| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Super Glam
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Excellent quality photos
+ A few very hot models
+ Possibly exclusive content
+ Streaming bonus content section (although the section is small)
+ No music in the videos
+ Good TBP price of $19.90, but arguably that's still too expensive |
| Cons: |
- Not alot of models
- Not alot of content
- Base price of $39.95 (without TBP discount) is outrageously too expensive
- Videos are low resolution by today's standards
- MPG video format only
- Many gaps in the alphabetical model index, many letters have zero models (I'm not just talking 'Q' or 'X' here, but letters like 'F' and 'P'. 'D', 'G', and 'R' only have 1 model each).
- Slow downloads
- Not download manager friendly
- Updates infrequently, 1x to 2x per month
- Interview videos are repetitive and uninspired, they ask each model the same questions ("Who do you cook for at home?") and the model never looks at the camera. Sophie Moone's interview is dubbed! A huge disappointment, I've always wondered what her voice was like. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site in spite of reading others reviews here, mainly because I was after collector's level content of Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Brittany Stone, and Nikki Summers. Well, that's about what I got, but not much else.
Read the intro page carefully - they state they have "63 SUPERGLAM GIRLS - 3510 VIDEOS - 157459 PICTURES" - I could have sworn it said more models at first. I believe the "SUPERGLAM GIRLS" count is correct, but I am skeptical of the other numbers. The average model has 3 videos, so just do the math and that's only 189 videos. But it's not just the numbers that don't add up with this site.
The amount of content is much smaller than I thought from the preview pages. You could easily clean this site out in an afternoon, if the download speeds were better. I had alot of trouble with "DownThemAll" + Firefox, I had to set max chunks to 1 (which cripples performance) and could only queue up the video sets. The photo sets, which are by far their best offering, have to be painstakingly downloaded the old fashioned way, one ZIP file at a time. On the plus side, they do offer multiple photo formats, with the highest being 4000px - looking at these, they do look great, but in reality they are nowhere near this resolution.
Overall an extremely disappointing site that I should have paid more attention to other's reviews.
Bottom line: Excellent photo sets, low res vids, poor site performance, too little content for the money. |
|
07-07-08 09:03pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
27
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt Frackas's Reply
Hey Matt! The man himself! Thanks for the comments and compliments, that means alot from someone in the business.
Thanks as well for the invitation to discuss fun topics, especially beer! If you aren't already stocked for the holiday, I'd recommend an Arrogant Bastard Ale (or 2 or 3) from Stone Brewing Company, one of my personal favs.
I'm actually going out to the valley today, I wonder if I'll be driving by your house?
I look forward to more exchanges, I may contact you through your website.
Have a good one.
|
07-04-08 11:44am
|
Reply
28
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
pornmaster's Reply
Hey pornmaster, thanks for the comments. Wow, having to turn down girls that want to be photographed naked, what a cool problem to have! Sounds like Matt has quite the fantasy life.
So you're the site manager? Wow, another cool job.
I don't know if it's possible, but one thing I would recommend to improve the site would be to remaster the old content. I was impressed to see so many models in their "just starting out" phase, and not that I was expecting alot, but was disappointed to see the small images and videos. Of course, 3 or 4 years ago, it would have been awesome, but after being spoiled by so many high end sites and HD quality, the old stuff has a hard time competing.
On the technical side, the site is well organized performs well, nice job!
Have a nice holiday!
|
07-04-08 11:38am
|
Review
29
|
Matt's Models
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Well designed navigation with multiple content indexes
+ Roughly 1000 models
+ Very amateur spin, alot of unknown models
+ Many models who are now famous, but were just starting out when photographed
+ Interview "audition" videos are genuine and interesting, you get to hear what these girls are thinking about getting into the industry, Matt is respectful and not irritating
+ Matt seems to be very open to being contacted (although I never tried)
+ Good TBP price of $14.95
+ Bonus join of "Ownmymouth.com" for $4.95 for three days, really hot POV content
+ Matt likes to drink beer, play guitar, and photograph nude chicks! That's two things I have in common with him, and one I wish I did.
