Also keep in mind that we are not just talking about porn stars with implants.
I really don't think it is a man's place to be opinionated about what a woman does with her body. Again, this thread is not just about porn stars that we pay to see. I do think it is a man's place to say what he likes and doesn't like, but is comparing a surgery that could change a woman's life in a positive way to what happens to war and accident victims, really necessary?
Being blunt does not mean being degrading. The thread started out civil, and is still civil, but some of the comments are disappointing to say the very least. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |||
|
||||
| 04-04-09 10:16pm - 5741 days | #41 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I'm glad my wife doesn't have an account here. Mainly because she wouldn't know how to type out caveman grunts that she was making after reading this thread. Seriously guys, read some of your posts in this thread, I think the overall forum's open-mindedness scale just dropped. Women should ask men before doing something to their body? Key word being, "Their" body? I also can't help but wonder how the young woman who just bought implants because she had self-image problems, feels about being called a mutilation? Opinions are one thing guys, using derogatory words is another one. This thread, not all of it, but a good portion of it is a field day for a psychologist, and the sad thing is, I don't even think some of you realize how much this thread proves that some men look at women as nothing more than objects. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 02:54am - 5744 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Good timing for this one! I just bought a new Iomega Prestige 1.5 TB hard drive and was moving content to and from my hard drives. First, I'm obsessed with organization. Not just porn either, I built a shelf with sliders on it to organize my 5,000 cd collection. This will show that I am pretty picky about porn that stays on my hard drives. Right now, I have a 1 TB and 1.5 TB Iomega Prestige externals hooked up and a 1 TB hard drive in my computer. These drives are big enough to hold the majority of my content and still have room for 500-750 GB of content. The two externals when opened, you first see model's names. When you click a name, you see folders with site names on them. When you click a folder with a site's name on it, you see two folders, one for pictures, one for videos. I have a total of 36 of these models that are in those two drives. Everything is organized the same way, model>site name>pictures or videos. The quality on those are all above average, unless the occasional old set is in there. These models are my favorites. I don't really go out of my way to find any rare content of them though. The content is mostly the well-known sites and most of these models have tons of content on those sites, models like Sandra Shine, Aneta Keys, Aria Giovanni are the ones in these 36. I then have 3 older externals that equal 1.25 TB, though not hooked up, they are filled within 10 GB of being full. These are site specific like a 300 GB Videobox folder in one. On these files, though not separated by model, the files are renamed according to the model in the video. I don't specify title of the video or any of that, instead, letting the Windows add a number to each file and downloading them from oldest to newest, so you get something like this EvaAngelina(1), EvaAngelina(2), so I can go back and check her newest videos and know which ones I need from that site. All 3 of these externals are organized the same way. And I always download the highest quality available. Then to my two Eve Angel drives. These are Western Digital 500 GB each. The level of organization would probably get me checked into an institution. Separated by site name folders, then picture/videos folder. I have also went back and renamed all the files and graded them on a 1-10 scale on her performance in the videos. The picture sets are re-named to tell what kind of outfit, setting and my 1-10 rating again. I have nearly 300 GB of Eve content and have made a copy of it all on the second drive in case one fails. So, my bottom line score would be in the 90s for me, but I would guess some would complain about lack of variety since a good portion of the collection is solo or g/g. Unless you pull out the 1.25 TB of various hardcore videos. Oh and of the Eve content, there is one set that scored a 7 on my 1-10 scale, everything else is 8 or higher! Fun topic My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 04-01-09 04:17pm - 5744 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
To answer the question, I would still rent or watch a video with all fake boobs. The reason, I'm not a boob lover, little, big, fake, doesn't really matter to me. You know me well enough on here to know that I like all-natural curvy glam models, but the fake boobs wouldn't stop me since I am indifferent to boobs. A few models that have fake boobs that are in my favorites. One is Sandra Shine, most people do not know or realize that Sandra has implants, her boobs with implants look natural because the rest of her body fits them. Look her up sometime and see if you can tell she has implants. The other is Heather Vandeven, hers are a bit more noticeable, but her implants only look to be B or C cup, she is slim and I would guess probably had A cups to start with. She is easily one of my favorites, probably my favorite American model. Heather makes my point better than any implant model. Her newest sets with redhair, can see samples on freeones, she has beautiful hair, a pretty face, great eyes, long nice legs, small but cute butt. Her only con is the fake boobs, and since I'm not a boob lover, that doesn't even rank as a con for me. Remember, there is more to beauty than boobs! Edit: Forgot something, a few models, Zafira comes to mind, have recently had implants because of "uneven" breasts. So we could be talking about esteem issues that these women had before they even entered porn. