Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Jeffrey99 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (106)  |   Threads Started (4)

51-100 of 106 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 Next Page >

04-21-09  01:13pm - 5724 days #5
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I have to agree with others. To be honest, if a site only had a 1 page preview, I'd probably not join. I think you need atleast 3-4 pages.

1)Would be a picture preview, maybe with like a preview from a few galleries. However each image preview should be available in all sizes that your website has. Or atleast letting us know exactly what resolution is the highest.
2)I think you need a page for the videos. Again in with a preview of all resolutions or atleast the highest resolution.
3)Think you need a preview page of your latest 5-10 updates (with dates), to give us a indication of just how much the site is updated.
4)And I agree with others on a Model Directory link being available on the preview pages.

04-21-09  05:06am - 5724 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
You normally only have to enter 2 of the 3 pieces of information. Did you try to go ahead and click next or cancel with the 2 pieces of info?

04-19-09  07:13am - 5726 days #14
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I will agree that in network sites (Brazzers, BangBros, RealityKings) I don't review every site in the network. I normally only give my pros and cons on the network's main site and the network as a whole.

However for solo sites, I normally try to review every one. Even if the site has alot of reviews, I kinda feel like nobody looking to join a site can have too much info.

04-18-09  05:20am - 5727 days #17
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by monty2222:


Nope, if you queue up files the first one will download fine, but the rest will fail. It's the download links that change after a while. I usually download three movies at the same time instead, that seems to work fine.


Thanks. That marks the site off my lists. Doesn't matter how good a price it is, I have no interest in having to spend hours in front of my pc to only download 3 at a time.

04-17-09  06:58pm - 5728 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I try to review almost every site anymore. Mainly just because it's really not fair to only review good or only review the bad ones. If I don't really feel like doing a full blown review, I still try and do a mini one, just pointing out the best and the worst of the site.

04-17-09  05:57am - 5728 days #13
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Hows it going with the Credit Card company? Just wondering if your having any better luck then I did when my info got stolen? The excuse they gave me was that I authorized that company (Epoch) to take out money for one site, so even though I didn't authorize the rest of the charges, they said they couldn't do anything.

04-17-09  05:53am - 5728 days #7
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I've thought about giving this site a try but can anybody tell me do they allow download managers? I seem to be finding a few sites latley that won't allow you to que up 5-10 files and theve it for the day.

04-16-09  05:17am - 5729 days #6
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Damn, that sucks. I've had my CC info stolen before but never actually got emails from site saying they charged me. I normally always stay away from sites that don't have CCbill or Epoch but every once in a while I sign up for one. So I'll make sure to stay away from the SOBV billing company.

Good luck on getting it back from your CC company. Hopefully it's alot easier then the problems I had with my bank.

04-09-09  06:12am - 5736 days #4
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
FTV Girls has videos 1440x1080 @ 8000kb/s. However FTV is non hardcore. However most the models are great looking and the HD content looks great.

04-06-09  07:24pm - 5739 days #15
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Nope. Obama was the first to impose conditions on the compensation and management of AIG/Banks and GM/Chrysler. (Ford got no bailout money.)

But that was only after Bush had already given the banks and auto market the bailouts. So in that extent, I can't blame him. Why should the government just keep handing them money without some kind of stipulations? Of course, I'd prefer they didn't give them money period but kinda too late for that.

04-06-09  02:18pm - 5739 days #11
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


But the agenda was not a bailout but to exploit an opportunity to use the crisis to permit the Obama Administration to take over the two industries to further his objectives.

Uh, wasn't the first bailout (AIG/banks & and GM/Ford first time) under Bush?

As for first amendment censorsip stuff, it started a long time ago. And not under Obama. The government has been trying to censor shit (from radio, tv to print media) for a long time. This isn't anything new.

04-06-09  07:51am - 5739 days #7
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Given that the Obama Administration has already taken over the auto and banking industries without any uproar, it's no stretch at all to see them take over everything else.

