| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Gender X
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ It’s one of the better high quality transsexual sites
+ You can download in every resolution from 160p to 4K
+ The picture sets are good
+ Is large enough to stand on its own and that’s good, there are no bonus stes
+ Easy site to use
+ Good price that includes downloads |
| Cons: |
- It is owned by the same people who own Adult Time, but you do not receive any bonus sites or access to their hundreds of sites.
- The growing pains of this niche. There are some rather poor performances, but it does seem to have more to do with hormones than disinterest |
| Bottom Line: |
Like others, I, as a female, find an attraction to the transsexual niche. I believe, in my case, it is just the intriguing possibilities a transsexual offers. Having said that, you don’t find a lot of transsexual sites where the transsexuals are with women. I know of maybe 5 sites that feature transsexuals with women. This leaves me wanting to see the transsexuals in solo content.
Gender X does fulfill that wish with solo transsexual scenes and those are some of the very best solo transsexuals scenes I have ever seen. I’m sure part of the attraction is the high production values and high resolution of the downloaded videos, both of which, the transsexual niche sometimes lack or at least slack on.
I also have wondered how much it hurts Gender X to know the owners of the site have hundreds of other sites, but do not include any with a membership to Gender X? I’m also under the belief that the transsexual niche is close to missing its arrival window. This niche is difficult to use to intrigue porn fans, and it’s why, I believe there should be more included sites.
Other ways I believe these scenes could be better (transsexual with a man) is to introduce a female to the scenes, even if she’s just watching and masturbating. It seems like when you have a niche like this one, that automatically requires some reaching to appeal to a vast audience, there would be more of an attempt to pull in viewers from other niches.
Gender X does what it needs to do. It presents transsexuals as attractive, even feminine, but like with most transsexual scenes, there’s little to no story. The site does offer as many download resolutions as I have ever seen. The quality of the downloads and resolutions are very good. The videos are clear to watch and the solo scenes are very good, but this niche really needs to improve and open its mind to doing more with the niche. Including bringing women into the scenes in whichever capacity. As it is, the niche is becoming polarizing and even too exclusive to the transsexuals.
I feel like I’m on a soapbox and maybe I am. I’m sure many years ago, it was a difficult sell to get straight female pornstars to do lesbian scenes and I know it was difficult to get some females to do scenes with men in porn. The transsexual niche doesn’t seem to be as open-minded as it wants its viewers to be. This is a very good site, but it could be so much more than it is. |
|
06-11-24 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Femme Fight
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ It’s a niche I’m surprised doesn’t have more coverage
+ Amateur models
+ I’m putting this in the pros, The Best Porn review lists a download limit, but that review was from 8 years ago. I haven’t crossed a download limit.
+ More fetishes than you think are being featured in these scenes.
+ You can download the picture sets and sometimes those show more than the videos
+ Pretty ladies wearing nice clothes |
| Cons: |
- I tried Ultimate Surrender years ago, but was bored from the scripted feeling of the “matches”. It’s the same feeling with Femme Fight.
- The site needs to be updated, not the content or updates to the scenes, just the site feels old
- Video quality should be better across the board |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of women wrestling or fighting each other. Especially if I feel like the models are bicurious. Somewhere in my mind, that’s how all bicurious starts. Two women get mad, start fighting, pull each other’s clothes off and bicurious feelings appear. It’s really unlikely that’s how it happens, but it’s realistic enough for my imagination to run with it. I think the best known site of this niche is Ultimate Surrender and it’s good, but you have to keep your imagination involved or you realize you’re just watching a porn scene with a heavily scripted story.
Femme Fight may do a better job of staying in my imagination. The women are dressed normal or professional. Unlike in “wrestling” outfits. The scenes all follow a similar pace and script. I think this is a more modern take on mud wrestling without the mud. The women start fully dressed and grab hair, rip shirts, pull bras off, tear skirts and end up having sex.
The imagination part is most important and it is more protected by this style of “fighting”. It’s not promoted as a competition like Ultimate Surrender. It’s trying to be women in normal, everyday situations. I like it, but my imagination has its limits.
I don’t see it as a fault of my imagination or lack thereof. The video quality hearkens back to a decade or two ago. Those older videos should just be removed. I didn’t even know there was such thing as a 200p video. I don’t even use a big monitor, but those videos look like colored ants running across rice. If you can just stick with the newer scenes your imagination at least has a clear chance at surviving the poor to average scripts.
