| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
26
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-20-24 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
27
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-25-17 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
28
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best celeb oriented site I have ever found
If an actress has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, her nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Weekly reportage of where to find nudity in newly released movies, TV shows, or DVDs
Occasionally offers lifetime memberships for $99.99 – a super deal
Once you’ve joined, they offer some pretty good discounts to some other sites – for example, they offer an annual subscription to Met Art or Sex Art for $72 – I’ve never seen it less than $99 any place else
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality) |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity – so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short – as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay. (But if it’s the only nip-slip of your favorite actress in existence, you’ll be glad for this feature).
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around for a long time, and may have been one of the first porn sites I ever joined. It’s not the kind of site where you will spend hours there – but it is nice to check in a few times a week and get a glance at a favorite actress’ boobies. Or breaking news about an upcoming appearance of said boobies.
No doubt you have some scenes of nude actresses burned in your mind, especially from your youth – well you almost certainly will find those scenes here and you can watch them as many times as you want. (Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places – yum).
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer: “MrSkin.com is the world's foremost authority on celebrity nudity, and MrSkin.com is the web's #1 go-to destination for the complete skinny on Hollywood starlets at their hottest. Since 1999, MrSkin.com has grown exponentially, now attracting more than 10 million unique visitors every month who come to experience the site's vast library of sexy celebrity content, including more than 20,000 actress bios, 30,000 movie and TV show reviews and over 200,000 pictures and videos.”
Navigation is quite good – especially if you can recall the actress’ name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: “has shown bush” (the most important criterion IMHO), breast size, hair color, ethnicity, along with a count of how many fit that category. So for breast size, we get 4,792 small, 16,248 medium, 4,417 large, 253 X-large.
Downloads are fast – helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
They have been offering lifetime memberships for $99.99 occasionally – most recently in December 2016. I have no idea what kind of pattern they have or when to expect them to do so again (if ever), but I would recommend signing up for their emails if you are interested in such an offer. Annual memberships are also offered at $48 per year (when on sale), so definitely look for deals for this site. When not on sale, prices are $15 monthly and $79 annual. The PU discounted price is $9.95 per month – not bad. |
|
03-30-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
29
|
Naked News
(0)
|
|
01-01-18 05:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lengthy videos
The “casting director” is also a starlet and likes to participate as more than just a camera holder
Gorgeous models
No need to subscribe separately to this site – it is one of the bonus sites for Nubiles-porn.com
HTTPS is used (TLS)
Very high quality video |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating in December 2015
Total of 67 videos |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one site I had been considering for quite a while, but never got around to joining. Once I joined Nubiles-porn.com, this was one of the bonus sites. I must say I thoroughly enjoy it.
The whole casting video genre can be formulaic, but it also has a certain appeal. Sometimes, this really is the first time this girl has gotten naked on camera, and that always has a special attraction. Other times, it may not be her first ever appearance, just the first visit with this particular site. And I do think that for most of the ladies appearing (but not all), this is not their first rodeo.
The good thing about this formula is there is no attempt to come up with a goofy story, and nine times out of ten, the dumb story really just gets in the way of what we are all here for. In a casting site, there is no pretense of a story. Just come in, introduce yourself, have some banter with the casting director, strip down, masturbate, move on to the blow job portion of our competition, etc.
I enjoy this particular combination of adding a casting director, who also happens to be a hot babe, who also likes to join in on the fun as she herself is aroused by the cavorting being carried out in front of her. The videos are all well-lit, there isn’t a lot of artsy-fartsy camera angles – really just horny young things enjoying their sexuality and getting paid to do it. What’s not to like?
It’s a pity that they stopped updating a few years ago. I’d love it if they start up again. |
|
06-10-18 05:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
31
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for the nice review. I was a member a few years ago and really liked the site and had been thinking about joining up again, so this is timely for me. One thing back then was they had some pretty strict download limits (per day, and also the number of files you could download at once). Did you encounter anything like that?
|
05-25-18 03:18pm
|
Comment
32
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
01-01-19 05:31pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
33
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yes, the photos are available to download in a zip file, even if you are not a VIP member. But I have never downloaded a photo that big as a non-VIP member, so I'd assume that you need VIP to get those larger files. But they don't tell you how much bigger the photos and videos are, just that they are bigger. I haven't actually sprung for the VIP so can't say for sure what the payoff is there.
|
12-18-18 06:07pm
|
Review
34
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Beautiful girls throughout the site
• Very high quality photography
• Daily updates
• Most of the updates include both a video and photo set
• Massive archive dating back to 1954.
