Messmer - I see your point about some of the daily free galleries - I think they are trying to play up the day-in-the-life/voyeuristic aspect of the site, which is also a part of it (albeit fairly untypical of my days).
Of about 55 models, each has approx 8 sets - on average, I'd say 2 are very lingerie focused, and another two feature it prominently, by way of getting dressed, waking up etc. And within that, a mix of coy teasing and strips, and more candid trying things on. A similar feel to the videos. (Alas for Cap'n, there aren't really many fully-clothed to stripped sets.)
One thing that stands out for me - although:
- I prefer girls at least mid 20s and there are some younger girls here
- I prefer at some pubic hair and there are quite a few shaved models
- I prefer a little curvy figures and there are some very slim girls
...there is a good mix, and so far as I look through each model's sets, I've found both pics and videos I've enjoyed from every one.
Oh, and the lingerie is all *really* nice. Right, now everyone knows this site really works for me, I'll stop harping on about it for now!
lk2fireone - I was thinking more of the appeal of being the recipient, rather than just subscribing to the site. Aforementioned friction/bending issues notwithstanding - which, admittedly, would certainly dispel the novelty!
This is novel, although I'd be slightly concerned at the potential for injury. I'd be lying if I said the concept doesn't have a certain appeal, though :) The trailer at least is worth a look...
Sounds like you found it much the same as I did! Perhaps something for everyone, but spread a little thinly. As you said, not much in the way of (nice) lingerie there, you know where I'll send you for that ;)
If you need a little inspiration, I found fun videos from the following models with good personalities: Darcy Tyler, Helena Handbasket, Holly West, Robbye Honeck, Kimberly, Liz, Megan
Hmm... that rings a bell, and checking my sources, I think it shares at least one - not sure if it's the only - photographer (Michael White) with Breath Takers. Looking at the two, they seem similar - the scene-setting, nice looking lighting, locations and clothing/lingerie make them both of more interest to me than many other art-nude sites.
Hmm... a quick tally from my admittedly inexpert eye (some are quite convincing!) makes me think probably just under half - 40-45%? - of the models here have fake boobs.
That sounds like a lot - but again, this is a big site, with hundreds of models - so you'll likely find some that you like, and there are some good strips, teasing and lingerie, followed up by showing what's underneath.
If you've joined either of the other two sites mentioned, I'm pretty sure you'll see similar content to here. For me there are just enough natural girls here to warrant a one-off subscription.
Christiaan, many thanks for your reply, much appreciated. PF sounds perhaps a little too foot-fetishy for me... but I do really like the feel of the clips and pics I see there, so will definitely keep you in mind and sign up when I fancy something a bit different!
Quick question for the webmaster or any users... I really like the look of this site, but can't tell from the tour how far it goes? I'm all for nylon-clad legs and feet, but I'd be missing out if the camera doesn't reach a bit higher.
My ideal material in this genre is, after a little teasing girls slipping their hands under the pantyhose and touching themselves, perhaps peeling their nylons off.
Just because I found it doesn't mean I get it... yet
Thanks Khan & staff for adding this... this site seems slightly baffling, which is probably why it appeals to me! It's on my list and will likely join up at some point... meantime I shall keep an eye on whatever it throws up to tempt me. Looks unique, at least :)
Meantime, if any fellow erotica enthusiasts have got there before me, would love to hear more...
You'll see a few girls eg waking up in plainer panties, but generally, the photographer is definitely a lingerie fetishist and almost all models have sets and videos focusing specifically on it! Also plenty of shower scenes, some with wet sheer clingy things :) This site really works for me; I hope it will for you when you get a chance to look at it.
Just discovered this site, from another of my favourite photographers. Am very likely to join, but don't see any recent reviews - does anyone know if it's still updating? And at what image size?
Looking at the list of updates on the site, I might have to revise my opinion and add this site to my list, as I see a couple of sets shot by the legendary (well, in some circles) Roy Stuart...
Actually, would be much obliged if somebody with a membership could let me know how many of his sets there are there?
Your review of All Over 30 was interesting, thanks - and I think I know what you mean by 'mainstream glam' - (actual) pearl necklaces and the like :| Do you think I'd find much else there that I didn't here?
Thanks for the review Capn - this is on my list of sites to try, as I'm generally interested in an angle of some sort, and the office setting is interesting.
The lack of full nude doesn't bother me as much as it does you - if we see the, er, important bits, I find it more exciting to still see some clothes on.
Agree that another set or two would be good... 60s office sounds perfect!
Yes, the tour could be better - I was lucky enough to have the accompanying book, which gave me a better idea of what to expect.
There are quite a few shoots featuring strips and fully clothed models - however, the focus is more on lingerie there are more where they start in lingerie and undress from there.