Unlike most of my memberships, I found that the picture sets were often better than the videos. At least for me. This is a genre that relies on suspension of belief or imagination. The pictures don’t move. I even thought of a comparison. If you have ever watched professional wrestling, you start seeing the mistakes or botches the wrestlers make. If you just looked at pictures of the same wrestling match, you likely wouldn’t see any of the pictures of the messed up parts.
It's the same feeling on Femme Fights. The pictures just give a better view for your imagination. I also believe the site should be updated in its programming, it would help make the site seem more up to date. It was better the first week than the fourth week. That’s going to hold my score back a little. |
|
10-11-23 06:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Mano Job
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ This should be called Guys Just Wanna Have Fun!
+ Over 1,000 scenes of young and pretty women giving handjobs and teasing for more
+ Some of the newer videos have 4K downloads and most have at least HD downloads
+ Each scene comes with a downloadable picture set
+ A lot of real, authentic, genuine responses from the females
+ Includes the small network Finishes The Job |
| Cons: |
- Kind of makes it clear why guys get tired of masturbating. There really isn’t much you can do with the penis.
- Which is the second con, there’s so much teasing from these young ladies. It’s only a con because we’re paying for action
- The other two sites, Mr POV and the Dick Suckers are not as good even though many of the scenes overlap with Mano Job scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
This should be a fun network if nothing else. It’s mostly young and very pretty women playing with penises. It’s not often the penis gets to take center stage, but does on this site and maybe shows why the penis struggles with the spotlight. There really is only so much a penis can do! It reminds me of why some of us women prefer guys that are growers not show-ers. Watching it grow is part of the fun and arousal.
The ladies on this site do a pretty good job of keeping the penis out of their mouth and or other holes, but there are times, I would have liked to see them do more than play with the penis. I think that’s the biggest con of the site. I can see how and why men would like this type of content. I would guess the guy can picture himself being the guy in the scene. It is why, I assume, the scenes are mostly filmed in POV.
The first thing that crossed my mind was why do we not have lesbian POV where one lesbian plays with the other in closeup detail? These scenes look so fun for the guys and surprise, some of the women seem to be at least somewhat new and inexperienced at playing with the penis. You get real reactions including cute grins when the woman feels the penis getting harder and you see the innocence of the woman quickly turn into horniness. I get the purpose of tease porn, but don’t agree with it. This site and its other two sites are already mixing scenes by having what was clearly a handjob scene turn into a scene for their Dick Suckers site. Thinking while watching porn should be against the law. It is my biggest problem while watching porn. I am, possibly, almost convinced the scenes from this network’s sites are really just edited down from a full scene. For example, you get the handjob part on Manojob. You then have the oral sex on Dick Suckers and finally, Mr. POV is full-out hardcore sex.
I’m not saying this is true. It is just the feeling I get when watching the different scenes from their different sites. It also made me think and wonder if maybe much more happens than makes its way to the porn scene? Is there a female who is great at handjobs, but not as good at oral sex?
The scenes are arousing and fun. From the female viewing perspective, I see myself taking the woman’s place and being as surprised as she is by how aroused the man becomes.
It's a good network as a whole and recommended especially for those who like some tease with their porn. |
|
08-09-23 08:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Bi Maxx
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Exclusive, downloadable, bisexual movies.
+ Over 350 scenes and photo sets.
+ High definition downloads with most scenes having 1080p.
+ Group (more than 3 people) scenes are my favorites.
+ Exciting and believable scenes |
| Cons: |
- Updates are possibly recycled scenes.
- High price and charges in Euros ($30+) |
| Bottom Line: |
Few sites show the supply and demand pricing model of porn better than this one. Bisexual porn is not a real popular genre and should be explained. Bisexual porn isn’t a male with two females. It’s a female with two or more males and the males pleasure each other and her. The bisexual is solely pertaining to the men.
Not only is bisexual porn hard to find, it’s near impossible to find exclusive scenes. Bi Maxx is exclusive. I believe the site excels at group scenes of more than 3 people. The group scenes involving bisexual men can be confusing and hard to follow the action, but there’s almost always some wild sex happening.
Where Bi Maxx stands out is in the setup and what appears to be a story for each scene. Nearly all scenes are party type scenes where one woman starts messing around with a guy then multiple other guys join in. It seems like a perfect story for how and why bisexual sex between men could happen. I believe the genre will have a difficult time being accepted into the mainstream and will always represent some level of taboo.