There's a big difference between the two though. The American people are pissed to see people like AIG get a bailout and blow the money or for GM to get bailout money and then need more months later.

And I think most people in America didn't want either bailouts. And there was quite a bit of uproar about it. But now that you've already given them the bailout, I think most taxpayers would rather the government take it over then for them to need another bailout months later.

04-06-09  04:40am - 5739 days #4
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


But the PATRIOT Act was passed pretty easily, and it took a while for the uproar to build, what little uproar there was. If they can give it a catchy name and spin it as legislation that is somehow necessary for our "security" (isn't that what lawmakers use for everything now?) I would not be too surprised if it was passed.

I think the only advantage the Patriot Act had was that it was pretty close after 9/11 and the American people thought it was needed. However I really don't see how they can try and tell us they need to be able to turn off the internet for security reasons. I think even they would understand it'd be easier just to turn off/unhook the government computers.

04-03-09  10:33pm - 5741 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Why not? They censor everything else. Why not the internet now? It's kinda impossible for him to turn off the internet, since it's not exactly a US thing. I guess he could turn off all the Americans access to it. I thought the democrats where suppose to be the liberal ones?

Just another 1 of the million examples of ways our government seems to think they need to babysit us. Even though the government was never made to do it that way. But it's kinda late now. We have already let them get away with so much, that it's kinda like that little snowball rolling down the hill. Right now it's the size of a huge boulder and almost impossible to stop.

I realize we got alot of dumb people in America but I'd really be surprised if that gets passed without some kind of huge uproar.

04-03-09  03:56am - 5742 days #3
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I can kinda agree with both sides. To me, I guess it really comes down to where were they panning on screening it? And how where they gonna make sure minors don't get involved? If it was at a adult store, I could understand that alot more then them just renting out a theater or something.

On the other hand, what's really the point of showing it in public? The whole point of porn is to get turned on and then either have sex or get off. I mean nobody watches porn for the plot things. So wouldn't that make more sense to actually watch porn in private? That is unless they are wanting to try and turn it into something else.

03-25-09  12:48pm - 5751 days #32
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
My 2 cents:
I'd recommend getting a internal drive and buying a external enclosure. For a few reasons really. If you buy a manufactured external drive and something ever goes wrong, you'll have to send it back into the manufacture. Even if it's something simple like a cable coming lose or what not. Otherwise if you open it up, you could void the warrenty. Where as if you buy a internal and external closure (same thing as a manufactured external HD) if something happens you can always open up the enclosure your self to make sure it's not something simple like a cable being unplugged. Or if you ever decide you wanna put it in your PC, you can do that easily also.

Anyway, just my 2 cents.

03-25-09  12:43pm - 5751 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I would try to email or call CCBill. Tell them your story and what happened. I'd think they would atleast look into it. Especially if you've subscribed to plenty of sites through CCBill before with no problems.

If CCBill doesn't help, I guess you could always try and dispute it with your credit card company. You could tell them the same thing above. It might help, don't know.

03-25-09  12:38pm - 5751 days #4
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Rick:


Been wondering how we can provide useful information about pay-site searches and it spawned these questions...

1. When at a pay-site that has a content search feature of some kind, what do you search for?
2. How do you prefer the results organized?
3. Would you like to see us provide more detailed info about a pay-site's search feature?
4. If so, what would you want to know?

Thanks for your input!!

1) It depends on how much detail it goes into but normally if I search for something, it's normally clothing style, boob size and/or labia size (if site has it). When I first join a site, I normally use the above just to check out what they have. Normally after that, I really don't use the search feature much.
2)Most sites seem to just show a preview thumbnail of the gallery/model and that seems to work pretty good.
3)I would like to see atleast just a brief rundown of what search options it has, if any. Is it just model name? Or does it have a ton of options? Example, clothing style, brest size, content involved in shoot (g/g, b/g, solo), etc.