+ This was a top site in its day |
| Cons: |
- Most content is very dated, low quality
- Alot of "unattractive" models
- Not many new updates, Matt appears to be losing interest in his site
- Too many photos in sets (typically 150 or more), alot of repeat photos, takes a long time to make progress |
| Bottom Line: |
If I ever owned a website, and was just starting out, I probably wouldn't do half as good a job as Matt has. Finding the models, photographing them, administering the website, etc., is alot of work. Matt has certainly done an exceptional job for someone that started out almost 10 years ago, and in its heyday this must have been THE place to go for amateur and up-and-coming content.
Unfortunately by today's standards, the site's age really shows compared to other sites. Most photos are low resolution, and the newer higher res ones are poorly photographed (blurry, bad lighting, etc.)
A key reason I joined was to get some early content of many of my favorites: Destiny St. Claire, Sarah Blake, Peaches, Jaime Lynn, Jassie, Jana Cova, ... Unfortunately most of this content is low quality, and I was a bit disappointed. Some photos appear to have been originally shot with a digital cam many years ago, that gives an idea of the quality, but at the same time, adds to the "home-grown" nature of the site.
Not to be rude, but alot of the models are downright ugly, admittedly that's just my personal taste. If I was photographing nude models from a newspaper ad I'd probably shoot anyone that was willing! I'd recommend taking the tour and carefully perusing the model index. The actual site is just like the tour, except you have full access to the galleries and videos.
Bottom line: An interesting history lesson for collectors. Take the tour and judge this book by its cover. |
|
07-03-08 11:54pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Taylor Rain comes to mind, very surprised she's not in the list.
|
07-03-08 11:08pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Many years ago, I was very into the girl-girl thing, although more recently not so much so. However a genuine, passionate kissing sequence can still get me going. VivThomas.com has some excellent content in this arena, although I've never joined them directly - you can get some, lower quality access to the content from TeenDreams.com - but I'd recommend any lover of girls kissing to check VivThomas.com out.
|
07-03-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
32
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Hi, TheRizzo. If you're a Twistys fan I strongly recommend it, especially for $18, as it sounds like you haven't joined before. While personally I think Twistys is a better site (more fun oriented and doesn't take itself too seriously) Digital Desire does have some truly excellent glamour content.
Just stick to the model index and go through alphabetically. Each model has all of her content, with links to her sets in each of the crazy categories. From there, you can piece together the photo layouts with a little work. I also forgot to mention that they have a pretty good video preview capability, where you can stream a video low quality to check it out before deciding if you want to download the high quality version.
Another thing other reviewers have discussed is the download speeds. I did find it a little slow, however I use DownThemAll with Firefox, and set the maximum files to download simultaneously to 1, and set max chunks to 2. This seemed to help the download performance.
Good luck, let me know if you join and what you think. I hope you find this info useful.
|
07-03-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
33
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hi PinkPanther, thanks for the comments/clarification. I actually got a deal to join for $18 that was good til the 30th of the month, and I joined on the 29th, so I got it just in time.
One thing I forgot to mention in my review, is that $29.95 is not worth it, unless you've never joined ddgirls before, or haven't for a long time. However the discount of $22.90 would be worth it, as odd as that price is.
I was able to harvest the site in a month, although I'm still unpacking and checking out the goodies.
I'm not sure if they'll clean up the categories, it would be alot of work, and would remove one of their signature trademarks. Seems like some of the artsy-fartsy nature of the videos is reflected in their overly-creative category names. Is this a porn site or an art school?
|
07-03-08 09:40pm
|
Review
34
|
Digital Desire
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Alot of models, most are extremely hot 9's-10's
+ Among the best solo video content on the web
+ Huge amount of content
+ No DRM
+ High quality images and videos
+ Easy to navigate, alphabetical model index is well organized
+ Only $18 until October 1 |
| Cons: |
- Too many confusing categories: Dreamgirls, Dreamheat, Creamgirls, Raw Heat, Girlz-on-Girlz, Toi Story, Seasonal Spotlight, ????