The performers while not well-known, are extremely attractive, both males and females. The action looks real in the sense that they want to do it and aren’t just going through the motions to get paid. That is hard to find in bisexual porn, but Bi Maxx probably does it better than any other bisexual site.
It is hard for me to say if the new updates are recycling of old scenes, but it seems possible based on the number of scenes. They should be well over 500 by now but are still in the 300-400 scene range where there were in 2018.
The download quality is good with high-definition downloads at 1080p being the high end. There are pictures, but most are below average quality. The bread and butter of the site are the 300+ bisexual scenes. The best scenes have at least 3 guys and 2 women. The positions get kinky and everything becomes more believable with that many aroused and ready people. I have seen a few bisexual sites that are better, but those had non-exclusive scenes on them. All of Bi Maxx scenes are exclusive to them. |
|
11-07-22 06:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Fake Hub
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Somewhat of a unique network
+ Good price, but that is for streaming-only. If you want downloads you have to pay extra
+ Niches that lend to the side of empowered women.
+ Download quality is great once you pay for it.
+ Entertaining if nothing else.
+ Gives you access to 7 sites. |
| Cons: |
- Paying for downloads; why not just offer the site with included downloads at a higher price?
- A lot of this content is repetitive and lacks emotion
- Cancelling was more difficult than it should have been. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m going to open this review with my cancellation experience. I had to chat with the biller. I was on hold twice and both times, my side of the chat was left in a frozen chat. On the third try, I finally was able to cancel the subscription, but I had to do it all again to cancel the downloads. That does affect my score by 5 points.
The interest for me is the niches they have. The sites you receive with a subscription include Fake Taxi, Public Agents, Fake Driving School, Fake Hostel, Fake Agent, Fake Agent UK and Female Fake Taxi. All of those sound interesting and are intriguing – to me.
I am split on how I feel about the content. The niches, especially the fake taxi sites, really are unique and some of those – great acting, are believable as being real and not staged. I thought with the “fake” adjective, the sites would be obnoxiously fake and silly, but they’re not. A few of the scenes are, but overall, you’re going to receive acceptably believable scenes.
The Public and “Agent” sites are all interesting and relatively unique. It’s like calling it “fake” helped them make it more – realistic and believable. The scenes are more on the fun and playful side than serious and maybe that is something I’m noticing in a negative way.
There are a few more negatives besides the mind-numbing frustration of cancelling. There are hardly no photos. I just think photos should be included on every site. It’s not that I’m a photo lover or collector, it’s that there are people out there who are.
I also only see 1080p as the max download size and that’s after paying for downloads. Similar to the picture one, I’m not a stickler for 4K videos, but some people are. These two problems, lack of photos and lack of 4K downloads, are not that acceptable for a network that costs $30 once you add the downloads.
I feel like the network and creativity of niches is very positive, but there are a couple of small negatives stopping this network from being a top of its class site. I will still recommend it especially if you don’t mind paying extra for downloads. You are going to get some unique content from this network. |
|
06-11-23 10:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ The original Gloryhole site
+ Nearly 700 scenes of Gloryhole porn
+ Gloryhole porn does show porn can be evolving instead of static
+ Includes access to the Dogfart network
+ Easy to cancel and promo prices make it a cheap join
+ Other Gloryhole sites on the Dogfart network show the evolution of Gloryhole better |
| Cons: |
- The content on Dogfart feels dated and like it was filmed decades ago
- Even the scenes on Gloryhole.com feel like they’re old and relying on old cliches
- Zebra Girls is a very good site on Dogfart network, but it receives hardly no attention |
| Bottom Line: |
Gloryhole porn has an interesting history. Half of the popular opinion says it was started in Gay culture and the other half says it was started in glassblowing. I lost interest in the glassblowing part, but my attraction to Gloryhole porn is likely like every other woman’s attraction to it. I like seeing a young, implied innocent woman, getting on her knees in a public restroom and giving a stranger a blowjob through a wall or stall. It’s taboo even if you are convinced it’s not. You just need to watch a scene and become a voyeur walking into a restroom and seeing what the video shows. There’s so much that can be added to the scenes. The woman is married or in a long-term relationship with a guy with a small penis who is also boring and not risky. That is what most of the early scenes on Gloryhole.com relied on and also the interracial twist. It seems when this site first started out, it was a little more taboo for interracial sex than it is now. That’s an unlisted con. The content does not age well. You can tell that the earliest scenes relied on the tension of interracial sex being a key component in the taboo.
