|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
sitsat (0)
|
| 1-4 of 4 Posts | Page 1 |
| 12-07-08 03:42am - 5859 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
sitsat (0)
Active User Posts: 4 Registered: Nov 28, '08 |
I was just checking out a few websites from www.eurobabeindex.com to find some with my favourite models, and I came across this nice solo site: www.analtoygirls.com It's brand new and original, and had loads of trailers featuring some incredible European models doing their thing. I'm thinking "great" and I download about 20 trailers to see what the content's like. Then I started watching them... Well, the action certainly looks good... other than the fact that in EVERY scene the stupid dorky cameraman has to put his hands all over the girl's ass to 'help' her out. Why?! Why do they have to do things like this? It totally kills every single scene. People in the industry make out that it's hard work doing what they do, and we, the paying viewers, don't understand what it's like. Well, if they're so professional, why can't they figure out something as simple as this - if a guy puts his grubby hands all over a stunning model while we are fantasizing about her during a solo shoot, it ruins the fantasy! If the girls are going to need help during their scenes, at least have a female help her out. Sorry for my rant, but it winds me up. Suffice to say that is one site I won't be joining. | |
|
||
| 12-05-08 03:46am - 5861 days | #14 | |
|
sitsat (0)
Active User Posts: 4 Registered: Nov 28, '08 |
Okay, for this post I'm gonna focus on my favourite niche (lesbians), and my perfect but possible criteria. This list is also in order of importance. 1. The models are HOT (I'm talking Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Andie Valentino hot), but they are also fresh and new. Most of them are aged 18-21, but there are some aged up to 40 (and still as hot as Monica Bellucci). 2. The action is hotter than anything I've seen or possibly even imagined. The girls must look like they actually *want* to screw each other as much as I want to screw them. They must kiss with the passion in kissmegirl. They must embrace like want to be one whole person. They must lick and suck and trib and grind as if it was their last day on Earth and they're a lesbian virgin who's just met a woman beyond their wildest fantasies. 3. The videos must be fully downloadable in a variety of resolutions and clip sizes, from 30sec to a 20+ minute scene. But you can also edit to choose where the scene begins and ends (because some people don't want the foreplay, etc). 4. No males on set. Period. If someone's gonna interview the girls, it must be a hot girl. If someone's gonna walk on set, it must be a hot girl. If a cameraperson accidently shoots herself in a mirror, it must be a hot girl behind the lens. No dickheads to be found, thanx. 5. Natural is good. No fake tits. No tatoos. No fake tans or bleach-blonde hair. Very little make-up. Having curves and a waist is okay! (Models must still be pretty though) 6. Navigation. I want an A-Z model directory with a portrait of each model (with a brief bio when I click on her). I want a scene directory based on content/niche. I want to be able to search by user ratings (overall, niche, and model rating), or perhaps even a webmaster's recommendation. They could even have a few trailers like FTV girls and list the 30+ girls who appeared in each one. 7. Organisation. When I click on a model's portrait it opens up on her page. One quarter of it will have her name, age, height, nationality, female celebrity she'd most like to have sex with, favourite position/niche, and perhaps a 30-sec interview video clip. Another quarter will have links to stuff related to the model (e.g. similar models, personal items for sale, etc). The other half of the page will be her scenes, which each open up to its video clips/pics page when clicked on. 8. A wide variety of content. Just because the site is devoted to lesbians doesn't mean it can't be more imaginative to other niches - sometimes more is more. I want sloppy kissing scenes, shower scenes, intimate bedroom scenes (perhaps even when one of the girls is asleep), 69-sex, tribbing, face-sitting, massaging, full body licking, female ejaculation, pissing, sex with both girls covered from head-to-toe in liquid chocolate or syrup (ala messyfun), hot sweaty sex after the girls have just done a workout, oily sex, dirty dancing, even a one-off 30-woman orgy wouldn't go amiss. Obviously, not everyone likes everything, but people are going to pick and choose their favourite scenes anyway. Some scenes might even have a simple storyline (that requires only basic acting), like a single mother seducing her non-lesbian babysitter (or even raping her until the other girl starts to enjoy it). There could be bondage where two girls are mummified or wrapped together in cling film... I could go on all night with this (I've come up with more in 5 mins than most producers will ever do though). 