03-13-09  06:23pm - 5763 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I use my tv some but not alot. When I do use it, 90% of the time I'm using the PS3 and streaming the videos across my network. Every once in a while if the PS3 finds a video it doesn't like, then I'll use the 360.

The PS3 works great with the remote. It plays most files and of course you've got the added Blu Ray and the ability to play PS3 games. So to me it's more then pays for it's self. And it's the only media server I ever plan on having.

03-11-09  07:28am - 5765 days #16
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Using Thunderbird and Verizon service, I get maybe 3-5 junk email a day if that. The rest, if I have any, go to my junk folder which I can only view through a internet browser. A very few of those will have my full name. Most of mine are for prescriptions more then porn.

The only big problem I had, was after subscribing to Playboy Magazine, they sold my info. As just shortly later, I got snail mail spam from Adam & Eve DVD's and 3x now I've gotten crap for buy this amount of movies, you'll get x amount free from some company I've never heard of.

02-26-09  08:58am - 5778 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
To be honest, I've never really been worried about them not cancelling. Granted I almost exclusively use CCBill. I also use Discover Card and their Secure Account Numbers. Which means I can create a new virtual CC number anytime I want. It is linked to my actual CC account but the billing companies get nothing but the virtual information. The advantage to that is I create a new one for each site I join, so if something happens I'll know exactly what site is still billing me. Then all I have to do is dispute the charge and tell Discover to cancel that virtual number. Makes it alot easier then having a company that just keeps charging you to the point of you having to completely cancel the card to get away from them.

02-25-09  07:13am - 5779 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I think Twistys has alot of fake brests. Tattoo's I can live with, as it seems almost all chicks are into the tramp stamp crap. I think one of the best for real breasts is FTV. I'm gonna guess their ratio is close to 80:20 real.

02-06-09  04:14pm - 5798 days #4
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
It could be scanning for virus's. My Firefox does that if I right click and save. Normally it doesn't take very long at all but some bigger files can take alot longer.

02-04-09  05:48am - 5800 days #11
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I don't really mind the talking as long as it's a interview style video and as long as you don't see any part of the cameraman, rather that be hands, feet, arms, anything.

But nothing pisses me off then something like JD mentioned, where it's a actual masturbation video and the cameraman feels up her tits or ass. Or sits there and talks to her about stupid shit for half the movie.

01-30-09  02:43pm - 5805 days #8
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I never have been into a actual adult book or video store. Been in a few of the smaller ones that are more the lingerie style shops. We have two pretty decent sized ones around here. However one of them has been hounded non stop by the religious people from that town. They even go as far as to photograph your license plate and post it on the web. And if your a trucker they will send it to the company you work for. Somehow the place is still in business. I don't think it'd be worth the hassle to go there.

01-30-09  02:39pm - 5805 days #31
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I'm still in the minors compared to most of you.

My main HD is 100gb but that's mainly windows essentials and itunes music. My 2nd drive is 500gb which is mainly for porn or anything else I wanna keep. And then I back it up about once a week with a external 500Ggb HD.

My 2nd drive used to be just a small 40gb and I used it for probably 3-4 years. Not sure how I ever handled that, as since getting the 500gb I've went on a downloading frenzy and have it almost halfway full now.

01-26-09  04:06pm - 5809 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I guess my question is, just how much are they actually making off the sites? I'm guessing they are making enough money, that if you reduce their members by 25% that they will still come out on top. When they actually start to lose on their bottom dollar, then I think you might start seeing some deals.

01-08-09  07:36am - 5827 days #8
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I'm guessing here in about 20 years nobody where know how to speak anymore. It'll all be done over the interent. lol

I don't think anything like this would have anything to do with a PS3 or 360. Since it'd have to be considered a game, which then the ESRB would rate. The only AO rated game to ever actually hit a console was Grand Theft Auto San Andreas. But even that was originally rated a M when released but due to a nudity controversy it got changed to AO.

I don't think were ever see a AO rated title on a PS3 or 360. Think it'll only be PC.