Someone decided to add a second guy and sometimes a second woman. There was then a realization that people could have sex through the Gloryhole, not just oral sex. The addition of intercourse to Gloryhole porn opened up a whole new taboo door. The young, innocent female willing to give a stranger a blowjob, becomes so aroused doing it, she’s willing to bend and contort her body so the man can have sex with her through the Gloryhole. I believe all porn had this type of evolution, but am not old enough to know when anal first became a big part of porn or threesomes, etc..
Dogfart does a very admirable job of showing the evolution of the Gloryhole, but each new step, including intercourse, is presented in the most vanilla state. It’s like there’s concern about each step being “too much”. That is one of the drawbacks of being an industry-leader. Other companies make a Gloryhole site and they’re confident in what will and won’t work thanks to Dogfart taking the risks.
The scenes are straightforward. Even the scenes with intercourse are predictable and repetitive. Your imagination is required to make these scenes anything more than basic, standard porn.
The video download quality is good. Most of the scenes have 1080p downloads or at least 720p. I’m just not for sure how many of these scenes you’re going to need since they are repetitive. Dogfart even cannibalized itself with another Gloryhole site called, Gloryhole Initiations. I find it to be vastly superior and unless we’re giving points for being the first, their own site easily tops Gloryhole.com. Luckily, you get access to both and another dozen or so sites, too. It’s fun to see how niches got their start and that’s what Gloryhole does. You can even sense the tension and uncomfortableness as the niche evolved. The network is worth joining just to experience the differences and see that it wasn’t that long ago, that society viewed interracial porn as a taboo genre of porn. |
|
11-07-23 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Sweet Femdom
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ BDSM from a gentler view.
+ Women dominating other women and men.
+ Nearly 500 scenes
+ Unlimited downloads on videos and photo sets.
+ All-exclusive content
+ Comes with access to Adult Prime. |
| Cons: |
- I feel like the site is mocking itself at times. Why is there a sweet side to domination?
- The scenes really need to be longer. Many of them last under 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I feel like I’m getting something I’m not supposed to get or that’s not even supposed to exist. Sweet Femdom. I believe this porn would turn some people off. Especially those who like the traditional gender roles. The content on here is like women taking it easy on the men they are dominating.
The site is huge considering it’s on the Adult Prime network which includes over 50 more sites. This one has 477 videos and 477 photo sets. One could make the argument that the videos are shorter than usual, and they would make a good point. The videos rarely last over 20 minutes and most are well below 20 minutes. On the other hand, unlike a lot of Adult Prime sites, Sweet Femdom includes over 100 pictures per photo set.
Everything you can download is unlimited. The videos are HD quality. I am at a loss when trying to figure out who the audience for this niche is. I have to think those who love domination porn will be put off by the softer, more tender moments in these scenes and those who want the softer, more tender moments, will be put off by the harder moments.
It's dichotomic to say the least.
The site, itself, would score quite a bit higher if the scenes were longer and there was more of a story to the scenes. I never understand why porn tries BDSM or dominance porn, but don’t explain the how’s or why’s of how this specific couple ended up in this stage of a relationship. It’s easy to understand the basics of BDSM and natural instincts. Those show man being the dominant one while the woman is submissive. How did we get to this woman dominating that man? It’s not natural. I believe that’s a burden of producing porn that goes against conventional wisdom or natural instincts. I believe even the most basic of plots would add a lot to these scenes. Something as simple as she caught him with her younger sister. Then, then that’s when we have a reason for the physically smaller woman dominating the physically imposing man.
And that’s when these tender moments would be more understandable. We could view those as the woman trying to remind the man of the good times of her being his submissive lover. It’s always one or two steps away in porn and this site is no different, in that regard.
A great network overall and many great niche sites like this one. |
|
07-09-23 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Pansexual X
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Gets better with time and especially if you like Evil Angel.
+ New scene released every two weeks.
+ Scenes include photographs and video.
+ Downloads are not unlimited, but the DL limit is very high (200 GB per day)
+ Access to Evil Angel, but will admit, I did not know that when I joined Pansexual X.
+ The downloads are very high-quality. |
| Cons: |
- Not for sure what I was expecting, but what I received, was not it and may not be for you either.
- Evil Angel may not be a bonus for some. I didn’t like hardly anything on it.
- Feels like the genre (Pansexual) is just there for the name and marketing. |
| Bottom Line: |
My brief and uncomplicated understanding of Pansexuality is when people are attracted to all genders. I have some experience with this genre and can tell you, the usual listing of genders has at least 15 different genders. I am not here to say if I agree or disagree with that. I’m just sharing what is the most-commonly accepted definition of Pansexual.