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Apr 01, 2009, 04:24pm | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 11:22pm - 5745 days | #13 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I'm thinking this forum and the good behavior could be used as an example as to how calm and collected we are since we watch so much porn. Maybe replace the major news stations on cable tv with a porn network? And happy birthday to the forum, she don't look a day over barely legal age! My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-30-09 04:30pm - 5746 days | #7 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I didn't know there was anything about user points being lost. My understanding always was that user points would be retained, but the site's reviewed would lose their points from the reviews as the reviews aged and expired. I very well could be wrong on that though. While I wouldn't have a problem with a current points leaderboard, I do wonder if it cheapens the point system. Similar to a few months ago, a martial arts instructor in Sacramento asked me to be a guest at his dojo. I walk in and there are kids there, 12 years old, wearing black belts. It took me nearly daily practice in the martial arts from age 7 to 15 to get my black belt, that these kids received in less than a year of 1 day a week training. I told the sensei that I was very disappointed with him. He is a little older than I am, but was a student of my grandfather, like I was, and to me he had cheapened the very things my grandfather had built his dojo on. I also think it also goes into the everybody deserves a trophy mentality that has drained American kids of their competitive nature. Really, if a person posted and received say 50 points to become the current leader, they would already be into the top 20 all-time. I would think breaking the all-time top 20 would be as rewarding as being the current leader over the last few months. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-30-09 03:33pm - 5746 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Lilane's site isn't listed on here yet, but there are a few other of the Raw sites listed on here. I went to the site, but can't tell anything about the content or updates based on the preview. Lilane is one of my favorites, and maybe my favorite of the tattooed models. Generally speaking, from my experience, when a site has the model's name and another word like "Raw" or "Live" or "Simply" those aren't usually very good sites. There are exceptions like Sandra Shine Live, but is the exception to the other pile of wasted potential sites. I checked Videobox, they have 16 non-behind the scenes, action videos of her. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-29-09 03:28pm - 5747 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I used to be the type who never joined for more than one month, except on Eve Angel's solo site, which I would join 6 months to a year at a time. It was the only one I had joined for multi-months access, but because so many sites aren't adding a lot of content that I'm not interested in, I have become more of the long-term membership type to sites that I consistently enjoy. I've been really impressed with some of the cross-sells I've been getting lately too. I have the 6 month deal with Twistys for $59.95, so I was scanning around on the site and found a cross-sell ad for Reality Kings. I clicked it and was really surprised since most of the cross-sells give you the same price the TBP discount does, but the Reality Kings cross-sell on Twistys is only $9.95 for a month! While Reality Kings doesn't have a lot of content that I am interested in, they do have Mike's Apartment, which is filled with Euro stars and they have Mike in Brazil, which is a pretty good site too. I'm able to get both of those sites, Twistys and Reality Kings, for $20 a month combined and both have multiple daily updates. I joined the multi-month deal (10 months, $99), and have actually gained a new respect for Videobox from that deal. The deal works out to roughly 30 cents a day and they're giving me 5 DVDs a day for that 30 cents. Even at the monthly price of $15 per month through TBP, the deal still equals 6,000 archived DVDs and 5 new ones a day for 50 cents per day. Oh and my other long-term that I just recently joined for long-term is Club Sandy, kind of a frustration one since I have to wait it out (6 months), while paying a monthly fee until I finally get Pix and Video as a loyalty site, but once I get Pix and Video in my loyalty, that will be a package that is Club Sandy, Pix and Video and around 40 other sites for $24.95 a month. I hadn't realized that the 21st Sextury sites were recurring at only $24.95. Over a year period that will equal around $300, but I would pay that for Club Sandy and Pix and Video for a year, plus get the 40 other sites. On a side note, I know I'm not the only Eve Angel fan, Eve is coming back with a new exclusive solo site soon and I'll probably be the first in line to join that for a long-term. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-29-09 12:48am - 5748 days | #8 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
