|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
TrashMan (0)
|
| 1-12 of 12 Posts | Page 1 |
| 02-16-09 06:57pm - 5787 days | #81 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Bubblegirls - http://www.bubblegirls.com/ | |
|
||
| 02-07-09 03:06am - 5797 days | #10 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Thats exactly what it is...Pink Visual content (with marginally better actress tagging)...except more of it that any DVD site offers to date. VideosZ offers a lot of Pink Visual, but not as much as is available on PluginFeeds. And although it is just reproduced content (which is what Bonus Feeds are most of the time), it at least is content you probably have never enjoyed previously unless you have been a long time member of VideosZ - no other site I know of, especial of the CDGirls type, offers Pink Visual material. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 10:43am - 5798 days | #5 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Not all of its crap. PluginFeeds is superb quality. Yes, I know that download links are not there, but with the right (and free) tools, downloading the streams is a snap. Hell, like I commented on CDGirls, there is text on the CDGirls' page telling members to get a stream downloader to download the PluginFeeds streams. The majority of PluginFeeds material is low quality 320x240 WMV split-scene, however they have been working hard at making their content worthwhile to site owners - they have updated their layout, added HQ images for all sets, re-encoded movies into HD full-movie flash streams, tagged all videos with dates, etc. PlatinumFeeds offers a library of over 5000 DVDs to stream from. Again, all are WMV streams, but with the right tools... Holio is complete crap, not even worth going into. Vivid bonus is just crap, its the same as the website content, which is next to nothing to begin with. Hustler bonus is good, since it is a dupe of the main site content. The content is low quality, but in the form of a free bonus, you can't complain (in the form of a full site, like lfpcontent.com, then there are grounds to complain). There are a lot of them out there. I'd say maybe a third of them are actually worthwhile and are high quality with real updates. A lot of them, by themselves, put many porn sites to shame. Personally, I think PluginFeeds with its network of sites, offers more than a lot of porn sites I know. When I get a chance I'll look around for some bonus feeds and review them. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 10:19am - 5798 days | #3 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
I certainly look at them, but it is dependent on site. On sites like NaughtyAmerica, RealityKings, or VideoBox (or any other major, quality website) I don't even think about looking for bonus material because the content the site provides is so good and updated to the point where bonus material isn't even necessary. However, if bonus material is available it is certainly a plus (I don't consider networked sites "bonus" material, btw). On a lot of other sites that I have looked at the content is either really lacking, really bad or non-existent where you have to ask yourself "where is the beef? maybe in the bonus content?". I certainly don't put much weight in bonus material when rating a site, but if its provided it certainly helps. | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 08:38pm - 5798 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
As stated in the title, not sure how this can be achieved, but a logical request none the less. Would be nice if there was some separate page on here where users could review bonus content that sites offer and have a list of sites that offer access to the content. E.g. PluginFeeds(.)com, Holio(.)net, PlatinumFeeds(.)com to name a few. Some bonus content is clearly better than others, would be nice to get ratings in the system. | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 02:56pm - 5799 days | #3 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Sorry, didnt know there was a thread. I just clicked "Add Thread" without looking. | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 12:09pm - 5799 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Need a page for NetVideoGirls: www.netvideogirls.com They have been around since 2001. There is neither a PornUsers.com or a TheBestPorn.com page for the site. | |
|
||
| 01-20-09 12:50pm - 5815 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
Is TheBestPorn.com successful where the site is able to give away $200 each week? | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 11:59pm - 5831 days | #9 | ||
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
A good idea in essence, but that still doesn't work. Example (following your suggestion): I post a comment on Reality Kings' page saying that "by purchasing membership to Reality Kings you are in fact getting access to CumFiesta, MILF Hunter, Captain Stabbin, 8th Street Latinas, etc. etc. all in one big page blah blah blah" A person then visits Reality Kings' page and sees that comment and says "OK cool, then I don't have to worry about the fact CumFiesta has no ratings because the Reality Kings' review applies here". OK fine. But now look at it in the reverse. What if that same person (who we shall assume is unaware of the affiliation between CumFiesta and Reality Kings) instead visits CumFiesta's page first? They will see no reviews and no comments because the posts were made on the Reality Kings page and there is no information to otherwise indicate to the user that they should be reading the Reality Kings page for this information. And this is where the problem occurs (for both users and reviewers). Users are not clued into the fact that CumFiesta is just website where Reality Kings parks. Reviewers, feeling an obligation to help users, will be inclined to double post and post a review on Reality Kings and CumFiesta. Yes, I see that you can click the RK Netmedia link to get a list of sites, but that still does not tell users "hey, all of these sites are linked into one big site called Reality Kings". Reality Kings is LISTED as a site, but shows nothing to indicate it encompasses all the sites listed below it.