- Photo sets tend to be split across categories
- Different mixes of the same video: a very softcore version as well as an "Extreme" version
- Some women look bored or overly posed in the photo sets
- Alot of makeup and airbrushing |
| Bottom Line: |
Stephen Hicks has set many standards for photography, and this site illustrates the reasons why. Extremely beautiful, almost surrealistic women perform for your enjoyment. I won't belabor this point, if you haven't checked the site out and you're a glamour or solo model fan, then this site is a must see, for at least 1 month.
Also old news is that this site has dropped the DRM, which is a huge improvement.
Where the site falls apart in a bad way is with the categories and the division of content. The category names I listed above are real (believe it or not) and it is difficult to tell which is which. Perhaps these are just artifacts of when the site was split into an "extreme" section that used to cost extra, and the "normal" (read: softcore) section. What makes no sense at all is with all of the closeups of lubed up women, many of which you can find in the "normal" section, I do not understand why similar content is split off into "extreme" - which often just has more closeups or more "spread-eagle" shots. Don't get me wrong, the photos are hot, but the split up of photo sets and videos into the different confusing categories gets tiresome fast.
However, if you're willing to put up with the categories, and stick to the model index, you can find some excellent content, you just have to piece together the photo sets on your own. Also, the "extreme" solo videos are among the best I've seen.
Bottom line: Very hot solo models, tedious categories.
UPDATE: No major changes to my comments, but a score increase from 84 to 88, and also for continuing to offer the $18/month deal. Compared with other glamour sites, this is one of the best, in spite of the crazy categories. |
|
07-02-08 09:53pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
35
|
LSG Models
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Attractive European models, most of which I have never seen before
* Exclusive content
* High quality videos in a variety of formats
* Hot solo and lesbian content
* Updates daily
* More explicit content labelled with yellow "LSG Extreme", although tends to be more softcore
* VIP area with behind the scenes vids, extra photos
* Bargain pricing for members who stay with the site - $59.99 per year |
| Cons: |
* Some high def vids have digitizing problems
* Music in some vids
* Not alot of content (about 1 year's worth)
* Small, repetitive photo galleries
* VIP area costs extra (unless you join by the end of this year) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site offers a different take on glamour model content. The models are attractive and younger, in the 18-22 year old range. They wear some but not too much makeup. There are no fake breasts, the models appear very natural and comfortable. Many of the names/faces are unknown, which gives the site an amateur feel, although East European favorite Nella is here in a few vids.
The vids are offered in a variety of resolutions for download, and they can be streamed at a lower resolution so you can preview first. They offer HD resolutions of 480p and 720p. However, I had trouble with some of the 720p vids, they were grainy with digital artifacting issues, a sign of remastering problems. I really don't think it's my computer, since I can play other HD content just fine. Nonetheless, this was not a major issue, I stuck to the 480p vids which still look great (even at fullscreen), are quicker to download, and take up less space.
The site often plays up an artistic angle, with piano and other music in the vids. Sometimes this works, but I'd prefer if they offered an option with no music. In any case you can always hear the models. The photosets are small and more artistic than arousing, I stuck to the vids.
