Yep. I always star/flag my active subscriptions in my inbox so I remember to cancel. Cancelling is easy enough, but it's a bit cumbersome with the capcha codes, having to retype bits of the credit card number etc. CCBill really spoils us!
Only just read this, but great news about the regional billing - I don't have as much of a problem with it as some members here (despite being in the UK), but this is a great move.
You're not the first person here to have this problem. I agree that PU shouldn't have anything to do with this site as they've ripped off several members here and would continue to do so if it weren't for warnings like yours. Definitely adding the site to my blacklist.
Black or white I guess, or maybe red. Something classic. A lot depends on the model's skin colour/skin tone where I think paler models look better in black and vice versa.
I'm not fussy at all really. Whether it's the Fame Girls teasing or Tia Ling leaving nothing to the imagination, both can be sexy in their own individual ways.
Haha brilliant, thank you for such a great overview of this site. I'm still laughing at point 8 where you explain the clear, simple, clever cancellation process.
Sounds like the site has been just chucked together with little or no regard for users. The download limit also sounds particularly annoying, and the quality of content doesn't make it sound like all the other problems are even worth the hassle.
I've done this in the past with several sites, and I'll do it again at some point I'm sure, but at the moment I'm trying different sites before settling on 'the one'
Wow, hope you do manage to do a review. Your experience definitely sounds different to other reviewers, so I'd definitely like to read your expanded thoughts and always think it's important things like this are reflected in the site's overall score.
Great review, sir; really good job. Completely agree with everything you've written from my time at Throated which really grew on me the longer I stayed a member and the more I explored the other sites.
I wish you gave more information in your review such as what sizes the images are, what way the adverts were deceiving etc. But thanks for the warning.
Good to know! Riley is bit of a new discovery for me (how I've not seen her before god only knows) - absolutely loved her at first sight, so really happy to hear she features here too. Thanks again!
Great review, and well done on justifying the perfect score. I've definitely added the site to my shortlist now, particularly with you saying that it doesn't centre around anal content - I'm getting pretty sick of everything either being a BJ or anal with nothing in between, so it's refreshing that there's something to cater for my tastes.
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
I think so, yes. When you consider the amount of time given up by webmasters and models, the equipment they need to use (cameras, lighting, computers etc), web hosting, paying for the payment processor etc etc...
I wish when sites become archive sites (eg, Karla Spice) they'd drop the membership fee, though. But generally for active websites, I think $20-30 is very good value.
For me it was a coin toss between 'how they perform' and their 'body shape/size'. I voted for how they perform in the end, though, as I'm more open-minded body-wise as I like slim, nubile models to fuller, curvier (albeit not fat), whereas if they're not very good performers or good in front of the camera, then it's hard to find any enthusiasm for them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Extremely high-quality photography and HD videos
- Already plenty of content despite it being a relatively new site
- Exclusive content and exclusive models
- Regular updates, all dated (3 galleries and at least 1 vid a week)
- All content is downloadable, with ZIPs available for galleries
- Two super, super-sexy models who are both very confident
- No ugly tattoos, fake breasts, lots of piercings etc
- Great quality photography and slickly-edited video
- Lots of variety in terms of shooting locations, gallery themes etc
- Nice, clean (if basic) navigation and previews of future updates
- Well-used comment and gallery/video rating system
- Ability to bookmark your favourite photos/sets
- Both models are outstanding teases without showing too much
- Billing by CCBill with reduced cost rebills
- Simple login with ability to choose own username/password
Cons:
Points marked with * don't bother me personally:
- Search system doesn’t seem to work
- Previews are a bit too vague, particularly for video updates
- Videos are a bit too arty-farty and can be slow-moving
- Daily bonus photos aren’t varied enough
- No interaction with/from the models (eg, blog)
- Currently only two models*
- Some might not be happy Katie/Ella aren’t totally nude*
- Pricey compared to some sites*
Bottom Line:
I nearly didn’t review this as I know a lot of people don’t ‘get’ non-nude sites, but for me a good tease site can definitely hold its own against even a lot of porn sites as for me the thrill of the chase, and the art of tease can be extremely sexy in my opinion.
A quick bit of history first: Famegirls.net replaces Fame-Girls which is now an archive site. Previously there were three models; the famous Sandra, Virginia and Ella. Sandra retired, and recently Virginia also retired. Vlad, Ella’s photographer, decided to start a new site on his own, and introduced Katie, who is new to modelling.
