| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Hi Monica,
seems as if this issue is no longer one. I downloaded a few ZIP-files today without getting an error. Thanks for your quick reply .. if only you would appear in more picture series ... but that's not a real issue ... at least none to be discussed here ;-).
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-05-08 05:22pm
|
Reply
127
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Monica already changed something 2 days ago but I wasn't able to double-check if everything works. I'll give it a try tomorrow. Seems as if I was very lazy!
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-05-08 05:48am
|
Review
128
|
Corset Goddess
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ unique amateur fetish content (see text)
+ good picture quality at 800x1200 pixels size for the new stuff. Only old sets have lesser resolution.
+ she writes a blog which is available in German and English on the free preview pages
+ weekly updates |
| Cons: |
- website was horrible in terms of navigation
- even though content is categorized I found it hart to find certain sets I've seen on the preview
- large and disturbing watermarks on all pictures
- some sets contained broken images
- no ZIP files (see text) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site I was really keen on joining in the first place and soon lost interest. The content is great if you love fetish stuff and like to see a girl wear extreme corsets but ... the website seemed to be only very basic and to see broken thumbnails made me almost mad. As I was very busy the last few weeks I didn't get in touch with Lady Jane as I would have done normally.
As there are no ZIP files available I had to figure out another way to get what I wanted to see. The only chance was to use the Flashgot plug-in for Firefox. This worked but was a lot of labour for me and so I didn't even download 15 complete sets. The worst rate of yield I ever had.
To find some of the sets took me long because it seemed almost impossible to find some of the sets I've seen on the preview. The watermarks are enormous at 196x196 pixels which is very annoying for me.
The content itself is unique and surely great - no doubt about that. You see Jane solo or with other girls and she also, if you like that, can be seen dominating a tranny in some scenes. Jane works her pussy with dildos, vibrators, a pussy pump, spreads her pierced labia wide open, uses massive weights on her labia, dominates others and etc.
Sorry, but I was so disappointed about the website that I didn't download one single video. |
|
12-05-08 04:57am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
129
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
arnaud's Reply
Hello Arnaud,
just to let you know that this must have been a temporary problem because I get much higher download speeds (~500kB/sec) today. Maybe some ISP in between had troubles with his equipment but your servers seem to be running fine.
Greetings,
Smut
|
12-05-08 03:00am
|
Reply
130
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yep, sounds like this would be a point worth to be mentioned in the bottom-line of a review!
|
12-04-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
131
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Hi Squirrel,
this is worth a thread in the Forums I'd say. I have no problems with condomed sex as there's still a deadly disease around named HIV that one can get through unsafe intercourse.
It's amazing to see that I still surf on that site while I wanted to write another review for PU.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-04-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
132
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
arnaud's Reply
Difficult to determine and surely not possible to say why in some cases the download speed is so poor. At least your servers allow simultaneous downloads so I won't considers this as a real problem and it will surely have no heavy impact in my review.
Nothing is worse than a site that allows only one download while providing poor download speed. I have seen this in some cases and I never went back to one of those sites.
|
12-04-08 09:21am
|
Reply
133
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I see 3 photo sets and 3 videos for Megane. I went directly to the end of the list of models where you find those with the worst ratings and I was surprised to find a lot of excellent and sexy girls there. That's what I always do if a site offers such a ranking and I never got disappointed doing so :-)
|
12-04-08 08:51am
|
Comment
134
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
|
12-04-08 08:28am
Replies (13)
|
Reply
135
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
chloebd's Comment
Have you ever had a look at girlsoutwest? This may be a site that I would expect to be more interesting for you :-)
|
12-04-08 02:19am
|
Reply
136
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hello Messmer,
they surely do. There's a lot of services available for geo location based on the ip address you have (fixed) or get (using dial-in to a pool of ip addresses your provider owns) when going online. Like for instance http://www.ip2location.com/ or http://www.geobytes.com/ipLocator.htm
I had trouble with some sites one of them actually didn't know that this feature was active for them. After letting them know they urged their billing company to turn that off a.s.a.p. :-)
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-03-08 01:53am
|
Reply
137
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
It's €29.95 for me too which is more than ridiculous *ggrrr* some may think that we Europeans are dumb as ... I don't know. I won't pay a significantly higher price just because I'm living here.
|
12-02-08 03:28pm
|
Reply
138
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Well the domains are for sale and all you can find asking mother google are some old promo pages for teeenfuns. Seems as if the business has been closed but I wonder why.
|
12-02-08 01:36pm
|
Reply
139
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Hello Andy,
that was in a lengthy explanation what I was trying to say. I only hope that you didn't waste to much energy or let's say I do hope that Zack is able to understand what our point of view is and that he will be willing and able to make his reviews helpful for others.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-02-08 01:13pm
|
Reply
140
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Hi Sir,
I think it's a great discrepancy between objective pros and cons and the explanation that should normally be given in the bottom line by Zack. I see about 2 1/2 pros and 1 1/2 maybe 2 cons with the rest not being explained in the conclusion of the review.