Lastly, there is not alot of content, but definitely some high quality solo and very hot lesbian vids. More explicit content is clearly labelled. If you like glamour content it's a good join for a month at $24.95, although I'd skip the extra $10 charge for VIP content |
|
12-27-07 01:15pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
36
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks, this is good info. I'll probably move this near the bottom of my list of "sites of interest".
|
11-25-07 11:15am
|
Reply
37
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hey JD - thanks for the comment, that's disappointing. I've had my eye on this one for a while, never joined, there seem to be some really hot Thai girls though. So the video samples on the site are the same quality as the actual videos? What about the bonus network sites (Hennessie, Asian Suck Dolls, others), do those make the price more worth it ?
|
11-25-07 12:07am
|
Reply
38
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Great idea...but I see now they have 2 "October" update pages (probably just a typo) although when I looked at it yesterday there was only one "October" update page that stopped with Aneta Keys on October 16...perhaps someone is watching these posts ?!?!?
Now at least they look up to date, BUT there is still something wrong - according to the update pages, no videos since October 22!! What's up with that? I thought they released 3 videos each week?
|
11-13-07 07:36pm
|
Comment
39
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
|
11-12-07 09:03pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I only join one site every 3 to 6 months, but when I do I download what I like in that one month, so on average I'm definitely in the under 1 GB per month range. I don't know where the other users here get their time (and money) to join so many sites per month and download so much! I find that I spend most of my "porn time" checking out, sorting, and sifting what I've already downloaded. My "main collection" is only about 70 GB, but in my opinion it's the "best of the best" that I've been collecting for about 10 years.
|
11-08-07 08:34pm
|
Reply
41
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Yes you are right - this site is very original and appeals to a variety of tastes.
Trouble is, the site becomes extremely repetitive. As kinky and outrageous as it gets, it does the same things over and over again: interview, makeup, go shopping, panty stuffing, masturbation, maybe some weird object insertions, then go on to the next model and find the same thing again. Even in the same actual locations! Resorts in Arizona, or that living room with the bar and the chair, or that shower. How many models have been in the exact same surroundings?
I don't mean to sound negative, but this is the first site I've joined like this that I actually got bored with about half way through the site. Usually I go through an entire site in a month, downloading what I like and saving it for later. This time however, I went through 2 of the 4 alphabetical model indexes, and I'm done. I'm going to cancel.
Maybe I'll join again one day, I guess it's just not my thing.
Which is sad, the site is very professional and well done, but between the kink and the repetition of the same kink with almost every model, I'm done.
|
09-11-07 10:34pm
|
Review
42
|
FTV Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Very high quality videos
* Major reality: personal model comments, real performances, they claim to be just being themselves
* Unmistakable, professional style
* A TON of content: 100's of models, 30 minutes video on average per model
* Original site design: Each model has her own descriptive magazine cover
* Comments from videographer are humorous, especially when he describes his difficulty controlling himself
* Some famous models in a different light then you would see them elsewhere |
| Cons: |
* Photo sets are small compared to other sites, and are often just recaps of the videos
* A bit too kinky for some: speculums, cucumbers, squash, fruit, shoes, panties, bottles, garden hoses...pregnancy?
* Some model comments are a little too real, some attitudes are a real turn off in my opinion
* Some might find some shoots boring: Going out to dinner, talking, shopping...hey, I'm not on a date here!
* The same video formula followed for many models
* Could use more international women |
| Bottom Line: |
It's difficult to say something new about FTV girls: High quality content, hot models, original ideas, very professionally done, weird object insertions...
I've had my eye on this site for years, but never joined. With all due respect to the site, the parade of panty stuffing, fruit and vegetable experiments, shoe heels (ouch!), bottles, garden hoses, gynecologist's office examinations, and even the occasional pregnancy I think cross over the line from arousing and end up more in the fetish/circus category. Obviously the subscribers like it, it is always tastefully done. You can tell the models would never do anything they didn't want to, so perhaps I'm just being old fashioned. To each his own I guess.
Also questionable is the several minutes of video of each model walking around, flashing, going shopping, eating... Personally I find this boring, but again to each his own.
However, there is a TON of awesome solo content more in line with conventional tastes. The models masturbate "as they would at home" and this is where the site really shines, letting the models do what comes naturally. Often they wear their own clothes and have input into how the sets are photographed and filmed.