• The older sets date from a time when shaving was not common, so if you enjoy a bush, you can find a lot of it here in the archives.
• Many celebs have appeared in Playboy, and a nice selection of those appear on this site.
• Good Navigation and Browsing Speed
• HTTPS is used – TLS 1.2 |
| Cons: |
• Newer updates include lots of full nudity, but not much of full frontal nudity.
• On the tamer side of the soft core spectrum
• Photo sets are typically only 30 pictures each.
• The archives aren’t as extensive as one might hope – I’d love to see them scan in every picture from all the Newsstand Specials they used to publish. I’d happily pay a premium to a site that included all of that content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Playboy Plus is the successor to some of the previous Playboy sites like the Cyber Club. It includes photos of every Playmate to have appeared in Playboy magazine.
Some celebrities that appeared in the magazine and included on this site include Marilyn Monroe, Kate Moss, Iman, Cindy Crawford, Margot Kidder, Barbara Carrera, and Bo Derek, and many others.
If you don’t upgrade to the VIP, downloads for videos are available in 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p, at least for the newest content. The newer downloaded photo sets have a standard size of 1920 x 1080 – older sets get progressively lower resolution.
To give you an idea of how many girls are on this site, there are 31 different models with a first name of “Melissa” on the site (spelled exactly that way – not including Melisa or Mellissa). For years this was almost exclusively limited to American models, but more recently they have tried to go international, so a number of your favorites from other European sites may make an appearance here too.
For the standard type of update, there is both a video and photo set from the same shoot. The model usually starts out wearing some type of outfit, she disrobes, and you get to view her naked body. Open leg shots are unusual here, and close-ups down there are almost non-existent. Videos usually run 5 to 7 minutes, and photo sets are usually 30 pictures.
There is an upgrade you can buy once you are a member, which costs $10 per month, and makes you a VIP member. They promise higher resolution photo and video downloads, and also the ability to see sets 3 days before the regular Joes. They have also added a “Girlfriends Channel” which is only available to VIP members – I think these are just sets with two nude women in them instead of one, not lesbian activity.
I have not yet sprung for the VIP upgrade, although I am sure I will at some point, so I can’t say if it’s worth the money or not. But I’ve enjoyed the site for a year without the upgrade, so don’t let the upgrade opportunity prevent you from getting a regular membership.
The regular price is $29.95 per month, which is kind of steep, especially if you spring the extra $10 per month for the VIP. Luckily the PU discount drops the non-VIP to $14.95 per month. Three months goes for $59.95, and the lifetime membership has a regular price of $229.99, but at the moment is $149.99. Around Black Friday they offered the lifetime membership for $99.95, which is the price that I paid a year ago. I would not be surprised if they made a similar offer around New Year’s, so if you are interested, keep your eyes open.
If you’ve ever seen a Playboy magazine you probably have a good idea of the kind of photographs you’ll find here. If you like that sort of thing, you’ll find a huge amount of it here. |
|
12-17-18 05:46pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
35
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There is a lot of content - aound 1800 photo sets, about 210 videos, and about 310 models
The technical quality is superb
The models are gorgeous and not the least bit shy
Navigation is same style as other MetArt sites, which is very good
Technical support for all MetArt sites is excellent
Lots of variety in settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Updates aren't that frequent - 11 updates in December, 11 in November, 12 in October, etc.
Almost all the models are from Eastern Europe with a heavy dose of Russia (I don't mind that at all myself, but some prefer more diversity) |
| Bottom Line: |
RylskyArt is one of the sister sites in the MetArt network. That means it shares the excellent technical support and back end technical staff, which is a very good thing.