01-06-09  12:19pm - 5829 days Original Post - #1
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA


A webmaster on a sites forum got me thinking, when is a image too big? For example images from like Penthouse or Ron Harris are normally 3000 or 4000 pixels. On a portrait image, that means looking at it 100%, most people will have to scroll left or right to see the image.

The reason I like them that big is for the landscape photos, because my screen is 1440x900, so I can easily downscale a 3000 or 4000px image to fit nicely as desktop wallpaper or PS3 or 360 etc. However if the image is smaller then that, then there isn't any good way without upscaling and distorting the image to make it atleast 1440 wide.

So I was just wondering everyone else's thought on that. Do most people on here actually care how big the images are?

01-05-09  06:13am - 5830 days #5
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by atrapat:


It might be legit but it's way too cumbersome: you not only have to sign up through their referral links but also have to manually claim the points by providing the email and subscription id you used to purchase the subscription.

Beware that, at ccbill, those two pieces of information are enough to access your subscription info; not only you are disclosing your user name and password but also the postal address of your credit card.

What's more, it looks like you cannot get instant access to the site when you want to spend the points: you have to make a request and they sign up on your behalf.

I'm with badandy400 here: at PU, we often get instant discounts and you also have the raffle. I'd rather stick with PU; is much more fun and less of a hassle.

That's why when you claim points it tells you to remove all personal information. Every time I claim points I remove username/password. I believe I normally leave the subscription id in but without a username or email, they woudln't be able to access you account at CC Bill.

I haven't gotten enough points yet to spend them on any site, so I can't comment on how well that works.

I normally go with PU if they have discounts but I've found for the sites I'm interested in, they normally don't have discounts. So if it's the same price at both, I'll go PCC.

01-03-09  10:50am - 5832 days #3
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I agree, I've had the same problem with the Playboy Girls of sites. PU has them all listed seperate but they are actually all 1 subscription. It'd be nice if there was someway on the main page to know that a membership to this site also includes these other sites. I realize they have company sites at the very bottom but not always are all of those included in that one membership.

01-02-09  06:23am - 5833 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I've used it for a couple sites. Don't currently have enough for a free membership yet but so far seems legit. I actually first saw it in a email sent by the website Only Tease, so I'm pretty sure it's legit.

All it does is they get some form of referal when you click the link and their page. So if you try to get a better deal and use a different sign up, you then can't get the points. The prices there are default prices, so you can find better deals other places.

01-01-09  12:17pm - 5834 days #99
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Mine is Steve Mason, rookie goaltender for the Columbus Blue Jackets.

01-01-09  09:22am - 5834 days #6
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I use Firefox. I love the add ons, like build in download manager DownThemAll. Or the way you can change the look of it with a theme. I a *huge* multi tasker so I love the tabs option. For example when I'm surving a gallery, I'll right click and open the image in a new tab. That way I don't have to look at a image and click the back button and then repeat for every image.

I know IE now has tabs but I'm too used to Firefox now. As for image size, I never have noticed a problem with FF.

12-31-08  07:14am - 5835 days #17
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
IF it's a solo or POV style movie, then I like the eye contact with some talking dirty or somthing.

If it's a hardcore video where they've already shown all of guy away from the camera, then I think looking into the camera is useless. As that point and time, it's no longer POV and the viewer isn't part of the action. He's now just watching.

12-26-08  08:06pm - 5839 days #10
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
If they really want to do this, why not do like the US with the patriot act? Rather then block sites, because as the article points out 1 to 8 percent are blocked wrongly, why not just record when someone visits one of those sites or searches for some keyword? Hell the US government records us when we say 1 of 100 keywords, so why not make the internet the same way? That way your not blocking any legit sites, your only punishing those that are seraching for the illegal stuff.

12-26-08  07:58pm - 5839 days #5
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
The Good:
I'd have to say Teen Dreams & Twistys. Both have forums in which the webmasters reply to.