9. I'd like a little shop on the site - DVDs, customisable or not. Autographed pictures or used items from the models. 10. Price should never be more than $20/month. 11. A well-organised forum where the webmasters listen to their customers, and you can post messages to the models (who might be exclusive to the site). This would include polls (for member-requested scenes and actresses). It would actually take a lot less than the above to score 100 from me, since nobody will ever come close to getting everything right. The most important thing in lesbian porn for me is seeing hot girls (who I couldn't dream of getting) absolutely snogging the faces off each other with real passion... as if they were (shock, horror) *real* lesbians. If one site could get just that right (with enough decent quality vids), I'd give them 100. It will never happen tho... | |
|
||
| 12-05-08 12:47am - 5861 days | #33 | |
|
sitsat (0)
Active User Posts: 4 Registered: Nov 28, '08 |
While I agree that scores will always be subjective, I really think people should try and stick to the guidelines for ratings, just so they are balanced. Let's say, for example, that I'm using my own rating system and decide that 70 is a high score, whereas other users decide that 85 is a good score, consider the following: -If I rate a site that has only two other reviews averaging 85 each, then I will bring the overall score down to around 75, which may be perceived by others as a 'mediocre' or perhaps 'poor' average user rating, even though none of the reviewers thought so. -However, if fourteen others had reviewed the site and their average was 85, my score would bring the overall down to 84 (no real difference). -Even if I thought the site was very good and gave it a score of 80, it would still have a negative impact on the overall score due to my personal scoring system. Hence, even though I might have enjoyed the site more than the average viewer, it would have been better for the site if I had not reviewed it at all. The point I'm making is that if our scores are all over the place due to us using different systems, visitors to this site aren't going to get good feedback from us (and this will particularly affect the smaller sites with only a few user reviews). On this basis, I use only two criteria when giving a score 1. How much did I like the site (including value for money). 2. How much do I think others will like the site (or how much would I recommend this site to others). For this I stick to the recommended rating guidelines to keep it balanced with other Porn Users. Just as an example, I recently reviewed SapphicErotica and KissMeGirl (two lesbian sites). I gave SE a score of 93 and KMG a score of 90, even though I gained far far more personal pleasure from the latter. However, I'm aware that others who are into lesbian porn might not put as much value on the same things as I do, therefore I gave SE the higher score because overall I would recommend it more to others. Edited on Dec 05, 2008, 12:51am | |
|
||
| 11-28-08 06:08pm - 5868 days | #20 | |
|
sitsat (0)
Active User Posts: 4 Registered: Nov 28, '08 |
Okay, bearing in mind that one man's pain is another man's pleasure in terms of content, I'm gonna mention just one porn niche that is seldom covered at all (I have many many niches, btw :p), and this is WAM (wet and messy porn). I should mention that I only like this niche when it's lesbians or solo girls getting absolutely covered in cream, oil, syrup, or whatever else... (no guys allowed!) Anyway, there are very few WAM sites out there, and most of them are of incredibly low quality - featuring unattractive girls doing basic, silly things that I feel would be more suitable for a clown than a pornstar. However, I believe this one site, Messyfun, is absolutely leagues above anything else I've seen, yet it is rarely covered on review sites (and even this site only scored it as 77.2 :O). Admittedly, the site is a little old and doesn't really get updated much nowadays (I think one of the main directors passed away, and the site never recovered), but the quality of the videos still exceeds anything else I've ever seen in this niche by a long, long way. There are very hot women in some of these vids getting absolutely drenched from head to toe in liquid chocolate and having erotic sex that would rival Sapphic Erotica. Yum! Anyway, it's such a shame that the site hasn't really improved much in the last 5 years or so, and the videos are of quite poor quality by modern standards, but it is still the best site for this niche by far (and I've searched long and hard...). No other sites appear to have any imagination whatsoever. Thus I feel it deserves a much higher rating. Edited on Nov 28, 2008, 06:49pm | |
|
||
| 1-4 of 4 Posts | Page 1 |
|
