Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Goldfish (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (265)  |   Threads Started (18)

51-100 of 265 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >

07-23-10  03:14pm - 5283 days #33
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


With all due respect to our honorable member who began this thread, and especially for the courage it took to appeal to others for help on this touchy matter, I hope he won't mind if I use it for a related inquiry:
Suppose a man finds himself developing a strong sexual feeling toward his same gender but.......cringes at the thought of having a male penis inserted into his rectum?
I know there are other ways men can share sexual affection. And I may be wrong, but my limited knowledge associates the anal thing as taking precedence.


I don't see why it's a problem. Why can't this dude just ask the guy he's attracted to to jack him off?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-22-10  08:15pm - 5283 days #7
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I can't speak for anybody else but I would definetely put masturbation under midcore. I think semi-nude or all nude are the only things that should be classified softcore.

If you have one or more performer in the scene and there is kissing, breast fondling or contact with genitals then this is at minimum a midcore type of scene. The only way this would become hardcore is if there is penetration of any kind. A simple masturbation scene where one girl is working her magic on herself should be midcore. I think if it's a mastubation scene with 2 girls or a boy & a girl but no penetration then it's still a midcore scene. A BJ or cunnilingus are hardcore.


I like Pat's definitions. All in favor?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-22-10  08:08pm - 5283 days #5
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I'm curious how people classify lesbian sex in regards to hardcore/softcore? At times I've considered all lesbian sex softcore but other times I've considered some lesbian scenes hardcore if it is intense enough and includes fingering/oral.

Thoughts?

...I like the "midcore" concept too.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-19-10  07:39pm - 5286 days #14
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I think lingerie, and just clothing in general can be sexy. I had one girlfriend who used to try on outfits for me and I couldn't believe how sexy it was watching her change and model them for me. It quickly became a regular pre-sex event.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-19-10  07:34pm - 5286 days #3
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I agree with messmer. 10 should be fine for now but as I haven't seen anything over 3MB/s myself but I bet within a couple years those restrictions on porn servers will slowly increase.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-08-10  06:38pm - 5297 days #4
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I still don't understand the subdomain rule. My newest site cannot be listed here simply because of a structural choice I made. The structure is beneficial for users (and very helpful for me) so I'll be sticking with it for my future new sites too. Hopefully I'll be able to persuade a rule change at some point or eventually I probably won't have any sites listed here .


Ed, If you have a sub domain site why not just include it as part of a network?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-07-10  09:19pm - 5298 days #5
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		A few newbies I've been enjoying.

Kasey Chase
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Ka...er=f/Kasey-Chase.htm

Amia Miley
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Am...der=f/Amia-Miley.htm

Melanie Rios
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Me...r=f/Melanie-Rios.htm

Edited on Jul 07, 2010, 09:24pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-06-10  02:47pm - 5300 days #7
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		There is one free dating site that is sort of fishy, if you get my meaning. I've browsed through the female profiles. When you clicked to see the details of a profile there was always an ad for one site or another with some hottie beckoning. The ad space is about the same size as the photo shown on the profile which makes me wonder how many dudes mistakenly think they are messaging some super model living down the street versus the typically less attractive owner of the profile.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  09:19pm - 5302 days #16
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by justme:


I mean, I read over on another porn forum recently a user who was absolutely dead serious in asking a producer of extreme porn for a dvd focusing on anal prolapse I do believe there is a large percentage of porn addicts who have lost sight that it is a real person on the other side of the internet, something more than just pixels on a monitor.

These idiots are out there and are largely being satisfied by producers. It's all a matter of percentages - does the "good" porn outweigh the "bad" porn? Personally I think the good outweighs the bad, but that's just me


That is pretty nasty! Just like zombie movies though, there is such a thing as acting and special effects. It doesn't have to be a moral issue.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  04:40pm - 5303 days #24
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I think it's just more acceptable for girls to be bisexual, or at least be more open about it, or simply just experiment if they feel like it, whereas guys risk the dude-you're-a-fag label if we just think it--that line's pretty clear. But even the most jaded male homophobe will probably get at least a little pleasure out of seeing a couple of hot girls go at it...talk about love conquers all!


I do think there is plenty of stigma around homosexuality for women as well. It's just portrayed a little differently by society.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  04:37pm - 5303 days #12
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


A couple of quotes from the article; first from Ms. Dines: "'To think that so many men hate women to the degree that they can get aroused by such vile images is quite profound,' says Dines. 'Pornography is the perfect propaganda piece for patriarchy. In nothing else is their hatred of us quite as clear.'" Ouch!

