Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Cathy is an amazing looking MILF (GILF perhaps?) She has a great personality and in case you didn't guess it from the title a love of creampies. Her body seems natural to me with medium-sized tits and an infectious laugh.
- picture sets available as zips. Most shoots have about 50-70 photos
- good fun. Cathy started as a swinger and brings enthusiasm and joy - this is not a job to her 😊
- High quality (4K for recent stuff 1080 for the majority. The older stuff was good for the tech available but today looks dated. Given that they've been online for 17 years they are some of the OGs of pro-am porn sites.)
- Over 800 videos. Updates about 1/week
- guest stars keep things interesting. Both professionals and other amateurs. Many of them are younger which is nice if you're not into the beauty of older women.
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- Good mix of action. Pretty much every guest star does a girl-girl set with Cathy. There are lots of 3-somes (maybe 25% of the content). And a ton of orgies/gangbangs (probably close to 50% of the content)
- Cathy is dirty in the best way possible she loves cum while there's no shortage of creampies she can guzzle cum with the best of them including licking off her female partners.
- Action is quick and to the point, not a lot of plot or why are we here development
- Mobile formatting friendly
- some content swaps (photo only). (see below)
CONS:
- No network - it's just Cathy all the time. Access to others' content is a mix of content swap and some user-generated material. Nothing stood out to me. (the content swaps were similar to Cathy and some were even sites I'd been a member of before)
- other than the above-noted model age (not a bad thing to me but some I know will be critical) and the lesser quality in old material there's little not to like here
Bottom Line:
Gangbang/orgies are tough to film (not that I have experienced - lol). Often times it's hard to get the lighting right and it's hard to get all of the action either you're too zoomed in or too zoomed out.
THAT IS NOT THE CASE HERE. Cathy and Peter do a great job of getting all the action (Seeing AND hearing). I'm a big fan of proper sound so that is very welcome to me. You can tell they are making the porn product they themselves would want to consume.
While neither of them have the "porn star body" they both look like real people and I kinda enjoy that more. They have plenty of talent come in from the porn world - people I've seen before but not big stars. So there's no shortage of beauty on their sets.
Lastly, I joined on a deal and figured I'd scope it out for a week, but I've been really impressed and will probably stick around for a while and add this to my rotation. They do a really good job of date collection every scene can be rated and reviewed I'm guessing they use that information to make better porn down the road.
Ditto to everything Wraith0711 says. NA is a perennial favorite of mine - but I haven't been a member in a few years, probably because of their "premium" policy. I just constantly feel like I'm being nickeled and dimed.
All that said your strong review and reminder of the focus on " betrayal" aka cheating/hotwifing means I'm putting this further up in my consideration list.
I'm no longer a member, but I'll do my best to help. Back when I had my membership I remember it being at the bottom of the page 🤷♂️. But it was several months ago now, so I can't be sure.
I'm on a mac and a lot of times used the app SiteSucker to get my files instead since I could apply organizing filters in conjunction with Hazel.
1st off great review. I’m seriously considering joining even though this is totally not my normal perfected content. To me this is the perfect example of what makes PU so good. The brazzers, wickeds, kinks, and gamma sites are always gonna break through and be noticed. I would have NEVER even seen this site, let alone thought of joining it if it wasn’t for your review (and hard earned reputation). Bravo sir!
I made this a reply to Wrath because I think you raise an excellent point (that maybe should be suggested in the forums?). I see why the staff eliminated the point system (I disagree with it, but I understand it). Having a “sites reviewed” tally noted with your review would be an important bit of context.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Puma is a big (enhanced) breasted MILF (maybe GILF?) from the Sweeden (normally I love accents, but this one doesn't do anything for me - and us guys say women are hard to figure out. Hahaha)
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Sophie Dee, Deauxma, Charlee Chase Maggie Green, Penny Pax, It's Cleo, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Kimberlee, Sarah Jay are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- Good mix of action (heavy on solo content, but plenty of hardcore and group stuff Male and female 3-somes).