Rylsky is one of the higher volume contributers to the MetArt site - he has 1731 photos or videos on that site alone, dating back to 2006. He continues to post content there frequently. He started this site, RylskyArt, in 2012. As far as I can tell, there is no overlap between MetArt and RylskyArt - the smae set does not appear on both sites, although of course many models do appear on both sites.
Some models appear here A LOT, so if you have a favorite from elsewhere, you can really add to your collection here. Some examples include
Jeff Milton - 7 films, 54 photo sets
Nikia - 10 films, 74 photo sets
Zelda - 6 films, 60 photo sets
This site is generally soft core with very little girl-girl or masturbation. The emphasis is on the beauty of the ladies. And with them being this beautiful, what else do you need?
The Backstage photo sets (54 so far) are delightful, and show the playful side of many of the models. Some of my absolute favorite photos can be found in these backstage sets.
Rylsky does read the comments and frequently posts a response - it's nice to have that kind of interaction with the photographer. He even welcomes constructive criticism.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly. Currently the PU discount brings it to $9.99, which is an excellent bargain. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
Bottom line - I highly recommnend this site to anyone that enjoys MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, or similar sites. Especially if you can snag a month at $9.99, I can't imagine how you could be disappointed. If the updates were more frequent I'd give it a higher score - that really is the only knock on the site I can think of. |
|
12-31-19 04:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Sex Art
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates – usually 3 videos per week and 4 stand-alone photo sets per week
Videos are accompanied by photos from the same shoot – these are not counted in the 4 separate photo sets I mentioned above
Good mix of girl-girl and boy-girl scenes in the videos. Most of the stand-alone photo sets are solo girls.
Very high quality photography, videography, good browsing and downloading speeds – no technical complaints of any kind.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Lots of content – 1,343 stand-alone photo galleries, 959 videos (most with accompanying photo sets), 564 models, 50 artists (although Andrej Lupin and Alis Locanta are by far the most frequent contributors)
Browsing speeds and download speeds are quite good
Each video has some sort of story associated with it |
| Cons: |
The newer solo videos have almost entirely moved over to the sister site, MetartX. Older ones that were posted here previously have remained here.
Not much else to complain about. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve seen another reviewer use the term “heartcore” for this type of site, and I agree it is a good classification for it. And if that is what you are looking for, then this might be the very best place to find it. There is a story with each video, and while a lot are forgettable, when they do get it right, I think it really adds a lot to the scene.
They've been on line since April 2012, so they've accumulated a significant archive. Videos are all in full HD and photos are all hgih resolution, so no worries about quality as you go back in time. Both the photo sets and the videos are shot with excellent production values.
Not surprisingly, the women here are beautiful, and many are even better than that. What might be surprising, if you have only seen them on Met Art before (and a large percentage have been featured there), is how frisky they can get when the restrictions of plain old nude modeling are removed.
Of course, some of the ladies may be a little awkward in their first appearance, but many of them seem to be totally uninhibited.
The scenes are on the softer side of sex. But the sex is real – there is nothing simulated about it. They do occasionally try something a little harder or more oriented towards S&M or other darker stuff, but it is not a lot, and I expect it to stay that way. The members’ comments tend to be more negative on this kind of content. So don’t go in hoping that things will move to a more hard core focus – they almost certainly will not.
Membership costs are $29.99 monthly (the PU discount drops it to $19.99) and $99.99 yearly. I have seen specials where the monthly cost drops to 14.99 or even 9.99. Also, if you are a member of Mr. Skin, you can get an annual membership for $72 by signing up through that site.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
This is an excellent site that executes its particular place in the porn universe very well. I definitely recommend it. |
|
07-22-18 08:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
37
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
2Cigars1Woman's Review
Thanks for this - this site has caught my eye. Based on their similar web site design, I'm thinking Amour Angels and Teen Porn Storage are from the same company. Have you also joined those? and if yes, how do the 3 sites compare?
Thanks!
|
06-23-24 01:16pm
|
Reply
38
|
Stunning 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I had assumed that being part of the Met Art network meant they owned the site, but maybe it's more of an outsourcing / management thing. You (the photographer) provide the pics and have editorial control over what gets posted when, and Met Art handles running the web site, marketing, billing, etc.