However, where there are clothes, they are nice, smart, realistic outfits - and to me, the getting dressed scenes more exciting than dressing (I guess you could go through them backwards!)
Most sets go to fully naked, but often in the middle, between trying on lingerie/outfits etc.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-23-1101:30am (Update History) Reason: Added another point for dropping the frame-based navigation, which was a bit awkward and glitchy. Revised navigation is much easier!
Pros:
- Great clothing and strips
- Wonderful lingerie
- Beautiful models with personality - good mix of shapes and types
- Good lighting and sets
- Outdoor shoots are fun and voyeuristic
- Great quality - most videos 1080, most pics up to 4000px
- Interview videos are fun and sexy
- Daily updates
- Consistent quality as the work of just one photographer
- Much sexier than most art-nude material
- Helpful and responsive webmaster/photographer
Cons:
- Navigation enhanced since I reviewed! Now more than enough options for the size of the site
- Would be nice if zips were named uniquely
- I'd be happy to see more late 20s models
- Would like more girls with at least strips/triangles of pubic hair (but there are some!)
- Studio/nude only shots are a little bland to me
- Some interviews in French are missing english subtitles (some have them)
- Update schedule is centred around specific models
Bottom Line:
I've been a collector of erotic photo books for a few years now; I like the tactileness of flicking through them, and there is some good material around that's more evocative than most porn (although porn does have it's own attractions, as I'm discovering online :) ). Such books come in two basic varieties:
- Those depicting the curves of the female form; or naked, shaved (and photoshopped) young girls cavorting on beaches
- Those that are actually arousing
From what I've seen of the well-known art photo sites - Hegre Art, Met Art etc - they fall more into the first camp and so, although featuring very beautiful girls and excellent photography, don't really work for me. This site - at least for me - is different and quite erotic, thanks to a number of things:
- Models - mostly natural girls, 19-28, most in early and mid 20s. Sophisticated French girls, glamorous eastern European models, and quirky girls with eg, tattoos, piercings, mops of curly or dyed hair. The photographer makes the most of them all; I've found sets to interest me for every model I've looked at so far.
- Clothing - the girls look great, comfortable and relaxed in what they are wearing (even if only briefly). And the lingerie... it's expensive, smart, sexy and different... in most cases the kind that girls themselves like and would buy, nothing gaudy or tacky.
- Lighting - the scenes are all well lit - but not harshly so; it looks natural, and the colours aren't oversaturated as we so often see.
- Premise - the shots are centred around various themes, eg: waking up, showering, trying on lingerie, getting dressed - a bit voyeuristic and quite sexy (somehow dressing more so than undressing). The settings are either modern, smart hotel rooms, actual apartments (more voyeurism!), and quite a few outdoor scenes - some quite risqué stuff in Paris.
About 50 or so models, each with, approx 8 photo sets (80 each?) and 6 videos of 5-10 minutes. The videos are worth mentioning - similar in tone to the shoots, and some fun truth-or-strip interviews; for once I don't mind a guy doing the interviewing, maybe his French accent gets the best out of the girls.
It's not all perfect; each model has a couple of fully nude and/or studio shoots - for me these fall into the arty category and don't work as well without the atmosphere of clothing/premise/location. These are spiced up a little, though, with some shibari (Japanese-style rope bondage) and liquid latex (!)
Content is quite soft, maybe too soft for some folk; you will see:
- Pussy close-ups, stroking with fingers, hands slipped into panties and tugged aside
You will not see much (although a little) of:
- Fingers/toys inserted, spread open shots
Also, some minor cons as above; and I find a few glitches - eg thumbnails linking to the wrong sets - but they've been corrected as I've mentioned them on the forum.
But these are minor gripes and not really important. Overall, a really great site that sets the bar for me.
Darn it - this was on my list of must-join sites, but now I'm joining things, it's gone AWOL. Even my mail to the webmaster bounced back. It's a long shot, but if anyone knows anything about this site - or of the material can be found elsewhere - I'd be interested!
This looks interesting... girls in fairy tale costumes and settings. (Not sure what that says about me that it's interesting.) Shame the preview doesn't show us much... but one to keep an eye on.
I'd be interested to see some more samples of this too. I'm keen on smut with an angle to it, and this - admittedly ludicrous and inauthentic :D - alpine setup is definitely an angle. If they were to talk dirty too, I'd be tempted!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of material
- Daily movie and gallery updates
- Reasonably good navigation options
- Most models in 30s & early 40s, which works for me
- Good movie quality; streaming, download options and screen caps
- Some good/protracted strips from casual and business attire
- Would prefer a camerawoman rather than man for the interview/chat movies
Cons:
- Age of models (some under 30) may stretch 'OW' for some
- Slightly retro design (although front end has been updated; am sure member area will follow)
- Very typical lighting/sets/premise for all scenes
- Many models a little too enhanced for my taste, and relatively few unshaved
- Very little girl-girl content
- Could use a few more navigation options
- Older movies are lower quality and split into parts.