- Mobile formatting friendly
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. Older videos have reduced quality
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- 367 videos
- pictures available as zips. About 87,402 pictures (not sets just pix)
- Puma knows how to play to the fans. While she may talk dirtier than she gets - it's plain to see she's been in the business for a while and knows how to make a kick-ass video. I sometimes found her enthusiasm to be bordering on aggressive - but it's a style that clearly works for her.
CONS
- No longer updating. The last update was Jan. 2019
- No longer active in live cams. I'm not sure when she stopped but she hasn't made an appearance in the last couple of weeks at least - probably longer (does anyone know if she's still in the business?)
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
Bottom Line:
CONS CONT:
- limited downloading options (mobile/desktop versions) - no ability to get higher or lower video qualities
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
Bottom Line:
I give this site a skip. There's not enough content and I don't think Puma brings enough originality to warrant a join. If you find the Sweedish accent exotic and sexy I'm sure you'll disagree with me.
Puma covers all the bases. She provides a solid site. But that site hasn't updated in over a year and a half. And she is no longer active on the cam sites that really carry this network. So for all that sticker price you don't even get to interact with her in any meaningful way.
I would have pushed the score down into the low 70s, if it hadn't been for the strength of the network. I'm a MILF guy and I also like ameatures/solo site this network does a good job with all three of those things - so if you like Puma hit up this network and look at the other stuff you get. I think you'll be happier with the other parts of the network over this.
All that said I think Puma is a porn treasure and hope she returns to shooting. Some of the best parts of this site are behind the scenes and interactions with her and other stars. For example, she did a game show (hula hoop contest, strip poker, that sort of thing) series that was really hot and fun.
Please don't ever be concerned about bad blood with this user. I know there's occasional drama here at PU, and I truely regret that. I try to keep this as a place of fun for enthuists. Life is full of enough frustrations we don't need anymore in the porn world 😂.
I appreciate your gentle respectful tone in correcting me. Thank you.
That's a really aggressive update schedule. You've convinced me this is my next purchase. Thanks - I like that they have great models and really good quality video.
I guess I'm getting old - lol. I see they've been around for 4 years. I have sites that have been on my "I gotta get around to joining that" for 6-7 years. Hell in that time some of those even went out of business 😂. I put Leslie Grey on my "reup this site" list back in 2013 - and now it looks like she shut down her site 😢
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sophie is a busty curvy MILF from the UK (I'm not good enough at picking accents to say if it's Welch or English, regardless it's sexy as hell!) I think Sophie is a rare find porn pro MILF who's not afraid to make dirty content (some riming for example)
- Weekly cam show with Maggie. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase Maggie Green, Penny Pax, It's Cleo, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Kimberlee, Sarah Jay are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- Good mix of action (weighted toward solo, but plenty of hardcore and group stuff) For a solo site there was more group action then I was expecting (both all-girl, MMF, and FF+M)
- Mobile formatting friendly
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- Professionalism. Sophie has earned her Porn Star title. So when she does a scene (j.o.e., orgy, blowbang, girl-girl) she brings full energy. Her dirty talk is on point and she is a master of getting her costars to cum hard.
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. Older videos have reduced quality
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- 398 videos
- pictures available as zips. About 38,815 pictures (not sets just pix)
CONS
- No longer updating. Last update was October 2018
- No longer active in live cams. I'm not sure when she stopped but she hasn't made an appearance in the last couple of weeks at least - probably longer (does anyone know if she's still in the business?)
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
Bottom Line:
CONS CONT:
- limited downloading options (mobile/desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago
Bottom Line:
I really struggled with the score for this review. I wanted to put it in the 80s. I think Sophie deserves a high score for her talent and her energy. She has a fun party person aura, she's hot as hell, and did I mention her accent is SEXY!?
Despite all these positives, there's no getting around the fact that there is not not enough content to rate a higher score. The fact that this seems to be a zombie site only cements the fact that this is a cautionary buy.