Just like some dates don't go well, some models have an attitude problem! This may be a turn off for some, but hey, you still get to see her naked.
Bottom line: Grab some tissues and get ready for reality. Check your glamour fantasies at the door. High speed connection a must. |
|
09-04-07 10:36pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
43
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hey Pink Panther!
Cool handle! I appreciate the response. Definitely moves "Digital Desire" up several notches on my list of "rejoin" sites. Please keep adding comments as you explore the non-DRM experience! This will definitely draw attention to this site...hey, maybe J. Stephen Hicks should pay us royalties?? LOL
|
08-18-07 12:51am
|
Review
44
|
Lia 19
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Lia is a total babe! A 10 in my book.
* High quality pics and videos
* Site is simple, well organized
* Fun and interesting photo locations
* Lia obviously has alot of fun doing this
* Lia tries outfits/toys given to her by members in newer sets
* Preview content is a very good example of what you'll find inside
* Did I mention Lia is a totally hot babe? |
| Cons: |
* Mostly softcore and posing, very "Playboy" like, but very beautiful
* Alot of tease without follow through, especially the "girl/girl" content
* Sets can get repetitive
* Lia is a bit shy in her earlier videos
* Thumbnails of earlier sets (in index) are too small to easily see
* Lia isn't the best typist - alot of her descriptions have typos/misspellings
* I sincerely doubt Lia is 19
* Okay, those last 2 were nitpicks! |
| Bottom Line: |
I ended up joining this site via a free trial for $6.95/week, when I signed up with FTV girls. That's the best $6.95 I've ever spent on a site.
It's obvious Lia has alot of fun doing this. She's very genuine and that makes her that much more sexy. Her home page calls her a "dreamgirl" and I tend to agree. She is totally natural, no tattoos, only her navel is pierced, I could go on.
Lia is the kind of girl you could get off on just by looking into her eyes - almost. Personally I prefer more "getting down to business" than she does in most of her videos, although there are some more explicit scenes. Even in these though, she seems a bit embarrassed and shy, but she has nothing to be shy about! She is so sweet you could fall in love.
Lia is Victoria's Secret quality hot, and has some fantastic photosets that would put Playboy to shame. She has alot of very sexy outfits, her boyfriend must be the luckiest guy on the planet.
However, the posing can get tiresome when she doesn't "follow through". Nowhere is this more frustrating than her scenes with other girls (I wouldn't even call it "girl/girl" content). They talk, kiss, touch a little, then that's it!
Lia would score major points in my book doing a full on lesbian scene - she flirts with Alison of FTV girls in many scenes. I have a feeling one day she'll follow through with this.
Bottom line: Totally hot chick, mostly softcore content. Try to get a deal when joining. |
|
08-17-07 11:33am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
45
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
08-16-07 01:22pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
46
|
Twistys
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) 1000's of models
2) High quality video
3) Excellent glamor type photography
4) No DRM
5) Extremely fast download speeds (300K - 400K)
6) Friendly, helpful technical support
7) Daily updates: 4 photo sets + 1 video
8) Previews of upcoming content
9) Very well designed rating system
10) Awesome TBP price, for $20 you can't beat it |
| Cons: |
1) Proportionately (10%) not alot of hardcore
2) Hardcore content is older and lower quality
3) Requires a Download Manager, many failed download attempts without one (not really a bad thing!)
4) Many of the models are similar type (also not really a bad thing!) |
| Bottom Line: |
Twistys is primarily a glamor model site similar to ddgirls in many ways. You'll find alot of high quality images and videos of glamor type models, most of which are exceptionally beautiful. What you WON'T find at Twistys (vs. ddgirls) is a high price tag, extra charge for "extreme" content, or DRM protection.
Many of the models have similar body types (voluptuous, large breasted, glamorous) so some users might consider it repetitive. However the quality is excellent, the models are beautiful and have great smiles and camera eye contact. If you are a fan of glamour type content (or if you've enjoyed ddgirls) then you will definitely not be disappointed.