Actually there are plenty of other pieces of "propaganda" out there that reach even more people and very likely have a greater impact; violent films with large box office receipts, popular violent television, not to mention the extremely skewed political world where most women seem to be sideshow puppets for the media, with little real impact or power. How about publishing a book (which seems to be her real agenda) about how men dominate the majority of political offices and races in the United States instead of pulling out the porn-is-the-root-of-all-evil card? Oh, it's probably because of all the porn, right? As soon as we get rid of all the porn everything else will just fall in place like dominoes. It's so simple, I don't know why I didn't figure it out before!


I thought of another propaganda media outlet for violence against women: The Lifetime Channel!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  04:30pm - 5303 days #11
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Since this woman "expert" admits to attending porn conferences, as well as viewing pornography extensively, it is clear that she herself is infected with the porn disease, and she should be locked away in a nutso wing until she can be cleansed of her porno filth. Let us pray for her soul, but realize that only with tough love and punishment for her impure thoughts and actions can she hope to be purified.

How much shit will we have to listen to from this tainted "expert"?


LOL!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  12:49pm - 5303 days #21
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I could be wrong and that wouldn't be the first time but I think it's significantly more common for girls to be bi than it is for guys. It's one thing for a man to say that he's thought about what it would be like to be with another man and the actual acting out of that fantasy. I think there are still some lines that guys do not cross.


Not to mention I think it's mandatory every female porn site Web master is bisexual by default. LOL.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  12:44pm - 5303 days #8
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I've only been to one 3D movie since I was very young. The movie was How To Train Your Dragon. A nice movie, but I found it very annoying to wear the 3D glasses, and it will be many years before I go to another 3D movie (the extra cost for the ticket, plus the annoyance of wearing the 3D glasses).

I guess I am in the minority, because most people don't seem to complain about problems with wearing 3D glasses.

And when I put the 3D glasses on that I got from the movie theater to look at a 3D photo on my computer, I found the same eye strain that I experienced at the movies. So the eye strain/annoyance was from the 3D glasses, and not just from the 3D movie itself.


I agree with you. I did see Avatar in 3D and enjoyed it but the other few IMAX movies I've seen in 3D have seemed dark and hard to see. I also don't enjoy wearing the glasses.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-03-10  12:34pm - 5303 days #5
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		This stuff drives me nuts. It seems everyone with a chip on their shoulder has to attack some aspect of society. Porn creators and consumers are just an easy target.

Their assumption that all porn is violent and reflects poorly on women is just wrong. I personally don't like the porn where women are spanked, hit and spit on or have three cocks shoved up her ass. I prefer fairly normal sex with hot models. I even enjoy when the woman gets off and more tender acts such as kissing.

At a higher level, you could say porn comes in many flavors -- just like any type of entertainment. Why not attack specific porn instead of the whole industry? I'll tell you why. These women are threatened by porn and have some false sense of morality they are trying to sell.

As far as kids go, I grew up through the times where kids listening to heavy metal, watching violent movies and playing video games was going to turn us all into serial killers. I'm an adult now and the world still hasn't fallen into anarchy so I'm guessing today's youth will survive online porn just fine.

Oh, and "child porn" is not porn! It's illegal and immoral. Porn is legal, fun and healthy if used in moderation.

Edited on Jul 03, 2010, 12:38pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-01-10  07:40pm - 5304 days #26
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		The new domain is nothing to worry about. They are hoping sex sites will self regulate and adopt the .xxx extension so parental software can filter it. The reality is established sites will buy the .xxx domain and just redirect to their .com or .net if they have been around a while and people are already familiar with those addresses.

Another side effect of this new domain will be established companies outside of porn buying up addresses. For example, CNN will not want a porn site on cnn.xxx so they will buy it just so nobody else uses it.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-01-10  07:25pm - 5304 days #18
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I seriously doubt anybody's sexuality was changed or caught, as the case may be, but I am sure plenty have discovered their homophobia or simply the intense fear of their own inexplicable feelings and emotions. Nobody seems to be able to really explain why they love something, or why something turns them on, or even why they are just curious, and in a culture of sexual identity absolutism--you either are or you're aren't, end of story--curiosity is a no-no. To some curiosity equates to full-fledged enthusiastic activity...that has yet to actually occur. To the more rational it just means you're curious, not 'converted' to the 'other side' (because apparently there's a war going on in all of this).