It's a pity that the updates slowed so suddenly, because I like the site a lot and would have considered a longer membership if the updates stayed at every-other-day.
|
05-05-18 06:48pm
|
Review
39
|
Stunning 18
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many gorgeous models
A handful of models appear to be exclusive
Had been on a schedule of every-other-day updates (see cons)
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very high quality photography
MetArt Network support is responsive
Good site layout, search, comments, features, etc.
Good browsing and download speeds |
| Cons: |
Without warning or explanation, only 5 updates posted in April
Since this is from a single photographer, less variety than you would see at a multi-artist site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the blurb about how the website describes itself:
“Antonio Clemens is one of the most innovative, accomplished, and popular contributors of erotic art photography to the MetArt Network. With the creation of Stunning18.com Clemens now has an exclusive showcase for his unique style of meticulously crafted digital erotica. Working with gorgeous young models from around the world, Clemens uses his camera to capture every aspect of their natural beauty. At Stunning 18 you'll find the girls of your wildest dreams in the most beautiful nude art photos you've ever seen.”
The site started in January of 2013, so it has a pretty extensive collection of beauties to look at. The vast majority consists of soft core, glamour type photos and videos. There are also a handful of masturbation videos, and also a couple of boy-girl sets. The photographer has been a prolific contributor to Met Art, where there are several hundred of his sets listed. And while this site is part of the Met Art network, the subscription to either site does not grant you access to the other site.
There are 176 Models, 244 Videos, and several hundred photo sets.
Updates are typically every-other-day. For instance, in 2018, in January there were 15 updates, in February 14 updates, and in March 15 updates. But in April there were only 5 updates, and there was no warning or explanation that the schedule was changing. As of the time of this posting on 5/4, the most recent update was on 4/21.
When it was 2 weeks since the last update, I emailed support and this is what Met Art Network Support replied: (there has been one update posted since I received this response, but only one).
“My sincere apologies that the Stunning 18 site has not updated on a regular basis. We are sorry but we do not own the site. The updates are dependent upon the photographer to maintain his update schedule. I do expect the updates will resume soon.
If there will be no update in a certain time frame what we can do is to
Cancel your remaining prepaid time and credit it to another site within our network
OR
Cancel the subscription and we can do pro-rated refund.
We are still hoping that there will be updates soon but that will solely depend on the photographer of the site. If you would like to take further actions with the option outlined above, please let us know.
If you need assistance with anything else, please let us know.”
The standard price is $29.99 per month, the PU discount takes it to $19.99 per month. Occasionally you will see bigger discounts to $14.99 or even $9.99, but these don’t appear very often or last very long. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
If you are a fan of sites like Femjoy or MetArt, you will find a lot to like here, and plenty to occupy yourself for a month or two. But given the suddenly infrequent updates, I would not recommend a longer term membership unless some suitable explanation is given or an extended period of regular updates resumes. So while annual memberships are offered, I would not recommend one at this time. |
|
05-04-18 07:57pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
40
|
Sweetheart Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video updates are usually every three days (except as of 4/17, the last update was 4/3)
Extensive collection of photos in addition to the videos
I really like the BTS features
Streaming works on all the videos
All video downloads are available in various formats, up to 1080p
Includes several bonus sites
Browsing, streaming and downloading speeds are pretty snappy
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
No model info
Streaming quality is not HD – more like 480p or 540P
Searching returns stuff from all the sites on the network – there is no good way to search and only get lesbian content, which is what this site that I signed up for (Sweetheart Video) focuses on.
Logging in requires entering a Captcha. This has now switched to a photographic Captcha, which I am finding to be pretty annoying, definitely worse than the text Captcha they used previously |
| Bottom Line: |
As part of the Mile High network, Sweetheart Video also includes access to these other sites: Bi Empire, Doghouse Digital, Cherry Pop, Lesbian Older Younger, Mile High Selection, Reality Junkies, and Sweet Sinner. (Girlfriends Films also appears to be owned by the same outfit, but it is not included in this network of sites and requires a separate subscription).
In this review I will focus only on the content on Sweetheart Video, not the other network sites.
It appears that Sweetheart Video started up in 2011, so they have a pretty extensive collection of stuff on line. There are about 1000 video scenes on line and almost 400 models on the site.