The Bad:
The only one I really got in the CC processing company Epoch. I had my CC info stolen after signing up to a site with them. Epoch made 3 other unauthorized charges. Needless to say I never did get my money back. My bank said they couldn't do anything about it because I authorized them to take money out, even if it was only for the 1st charge.Epoch wouldn't do anything about it because I needed 2 pieces of information and of course I had no email or subscription id or anything. All I had was the CC number.

I've since changed banks and now if a site uses Epoch only, I don't sign up for it.

12-25-08  12:59pm - 5841 days #5
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Twistys - Very easy to use member forum in which the webmaster responds pretty quickly.

Teen Dreams - Another very easy to use member forum in which the webmaster answers quickly.

Any of the Playboy sites - Mainly love how easy it is to add, remove or cancel the sites.

12-25-08  12:56pm - 5841 days #3
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:

The most accurate filters slowed browsing speeds up to 86 percent.

I think that's the most telling fact form the whole article. If it stays that way, it won't last long. You can't expect people to go from DSL back to dialup speeds.

While I'm not for censorship, I'm kinda torn due to the fact that what they want to block is illegal. I mean if you really think about it, it's no different then the FCC here in the US. With their rules on what you can/can't say/show on radio/tv.

12-23-08  12:33pm - 5843 days #16
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Toadsith got me thinking about something. I myself prefer around 75 photos per set and really don't care to see ones where they look identical except for some small difference. I would say no matter who many you have, allow the users the option for all thumbnails on one page.

I know dial up'ers may not like it but nothing pisses me off more then sites like Teen Dreams or ALS Scans, where they have 100-200+ photos per set but only 10-20 thumbnails per page. As then you have to go through 10+ pages of thumbnails.

12-23-08  07:18am - 5843 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I think it all comes down to what you think your needs are. I got layed off about a month ago, so I've drastically cut down on my monthly porn spending. What at one point and time was around $60 a month, is now down in about the $20-$25 range. And I may have to drop even less.

However I'd also like to add that just because PU has alot of new signups, doesn't really mean the market is still strong. I signed up in November and post alot of reviews but I wasn't currently signed up for all of those sites when I posted them. I also think now that money is getting tight, people are doing alot more informative research on what sites deserve their hard earned money.

12-22-08  09:39pm - 5843 days #10
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
My thoughts:

Don't downsize the photos. If they are 4000x2500 pixels, straight from camera, use them that size. Or do what alot of places do add a normal res (downsized) and a hi res (straight from camera).

I'd say update atleast 3 times a week.

And also have to agree on the adding vids part. Even if it's nothing more then interviews/behind the scenes of photo shoots to start with. Of course no DRM. And videos will also need to be good quality and preferably, 2 quality's. One HD and one lower quality for lower PC's.

As for add's. I have no problem with them, as long as they aren't huge flashing banners. Or do what some sites do and make them a whole separate section by themselves. Maybe like a friends of page or something.

Price: I'd say anywhere between $9.95-$14.95. And maybe to get customers, since you are a new site, have a good week long trial or something.

12-18-08  09:39am - 5848 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I'll admit I'm in the US but I'd be guessing it has more to do with the exchange rate, then regeonial pricing. I mean it only makes sense to me, that if I'm buying something that is charged 29.95 euros that I'd be charged whatever the exchange rate is to equal 29.95 in euros. For example Club Seventeen is 29.95 Euros but they charge $43.77. According to Yahoo finance, that's only about a dollar more then what the conversion rate is.

A non adult site that does that is Rapidshare. They charge in Euro and never gave me a actual $ price but there are plenty of resources to find a pretty close conversion amount.

However I do think that all sites, adult or non, should list the price in you currency before they are allowed to charge you. Like Club Seventeen, lists both Euros and Dollars. I realize conversion rate changes but it shouldn't be that hard to get a price within +-5 dollars.

12-17-08  02:35pm - 5849 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
After taking a look at the site, not really sure I'm fond of hardcore in public places. But there are many US sites that have public flashing and/or girl/girl making out stuff.

