All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Yes, great move for them to FINALLY upgrade the image size and resolution. Some of the new shots look great! (Hopefully, Hairy will do this too.)
Unfortunately, the Galleria site is so slow now that it's almost unusable. It takes about 30 seconds to bring up new pages and often times out completely. They need to fix this problem fast!
|
12-29-10 09:38am
|
Reply
52
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
AW webmaster: Depth of field is one issue on AW, and continues to be. But that's not what I was talking about in this thread.
Yes, all other sites I compare to are viewed on the same monitor which is well-calibrated, and 1920x1200 resolution. I am a keen photographer myself, so I'm not talking out of lack of experience or judgement.
I can't point to a specific set, since I'm not a member any more, but if you look at the largest size images and think they resolve detail well for their size, then there isn't much hope. I'm not sure what you mean by "moderate compression", but if they're more compressed than 10 on Photoshop's scale, then that may be contributing to your problems. In addition, a lot of the shoots don't seem to pay attention to where the focus point is; you have the wall behind the model in sharp focus, but the model is not. Also, many shots appear to have slight motion blur due to too low shutter speed, so that may be contributing to the overall lack of resolution and quality too.
Honestly, I'd love to see a big jump up in image quality on AW because I've really liked the type of models used in the past. I'm not mouthing off for no reason. Perhaps you could show your large images to an unbiased professional photographer to get their opinion and advise.
|
12-26-10 01:41pm
|
Comment
53
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
|
12-14-10 10:45am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
54
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
|
11-22-10 06:32pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
55
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestDave's Review
I'd like to point out that although some picture sets have a large size option, the majority do not -- even recent sets. Abby Winters likes to tease you with only making some sets available in a larger size. Also, the pictures are not up to the count-every-pore quality that some sites give.
|
06-18-10 10:15am
|
Comment
56
|
Zemani
(0)
|
|
06-04-10 02:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
57
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
|
06-04-10 10:04am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
58
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Comment
Totally agree about the Sean R review. But I would add that, in my view, he needs to drop the hideous makeup and lipstick in so many shots. It completely spoils it for me when the model looks like a clown! And the clothes? I know some guys like the fantasy outfits, but do we have to have high-heel shoes in EVERY set? I find the clothing so, so corny which also takes me out of the shoot.
|
06-04-10 09:54am
|
Reply
59
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
SueAnn's Reply
Sue-Ann,
Regarding the bank problems, I've been told the same thing by AW before, but Wells Fargo Visa still gets rejected through GMBill. I've given up now, and it NEVER offers CCBill as an alternative.
Regarding the new site with big, high quality pics on every set... it is now mid February and it looks exactly the same to me with just the small pics on most sets. So when exactly will all this change?
|
02-13-10 11:06am
|
Comment
60
|
Need A Pee
(0)
|
|
12-09-09 11:55am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
61
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
11-29-09 03:30pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
62
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
|
11-27-09 04:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
63
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
11-27-09 03:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
64
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks for the quick reply, RagingB !
|
11-27-09 12:33pm
|
Reply
65
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Comment
I have to agree with the various comments here. To add some of my recent thoughts (late 2009):
1. Although there are several new sets each day, most are of the same models who appeared in multiple sets over the last month. The only difference in a model's many sets are the clothes she wears on page 1. The poses, etc, are almost identical, which gets tedious.
2. Quite a few models used to have at least one peeing set, which gives some variety and excitement. But now, ATK keeps the pee sets for its "watersport" section on ATK Galleria, so we almost never see a model's peeing set on the Hairy site. Bring them back!
3. Apart from the hideous tattoos, piercings, bizzare makeup, wrinkled grandmothers... we also have to get high-heel shoes in most shots. It's so corny! Please ATK, give us more natural girls in NORMAL clothing who don't look like circus freaks.
4. And yeah, the image quality is quite good in about half the sets, but it could improve, and much larger size options would at least give us the scope of better detail. Some sets are way over compressed, with detail suffering badly.
Still the best hairy site, but much room for improvement!
|
11-27-09 12:19pm
|
|