Every video I have looked at (excepting the BTS features) has a run time of between 25 and 35 minutes. There’s usually a couple of minutes of setup story before moving into the love making, so the story line is more ancillary here than on some other sites.
One of the neat things is the BTS (Behind the Scenes) features. They usually include a post-scene interview with the ladies. (Sometimes it’s a pre-scene video taken in the minivan while they’re driving to the shoot location). It’s quite enjoyable to hear them talk about what they liked about the scene and each other. The fact they are both usually buck naked is a plus. Two nude women in full afterglow can be extremely charming.
Searching will return values from all the sites in the network, which is good and bad. Good if you want to see anything a particular model might appear in, bad if you’d prefer to focus only on lesbian content.
Here’s an example of file download size for a video that runs 25:36. 1080p runs 1.26 GB, 720p runs 922 MB, 540p runs 369 MB.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window where you’ll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Here’s what the update schedule was for March 2017. Videos were posted on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 28th, 31st. (Also on 4/3 – but as of 4/17, no video updates since 4/3). Photos were posted on the 1st (2 sets), 4th (2 sets), 10th (4 sets), 13th (3 sets), 16th (3 sets), 19th (3 sets), 22nd (1 set), 25th (1 set), 28th (2 sets), 31st (2 sets).
Bottom Line – This is a good Lesbian site, although if the lack of updates in past 2 weeks is an indication, this might become a non-updating site. Although you should be able to get a daily update if you consider all the sites in the network – it just won’t be lesbian content in most cases. |
|
04-18-17 04:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content – solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesn’t work at all for me – lots of fits and starts
Despite the site’s name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. It’s not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in – a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule – there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so it’s kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model’s name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the “pros” section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets I’ve ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I haven’t used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I won’t be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
42
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
6 updates per week – 3 videos and 3 photo sets
Very high quality production values
1,017 Models, 23 Artists, 2.882 Photo Sets, 1,598 Films – there is A LOT of content
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
The Behind the Scenes videos give you a good chance to get to know the models better.
PU price of $19.99 is quite reasonable. Annual memberships are $100, and lifetime memberships are available if you already belong to some other Met Art site.
Speeds of browsing, downloading, etc. are quite good. Navigation mirrors that on Met Art, which is excellent. |
| Cons: |
For me, sometimes all the artistry gets in the way. I like simpler stories and less makeup. Although the makeup is rarely garish, it’s not the more natural look that I prefer.
Many of the photo sets are simply pictures taken from the video session, as opposed to separately conceived sessions. They are not screen caps however.
The Behind the Scenes videos tend to be quite short – less than 10 minutes
Except for the Behind the Scenes videos, there is very little model information |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas was originally founded by its namesake, but Mr. Thomas has since retired in 2014. He does make occasional cameo appearances in some recent videos, but is not the director for any new material that I have seen.
Unlike some sites where the primary content is the photographs while the videos are an add-on, here the focus is on the videos. The photo shoots are frequently (but not always) just photos of the video session. But they are still high quality photos in their own right.
The video collection includes almost everything that was posted to the site since 2009, with a small collection of earlier stuff, some dating back to 1999. So if you’re looking for stuff prior to 2009, it will be pretty hit or miss. Older videos are available in 360p. Starting around 2010 the stuff starts to become available in 720p. From 2012 on there is 1080p. Newer stuff is available in 4K, although I am not equipped to take advantage of that myself, so can’t comment on how good that is.
The site is mostly lesbian content, with some solo, and occasional boy-girl content up until about 2013. After 2013 it seems to be all female, which is fine by me.
Production values, in terms of clarity, lighting, sound quality, are all state of the art for the time they were filmed. The people behind the cameras here know what they are doing.
I tend to find the story lines to be not that interesting. The love making however, that does hold my attention.
The women are supremely sexy, with many of your favorites from Met Art or Sex Art also appearing here. For some, like Tracy Lindsay (who is amazing), this is her main site, with less frequent appearances elsewhere in the MA network.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The bottom line is this is an excellent site, and if you are interested in girl-girl photos and videos, you definitely want to consider this site. |
|
07-03-17 09:16pm
Replies (0)
|
|
