| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Touch My Wife
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun niche that may not appeal to everyone
Owned by Gamma and has the quality you come to expect from Gamma
Storylines are at best comedic but if it works it works
Is really just cuckold porn, but that’s okay
Downloads of videos are up to 4K on all scenes
Small site and it’s a pro, the scenes are worth watching from start to finish |
| Cons: |
Story porn is not for everyone. I usually don’t even like it, but do find these scenes entertaining
Far from a unique idea. They really could do more with this niche.
Most of the female models are known pornstars and that hurts the content |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the first porn I watched was of an older man who paid married women to have sex with him or another man, while her husband watched. Touch My Wife tries to follow that tried and true basis, but some of the scenes only tell the viewer “the husband knows”. That, to me, is the best part of this niche. I enjoy seeing the “husband” trying to watch his wife or girlfriend have sex with someone else without getting aroused by it. Isn’t that what porn is for? Showing and doing the things most of us would never even consider doing in real life?
The scenes on Touch My Wife lack a lot of the believability I am used to from this niche. Maybe it is because it’s not officially tagged as cuckold porn? The title of the site, Touch My Wife, implies that the husband is at least somewhat involved in the decision. Why not have him in the scene?
It may seem like I’m focusing too much on this part, but porn has a hard enough time making believable scenes. Now, the husband knows someone is touching his wife, but he’s not there to watch, enjoy or become angry?
My feeling with Gamma-owned sites is they have times where they depend on the quality of their videos too much. That is the best part of Touch My Wife. The video quality. All available scenes have 4K downloads and a very good picture set you can download. Everything else about the scenes could be better, in some cases, exponentially better.
The female models are all known and I don’t follow mainstream porn much. I’m confident, at least from my perspective, I would like all these scenes better if the models were amateurs. It’s hard to convince me there’s a wife “cheating” on her husband, if I just saw her advertised in 50 other porn scenes.
There is available humor if you’re going to invest much time into these scenes. It’s just not prominent enough to carry the scenes. The scenes also follow a similar path. If a woman is cheating on her husband, couldn’t some of the scenes just be her giving the guy head? I came away feeling like these scenes could have been from a bargain bin DVD.
If I was going to compare the site directly to a more known site it would be the New Sensations Network. These scenes are not believable and the basis of the site is to convince the viewer these women are cheating on their husbands. It’s an okay site at best. I won’t be joining it again, but can see some porn fans being into it. |
|
11-07-23 09:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A personal favorite in the anal genre
High production values
Every model is smoking hot
Stands out in the crowded anal/hardcore genre
Super nice photos you can download
Videos can be downloaded in 4K |
| Cons: |
Downloads are limited to 25 scenes per month
Really should be made into a network based on the price
Too much separation between similar sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the high score and all the positives, this site along with the entire network of sites owned by the Mad Cheddar company really needs to be a network. You can, in theory, join it as a network by joining their ultra premium network of sites for $50. That’s not very realistic in the long-term view.
As it is, the site, relatively small in size (give or take a few at 250), is very similar to their site Tushy. There is not noticeable, discernable difference between the two except you have to pay to access each separately. That is going to be a recurring positive and negative with their sites. Their “harder” versions of their sites, labeled “raw” just aren’t different enough to justify the multi-memberships needed to access all the content. Even then, you will then see the further ugliness of their download limit.
I can’t complain about anything involving the site and quality of content. The scenes are well-produced, great lighting and delivers all the anal sex you could ever want. The downloads are super high quality on pictures and videos. I believe my suggested remedy for the price/low quantity is to make it a premium network and spread te amount of download limited videos across all the sites.
As much as Mad Cheddar should be applauded for this high quality porn, they also should be looked at as miliking a niche with each of their sites. My compromise would be to at least pair two of the sites that are directly-related. For example, Blacked and Blacked Raw, Tushy and Tushy Raw to make myself clear. I just believe when the content is this similar it makes that download limit stick out like a sore thumb.
The models are all sexy and hot. The sex action is very good and the camerawork is superb. Why hurt any of that with a heavily limited download limit?
I will answer a question if anyone is wondering. If you join their entire network of sites it does not change the download limit. That means you have 25 downloads per site, per month. That is the sticking negative point. All this great content, but you can only download 25 scenes. That seems like the most counterproductive decision. I get that it means fans will have to join multiple months, but I also wonder how many of those members refuse to join a second or third time? Let your porn’s quality be the deciding factor in the public view of your site not some strange, limited download limit. |
|
04-11-23 11:19pm
Replies (0)
|
|