If you've seen Sophie Dee in other things and like her this site will not disappoint you. It's worth a month's membership for sure. If you're a general porn enthusiast I think you should skip this one. If you join the network, this is a great spot to wet your whistle.
If Sophie Dee went into retirement I hope she's enjoying it. I've always been a fan of hers's so this site left me with no regrets.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Maggie is a (naturally?) big breasted "curvy" woman. She is a classic beauty and looks like a real woman. On top of that, she's got some acting chops and can do fun role plays and not look like she's reading from cue cards.
- Weekly cam show with Maggie. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Kimberlee, Sophie Dee (love her!) are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- Good mix of action (weighted toward solo, but plenty of hardcore and group stuff)
- good role-play (light dom, joi, "family play" (not for me but I see it everywhere these days), nympho, workplace, interracial, etc.)
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
- updated looks Maggie often changes her hairstyle/color. She not afraid to experiment
Cons:
Pros CONT:
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- as of July 22, 2020, 591 videos
- pictures available as zips as of July 22, 2020, about 45,000 pictures (not sets just pix)
CONS:
- I appreciate that Maggie does not look like she's been to a plastic surgeon a million times - but I know some guys want to see the "porn star look". She is also in the MILF age and I know some guys won't like that she's not the 98-pound girl they see in other videos. I actually think these are positives but know some would disagree
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile/desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago
Bottom Line:
I really enjoyed Maggie's site. I think the combination of her "girl next store" look and her ability to act (plus get wild when the action starts) makes her an amazing find. To me, I don't think I'll stick around for a real long term commitment only because she seems to keep going back to the same creative plots (if you're good at it and it sells good on ya!).
I like that weekly cam shows are available - but I can never seem to get my schedule to work to make it into them. I bet she would be really good in a chat session, but I can't speak with 1st hand knowledge.
The main page interfaces with her twitter account so you can always see what's new in the world of Maggie Green
All in all, I give the site a solid recommendation, with the caveat that you like curvy MILF women. For a solo site, it covers all the bases and keeps fans satisfied
Ugh thanks tangub. I didn't realize I was just in the "channel" and not on a kink.com site. So that was a content share not a full site. I've asked PU to delete the review.
I have to hand it to kink.com they are adaptable. During quarantine, they're continuing to be an industry leader. In addition to doing what most sites are doing (adding content swaps and remastering old content) - kink launched a new site: Kinky Bites
I'm rather enjoying it (while they can be very hit or miss) there's enough good here for me to add it to a favorite site. The basic idea is simple they hire a model to shoot from her own home on a theme (JOI, Cucking, Ass worships, etc). Most of the content is solo model but there have been a couple of couples that they've managed.
It's not the production value that we typically see from kink - but it's something new and on brand. While I'm eager to see regular production resume - it's good to see they're keeping the creative juices flowing.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kimber is a good looking young lady. Large natural breasts. Focus is on solo shooting
- Weekly cam show with Kimber. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- 43 site network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network.
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
Cons:
Cons:
- performances are underwhelming.
- About 271 video
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line:
Seemed to have everything right. Hot girl, fun flirty personality, decent camera work. Despite all those pluses, I found Kimber Lee to be flat and without personality. It seems like she's taking suggestions for content - but doesn't really get into them so the performances come off as wooden and fake. In short, it doesn't seem like she likes what she does.
The 1st time I logged in I downloaded a bunch of videos without doing much of a preview. I thought I was set cause she looked so perfect. I probably downloaded 30 files, but then when I started reviewing them for filing I found they were mostly underwhelming. There just isn't anything remarkable. If you like watching a pretty girl masturbate or screw you'll proably be fine. But if you want role-play/plot/set-ups/kinky or spontaneous there's little of that here.
As you might guess. I give this site a skip. Even if you go in for the network - I don't think there are too many gems in this one.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sara Jay has been described as being a "butter face" performer (beautiful "but for her face"). I think that criticism is harsh. While she has had plastic surgery to be overly enhanced I think she retains her "real girl" beauty. I sometimes think her hair could be done in a more flattering way - but that's a small complaint.
