Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : manholelover (0)  

Feedback:   All (181)  |   Reviews (21)  |   Comments (14)  |   Replies (146)

Other:   Replies Received (62)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 176-181 of 181 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Rating
176
Visit Haze Him

Haze Him
(0)

75.0
No Review.
06-19-11  02:25am

Rating
177
Visit Chaos Men

Chaos Men
(0)

81.0
No Review.
06-19-11  02:24am

Comment
178
Visit Randy Blue

Randy Blue
(0)

Fantastic Site

This site must be one of the best of type. Excellent production values, hot,exclusive guys, live shows with easy member interactivity. The site makes its members feel part of a Randy Blue family. Unfortunately, there isn't that huge a range of guys, so I join occasionally and let my membership lapse. But well worth the money.

06-19-11  01:43am

Replies (0)
Review
179
Visit Gay Public Hardcore

Gay Public Hardcore
(0)

59.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Good concept- either having sex, or getting others to have sex with the guys in public places gonzo style.
Length of uploads good, usually over 20 minutes.
Credible scenarios inviting members to write in and join in the action
Cons: Very few uploads
Not all uploads are of the site's concept i.e only a handful are actually "in public"
The quality of the camera work, direction etc is often quite poor
DRM
Bottom Line: The concept sounded really appealing, two guys going to public places, surprising onlookers and getting them to have sex in public. in reality only a couple of the uploads have delivered this. The majority have been group sex in private places, with no public around. There have been very few uploads, and most new uploads are just the second half of the original video.

In short, this site has been very disappointing. it doesn't really do what it says on the can, and there have been very few uploads, although it is early days.

06-18-11  02:21pm

Replies (0)
Review
180
Visit Bound In Public

Bound In Public
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: High production values
Original take on BDSM fetish sites
Long (over 1 hour) original content updated weekly
Site easy to navigate
mix of BDSM and public humiliation
hotter guys than on regular fetish sites
Cons:
Variations on same concept could become repetative
"interviews" with the guys pre and post scenarios do detract from the fantasy element of the concept
uploads could be split into smaller scenes so you don't have to fast forward through entire video
Bottom Line: This is a high quality site from the Kink franchise, so the production values are, as you would expect, very high.
Basically a guy is humiliated, bound, subject to BDSM in front of groups of other guys in various scenarios e.g bars, shops, toilets etc and the other guys join in. The content is often quite sophisticated.
The downsides are that at the beginning of the scene there's an interview with the guy basically to show us he's consenting to the scenario. For me, this detracts from the fantasy and seems it's been added for "political correctness" - odd in a porn world that is anything but PC. For authenticity, sites like Straight Hell appeal to me more.

However, a great site, if not a little repetative, but well worth the money for a month or two.

06-18-11  01:46pm

Replies (5)
Review
181
Visit Rate These Guys

Rate These Guys
(0)

78.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Original concept - Members comment and rate performances in various categories e.g anal, strip.
Good interactivity - members comment, guys reply
Good video quality and quick to play
Site easy to navigate
Members can nominate challenges for guys
Sort of talent show for porn creates suspense and interest
Exclusive content
Hot, "straight" British guys
Cons: Video clips are very short, longest about 4 minutes
So far, limited selection of guys
Some of the performances shows this might be all a little staged
The concept of ratings and the challenges not yet completely thought through
Irregular uploads
Bottom Line: This is a really great, fresh concept. Guys submit videos of themselves doing things in various categories - stripping, wanking, pissing, showing hole etc and members rate them. The highest scorer wins a cash prize. Members are expected to submit critical comments, the guys respond, and can resubmit to improve their score. They can also do challenges set by the members to win additional cash. The guys are hot, but the videos are very short, and as this is fairly new, there are a limited number of guys.
In short, this has the potential to be a really original site but in it's infancy there isn't that much content. Will probably be better in a month or too.

06-17-11  12:53pm

Replies (3)

Shown : 176-181 of 181 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.32 seconds.