Can you give me another example? I've never joined that network. Edited on Jan 04, 2009, 12:03am | ||
|
|||
| 01-03-09 09:09pm - 5831 days | #7 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
I realize this. JaysPOV has no landing site. You just login to one of the 6 network sites and in the left column you have links to the other 5 network sites' login page. In that event, when you search for one of the network sites, instead of getting back JUST the site itself there should be a message like: "The site you searched for, XXXXXXX.com, is part of a network of sites which are included with membership to this site. Therefore these sites have been included as results as reviews for those sites may apply to the site you are searching for." And then return all of the sites. So searching for JaysPOV would return JaysPOV, RectalDestroyer, etc. etc. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 10:01am - 5832 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
I saw an admin comment (in my profile) on one of my comments, asking me not to cut-n-paste comments on multiple sites in the future. The intent was not to bolster my stats or whatever, the purpose was so people could realize that the sites (where I posted the duped comment) was part of a network of sites which use the same password as the site I posted a review on. If thats hard to understand: I posted a review on JaysPOV, but instead of copying and pasting the review on the other 5 network sites (e.g. CockHungryMoms, RectalDestroyer, etc.) I posted a comment saying that these five sites were part of a network of sites which included JaysPOV and therefore shared the same review as JaysPOV. And the reason I did this was because I saw someone left a comment on one of the network sites review page (TeensHoney) asking if anyone had info on the site when all the info that was needed could be found in the review of JaysPOV. And that brings me to the issue at hand. There are too many sites listed on PornUsers which are part of a network of sites, which share the same password, share the same kind of content, same layout, etc. 1) It is a waste of time to have to write separate reviews for these network sites when the review will be the exact same (since everything about the next site is the same as the previous) and apply to all sites 2) It looks like spam if you copy-n-paste your review to this list of sites. For the sake of users who are looking to invest in new sites, there should be a system which links reviews from network sites as to apply to the network as a whole. For example, when you buy access to "Teens Like It Big" you are actually buying access to the Brazzers network, and thus the reviews of Brazzers applies. If you buy access to CumFiesta you are actually buying access to the Reality Kings network. (In my case) If you buy access to JaysPOV you get access to five other sites that are exactly the same as that site. However on PornUsers there are separate review pages for CumFiesta and Reality Kings, there are separate pages for Teens Like it Big and Brazzers, there are separate pages for JaysPOV and its network of sites, etc. It would be nice if, besides merging the network pages into one page, that if you searched for a networked site you would get the main network page result. E.g. if you searched for "Teens Like It Big" or "Real Wife Stories" you would get back "Brazzers" with a note that the site searched is part of the Brazzers network. I've been to places like that (not for porn, mind you) and it is a pleasure. Obviously MOFOS.com is also a Brazzers owned site, but in this case it would deserve its own page because you dont get that site included with Brazzers. Similarly, while 1By-Day, and DDFCup, and Sweet-Models, etc. are all DDF-owned sites you don't get all those sites with 1 membership; they all require separate accounts. I hope what I said was clear. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 12:51pm - 5834 days | #9 | |
|
TrashMan (0)
Disabled User Posts: 12 Registered: Dec 22, '08 Location: PA |
I used to be a hardcore Internet Explorer user, but my habits forced me over to FireFox. By that I mean that I would routinely visit sites where I would like to open 10-20 tabs at a time (or during IE6 days, 10-20 windows at a time with CTRL-N), and if you never close your browser and keep opening windows Internet Explorer would eventually achieve a ridiculous RAM use (thanks to a RAM leak) and would fail to work at some point, forcing me to kill the process. FireFox does not experience this problem. | |
|
||
| 1-12 of 12 Posts | Page 1 |
|