The site is only a few months old, but already it has 36 galleries (5,000 pictures), and 19 videos, and with three galleries (averaging 100-150 photos) and at least one video every week, it’s growing fast.
Both Katie and Ella pose nude, with very little being left to the imagination apart from between the legs. They come very close to showing everything, though, particularly Ella. They are both supreme strip teases, though, and for me, little is sexier than a beautiful girl, slowly, sensually taking her clothes off and having fun as she does.
The galleries are set in number of locations; either in the studio, normally with a plain background and props, or often outside on a deserted road, beautiful meadow or idyllic river. Even on the outside shoots, the image quality and lighting is exceptional.
It’s a lot more sexual than the previous site in terms of poses, the style of photography, the detail and things like the Ella pouring milk over herself in one set, or Katie smothering herself in oil in another – it’s more than just glamour now.
Although sets are generally the same format, each gallery brings something new to the table. There’s always a strong narrative, the costumes vary from bikinis to dresses and everything in between, and both Ella and Katie seem to have a huge variety of poses so it somehow never gets repetitive.
Currently there are 35 galleries and around 4,500 images.
Images are 5760px on their longest side, and have a
translucent simple white logo in the corner. Each gallery is downloadable as a zip file. You can also choose to download the zip file with six different image dimensions from 640px on their longest side all the way up to their original size.
There are also 20 videos available. All are 1280x720, HD, MP4 and are around 5-10 minutes long. They’re beautifully shot, but generally a bit too arty-farty and slow-paced, although there are exceptions (eg, the latest Katie video where she’s in a sauna). At least one video is added every week.
Members can rate and comment on both videos and galleries. These seem like well-used features, and comments aren’t censored or even moderated from what I can tell.
Navigation-wise, you can view Ella’s sets, Katie’s sets, or videos. You can also add sets and photos to your favourites and view just those. There is also a search function, but I’m not sure it actually works – it would be nice if you could search for ‘lingerie’ or ‘bikini’ or some kind of tag, but every search term I tried didn’t return any results. The navigation is fairly simple but definitely fit for purpose.
Another little criticism is the daily bonus photo, which is not included in normal sets, ‘such as pictures from real life, artistic shots, or working moments’ – since I’ve been a member, every day it’s been a picture of Katie from the same shoot, albeit a different picture. It would be nice if these could be more mixed up so one day it might be (for example) Ella at the beach, then Katie on a shoot, then Ella shopping etc... at the moment it’s just like being slowly drip-fed a gallery day-by-day.
At the moment it is only Katie and Ella modelling. I know the webmaster is looking for another model, though. Both Katie and Ella compliment each other with both being extremely svelte, with incredible figures. Ella is blonde, while Katie is raven-haired. Neither have lots of piercings or any tattoos which is good to see. So far, there’s only been one video with the pair in, so fingers crossed for more.
My last criticism, possibly my biggest, is that there’s no interaction from the models in terms of behind the scenes footage or candid photos. I know a lot of people don’t care for this, but on a site like this I think it’s important. I don’t blame them for not getting involved with comments etc, but maybe Vlad (the photographer/webmaster) could consider a blog with more of a behind-the-scenes/off duty look at these gorgeous girls?
This is a great website with great photography and is incredibly sensual. The girls are both gorgeous, Ella is incredibly experienced and Katie is already confident and exciting in front of the camera. At the moment it is on the pricey side, but Vlad has a long history of being extremely reliable with updates, and content is continually being added and I definitely feel like I’ve got value for money compared to a lot of smaller amateur model sites.
Has it always been like this? I seem to remember Foxes was one of the first sites I encountered when I got into porn many, many, MANY years ago - I don't recall ever joining it though, definitely not if it was a PPV site. Surely people must be insane to spent that much on four sets!
For me, it's very important. The latest site I've joined, Miss CJ Miles, doesn't have zips and I don't know where to start in downloading them, particularly as it's not even a case of right-clicking the thumbnail and saving the target file.
Thanks, yeah, I'll probably do that. In the meantime I've joined Miss CJ Miles' site instead. It's pretty average, but she's pretty hot and a new model to me.
Thanks for the reply, I'm using a debit card which I'm not sure if it would be classed as a pre-pay (I'm in the UK...). I've never had this problem before with CCBill or any other site. Thanks for the suggestion though.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