GCode, The way I do it, if I give a positive rating, a lot of times, there isn't much to be said. Also, you can give advice to some even with a positive vote and get an attitude back from them since they don't want advice, so I've stopped doing that and usually just give a yes with no comment or a short comment and figure that the yes vote is enough. On the few no votes that I have gave, I do post a reason and try to explain it as well as possible. I also try to check back on ones that I have clicked "no" on to see if they have either changed whatever caused me to click no, and if so, will go back and change to yes, but that has only happened once or twice. Edited in I wouldn't worry too much about the retaliation no trust vote, for one thing, it would be very obvious. I had a few no trust votes, one was finally worked out between myself and another member, and the other was one I received way back when the site first started. Sorry about the edited in part, storm knocked my internet connection out. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk Edited on Mar 29, 2009, 01:18am | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 08:45pm - 5754 days | #6 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Just be sure to uncheck the cross sells, I just made a comment about it. Didn't realize they were doing that. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 07:50pm - 5754 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Zuzana Z does some hardcore b/g sets. A hidden gem site for me is the Tasty Pass network, there is a TBP discount of $12.49 a month and they have a solo site of Zuzana on there, listed as Tasty Tara, it has a couple of b/g videos of her. Seems like it had about 110 photo and video sets of her and for me, it was worth joining just for her content. She is one of my favorites. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 07:41pm - 5754 days | #3 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Eve Angel has kept the same look to her pubic hair for several years, only changing it when she is on a site like ALS where they require fully shaven, within weeks, her "V" is back to normal. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 03:31pm - 5754 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I'm probably like you, not really a movie buff, but I do have my favorites. I could get the genres wrong. War movie: I thought Full Metal Jacket was really good, but I'm not real big on war movies, so I don't have a lot to compare it to. Comedy: I'm with you on Animal House, when my wife and I first met, she had never seen it, being from Puerto Rico, she hadn't seen a lot of movies and her response was, "So, this is why guys go to college?" Yep! The Porkys series was also a favorite of mine and a frat house standard. Western: While I agree on Clint Eastwood westerns, my dad before passing away used to love this western called, "Trinity" It was a comedy western, but I used to love watching those and saw them on Amazon a few weeks ago, re-released as a DVD box set, it has the two feature films in it. And Blazing Saddles if it was a western. Sci Fi: I'm going with Aliens, the Alien Quadrilogy is easily one of my favorite box sets, and thank goodness they left the Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem disc out! Fantasy: I like Lord of the Rings, but I never got into the books, so my pick is Willow. Action: I don't know if these fall in the Action genre, but I have really enjoyed the last two Batman movies. Also have to have Scarface in here, as cliche as it is, it still ranks up there in my top 3-4 movies. And seriously, anything with Bruce Lee in it. Drama: Godfather 1, 2, 3 Classics: I love the classic horror movies that had either Boris Karloff or Bela Lugosi in them. Other: I never really understood why, but I really liked Kill Bill and Natural Born Killers My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 03:07am - 5755 days | #7 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Reaver, I don't see anything about the exxxcel sites including gothrockgirls having a DL Limit. I went through the FAQ on the exxxcel sites and didn't see anything about DL Limit and also don't see anything on The Best Porn about a limit. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-20-09 10:51am - 5756 days | #5 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I had a big problem with Club Sandy's site blocking me out awhile back, and have a comment on this site about it. In it, the webmaster Damon replied to send email to support@21sextury.com To top that off, I had a problem before that one with Pix and Video, same company and called websupportcentral's phone number on that problem and had the problem fixed within 24 hours. Here is the comment I made when I was having the same problem you are having and it is where I got that email address from. https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16569 Maybe that will help, also be sure to tell them how long you have had the problem and they will, as that reply by their webmaster says, give you extended access for the amount of time you missed. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-19-09 11:30am - 5757 days | #3 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I did what GCode did and looked it up, got the wiki page, and I'm not even for sure how that would add to the blowjob, at least not for the one receiving the blowjob. I always liked these things, I liked the woman to be slow about the blowjob, at least make me think she loves doing it by going slow, eye contact, and for the blowjob to be more of a tease than anything else. That is just my opinion on what I liked, even though most women never do these things and one thing I always hated was when the woman went so fast and was so sloppy that she sounded like a fat man eating pizza. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-17-09 11:53pm - 5759 days | #5 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I always wondered where Snowdude went. One thing also to remember is the last few months has been very hard on the economy, and I think some members probably were using their porn money for food, gas, etc... I do think feelings get hurt at times and those members either leave or take a break, get their heads and thoughts together. I was running the risk of burn out last year and took a few months off, though I still would come by and check for any replies. As a psychologist and motivational speaker, one of my most requested lectures is about how we don't realize that each of us has our boundaries. What might make one person mad, might make another person laugh. What seems like an issue to one person, might not receive a second thought from another. The other thing and I think this could be part of the explanation of leaving members from any forum or website, not just this one. The overall mood of the members on here has become much more negative, and some people, say a recovering alcoholic, would remove themselves from that negative situation. There seems to be an almost overwhelming pride in giving sites a low score these days. I've always wondered if the people who generally score sites in the 70s realize they are admitting that they chuck hundreds of dollars out each month to something they say wasn't very good. Just my opinion there, as negativity always hurts group settings. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-16-09 11:43pm - 5760 days | #19 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
The original Star Trek series was before my time, I was born in the mid to late 70s. I do like Science Fiction, but the Star Trek series was doomed with me. I think the second series came out in the late 80s, I was playing baseball, football and studying martial arts at that time and was a huge video game fan, so I rarely if ever watched tv. I do remember going to see Star Wars when I was maybe 3 and then going to see Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers, Swamp Thing and the Battlestar Galatica movie when I was a kid. I also have great memories of watching Lost in Space re-runs with my grandfather. Even now, I don't watch much tv. The only series' I have followed of any kind are Family Guy and Simpsons, and still spend more time playing video games than watching tv. And my favorite show, my wife buys me the DVDs for birthdays, Christmas, etc.. is Mystery Science Theater 3000, since I do usually prefer humor over seriousness. Volume 3 being my favorite. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-16-09 06:14pm - 5760 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I've been over in Nevada a few times, I won't say this for sure, but I don't think Reno has fully nude clubs. Reno is kind of the shy, sweet sister city of Las Vegas. Vegas is a good 6-8 hour drive from Reno, so Vegas is probably out of the question. If I was going to say a closer city with fully nude clubs,I would say Sacramento, California, it is less than 2 hours from Reno. Not for sure if Grass Valley or any of the other Northeast California cities have full nudity, but Sacramento does. Of course, if you could make your way down to Vegas there are a dozen or so nude clubs down there. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-16-09 09:03am - 5760 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
bluebawa, Porn Access does give you access to all those sites, but I will tell you from my experience that many of those sites have shared content with their other sites. For example, they had 7-8 handjob sites and more than half of the content was used on 4 of the sites, same exact clips and screenshots. You do pay $15 though and get access to all the sites they advertise. A few things to note about them. They are the same company that has the DVD site, DVD Box, and most of the content on Porn Access is on DVD Box as well. The overall number of sites they offer really isn't quite as impressive as the numbers looks. They call a scene a "video". The numbers I see are 15,126 videos. This is really 15,126 scenes. Videobox in comparison has 33,749 scenes as of right now or double the amount of content of Porn Access. Videobox's basic membership which is smaller resolution/files, but still good, is $9.95 a month if you join by following the links on this site. Just thought I would throw this in. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-16-09 07:43am - 5760 days | #26 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I have a cousin who lives in Boston, he calls me and says, "I got my new apatment" and "I traded my caa" where did the R's go? We always have fun with it. My wife, a native Spanish speaker, can't understand anything he says. I loved the southern accents in college and still go to the south frequently. We were in Alabama last year for a week, and my wife was so confused. One guy told us he needed some help, "My tar is flat" my wife looks at me, I told her tire. Then while eating breakfast at one of those incredible southern roadside diners, the waitress asked how we wanted our "aggs" and was telling the other waitress that her "lags" were tired from standing. Eventually, we want to move to the south permanently. I lived there on and off for 5-6 years including college and loved it. And believe me, from my college days, those southern girls are wild! I read an interview with Georgia Jones last week, she was talking about if she wasn't in porn, she would be a mixed-martial arts fighter, "Because I love to fight" I wonder just how many men would be willing to take a beating from her ha ha? My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-08-09 09:07pm - 5768 days | #16 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I recently fell over that Sara/Sasha UK model, I still don't know if it is her accent or just how dirty her mouth is, though I will say that Austin Powers didn't help the British porn industry with his, "Do I make you 'orny baby?" Even though in America, I too have a midday snack called "Beaver" keeps the wife happy, she calls it a quickie or a nooner. One thing I have always found interesting about America is all of the different slang terms depending on the area and meanings words have depending on the area you are in. We were down in Texas last fall and I did not "get" their slang at all. Instead of saying how are you doing or what's up or what's going on, the locals in a town there called Lufkin, TX, say, "What it do?" instead. The central parts of California still have the valley girl talk of, "Like totally gnarly rad and bitchin'" The reason I mention that, when I played college football it was at University of Mississippi aka Ole Miss in the deep south of America and they actually had a pre-game chant titled, "Hotty Toddy" that the drunken from pre-game cookouts crowd would yell, it went, "Are you ready? Hell yes! Damn right! Hotty Toddy, gosh almighty, who in the hell are we? Flim flam, Bim bam, Ole Miss...by damn" And to be honest with you, I have no clue what it means! I heard it for four years while there, but all I know is it fired the crowd and team up. And the crowd was always very drunk, I don't know how many were drinking Hotty Toddys though. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 03-08-09 08:49pm - 5768 days | #2 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Hey Thy, thanks for the reply on my question about the network too. I myself am tri-lingual. So, I don't mind the Spanish at all, as my wife is Puerto Rican and speaks Spanish and English. I don't mind though, like on the sites with Hungarian models or German models, that speak Hungarian or German, as long as I get their passion from what they are saying. I think one of the most expressive models in the world is Eve Angel, her eyes, her moans, everything speaks for her. Here is a good way to look at it. If the model is seriously into the scene where she is enjoying, we will know what she is saying even if she doesn't say it in a language we know. I do think subtitles would be good, especially if those stay off the viewing area of the movie, like down in the black area of a letterbox or widescreen movie. Even saying that, language or my lack of understanding of the language spoken has never stopped me from joining a site. You would probably be surprised that some porn fans turn the volume down anyway, and don't even listen to what is being said. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-26-09 11:09am - 5778 days | #4 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I haven't had any problems, but I have stopped going to one network, Tasty Pass, because they changed from Epoch to independent billing. I really like their network of sites and joined 3-4 times last year, since the discount is only $12.50 a month, but I just don't trust most sites that use independent billing. I did have an account that went over for about 6 months because it was a lesser known billing company, and I forgot to cancel it, you had to send them an email and I just forgot. I've seen the other side of it too and it does make me worry a little with Epoch, in the last year, I have had 4 Epoch sites that I canceled, not charge me, but continue to give me access after the subscription runs out. In all 4 cases, I played the good guy role and sent the sites an email to let them know that I canceled, but still have access. That shows inconsistency on Epoch's part. Oh, I do trust ALS Scan, they are independent, but they send you a receipt and a thank you email when you cancel, telling that you canceled. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-26-09 03:37am - 5779 days | #22 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I have that problem solved already, just send Eve to my house and she can work from here! Rick and Duke and Khan will just have to bring Amy Reid in for their viewing pleasure! This way, I would set up a camera and get a live feed going of Eve reviewing sites for us all to watch! My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-26-09 03:33am - 5779 days | #21 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Badandy, I know you have more hard drive space than me, but seniority rules and I say Eve! ha ha Just kidding around with you. Maybe we could compromise with Aria Giovanni? I mainly talked in the Teen Dreams forum about how I don't think anyone expects us to be completely unbiased, a point I have made and JD made above, we usually join sites that we know we are going to like. Most of the Teen Dreams members seemed to talk like they are only members of that site and maybe try one or two more per year, and were thinking if they put a high 90s review for Teen Dreams, then two lower ones on other sites that they would be looked at as shills. On Twistys, it was more or less joking around with the members that Shap (webmaster of Twistys) should add more Eve content in the months I am on to get a higher score. I thought it was interesting that neither Shap or Andrea (webmaster of Teen Dreams) posted on either thread, though both are very active on their forums. I did talk to Andrea in one thread about PU, but it was to tell her she could post announcements about Teen Dreams on here. I do think that some of the webmasters really listen to the requests. I noticed not long after me, Denner and I think Roseman posted reviews about Anette Dawn's site being very good, but not near big enough for the price, it ended up being a free bonus site to Twistys. When Teen Dreams bonus to Viv Thomas' Videos became stream only, I posted my displeasure with this on the Teen Dreams forum and here as well, since the videos are not near the quality of the ones you get from joining Viv's videos, it took just a few days and the downloads were brought back to Teen Dreams bonus and the recent one with the 1byday archive disappearance, it was back in just a few days too. Those were PU pros I forgot about earlier. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-25-09 02:19pm - 5779 days | #17 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I am going to give PU a 95. For one reason, that I don't think some of the newer members know about is the forward progress of the site and the willingness of Rick and Khan to add new things that improves the site. For one, some members might not know that the forum we are posting on was not here when PU first started. This was an addition to the site. For another, the fixing of trust ratings, and requiring a comment to post a no trust rating. That was an addition, and then there was the one that made me personally very happy and that was the changing of the Bottom Line limit of characters from 1,500 to 3,000 and the changing of pros and cons from 500 characters to 1,000 characters. There was hardly ever a review that I wrote back then that didn't go over the 1,500 character bottom line limit. Now, I am using all 3,000! I have a feeling if the limit was 10,000, I would still be going over! But 3,000 is much better, especially since the pros and cons area has expanded and you can sneak some parts into it that you would have had to put in the bottom line. I used to run a forum with my wife about Philosophy and Psychology, and believe me, I know how frustrating it is to deal with trolls and shills. If you ban their IP, they just get an IP switcher software. If you remove their posts, they just get pissed off and post more and if you belittle them, they get a laugh out of it. We would ignore them and hope they would tire themselves out realizing we weren't paying them any attention. So, I can't take away for those shills and trolls. One of the biggest positives to me is what others have mentioned and that is that we do seem to have a pretty civil group of members here. I've talked about PU on both the Twistys forum and Teen Dream forum, and see nothing but praise from others about how they come by and read reviews "but don't know how to start reviewing, I would be biased!" Speaking of being biased, the 5 points off the score was for the fact that Eve Angel still isn't on staff here! Get Eve and we're going 100! That has been in my profile since I first joined the site see, "Is there anything else you'd like to add? Yeah, have Eve Angel on staff so I can talk to her!" Similar to how I do review high in most cases, I have yet to hit a 100, and the reason for that is because the same reason I rate PU a 95. Nothing is beyond improving. The biggest con that I used to have was that for some reason, my browser used to get stuck when I would click the intro page to enter, but that has been fixed, could have been a computer issue since I am using a different computer now. I've always enjoyed the humor of the members and have enjoyed watching the size of PU in members, grow. I can remember when the raffles first started and there would be less than 10 people eligible to win each week! Total tickets out would be less than 100 every week and most were Snowdude, Denner and myself. We would have 65 of 80 tickets between us. Oh and the society trend in reviews. I remember when Twistys and 1byday would receive glowing reviews, as I still think they should, but I've noticed that both seem to have the whole "Wal-Mart" vibe around them in new reviews like they are the evil corporate giants and the scores tumble. Last thing, I've liked the chance PU gives us to know other porn fans. A member from awhile back, haven't seen him around lately, nadiacendia emailed me from the site and we talked about sites that were not well known but had content of our favorite model, Eve Angel, on them. I've had the chance to talk with webmasters, who I have a new respect for, seeing that none have ever made me any kind of offer of free content to score them high and that showed me that most were hardworking, honest people. Got to talk to a few photographers through one of the webmasters and "throw ideas" at them about poses. These are things I would have never been able to do. And just like in my reviews of porn sites, I rarely can find anything too bad to complain about with PU. Oh, and enjoyed talking with and reading Khan's posts and the ones by Rick about how he got into the website business. Not that I plan on ever trying, tried the forum thing for 3 years, but didn't have the patience to do it. And no this wasn't a shill! These are my honest feelings. Improvements have been made, the great discounts, talking with other intelligent porn fans, webmasters, I just can't find much to complain about. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-22-09 06:07am - 5782 days | #10 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I was laughing about Drooler's ad nausem comment, but Drooler, no guys talking and asking stupid questions IS what we want to see! I think you gave us too much leeway there! I didn't honestly realize that you were looking for names and ideas, though the part about "creative juices" should have been a hint. Here is mine, set in the old western town of Doujuana a run on Tijuana, title is The No Take Dick Six and those will be Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Sandy, Aneta Keys and Aria Giovanni. The six ladies have agreed to do hardcore for this one video. Imagine the DVD sales of that! There will be a hundred men brought in to watch the six women have an all-girl orgy. Every time one of the men says ONE word, he is eliminated and he has to go in the back and do a "extra bonus" scene with Rocco. That won't be shown though. Any moan from a man, any noise at all, will result in elimination. The competition toughens once the ladies are finished with their orgy, the few men that are left are tied up to chairs, the six women take turns giving them a lapdance, and if he moans or says anything he is eliminated. To add to the challenge, one of the ladies could even ask questions, "If you say yes, I will touch you" and you know the guy of course says yes and is eliminated for talking. In the end there will be only one man left and he has sex with all 6, but if he talks during any of the scenes, he is eliminated too. I'm pretty sure I just told a creative way to get the man to shutup ha ha! My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-21-09 10:21am - 5783 days | #9 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I had just noticed it. Thanks for this, seems like I got my no vote way back when the site first started. I always figured that it would be there because we had some members that disappeared back then. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-21-09 10:17am - 5783 days | #5 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I think less facials would be my first recommendation. The facials have always, first, ruined the pretty girl's face for me and second, whether true or not, it makes me feel like I'm watching some guy let off his problems with women when he does the facial. I think if more of the female stars were into the facial that I would feel differently about that. I always liked the "risky" sets, even if they really aren't in public. I saw a pretty rare Zafira video of her giving a guy a handjob in public that wasn't really hardcore, but the spontaneity of it made it more believable. Which gives me my biggest complaint and the first thing to go, asking the model questions before a hardcore shoot. One of Eve Angel's best sets is on Mike's Apartment. She is really into the solo in this one, but the first 10 minutes is the guy asking her if she speaks English, if she likes Family Guy and I've seen hardcore shoots that do the same thing. Once the guy asks "Do you" or "What is your name" or any question, it takes away from the believability of the scene. I've always liked the voyeur storyline too. Man and woman having sex, her friend is lonely and asks to watch and plays with herself while watching. Little Mutt has a hardcore video of Sarah Blake with a guy, and this other model is there, but says she isn't willing to do hardcore. As the scene goes in, she is fighting herself not to join them. Best though, a scene of Sandy from Club Sandy in Brazil with a Brazilian woman and Kid Jamaica. Anyone who has followed Sandy's site knows she has a crush on Kid Jamaica, but she has that whole won't do hardcore, won't be with men in porn clause. After watching Kid Jamaica pound the Brazilian model, she is touching his chest and before you know it, Jamaica is fingering her while pounding the model. That ends with a new scene where Mya Diamond is with Kid Jamaica and Sandy trying to just tease him, ends up giving him a pretty impressive blowjob. That is what most hardcore porn lacks. It is all too planned out, and too set up to make you believe it is close to real. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-16-09 11:21pm - 5788 days | #13 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Hey guys, thanks for the opinions on this. I was giving the thread a day or so before coming back to check, when lk2fireone made a reply to my newest review and was surprised at my split personality, going from my OCDC rambling post here to an excellent review. We have some newer members that I would like to mention this to about me, English isn't my first language, so I do run into problems with finding the right words when typing out my thoughts. Drooler could have saved me a lot of time and typing with this comment from above, "These days, I really know exactly what I want, and if I'm not getting it, then whatever I'm looking at, as far as I'm concerned, it's just crap. That has made it harder for me to write reviews now because I have to try to think like a general user, just to be fair about it. And that sucks. I'm much happier just being horny old ass-crazy Drooler." Those were my exact feelings. I run into the dilemma that a site may have blown me away last year, but since then has been passed by others. Which brings in the other part, some of my reviews date back to early 2007, so those are going on two years old. Since then, we've seen the peak of the Euro Eight, as I like to call them, Eve, Sophie, Sandra, Aneta, Mia, Susana and Sandy, and now we are seeing them slowly, with butts facing us as they fade away. I don't want my reviews to become that biased that if a site can get a new set of them, I score it high. But like Drooler said and applies to me too, I know what I want and that want centers around those models. I really like the one new British model Sasha, but the newest models are bordering on looking too young to me. So, this really wasn't a thread where I am questioning my own reviews, as much as I was just looking for what the average reader of the reviews likes to see in the reviews since I don't want my reviews to be too biased sounding. lk2fireone mentioned in a joking way about the OCDC. My OCDC is funny too, for one, I'm a Psychologist, so imagine when the 17th straight patient comes in with the same problem as the previous 16! I'm thinking, "Can't someone today at least be suicidal instead of depressed?" The OCDC causes me to get quickly frustrated with sites for example, no zips for pictures or movie scenes in parts. The rambling style writing comes from some problems with writing English, so I keep trying to say the right thing. Oddly enough, I've lived in America most of my life, but I get a strange blend of languages from my parents and I spend half of my time in California, where everyone speaks good basic English and the other half in the southern United States where everyone speaks in southern slang accents. Most of what I was looking for though, was in these posts. When I write a review, the site is usually fresh in my mind or I even sign in on the site to make sure on the facts, so that is probably why my reviews are more straight-forward than these rambling posts where I am trying to think of what to say. Badandy, I had thought about doing an update, but most of my top site reviews by score were in 2007, and all will still be approaching the two year cutoff on them, oh and in general, this is my time of the year to join multiple sites and I have much more time now than I will once summer gets here. So, I figure it is better to go ahead and do a full re-review. Thanks everybody My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-15-09 12:09am - 5790 days | #15 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
