| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Lol, I wish I were a webmaster for Brazzers, I'm sure it would be much more lucrative than what I am doing currently. Nonetheless...
First off I originally stated that Brazzer's HD is the best I have PERSONALLY seen; I'm no expert on the subject. You may indeed know of other sites that offer video that is equal in quality to what they have at the moment. (Although I would probably guess that there are not many.)
As for Ass Traffic, it is a site that I was vaguely familiar with before but had never had an interest in membership. Now after having had a look they do indeed shoot vids in 1080p so it probably does match Brazzers offer from that standpoint.
However even if it does offer 1080p it still a poor comparison since:
#1 There is no network access.
#2 Site hasn't been an updated since August (according to the TBP review in September 09) may well be dead, not sure since the have no update schedule listed on the preview.
#3 As of the TBP review in September they only had about 138 HD videos. Brazzers has a little over 300 already with updates of 2-3 per day.
Nonetheless, some have brought up legitimate beefs with the Brazzers model that I do agree with. First if you purchase a yearly pass you should be given access to the HD vids immediately since you have already paid up front. (I actually think that is a bit ridiculous.) They should also think about giving immediate access to the 720 HD since that is what you would get immediately at a comparable site
All in all I'm pretty confident that Brazzers is the only one putting out 1080p porn in quantities this large. Even DDF's vids aren't nearly as impressive and they've been the standard for a while now (as for as networks). For that I think charging a premium is fair. Besides from an IT standpoint offering complete unrestricted access to file sizes that large would be painful at best. I've been on sites that had no HD and what shut me out due to server demand (Scoreland).
Speaking of Scoreland now THAT is model I disagree with. They segregate nearly ALL of their HD content to a completely separate site called ScoreHD. It's basically the same exact videos from across the Score networks but just in HD format, forcing you to pony up another $30 (standard price) if you want the HD vids. (But there are no pic sets at SCORE HD)
|
11-12-09 10:44am
|
Reply
177
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Sounds like a good deal. I may have to jump on board as well pretty soon.
|
11-09-09 03:32pm
|
Reply
178
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
I didn't want to play the bad guy here, but I think this site is getting a bit of a bum rap. First I would say that the new 108p HD videos are absolutely STUNNING!! It's not easy to impress your average porn connoisseur nowadays, but I can honestly say It is by far the best HD I have personally seen on the web, I don't know if it can even get any better. Certainly I will admit that they had issues before with vid quality but now they have clearly gone from worst to first in dramatic fashion.
That said, I can also see from a business standpoint how it is fair to charge a premium for the new HD. First off as stated before it is by far the best HD out there, particularly if your talking about "mainstream" sites. Second, as they have mentioned, if they allow everyone access to the HD vids it would almost certainly overload their servers. Most of the 1080p vids are huge, were talking 4-5GB's for a typical 30 minute scene. Even the 720p vids are around 2-3GBs. If they just allowed the typical user with a high end computer and a fast connection to download whatever they wanted it would be a nightmare for everyone, including those just wanting to get the regular wmv quality.
Nonetheless if you still want to get the HD vids you have two ways to do so. Purchase the credits, or remain a member for 6 months. I think that's fair. Many users like myself took advantage of the loyalty discount a while back for $9.99 a month so it's not that bad. (Don't know if they still offer it now)
As far as the billing issues I can't speak to that, although I am not downplaying it. I'm just saying it hasn't happened to me and I've been a member for a while, had to change credit cards etc. I will say that for those who had yearly memberships that is indeed a bummer. They ought to have some sort of yearly recurring membership so you don't have to renew manually, but I can see how some people wouldn't want a membership to recur yearly, most sites have that as a one time thing.
|
11-09-09 02:00pm
|
Reply
179
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm only lukewarm in regards to all over 30, they do everything about right it's just that for me I prefer North American Models and they seem to have too many European's for my taste, I don't know just a preference. I don't mind Euro models for other niche's (although I still prefer North American or English speaking), but I don't much care for them when it comes to the mature niche. Aunt Judys seems to have mostly English speaking models, and I'm not sure about Anilos since I have not been a member. I was considering Anilos but at the time they didn't have enough of a back catalog.
Other than that we have similar very wide ranging tastes. Most of the guys on this site only like younger models which is ok too, but it is good to find someone else that is more excepting of women in different forms. It is very hard to find good reviews on many of the BBW and mature sites because of this.
|
11-04-09 03:47pm
|
Reply
180
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't see that being much different at 50 plus milfs, their watermark is about the same size and in the same top left hand corner as 40 something mags (albeit not bright yellow).
I remember you now messmer, your the guy that hates the big watermarks. Well most of the mature sites don't have big ones such as all over 30, and aunt judy's, so I hope your doing ok with those. That site Anilos I think looks good too.
|
11-04-09 03:05pm
|
Reply
181
|
Extreme Ladyboys
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I see, well I will probably be going back to Shemale-Club this month anyhow, but next month I will more than likely check out Ladyboy 69 since I actually prefer the pic sets there. Thanks for the response.
|
11-03-09 07:56pm
|
Reply
182
|
Extreme Ladyboys
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
I don't seem to understand your low score for this site as compared with some of the other sites you have scored in this network, such as ladyboy-69? This site seems to be much the same except with a hardcore emphasis. I'd appreciate if you could expand as to why this site differs. I've been shopping for a tranny site lately and have been thinking about this one among others, may just go back to Shemale-Club.