Plenty of people fantasize about far more extreme things than sex, like "That asshole just cut me off! I'd love to go up to him and kick his face in!" but that doesn't make that person violent or murderous. Thinking and doing are two very different things, so don't get too stressed out about fantasy or thoughts.

And if you're really curious...wear a condom, or if you have an open-minded girlfriend discuss it with her and try a little role reversal. Just be careful not to send her from the room screaming and sobbing if you ask.


Good points. Even with the relative anonymity I hesitated from chiming in on this post because of all the stigma around this topic. There really is no reason for it though. Sexual thoughts/discussion about the same sex shouldn't be anymore taboo than talking about the opposite sex.

I'm heterosexual but over the years I've had curiosity about homosexuality. When those thoughts are over however I usually end up back at "yuck!" and go back to the women. I also do have preferences about the men in hetero sex scenes. Is this some latent bisexual tendency? I doubt it but who cares if it is!

Oh, I also meant to add there is a definite double standard in this area between men and women. If you know a sexy woman who "experimented" with lesbian sex in college but is now dating your male buddy you probably won't give it a thought. If you're talking about a guy who experimented in college with gay sex and is now dating a female friend of yours you'll think hes gay, end of story. If he's dating women now he must be repressed. Edited on Jul 01, 2010, 07:35pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-01-10  07:15pm - 5304 days #2
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I'm sure it would be cool looking but the 3D technology doesn't really interest me. It seems like a lot of money for not that much benefit. I don't think the technology will take off unless they figure out a way to get rid of the glasses. In the theater it's one thing but who wants to wear those stupid things sitting around watching the tube?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-20-10  08:05pm - 5315 days #9
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I haven't seen one in a while but I know there have been some documentaries about the study of what is attractive on Discovery or one of those channels. I didn't see the whole thing and it's been a while but I think there are some traits they considered universally desirable like synchronous features and hip to waist ratios and stuff like that.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-14-10  11:55am - 5322 days #6
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I've never tried the cam shows at Met Art but generally I'm not interested in the shows. Every once in a while I'll click into one and watch for a minute, get bored and leave. I've never paid for the ability to do the private chats but honestly I can't imagine it gets much better.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-14-10  11:51am - 5322 days #27
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I get the enjoying the motion and gyrations. I'm not huge on solo but do enjoy the occasional strip tease for that very reason.

I do however enjoy the solo scenes with masturbation. I found some good ones recently on Teen Pink Videos.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-14-10  11:51am - 5322 days #26
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I get the enjoying the motion and gyrations. I'm not huge on solo but do enjoy the occasional strip tease for that very reason.

I do however enjoy the solo scenes with masturbation. I found some good ones recently on Teen Pink Videos.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-14-10  11:40am - 5322 days #3
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I hate when that happens
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-03-10  08:32pm - 5332 days #69
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


I've def gotten some good ideas for future research. I think in the future I want to do a study on pornography collections. Anyone have any thoughts on that idea?


If you go through the forum posts you'll find plenty of discussions regarding porn collections. People here have plenty to say about it!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-03-10  03:30pm - 5333 days #3
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		Thanks Wittyguy, these are always fun to read.

Did the publisher of the stats have a definition of "porn"? These stats could have different meaning depending on how broad/narrow that definition is.

For instance, in #8 I wouldn't consider "adult dating" to be porn.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-03-10  03:25pm - 5333 days #2
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I'll stick up for the home grown American women. Sure, there are prudish women anywhere but I've met some great women here in the States that have no problem with being sexually repressed.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-02-10  03:26pm - 5334 days #11
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by messmer:


How are the ATK movies these days, quality wise, goldfish?


Hey messmer, The newest vids are 1280 x 720/4.8 Mbps. I don't know exactly what percentage are HD but at a glance it looks like at least half the videos I downloaded and kept are HD. The others are 854 x 480/2 Mbps -- not bad.

As for the quality of the action in the videos I am satisfied. I found some really good hardcore but I think my favorite is actually a masturbation video with a model named Kasey.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-02-10  03:14pm - 5334 days #63
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


I haven't yet. I stayed off the forums yesterday after being torn up by amazon! haha. I was thinking about looking at porn addict sites today. Think I should just google "porn addict forum"?


What are the user's beef on Amazon? I've never looked at their forums. I've only used the site to purchase books and other various things.