- Weekly cam show with Sara. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- High energy; Sara dives into her scenes making them fun and nasty. Gentle love-making is not her specialty.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
Cons:
Pros CONT:
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- as of July 7, 2020 687 videos
- pictures available as zips
CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
Bottom Line:
I've come to really like Sara as a performer. She brings personality and passion to her work. She seems to be a porn performer who loves sex and is having fun with her work. I always find that endearing.
for a solo performer, she mixes in a lot of different genres and works with many different male and female co-stars. She seems to lean toward interracial content - so those of you interested in that might find this to be a plus.
All in all, this is a solid site. I would give it a "buy". She doesn't blow my doors off and make me think that I'll be a long term member (for me long term is a year or more). But I'm very satisfied and not leaving after the 1st month either.
I haven't caught one of her cam shows yet (I'm really trying to figure out a time to do that!) My guess is that she would be amazing at that instant feedback environment
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An anal focused site with unrelated sub-genres. The main video page includes categories for: anal, anal creampies, gapping (which is really more rimming), and cuckolding (which has more of a foot licking with banging category).
- STILL updating about 1X/week
- While I like anal content I usually go for sites that are more well rounded. That said the sex here was good - but as you might guess unimaginative and repetitive. I really felt like the only thing that changed each shoot was the model.
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
- The older stuff features more established models (Janet Mason, Barbra Summers)
- Great Stars (but not their best performances) like Lauren Phillips, Kate England, Kaylee Hilton.
- New
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- New talent I haven't seen before: Black Angel, Cristin.
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
CONS:
- It seems to me like they are recycling content from older DVDs? I'm not sure but it has that look to it.
- Formulaic to the point of being boring. I KNOW some of the talents they brought in is killer - but they fail to deliver good performances. Everyone's entitled to a bad day, but when you see great performers wasted over and over again - it's disappointing.
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks old
Bottom Line:
I'd give this a skip. If you want anal content there are much better sites. If you buy for the network maybe pass through here and see if you like anything - but I wouldn't spend long.
The dated design, the repetitive content, the underwhelming performances all combine to keep this from being recommendable.
What this site does have going for it is the price (reasonable) and extensive catalog. But short of that this site is middling in every way. There's no personality, there's no passion, there's no hook.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,700 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot newcomers like Karma Rx, Febby Twigs, Vanessa Vega.
- Big star: India Summer, Adriana Chechi, Natasha Nice, Penny Pax, LAUREN PHILLIPS, Britiniy Amber, Jasmine Jae.
- The catalog goes back to 2002 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 MB/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- as of July 7, 2020 over 5,725 videos!
- STILL UPDATING usually 1x/week
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. The organization is done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
- Wide variety of niches. (However, all of the network is interracial)
Cons:
These are really minor points as you can tell from the excellent score
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot massage or two - some are witty and fun)
- extra fee for 4K content (I'm seeing a lot more places doing things like this maybe it's becoming industry standard?)
Bottom Line:
I know 100 is a controversial score (as we discussed on the forums: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=6023. That said I still stand by it. I think dogfart is the leader in interracial porn (more on that in a minute). This network is one of the granddaddies of internet porn - and they've kept up with the changing time rather well. So why 100? Because they have a giant catalog that is unmatched because they have top of the line quality (some of my favorite stars have given some of their best performances here) because they update frequently because they evolve and maintain creativity (although the sex is often formulaic with the same positions used in the same order).
I know we are having a moment about race in society right now. I myself am IR sex agnostic. I'm not particularly drawn to it - but I don't shy away from it either. To me, the strength of this site is its passion. While adjectives like raw, passionate, intense, hardcore used to be good to describe dogfart's style. Right now I'd describe it as hot - everyone seems to genuinely enjoy themselves (always an important part for me).
While the price is higher than others, I feel it's well worth it. Good production, top talent, and sustained catalog all cost money. I'm not afraid to pay for high quality and this network delivers it.
I'm with you the organization could be better. But with sooo much content I feel that gives them some latitude to work on it.