B.t.w. I can see the shape of her boobies in the preview and have to say that these are nice natural ones. I personally like what I see :-)
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-02-08 11:57am
|
Reply
141
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Hi Monica,
I left a message in the Tech Support Forums of your site but will send you the details via mail.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-02-08 11:41am
|
Comment
142
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
|
12-02-08 09:05am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
143
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
please have a look into the Forums where you can find a thread called GONZO.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-02-08 08:48am
|
Review
144
|
MILF Sarah
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ exclusive and very unique amateur content (see text)
+ content is different to what can be seen on her second site goldenfeet.com (see text)
+ Sarah is one drop-dead gorgeous MILF doing lots of kinky things (see text)
+ updates come weekly on Sunday
+ compared to other fetish sites of individual models pricing is reasonable |
| Cons: |
- site is brand-new (up and running since 2008/10/25) and therefor hasn't got that much content to offer (see text)
- right now it's a pictures only site and I'm not sure if they will release videos there
- site's design is very plain but at least it works even though some galleries have broken thumbnails
- no ZIP files
- no extras not even information about Sarah (see text)
- picture size varies for the first 30 sets plus older sets have annoying watermarks |
| Bottom Line: |
If there was the chance to elect the Duchess of Kink Sarah would definitely have to be on the list of candidates. This lady may have been a teenager or young woman while I was wearing diapers for the first time but she has a rock-solid body that you can only call sexy.
On this site she can be seen solo only. No other model or guy will be portrayed. You can only see a guy's cock on some of the pictures carefully sucked by Sarah or pounding her pierced pussy. The image sets show her posing in elegant dresses, heels and fully fashioned stockings, playing with her piercings, peeing, masturbating with dildos and vibrators, stretching her labia with weights etc.
All this happens indoors or outdooors and some of the sets show sceneries like a desert or expensive hotels for instance. It's amazing to see Sarah have a wee in a nightly desert.
Some sets may have less than 50 pics while others contain 200+ or even 300+ pictures resulting in sizes for ZIP-files between 10 and 100MB. Older sets may contain pictures having 768 pixel on the long side for portray and 1024 pixel for landscape. Newer sets have 1024 pixel for portray and 1300 pixel for landscape.
One good thing is that they stopped to use the watermarks that had a bar with increased brightness underlying. Not sure if you get that one but it was making me crazy as this was very disturbing.
The site's design is very basic and the only information given about Sarah is that she's available for photo shootings and private meetings (without sex of course!). On the other hand you can that information in the free area of goldenfeet.com. The content is 100% different to what can be seen here. On her older site you see her together with other female models, giving blow- and footjobs, having sex and doing some weird insertions.
If you like to see a sexy mature lady dressed up in elegant apparel do naughty things you should give milfsarah a try. I've seen a lot of other sites having fetish content but none of them has a mixture of unique and kinky content on a level of quality this site offers plus the other sites are very expensive compared to what you get here. |
|
12-02-08 05:14am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
145
|
Brandi 4 U
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Well that problem came from the fact that they made a site relaunch while I was checking for the trial option. The new site looks better than the old one - at least from a guests point of view. I guess I'll have to re-subscribe soon in order to find out what has been changed.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-01-08 08:38am
|
Comment
146
|
Brandi 4 U
(0)
|
|
12-01-08 07:09am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
147
|
Sweet Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
O.k. thank your for this information :-)
|
12-01-08 05:03am
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
Hanging butterfly labia are nice especially when they have piercings. Guess I'm a real pervert :-)
|
12-01-08 12:27am
|
Review
149
|
VideoBox
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Almost 5,600 videos available for download (2008/12/01)
+ Videos come in different formats (WMV & MP4) and resolutions from 320*240 up to 640*480 plus you can create custom clips quite easily
+ Regular updates with 5 new videos each and every day
+ This site is download manager friendly
+ Downloaded videos have names that speak e.g. Mature_Women_With_Younger_Girls_6_Scene_3_dvd.wmv
+ Lots of categories to choose from like Teen, MILF, Fetish, Toys etc.
+ Good download speed and no download limit (see text) |
| Cons: |
- Names are only available for female actors
- Some scenes haven't got links to the models
- Older content may not be as crisp as most of the newer stuff
- What the hell is Gonzo? (see text)
- Searching for a particular model may not show all valid results (see text) |
| Bottom Line: |
Even though I'm not a guy that likes videos that much I'm mighty impressed by the enormous size of this monster site. Surfin' there you can easily get lost when clicking one of the links that guide you into other categories or to a list of scenes for one particular model. It will take you lots of hours to get to see only the scenes that you are really after plus there's enough other material that will get your attention.
Sometimes you'll see that model names are not correct e.g. the search for 'rubee tuesday' links to 9 DVDs and the search for 'ruby tuesday' to 1 DVD still it's the same model. This may sound pedantic but that happens for other models, like Druuna 3 DVDs vs. Druna 1 DVD, too and not all will know all synonyms his favourite model uses. Well but that's no reason to give a lower score.
Download speed was constantly above 300KB per connection for me no matter what time I was online. Using 2 parallel downloads I always used up the whole bandwidth for my ADSL-link. They must have real good equipment and excellent admins at videobox.com!
What's definitely missing is DVDs from European companies. dvdbox.com for instance offers some weird stuff from France, Germany, Italy etc. in it's category Euro. Something I'd like to see here too! Another annoyance is the fact that you can only download the front covers of the DVDs plus you need to open the link in a new window or tab of your browers because the cover image is shown in a layer inside the current window.
And what the hell is category Gonzo? 4,327 of 5,596 videos or 77% of all DVDs are in this category. To me this sounds like a bad joke ;-)
All in all I highly recommend to have at least a look at this site but most of us will already have done so. The new scenes I've seen in full resolution looked much better than the old stuff. At $17.95 for the DVD resolution this is a real bargain. |
|
12-01-08 12:08am
Replies (10)
|
Comment
150
|
Sweet Models
(0)
|
|
11-30-08 09:41pm
Replies (2)
|