- Some daft fake uniforms and hackneyed outfits (newer sets are redressing this, thankfully)
Bottom Line:
Looking for girls up to around my own age (40), it was a choice between this, Anilos and All over 30. They all look similar and suspect they offer similar content; the quality of samples I found on TGPs just tipped the scales in favour of Karups OW. (Interestingly, they include bonus content from, and link some models to, the other two sites.)
There is a lot of material here, it's a bit daunting at first! On top of that, they add a new movie AND a new photo set 6 days a week, so it is growing at a good rate. Navigation is fine; 4 categories of pictures and two of movies - although with the amount of material, we could use more, and/or the ability to sort each list by model name or date added.
Most of the material is soft, with maybe a quarter hardcore; the latter isn't really my thing, but actually the scenes are relatively well-positioned and I enjoyed them. Of the softcore, it's probably about 50/50 between toys and fingers; and there are some good strips and teases before getting to that point. Only a handful of girl-girl shoots and movies; I'd like to see more.
Movies are good quality, sharp and well-lit (even if slightly saturated) - 720p and each page shows a few download options and screen caps of the action, which is useful. This format goes back about a year and a half (a bit less for the screen caps); before that, the movies are mostly SD and many are only available in parts. Image quality is OK; available in 1024px and 1500px which is just about acceptable; I'd prefer 2000px.
I was quite disappointed that so many of the models have fake:
- boobs (I'm no expert but could spot these a mile away)
- tans (and the lighting makes them look even more orange)
- smiles (only the minority of models show their personality and a range of expressions)
Natural is always better in my book, but it seems this is endemic in the milf genre. Similarly, I like a mixture of pubic hair arrangements; shaved, trimmed or natural - although I do prefer the latter and there are very few unshaved girls here. Am hoping it tells them something that the hairiest girl I found is their 4th top model! (Am planning to join We Are Hairy at some point to redress the balance.) OTOH, it's a little churlish to complain, given the quantity of material here.
Overall, nothing groundbreaking here but a good site nonetheless. Although I'm only staying one month, I've definitely got my $30 worth; I will likely join again sometime, but will probably try the other two sites beforehand.
The preview looks good; pretty, natural models, with some smart lingerie, as opposed to the cliched stuff that we see so often. I like also that each model has a rating: Tease/Topless/Full nude/Explicit - looks fun to have a range of styles like that one one site.
Ultimately, I think the model base is too young (and too entirely hairless) for my liking, but it looks like a good format nonetheless.
NB fellow UK folk: this is not what the site name might suggest :D
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated:
01-07-1111:09am (Update History) Reason: Minor score change; think I set the bar a bit high to start with...
Pros:
- Mainly pretty, amateur-looking, natural girls
- Some videos have them chatting, which I like
- Great legwear, Wolford tights etc
- Not just tights as the name suggests, stockings also
Cons:
- Last updates seem to be from 6 weeks ago; update schedule AWOL since 2009; actual update material dated 2008
- Quality is not great; older videos at 480x360, newer 640x480 or 700x400
- Same for photo shoots; some at 1500x1000, others seem to be captures at 640x480 or 960x540
- Some videos have ludicrous music over them
- Some - luckily not many - have the cameraman talking and lending a hand - not really what the material here is about
- Listings are basic - just straight list, with thumbnails, of albums and movies; no sort, filter etc
- Not many unshaved girls, and only a couple of girl-girl videos
Bottom Line:
I've got a much bigger list of cons than pros, and given that, my score might seem a little high. Especially as the site is pretty dated looking - content seems to be from 2000-2008, and has the bare minimum of navigation to get round the 200-odd movies, and similar number of photo sets.
However, I do like the material. The girls are cute, unpretentious, pretty without being too glammed-up. Also a few familiar names there, perhaps from before they were so well-known (eg Sunny Leone, Bree Olsen, Mai Ly).
Videos are almost all solo, some good teasing to start with, and as per the niche, some clothing tends to remain on - with panties pulled aside, or tights pulled down but remaining on while the models masturbate; some with toys, others just with fingers.
Oh, and there is some GREAT legwear. I like tights and stockings, but there are some videos here with some impressively patterned Wolfords etc, which is a big turn-on for me. There are a few nylon sites around, but featuring really sexy tights like these seems fairly rare.
I joined on a 3-day trial - well worth it, but you can likely get all you need within that 3 days.
It also comes with access to Amateur Upskirts - some of the same models, but it's more lollipop/pigtails/barely-legal themed, which isn't really my thing.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.