I could see if you were promoting porn or calling the people on the forum Internet addicts would upset them but you are simply taking a survey. Maybe the bestiality and under-age stuff takes them off guard? (I personally would have shaved that stuff out of the survey. I'd think legal porn or Internet addiction would be a large enough scope in itself without adding in those odd ball tangents.)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-02-10  03:04pm - 5334 days #16
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Not true, Goldfish. The Bush Administration had the Justice Department create the "Obscenity Prosecution Task Force" back in 2005 to go after those no-good pornographers and their evil, sinful products. Look what happened with Max Hardcore and now Evil Angel. You'd would think after the horror of 9/11 the leaders of the 'greatest country on earth' might have bigger legal priorities than wasting time in the perpetual gray area of defining 'obscenity'.

But, yes, we are now diverting our attention to financial institution bailouts and fucking up the environment--in other words, business as usual.


It was a joke TS.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-01-10  08:03pm - 5334 days #58
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


people on amazon were SO mean!!!!! i can't believe it! thank you to all of you for being so kind! i really appreciated it. they went as far to look up my name to see where else i have posted and said i was a scam and that i am completing my Master's research "all wrong". i'm just trying to get as many responses as possible


Wow, that sucks. Did you try looking up porn addiction support sites? I'm guessing they're responses will be biased more one way than another but I'm not sure if that matters to you.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-01-10  07:58pm - 5334 days #10
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by pat362:


It is a sad state of affair when a reputable business that pays taxes and employs a significant amount of people is forced to leave the Country to avoid likely future legal problems.


I agree. Wasting government money prosecuting porn sites probably isn't the most efficient use of their AUD's! Over here in the States we have out priorities straight -- we dump all our money into saving banks and oil company fuck-ups.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-30-10  08:59pm - 5336 days #8
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		Does the site have to be solely girls on top? as someone already mentioned many sites specializing in hardcore sex usually have the girl on top for at least a portion of the scene. I'm a member of Reality Kings right now and see plenty of it. I was also a member at ATK Petites recently and many of the hardcore scenes had the woman on top for a portion of the clip.

I guess if you're looking for a site where the woman is on top from start to end in every movie no, I haven't seen that.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-30-10  08:48pm - 5336 days #19
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I think the girl-girl/'lesbian' material we guys like is not really homosexual and that's why most guys are comfortable watching it. We view it as just another porn video because we are ogling the opposite sex, if only a few more of them in the same place at the same time--convenient! Add in the factor that you have seen some of the actresses in guy-girl videos as well and you realize it's just horny guy fantasy material, not exactly what any lesbian would care to see.


Do lesbians actually not like the girl on girl scenes in "regular" porn? I've known lesbians but none well enough to ask.

Has anyone ever met a straight woman who enjoys guy on guy porn? I've discussed the whole lesbian porn thing with a few women and they don't seem to have a similar taste for seeing to members of the opposite sex.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-27-10  06:45pm - 5339 days #40
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Ok, I've maybe been a little harsh/tough on purduerachel - still do not know.......
But it's not the first time, I've experienced requests like this (else where) - and even if it's legit with the Purdue University of West Lafayette, Indiana and all - I'm still suspicious of the bottom line here - and above all: could this be some way to use this PU to publicize details about 'the porn pervs on the net' - with a political/religious right wing purpose.
Maybe I'm paranoid - and again I do not need to be here in Europe and say: I could not care less...........still?

But purduerachel - if you get this together - it'd be reasonable to place a link here to your result/paper/project or whatever...


Even if purduerachel is doing a strictly scientific survey and her findings are reported with absolutely no bias it can still be detrimental to our little hobby. For one, using the buzz words "porn" and "addiction" together basically broadcasts to the readers of the report, "Hey, there's a potential problem here!" She could have written a survey to determine if people become addicted to Diet Coke (which in my opinion is more likely than porn addiction) but nobody really gives a shit about Diet Coke addiction.

Then there is interpretation of the results. The findings could lean either way depending on the interpreter. (Which also means it could lean in our favor as well.)

I will give PR props for picking a cool topic for a paper. I always went for the controversial topics myself when I was back in school.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-10  09:13pm - 5340 days #36
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I think the main reasons why so many celebrities have come out as sex addicts is because they are hoping to save serious money during the inevitable divorce...


I tend to agree. I'm generally skeptical of that word "addiction" being thrown around with anything outside chemical addictions. I think in recent years anything and everything can be an addiction. It's used like a bargaining chip (i.e. the celeb divorces) or a way to attack or manipulate people.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-10  09:09pm - 5340 days #35
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


by the way...i need more responses!! so if you're reading this and haven't taken it pleaseeeeeeee take it


I responded!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-10  03:30pm - 5341 days #142
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I saw Iron Man 2 today. It was good, but Iron Man 1 was better.