It's funny I've dropped both my netflix and adult time subscriptions - maybe that says something about modern subscription services that try to own the mainstream (I always though the real beauty of the internet was the niche, not the broadcast).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The "Nextflix of porn" - very mainstream and a LOT of content!
- STILL updating 5 or more updates a DAY typically
- The strength of this site is its vastness. There's so much porn here I found I would get lost in a rabbit hole of finding one more video after yet another video. My "favorites" collection was huge
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: But it runs the range old stuff from the VHS era are obviously not as good, the latest stuff is full 4K. The 1080 stuff I watched on my 30" monitor looked perfect. I hesitate to give a lot of specs here because there's so much variety depending on where they're aggregating their content from
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- As of June 12, 2020 43,611 videos - but with multiple updates a day that grows really fast!
- pictures available as zips
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- tags and keywords make navigation easy. Again it's almost too easy to find stuff and to spend too long here. I think my family started to get worried about me at one point
CONS:
- Porn is never boring. It's like pizza even when it's bad it's pretty good. That said there is a lot of mediocre porn and much of it found its way here.
- Most content is non-original. And a solid chunk of it is so dated that unless you're a fan of stuff from decades ago you're unlikely to be interested in it.
Bottom Line:
I respect what Gamma is trying to do with Adult Time - to become "the Netflix of porn" and I think there's a real need for something like this. Adult Time seems to be running the same play as Netflix; buy up lots of old content and work to produce high quality interesting new stuff.
The bought up old stuff: mostly cookie-cutter porn, same set ups; no risks, fun but not exciting. If you're into anything niche, kinky, or unique you'll probably find a few shots of it here - but not enough to find satisfying.
The new stuff: more artsy, shot in unique light/frame rate, lots of plot (I'm a plot guy and some of it was too much for me) - a lot of it reminded me of the 90's era feature films. These are often edgy and have unique plot twists. Like Netflix this is where adult time takes risks PureTaboo (one of their studios) reminds me of when Netflix did House of Cards. (I mean that as a compliment - I loved HoC)
If you're a casual porn consumer or like mainstream porn this site is perfect for you.
However, if you are into niche porn, or want more kinky stuff you will quickly burn through the content that appeals to you and I would recommend a dedicated site that will hit your itch.
In short - Adult Time is the Netflix of porn - they accomplished their goal. But for those of us who want our unique taste (like those of us who want our Disney fix in the non-porn world), We aren't going to be satisfied here.
I grabbed a 3-month membership and certainly enjoyed it - but I decided not to renew it. I'm sure I'll come back and dip into Adult Time. But it didn't do what I wanted it to do. I wanted this to be my permanent membership for all non-ameature content, they couldn't do that for me...yet. I'll keep an eye on them
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sandra Fay is a busy Canadian with wild dyed hair, an unforgettable voice and one of the dirtiest amateurs I've ever seen. She brings a passion to her videos that few others provide. And her prolific toy collection leaves quite the impression
- STILL updating But very recently sporadic.
- The strength of this site is her the fact that she's crazy dirty. Lots of hot dirty talk, role play (twin/nurse/etc). She also has a strong exhibitionism streak (to my untrained eye it looks authentic) and she kills it with Cosplay her Jessica Rabbit is among the best (also does batgirl and poison ivy really well)
- There's plenty of pegging (mostly non-femdom_
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 350 video
- pictures available as zips
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line:
While I like Shandra's attitude and playfulness I warn you that some will find her voice offputting. It seems like she is intentionally raising her voice like a characteracture of a porn star. I don't mind it at all, but I've seen comments where some have complained.
Normally a site like this would be right up my ally. I like amateur, I like public stuff, I like Cosplay. All that said I went with a rather lower score because there doesn't seem to be a personality with Shandra. She seems like a projection of what people are expecting her to be. I'd love to see her let her hair down and let her fans know who she is.
That said there are some real gems here (but again they're hard to find because of the site structure.).
If your thinking of buying I would say skip it. If you like the rest of the network make sure you stop here for some treasure hunting.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