Nearly everything on this site is transsexual. I like transsexual porn, but do not think it should be listed as Pansexual. I guess anyone can be a Pansexual, but we are talking about porn and it’s just my opinion – this is not Pansexual porn.
That’s probably beside the point. All of the alternate gender beliefs have trouble being accepted in porn. That goes into my mistake of joining this site. I thought it was a standalone site and didn’t know it is part of Evil Angel. I had not been a member of Evil Angel before this Pansexual X membership.
I decided to make the most of the membership and look into the Evil Angel content. They have a large selection of transsexual porn and maybe that lightened my frustration of joining a network I didn’t realize I was joining, then receiving a site listed as Pansexual, but it’s really just a transsexual site?
Evil Angel is a very large hardcore site. It’s not for everyone and that includes me. If you take your time and keep an open mind, it does have some good scenes on it, as does Pansexual X. You just have to remove the preconceived notions.
I also didn’t know Evil Angel is owned by the same company that owns Adult Time. You can see that in the navigation and layout of the site. Also in the offered download resolutions. It’s a good site in terms of usability, quantity and quality, but the niches will determine how you feel about it.
My thinking, I think, was that the scenes on Pansexual X would have what appears to be a straight man with a gay man while a lesbian woman watches and seduces a straight woman. When you think about that it probably is too complicated and complex to ever expect that from porn.
You do get 4K and HD downloads. You also have photo zips to download and the gracious download limit of 250 GB per day, should never be at risk. At least not, in my head, as I’ve never been a mass downloader.
It's hard for me to recommend Pansexual X just based on my opinion that it’s not Pansexual porn and it’s not fair to not recommend Evil Angel. I wouldn’t join it, but that’s just because I don’t like the real hardcore content. It’s good at what it does. You just need to know ahead of time what it does and if that does it for you! |
|
06-11-23 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Little Mutt
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ This is where my interest in porn started.
+ This is an amateur site with hardcore, lesbian and solo scenes.
+ Diverse selection of models.
+ Downloadable videos and photo sets.
+ Site is easy to use.
+ Good size site with around 800 videos and 850 photo sets. |
| Cons: |
- I hadn’t been a member for nearly 3 years, I can’t say with confidence that they are updating with new content.
- The video quality makes me think it’s not updating. The best resolution videos are 1280x720.
- My feelings about my recent join of Little Mutt are much different than 8 years ago. It’s a negative change, but the site is still good for anyone who hasn’t visited it before. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Little Mutt back in 2015. My interest back then was the amount of pretty, uninhibited, amateur females. The site is still as good as it was in 2015.
I am bicurious at least in mind. I liked watching the younger women that looked possibly inexperienced despite being in porn. I did come away from that membership in 2015, with a very positive feeling.
My 2023 return to Little Mutt brought back some great memories, but little else, very little new. My favorite scenes from 2015 are still on the site and they’re still some of my favorite scenes.
I cannot tell if these are new scenes, but can tell that the total number of scenes and photos hasn’t changed that much. There are roughly 800 videos and 850 photo sets. All are downloadable and downloads are not limited. The site is basic and therefore has very easy to use, simple navigation.
The video resolution could be the most telling statistic The videos download in 1280x720 files and the pictures, while available for download in zips, are only 1600x1200 resolution.
I wouldn’t take the time to write this review if I didn’t think the site still has some value. The video resolution doesn’t look that bad and these are amateur filmed. You don’t have as much direction and production in these scenes. You will see couples that look like they’re really in love and lust with each other. The models, especially females, are exceptionally cute and amateur. The sex is believable and at times, it even looks amateur. It’s not a bad thing. Haven’t we all seen enough perfect sex in porn to miss the days of when accidents and oopsies happened?
I am trying to make this review as positive as possible without burying this site. I wouldn’t be able to do that if there weren’t redeeming qualities on the site. If I was new to the site, I think I would be as excited as I was in 2015. That is how I will recommend Little Mutt too. If you have never been a member and like amateur porn, I really believe you’ll like this site. |
|
06-14-23 07:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ After seeing a couple of scenes of models playing games, I searched and found this site.
+ Large site with various fun strip and sex games.
+ The models look like amateurs to me.
+ Downloads are unlimited and are HD quality.
+ Very fun scenes which to me is unusual in porn.
+ The scenes are long and involved. |
| Cons: |
- I don't know if the site is updating. The dates on the scenes show as updated, but I can't say for sure.