Good to hear. Sometimes a sequel can ruin the story.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-10  03:25pm - 5341 days #32
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


Edit: of course I eat animals that were killed without their consent, so maybe I'm having some cognitive dissonance about this issue. If I were to stay true to my beliefs I should really become a vegetarian. So you may dis-regard what I wrote above, although I still think sex with animals is rather disgusting.


Here's an argument for you. The food chain is part of nature. One species fucking another species is not something you come across a lot in the natural order of things.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-26-10  01:17pm - 5341 days #29
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		Are you a user of pornography purduerachel?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-25-10  02:10pm - 5342 days #11
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		This mind doesn't want to see, hear or know anything about bestiality. It's hardly equivalent to anal sex. It's gross and abusive to animals.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-23-10  06:23pm - 5343 days #4
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		Do you think you could shave it down 20 minutes? I don't want to become addicted to surveys. lol.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-19-10  04:59am - 5348 days #8
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		The virtual reality we have today doesn't excite me. With all the accessories and expense it doesn't seem like you get that much more bang for your buck.

I think I'd only be impressed if they could actually create something that directly manipulates your thoughts so the experience basically is "real". BUT, that seems kind of creepy and big brother-ish so I probably wouldn't even use that.

If they could create an android that acted, looked and felt 98%+ like a real woman I could probably get into that. There would still be a weird-factor to it though.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-17-10  02:27pm - 5350 days #51
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I don't feel deprived in connection with cheerleaders, goldfish! I feel deprived because some of my earliest excitement came from seeing a woman's dress being blown up by the wind, revealing those sexy stockings and garter belts and full panties. I am still looking for the same kind of shot to this day, that's why my agreement re. the point of "awareness" that was brought up by Ed. I believe he is right.


Nice! I'm moving to Germany.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-17-10  02:20pm - 5350 days #26
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA 		I'm sort of anal with my video collection. I always watch all my videos before I add the files to my permanent library. (At least a skim-through viewing of the video.) If it's not the first time I've been to the site I'll usually go through all the old material from that site and weed out videos that are low quality or I'm bored with before I mix in the freshly downloaded files.

I do enjoy the thrill of the chase and going for the latest and greatest but I also enjoy reviewing my old stuff while I'm purging and organizing.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-16-10  07:17pm - 5350 days #47
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by messmer:


My formative years were spent in Germany, goldfish!


Ah, so sorry you were deprived of cheerleaders.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-15-10  09:59pm - 5351 days #45
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I feel the same way about cheerleaders' uniforms because, in my culture, American football did not play a role. I think you put your finger right on it when you talk about that point of "awareness." I think most of our later preferences for certain niches are being shaped by it!


What are you talking about? There is a Canadian football league. Doug Flutie kicked some butt up there in Canada.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-15-10  09:48pm - 5351 days #26
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Bottom line, it's understandable that "collectors" would get frustrated when a model is published under more than one name. Still, getting pissed about it may be a bit of an overreaction.


As a collector I'm not "pissed" but it is unfortunate we lose the ability to search for our favorite models. Back before the explosion of porn on the Internet I'd look for videos by Racquel Darrian or Jenna Jameson.

Even though some Eastern Euros may not be in it for long there are plenty that create a significant amount of material. If they gave them a fake name like "Jenny Smith", I wouldn't care as long as they were searchable.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-15-10  09:41pm - 5351 days #25
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Another thing I will say that a lot of Eastern European females names are not too pleasant sounding for us English speakers. Try "Agnieszka" for example.


Agnieszka sounds hot! lol

BTW Ed, I don't put the whole burden on you or any single web master. It appears to be an industry wide practice so what can you do? Edited on May 15, 2010, 09:53pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-15-10  09:38pm - 5351 days #24
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Probably not, but it makes it a lot harder to search by name.


I have to agree with Cpmx54. If a woman is in porn she can easily choose a fake name (preferably first and last names) that will persist through various Web sites. There is no way going from "Liza" to "Lisa" to "Ivana" is going to confuse some 2nd cousin who stumbles on her video clip one night and blabs to the family. I think the increase in that sort of risk is insignificant.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-13-10  07:46pm - 5353 days #4
Goldfish (0)
Active User



Posts: 265
Registered: Jan 19, '08
Location: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Advent:


My advise is to tell them what you want and ask them what they want....you never know what you might get.


Great advice. As a guy I actually prefer that type of communication over a woman who fakes it or is indirect about it. Edited on May 13, 2010, 07:50pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

51-100 of 265 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.05 seconds.