Otherwise I enjoy your reviews, keep up the good work!
|
11-03-09 05:40pm
|
Reply
183
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
In regards to this site, I have been a member once and while it is pretty good I think that for now the better option is to just go with 40 something mag (same company) since they update more often and have a better mixture of hard and soft core stuff. Agree that the video quality needs to be picked up. That is another issue that Score needs to work on in general. They seem to segregate most of their HD content to the Score HD site which I think is a bit unfair, but oh well.
|
11-03-09 02:22pm
|
Reply
184
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I am a long time member, basically took advantage of the loyalty $10 discount. What I would say about the HD is that it is truly stunning. It's by far the best HD quality of any site I have been a member of. They basically went from worst to first in that regard.
That said if you hadn't seen the HD and still gave it a 92 that is fair enough although I think you would have been pleasantly suprised had you gotten the chance to check it out.
|
10-29-09 10:24pm
|
Reply
185
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
My comment was not really meant to criticize your review. I think it is a good review and you make a lot of good points. There are just a number of comments in general about the extreme nature of the site, but I don't think it's as bad as some are making it. I don't disagree that many of girls get in over their head, and I didn't realize they did all the shoots the same day. That said I'd have to think that most of them at least have viewed some of the video's from other girls prior to shooting. Many of these girls have made the rounds on other websites (some are hardcore vets). As for the first timers, based on at least some of the stories, they are the ones who contacted the producers (some are referrals from other girls). Also I HAVE seen them back off a bit when it get's to be too much.
I don't know, maybe I'm on the wrong side of it, and I don't want to come across as advocating for abuse. I just think there are a far more girls that go for this stuff than many might believe (and it shows in some of the interviews).For me this site is one that I join maybe a few times a year and only download a handful of scenes, so you may know better than I do.
|
10-15-09 10:16pm
|
Comment
186
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
|
10-15-09 08:58pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
187
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Looking forward to the review!
|
10-15-09 05:15pm
|
Reply
188
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Comment
I've been a member here before and it's pretty good. They update with a video about once a week, and they definitely have an angle that is lacking in today's porn. Most mature sites either cater to "Milfs", or those that do have older models tend to be European based, which alot of guys aren't into. There's definitely a void that this site fills in.
I'd say though if you want more bang for your buck I would maybe check out 40somethingmag first, since they have a much larger back catalog of content and updates more. Plus 40somethingmag is not just hardcore, but it does I think add a hardcore scene once a week. (From the same company Score)
|
10-02-09 04:09pm
|
Reply
189
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You need to clear your cookies bro, the $19.95 came up for me no problem.
|
10-02-09 03:56pm
|
Reply
190
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
This is the exact site I was coming here to query about. Great news, I'll probably sign up in a few days.
|
05-12-09 08:25pm
|
Comment
191
|
Goth Rock Girls
(0)
|
|
03-21-09 03:28pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
192
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Agree %100; a while back I made a negative comment about this site but they have since stepped their game up considerably. They could still use some work in the areas of vid quality, more pics, zip sets and so on, but progress takes time.
Nonetheless, considering how underrepresented the BBW market is at this time, these guys have certainly placed themselves near the top in this category.
Hats Off.
|
12-11-08 11:56pm
|
Comment
193
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
|
08-16-08 05:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
194
|
Bootylicious Mag
(0)
|
|
08-16-08 05:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
195
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
My computer is limited as far as space, so I rely primarily on burning to cd. This is obviously out of the question for anything approaching 1Gig.
I actually decided to sign back up today, and a couple of things have dissapointed me. First I find the new layout to be thouroughly confusing; second and more importantly, on at least a couple of their sites they have removed all but the very lowest quality mpegs for their older videos. The older videos used to look almost as good as the new ones but now look like trash. This has basically removed alot of my motivation to keep the site now. I'm not quite sure why they would do this, maybe the needed to save bandwidth or something, but it is real turnoff.
All in all this network has always had alot of potential but lacks the business sense to really be taken seriously. It relies on a very hardcore niche market, but things like what I mention above only work to turnoff their most loyal constituency. I can see where they are now trying to make a play to become more mainstream with the addition of some newer more 'tame' sites. However these attempts come off as somewhat generic and bland. There's your generic "pantyhose site"; generic "monster cock" site; generic "first timers" site and so on.
Oh,and they have always had much higher than average vid quality, but you would never know it from their ads (poor marketing). I swear I have seen sites touted as "HD sites" where the vid quality wasn't nearly up to what they have here.
|
08-09-08 11:54pm
|
Reply
196
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
I was a member here for over a year (up until a couple of months ago)and I agreee with you about the vids, I tend to not mind though as I usually will download, them keep it for a couple weeks and get rid of it. Just today I strongly considered a return visit but held back for now.
|
08-09-08 04:20pm
|
Reply
197
|
Fritz Ryan
(0)
|
Reply of
Flimo's Comment
It looks like a pretty interesting site, hopefully you provide a review.
|
04-30-08 12:43am
|
Reply
198
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
Amen
|
04-30-08 12:33am
|
Reply
199
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
I just re-signed up again recently.
The site now has solid amount of content, with new scenes added weekly; the video quality has been improved to near HD levels. Of course there are still are no pic sets, and yes, you still have to deal with those frustrating mini downloads.
As far as download speeds I really didn't have that much of a problem, they weren't super fast, but I am able to get what I wanted within a reasonable amount of time.
In my opinion the negatives for this site are still high, despite the improvements. However, bottom line, it's just one of those sites that can be strangely addictive regardless. (at least for me) If you are a fan of this kind of content you are aware that it is not really duplicated elsewhere. Sure there are other interracial sites, but none of them really have the same focus as this one.
|
04-23-08 09:33pm
|
Comment
200
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
|
04-22-08 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