There is a ton of content on the site, most models have many photo sets, and it is very well organized and quite easy to get around. The site is highly responsive and fun to browse, and extremely easy to get back to what you were doing if you get distracted while looking for a particular model or set.
Users can rate the models (1-10) by photo set or video, and the votes are tallied, allowing you to browse by rating, alphabetically, or by update date. There is also an impressive search engine and a "find other models like me" link that will keep you busy for a long time.
Rarely do you find a site that is even better then its preview was. If you like the preview then you'll love the site. |
|
03-29-07 09:54pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
How about "ALL OF THE ABOVE" !!
|
02-13-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
48
|
Girls And Fingers
(0)
|
Reply of
YanksTodd's Reply
Hello, YanksTodd. Thank you for your thoughtful message and for addressing all of my concerns. I would very much like to take you up for your offer of a "Free Week" - I'm just not quite sure how to directly email you. Please let me know the procedure.
It really sounds like most issues I ran into were due to the site changing ownership. But I did make one error - the video quality is very good, I went back and double checked the videos I downloaded (640x480) and I apologize for this error. I will correct this fact in my review as soon as I finish this reply.
On the price, with your discount of $10 for TBP members, that is an outstanding price. I just felt that $30 was too much compared to other $30 sites I've joined (I'd be happy to provide a list if you're interested). Thank you for offering this discount to everyone, that is extremely generous and more than fair.
Lastly, on the cancellation issue, I certainly don't want to argue with you. While I did not keep detailed records, I verified that I signed up on 11/21/06 (according to my bank statement). To the best of my knowledge, I cancelled around 12/14, and could no longer access the site after about 12/16. I believe these dates to be accurate because I joined another site right after yours (after access was denied) and that site join was on 12/18.
I certainly am not implying there was anything "vindictive" about cancelling, likely it was an error (perhaps due to the new site getting revved up?).
Anyway, I am interested in moving forward and checking out the new site. Please send me details on how I can directly email you.
Thanks again for your thoughtful, detailed reply!
|
01-19-07 06:59pm
|
Comment
49
|
CD Girls
(0)
|
|
01-17-07 10:15pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
50
|
Girls And Fingers
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) Preview pages look good for solo girl surfers.
2) Very good video quality (640x480)
3) Responsive, friendly staff, eager to address any member's concerns.
4) Excellent price ($10) for TBP members!!
5) Some very hot models, very personal performances.
6) Very fast download speeds (280KB/sec).
7) Ipod and PSP downloads (although I didn't try this, personally I'd rather see them on a larger screen)
8) No DRM on any videos! I wish every site was like this. |
| Cons: |
1) Site changed ownership recently. A few minor technical problems but they are actively working on them.
2) Not alot of models (22), on the other hand most are very attractive.
3) Only updates weekly, more of an issue of quality vs. quantity
4) No zip downloads of photosets |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're a fan of solo girl content, this is a must join. Usually I find myself fast forwarding to the "good parts" of videos, not so with these. Many of the models have a way of establishing a certain type of intimacy with the camera. Perhaps it's just my imagination, however if you like what you see in the previews then you'll like the site.
On the downside, there is no zip download capability of the photo sets. I also emailed the webmaster about this and was told they did not want to provide an "express lane" for downloading photos. Fair enough, but even the big name sites do this.
They do have a browsing engine to view photosets in a "slide show" format. You can configure the frequently to view photos, from very fast to very slow. You just can't download it, unless you go into your browser cache (if you're a techie).
When I went to cancel, I would have expected access to the end of my 30 days. A couple of days after my cancellation I could no longer access the site even though I had a few days left. However the webmaster took care of this, I attribute it to simply "growing pains" with the change of site ownership.
This site is run by the same people as yanks.com.
If you like their content then you'll like this site. |
|
01-16-07 12:18am
Replies (3)
|
|
