|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
uscue (0)
|
| 1-13 of 13 Posts | Page 1 |
| 02-14-10 07:18am - 5425 days | #6 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
I'd be either Voodoo, Preston (Bang Bros) or John E. Depth. Mainly because they seem to get the most action. All three are regular performers for a variety of websites that update weekly, meaning they get a lot of different types of women every couple of days. Add to the websites the studio porn work that they do, and you're talking about a great time as an avatar. I wouldn't want to be a woman.... | |
|
||
| 01-04-10 12:15pm - 5466 days | #11 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
The big reason I like Firefox is because the first time you put in a login and password for any type of site, it asks you if you want it to remember this for future uses and always works afterwards. The only sites I ever have to type in info for now are sites with the pop-up login | |
|
||
| 08-19-09 05:52pm - 5603 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
I forgot how we normally inform of new sites but for the PU staff, two sites that I found today that look interesting to me and of good quality: PinkyXXX.com PinkysNewBooties.com Both are black sites featuring porn star Pinky. The trailers look great, was hoping you guys could scrounge up some facts (billing company mainly) before I joined and gave a review. | |
|
||
| 03-12-09 10:50am - 5764 days | #13 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
I don't get it. I'm an electronics person (not by craft, just by being into videos and movies and such for a long time) and have a great Mac. The videos for Brazzers look fine to me, although sometimes I can see where the quality looks bad (closeups look grainy every once in a while). Now that I think about it as I write, maybe that's the problem everyone's noticing, which I understand. However, I think the quality problems should actually be laid out by people instead of just listing the ratio..that way we can see if the "quality" problems would affect our preferences. Just saying there's no Hi-Def option doesn't mean anything to me when buying because I never download Hi-Def options on any of the sits...I get by on the smaller file sizes that look just fine, just not perfect. But, if you say closeups can be grainy every once in a while on a site, then I understand the gripe better and can make a better decision on if I join. | |
|
||
| 02-13-09 10:27am - 5791 days | #12 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Lesbian/solo/toy scenes don't do anything for me. I like b/g because I can put myself into the mix (in my mind of course) and see how a girl works it in bed. Look at someone like Annie Cruz, Olive O'Lovely, Ricki White or Rachel Starr. What makes them good is the way they work the guy off. They energy they do the guy with is what makes it exciting thinking about if they were doing that to me. In a solo scene, all I'm doing is looking at a naked woman not doing much, which I can get that just off of pictures. No need for videos. Lesbian scenes aren't much better...two girls eat each other, suck tits and maybe use a strap-on/dildo. You can't work it the same way as a guy. With that said, POV is horrible. You can't appreciate the way they perform with POV even though it's what you really would see. | |
|
||
| 12-05-08 08:52am - 5861 days | #36 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Figure I'll add in...nothing too groundbreaking or anything. But here goes: I think - and I try - to follow the guidelines given by PU. If you follow the general guideline (ie. 80-89 enjoyable but could use some improvement...recommended or 100: could do little to improve or 70-79 some things good, some things bad) then the scores should all be pretty close to what they should be. At the same time, it's individual reviews. Just like Roger Ebert and his pal may give a movie two thumbs up while the LA Times rates it as a C-, individual reviews are subject to what the individual person believes makes a good site. A movie I liked (History of Violence) did well with me, but my buddies hated it - we all had what I consider valid reasons for our likes/dislikes. Same thing with sites. I might give VideoBox something in the 90's because for what the site's purpose is, it does a really good job -- never misses an update, lots of updates a day, many types and genres to try to appeal to all, VERY affordable, the most sophisticated download options in the business. Someone else might give it something in the 70's because there's not enough niche videos, quality of some videos isn't that great. In their mind, it greatly detracts from the experience and grade while in mine, video quality is only as good as the original (they're not into making movies, they distribute movies). Important thing is we all read the reviews and make an educated guess on if we would like it based on what people rate it and the reasons. As long as they explain the site in their review, I could care less about the actual number. I've joined sites that on here and TBP had mediocre scores but I loved. Then there's sites like Abby Winters that have high scores across the board but I'm not a fan of because of price - the content is enough to give it a high mark but the overall value is greatly diminished in my eyes because of the pricing structure. I guess my bottom line, use the guideline to create your basis of scoring, but in the end it should be the actual review that matters. | |
|
||
| 11-19-08 01:23pm - 5877 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Anyone ever heard of "Bring Me Your Sister"? Just ran across it for the first time today and curious if anyone's heard anything about it. | |
|
||
| 09-30-08 05:44pm - 5926 days | #11 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
It's the sites themselves, not Epoch. About 99% certain on that based on my previous experiences. Whenever I have trials that don't work right, it's the same problem regardless of what I used as billing. I can say that I prefer Epoch over CCbill because their search actually works. | |
|
||
| 08-03-08 06:43pm - 5984 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Just for plain fun: a company wants you to run a site (either just as the owner/director or also as main talent) and you need to hire the first five girls. Which three do you hire for a scene right away (which means they must be current). For me, in order: 1) Tia Sweets - no one can ride like Tia 2) Kayla Marie - the best looking front/back combo in the biz 3) Annie Cruz - her scenes are always golden 4) Gianna Michaels - no one loves her job as much as she does 5) Flower Tucci - although Annie does too, I would want to be in front of the camera and see what it's like to make her squirt. | |
|
||
| 07-18-08 10:08am - 6001 days | #31 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Cathy at Cathy's Cravings | |
|
||
| 07-16-08 04:31pm - 6002 days | #15 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Epoch has full history of all past and present memberships, when you signed up, when you cancelled, if it cancelled as a trial or as a recurring. I don't know if maybe they used to not do that, but it's been that way for at least the last 12 months when they had the redesign. | |
|
||
| 07-16-08 03:04pm - 6003 days | #13 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
I use epoch and have for years. I've never had a problem with privacy, fraud or rebilling. They make it really simple | |
|
||
| 07-16-08 02:56pm - 6003 days | #42 | |
|
uscue (0)
Active User Posts: 13 Registered: Mar 01, '07 Location: USA |
Lots. I have to list them all before picking a top five to make sure I don't leave any out. In no particular order: Tia Sweets, Olivia O'Lovely, Flower Tucci, Katie Morgan, Luscious Lopez, Sophie Dee, Charlotte Stokely, Gianna Michaels, Cherrie Rose, Samantha Sin, Chyanne Jacobs, Christine Young, Dasani, Fiona Cheeks, Gina Lynn, Isis Love, Jenny Hendrix, Jerzi Lynn, Kayla Marie, Kinzy Jo, Liv Wylder, Paige Turner (Katie Thomas), Ramona Luv, Sara Jay, Tiffany Summers and Violet Blue. Apparantly I'm an ass man. Top 5 Asses: 1. Tia Sweets 2. Olivia O'Lovely 3. Flower Tucci 4. Kayla Marie 5. Charlotte Stokely | |
|
||
| 1-13 of 13 Posts | Page 1 |
|