- Some of the games are boring and I just end up fast forwarding thru the game. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw a few scenes of porn models playing games, I believe from ALS Scan and maybe Girls Out West. I thought that is a great idea.
Joining this site reminded me there's a big difference between pro and amateur models. That difference is the pros have to act. The amateurs can just be themselves. It works well on Lost Bet Games.
The models generally act shocked and surprised when they have to take an article of clothing off and most important, by the time the game is over, you can tell the models are really turned on and ready for sex.
The games vary, most are just a variation of strip poker, but some become borderline boring. I think to produce this type of porn, you have to have a pretty high opinion of your ability to engage porn viewers. We are talking about people paying to see nudity and sex.
The models become game show contestants. Of the scenes I have watched, I knew within the first 3 minutes of each one if it was going to be a good scene. Some of the models do seem to be trying to act and those stand out in a negative way. The models that are being themselves are great. You see a lot of laughing and real smiles.
The scenes are typically long. It does look like there is some editing to maybe speed up the slower games. I'm thinking there needs to be a time limit on how long it takes to see nudity. At least there was for me.
The site could use some updating. You just get one page and scroll. I have downloaded 38 scenes and believe that is going to be enough for my collection.
Don't take the low number as a negative. That is around 40 hours of stripping games!
The scenes do make major changes. Some of the scenes look polished and professional. Those usually have models that look like pro models. The other scenes look more ad libbed. I much prefer the ad libbed ones. Even though, those are the ones that have some boring scenes. The professional ones just look like any group hardcore scene.
I am not for sure who would be in the recommended group for this site. The video quality is good. There are no pictures. If you like seeing naked people being genuine and having fun, that's who I recommend this site to.
There isn't much kinky or obscure sex acts in it, yes, those would make the content even better!
It's a great idea which means no one else will try it. I could see the sites that like using the family sex niche turning a game site into not so wholesome entertainment. It would at least add a fun narrative. I like the site a lot, but would only recommend it to those who like laughing while watching porn. I doubt I will join it again, unless I can see they are updating with new scenes. |
|
09-10-24 06:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Beautiful Agony
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Real people having real orgasms. User-submitted.
+ All sexual orientations and genders.
+ Couple updates per week
+ Older videos are remastered.
+ Voyeuristic even if not an explicit scene, the sounds could be enough for some people.
+ Large catalog of nearly 14,000 videos, but most are short. |
| Cons: |
- Most of the scenes do not show nudity.
- Bigger deal when it’s a male and you can’t see his orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was the first porn site I joined nearly 10 years ago. It’s not a regular porn site. The focus is on watching the faces of people having orgasms. There are straight men and straight women. Gay men and lesbians. Transsexuals and non-Binary. The scenes are truly good if you’re into voyeurism. You may not see much if any nudity, but usually a voyeur relies on imagination and self-deception to make the voyeuristic moment more believable. I just like watching for the ones that slip and let some nudity show.
There are no real stories or plots. There are no reasons to follow any of the action other than to see the person orgasm. If you think about it that is what a lot of porn is. It’s just on Beautiful Agony you get closeups of the person’s face and get to hear and see their orgasmic ecstasy.
The site has nearly 14,000 videos with most being under 10 minutes long. They add an average of 2 new videos per week. I do think the different genders make it interesting since maybe you’re curious about how people the same gender as you look during orgasm. On the negative side there are no photos.
The videos are not looking to arouse you with action. I am thinking the goal is to catch the videoed person right in the moment of orgasm to cause the viewer to try and orgasm at the same time. Some of the females are very vocal while most of the men don’t say much or make many noises. It’s definitely different in a good way. I would like to see scenes of a man and woman mutually masturbating while showing their faces and how much they look at each other,
The site is very easy to join and cancel via CCBill. The site has been around for 15+ years and the older videos have been remastered to higher quality videos. I believe this site falls heavily into a niche category. The one thing you are guaranteed to see in every scene is a person having an orgasm. Nudity, dirty talk, are not guaranteed.
Few sites will show you the subjectivity of looks like this one does. There were some males and females I didn’t find attractive, but the comments showed that others do. These are all amateur and user-submitted so there is no standard in looks. It’s an enjoyable site at a good price ($14.95), but probably should only be joined once or maybe twice per year. There’s just not enough variety in the scenes to make it a site you regularly allow to recur. It Is worth it for those into orgasms. |
|
11-08-22 11:20am
Replies (0)
|
|