As a bouncing booty lover, I do like the POV style videos that has the girl in reverse cowgirl, but with her upper body leaned forward while the booty and hips does all the work. There is a handjob/tease site that does this style and position in nearly every video, believe it is one of the Combat Zone studio video series' My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 02-14-09 10:39pm - 5790 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
Hey PUs, I really haven't joined many sites lately that I hadn't joined and reviewed before. I'm finding the new models in my preferred niche, glam/solo/Euro just don't interest me near as much as the models that made me a fan of that niche. So, I bought myself a new pair of 1 TB external hard drives and have been going back through my favorite sites and re-downloading all of the content of my top 10 favorite models and storing it on the new HDs. What I'm running into on the re-reviews is that I seem to be a different reviewer than I was two years ago ha ha. I got review implants. I'm thinking with most of the world having economic problems that I'm leaning more towards joining the sites that give me the most bang for my buck, but if I do join a site that doesn't have a lot of content that I plan to keep, it better be very high quality. Here comes the dilemma, I joined Met-Art a few weeks ago, and though I'm still not really into artsy porn, my respect for the site is much higher now because of the high quality content and the high amount of quantity. There are many models on the site that I like, but I've seen much more exposing sets of them. This is the dilemma, I find myself wanting to grade a site not just based on my liking it or not, because my thinking now is that we all have different tastes in models and what style of porn we like, hardcore/softcore/lesbian etc.. So, just looking at the technical aspects of the site, the value it could be a very high score even though it isn't really my preferred niche or maybe doesn't have a lot of content of my favorite models. The other side of this is the sites that have a lot of content of my favorite niche and favorite models, but might have lower quality content. By scoring the higher quality site higher that would let the potential customer look at a site and decide if they liked the models, while knowing the quality was very high, but if I do that am I taking the personality out of my reviews? I've had a couple of PUs over the years email me from here and tell me they really like my taste in models and join most of the sites that I score high since my reviews were higher scored if those sites had the models I prefer, not so much based on quality or quantity. As an example, my highest rated site is Twistys, not so much for the quality of the content, as it is that I get twistys, one of the biggest and best, mostly glam sites on the internet and includes access to two very good solo sites, Anette Dawn and Nicole Graves, plus the added bonus of a very good glam/softcore site Blue Fantasies for $20. The downfalls are in the quality section, with average at best picture size and slightly above average video quality. And those are offset in my reviews by the amount of content of my favorite models, which is very high. The thing is, how helpful is my review if the person reading it doesn't have the same favorite models that I have and they see a 98 score and end up on a site that is high on content, but only above average in quality. Probably should have taken self-therapy for my OCDC! This came up after going through the frustration of 1byday trying to switch formats of their site in the middle of my membership. Their newer content is certainly higher quality than Twistys, and with the archives back in place as part of a regular membership, their quantity matches Twistys. Their model selection is also similar to Twistys. This dilemma was compounded when I joined zoliboy to get in on the the new, finally understandable 21st Sextury network, where you join one site and get around 30 bonus sites. While some of those bonus sites are just filled with content that was once on Club Sandy and Pix and Video, some of them are 100% exclusive, I've also noticed that Playful Hands is getting many of the new Club Sandy updates too, which saves me $30 on joining Club Sandy. I made a comment about the zoli bonus sites and it really is impressive, Sweet Sophie Moone, Open Air Pleasures, Playful Hands, Lezbo Honeys and a site that has many of those "missing" hardcore clips that used to be on Club Sandy, Euro Porn Sluts, including one of the few hardcore Eve Angel clips, Aneta Keys hardcore, Sophie Moone in an almost b/g clip, it is b/g/g. As a collector, that site alone has enough clips for me to have joined for the full price, but I now get those other listed ones and around 30 more. They also are releasing new updates in HD and re-releasing old clips in HD on most of those sites. Onto the questions, do you prefer the reviews/bottom lines that are more of an opinion or more of just the facts type reviews? Do you think we lose our PU review personalities if we don't grade sites higher that have our favorite models on them? While I do try to be as unbiased as possible, I still think it is impossible for non-professional reviewers to be completely unbiased since we are paying for the memberships and would generally think that we join a site because we already like something about it before throwing the money down to join. Thoughts? Opinions? Thanks PUs. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 551-600 of 664 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 11 | Page 12 | 13 | 14 | Next Page > |
|