As for children in cars or people in cars driving buy, people don't pay attention to what the hell is going on on the road. Like they are really gonna pay that much attention to see some lady flashing or having sex on the side of the road? I think you could put a huge sign that reads Naked Lady with a arrow and most drivers would still miss it. Edited on Dec 18, 2008, 07:19am

12-16-08  07:48pm - 5849 days #14
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I agree with jd, I'd tray uninstalling and reinstalling first. If that doesn't work you can also go to http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Support+Website+Forums and ask the question there.

I also found this from that site http://kb.mozillazine.org/Error_loading_websites You can check it out, maybe that'll help. It seems to kinda describe the same problem you are having.

12-15-08  08:24pm - 5850 days #7
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I just came across a site that forbids the use of download managers and was wondering if the built-in download managers in the various browsers are included. They were also mentioning that queuing is not allowed, but I do that all the time with Firefox and no site has ever complained.

Are they talking about applications that "harvest" everything in site? As to "DownThemAll," I got that plug-in some time ago but never knew how to use it so I un-installed. I would like to know the procedure. How is it normally used in sites that permit it?

I'm embarrassed about admitting ignorance when it comes to download managers but to me it's always been enough to right click, "save as ..," repeat on the next link etc., while Firefox did the rest.

I also use DownThemAll with Firefox. I've only came across one site, Teen Dreams, that it didn't work with. Even with that it worked fine for saving video, just not photos. Something to do with the extra security they had.

What I like the most about DownThemAll is that I can save the fist photo/video as whatever I want to call it with *num* behind it and then I can just right click on the photo and I can save it using the option of dTa One Click. It will then save the next photo in same spot, with the same name, just one number higher then the previous photo.

Only problem is, I have yet to find a way to restart each set at 1. So the number behind the first photo in the set will probably be something random like 452. But it makes for a easy way to save photos then going save as and renaming it each time.

I've never been one to download full sets, I only keep the images I like. So DownThemAll works great for me.

11-28-08  06:17am - 5868 days #2
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I've guess I've never had that problem. I always keep the emails they send, so I normally use email and subscription ID to cancel. As for Epoch, I won't ever use them again. Got my credit card numbers stolen after signing up for a site with them and of course since I didn't have 2 pieces of information (email, credit card or subscription id) I couldn't cancel and they weren't willing to help. And my bank wouldn't refund it because I authorized the first charge. But that's another story and I've since changed banks.

So if a site doesn't use CCBill, I won't sign up for them.

11-13-08  06:17pm - 5883 days #5
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
I'm not as organized as everyone else. :) I have it listed by site name, then directory label with the model name. Whatever the site has her listed as. If I know her from another site under a different name, then I'll put that name in ( ). Inside that folder I normally save the pictures as Model Name and then ether set number/date/name with a progressive number behind it created by my download manager DownThemAll.

Some sites like Playboy you can only download the higher res pics in zips, there is no way to view them on the site. So instead of going through 25+ pics and renaming, I just put them in a sub directory labeled as set name/date/number or whatever it's listed as on the site.

11-13-08  03:52pm - 5883 days #13
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


AH yes,Download Resuming is definitely very important - I forgot to mention that. Even with just one connection per IP, we should be able to pause and resume our downloads at our leisure.


I agree. In todays day and age, with the size of the files, the least a site could do is allow resuming. Especially if they are gonna put a connection or download limit on you.

11-12-08  12:28pm - 5884 days #4
Jeffrey99 (0)
Active User



Posts: 106
Registered: Nov 04, '08
Location: Good Ole Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I guess I should specify when I say limit sorry about that, the site only ( according to their support ) allows three connection, but I can only get one at a time.

Now I gotcha. I do agree I also hate that. I've only been to a couple sites that had that. Anymore I don't pay much attention, as normally going 1 at a time gets it done alot faster for me anyway.

51-100 of 106 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.